Smarter Balanced
Scoring Guide
For Grades 3, 6, and 11
English/Language Arts
Performance Task Full-Write Baseline Sets
November 2014
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 2
INTRODUCTION
English/Language Arts Performance Task: The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium provides
this scoring guide to help educators understand the scoring process for the Performance Task Full-
Writes. To understand the writing scoring guides, it is helpful to understand the specifications for
each Smarter Balanced Performance Task, including the following:
Writing Tasks: Each Performance Task begins by describing a writing situation that motivates
students to “find out more about” a given problem/question/circumstance, etc. Students are then
presented with relevant source material and a writing task with a clearly stated writing topic,
audience, purpose, and form, along with the scoring criteria. On the ELA Writing assessment, each
student will respond to one performance task.
Source Materials: Each Performance Task is accompanied by grade-appropriate “source material”
(i.e. 2-5 texts depending on grade). Except for narrative tasks, which may be more text-inspired
than text-based(i.e. connections to source materials may contribute to or enhance the narrative),
students will use source materials to support ideas
Writing Purposes: The Common Core State Standards prescribe three general rhetorical purposes
for writing: narrative, informational/explanatory, and opinion/ argumentative. Each writing purpose
has a different purpose-specific scoring rubric. For the assessment, each student will be given one
of the purposes designated for his or her grade level. These purposes have subtle differences
depending on the grade level of the students:
o Students in grades 3 to 8 may be expected to write to the narrative purpose, using the
information in the sources as inspiration to write a story or capture the essence of an
experience (students in grade 11 will not receive a narrative PT).
o Students in grades 3-5 may be expected to write to the informational purpose, using source
material to “inform” an audience about a topic. Students in grades 6-11 may be expected
to write to the explanatory purpose, analyzing source material to explain some aspect of a
subject.
o Students in grades 3-5 may be expected to form and defend an opinion, supported by
information provided in source material. Students in grades 6-11 may be expected to
compose an argument, using evidence from source materials to form and support claims
and (in grades 7 -11) counterclaims.
Writing Forms: Each performance task provides students with a clear expected writing form
or product. These forms are grade-appropriate, such as letter or report in the earlier grades, moving
to more sophisticated essays in later grades.
Audience: The designated audience will be appropriate for the grade level, purpose, and
situation for the task, ranging from familiar audiences (e.g., parents, principal) for younger students
to more general audiences (e.g., legislative bodies, Internet audiences) for older students.
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 3
Baseline Anchor Set:
How is a “Baseline Anchor Set” developed? Professional contractor scorers, trained to use
the Smarter Balanced scoring rubrics, preliminarily score a range of student responses, defining top
level responses and then identifying samples representing different score points. Educators from
Smarter Balanced states then review these selections and agree upon, or validate, sample
responses that define the range of each score point and provide a variety of response types.
A Word of Caution:In order to maintain the security of the spring 2014 Field Test items for
use in the 2015 Summative and Interim item banks, the student responses included in this guide
were selected from the Smarter Balanced 2013 Pilot Test. The writing samples can help illustrate
the descriptors for each score-point category on the Smarter Balanced writing rubrics; therefore, we
see the baseline anchors as a useful educator tool. These first Baseline Anchor Sets are, however,
just the beginning of what will become full and rich sets of student writing, that include a wide variety
of purposes and writing forms for each grade.
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 4
Grade 3 Narrative Performance Task Full Writes
The following third grade narrative rubrics and baseline set are used to anchor the scoring of student
responses to narrative tasks at grade 3. Each student response is scored for three traits:
organization/purpose (4 points possible), development/elaboration (4 points possible), and
conventions (2 points possible).
Score
Organization/Purpose
Grade 3 Narrative Description
Organization/Purpose
4
The organization of the narrative, real or imagined, is fully sustained and the
focus is clearand maintained throughout:
an effective plot helps to create a sense of unity and completeness
effectively establishes a setting, narrator/characters, and/or point of view*
consistent use of a variety of transitional strategies to clarify the relationships between
and among ideas; strong connection between and among ideas
natural, logical sequence of events from beginning to end
effective opening and closure for audience and purpose
3
The organization of the narrative,
real or imagined, is adequately sustained, and the focus is adequate and generally
maintained:
an evident plot helps to create a sense of unity and completeness, though there may be
minor flaws and some ideas may be loosely connected
adequately establishes a setting, narrator/characters, and/or point of view*
adequate use of a variety of transitional strategies to clarify the relationships between
and among ideas
adequate sequence of events from beginning to end
adequate opening and closure for audience and purpose
2
The organization of the narrative,
real or imagined, is somewhat sustained and may have an uneven focus:
there may be an inconsistent plot, and/or flaws may be evident
unevenly or minimally establishes a setting, narrator/characters, and/or point of view*
uneven use of appropriate transitional strategies and/or little variety
weak or uneven sequence of events
opening and closure, if present, are weak
1
The organization of the narrative,
real or imagined, may be maintained but may provide little or no focus:
there is little or no discernible plot or there may just be a series of events
may be brief or there is little to no attempt to establish a setting, narrator/characters,
and/or point of view*
few or no appropriate transitional strategies may be evident and may cause confusion
little or no organization of an event sequence; frequent extraneous ideas and/or a major
drift may be evident
opening and/or closure may be missing or unsatisfactory
NS
Insufficient (includes copied text)
In a language other than English
Off-topic
Off-purpose
*pointofviewbegins atgrade7
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 5
Score
Development/Elaboration
Grade 3 Narrative Description
Development/Elaboration
4
The narrative, real or imagined,provides thorough, effective elaboration using relevant
details, dialogue, and/or description:
experiences, characters, setting and/or events are clearly developed
connections to source materials may enhance the narrative
effective use of a variety of narrative techniques that advance the story or illustrate the
experience
effective use of sensory, concrete, and figurative language that clearly advances the
purpose
effective, appropriate style enhances the narration
3
The narrative, real or imagined, provides adequate elaboration using details, dialogue,
and/or description:
experiences, characters, setting, and/or events are adequately developed
connections to source materials may contribute to the narrative
adequate use of a variety of narrative techniques that generally advance the story or
illustrate the experience
adequate use of sensory, concrete, and figurative language that generally advances the
purpose
generally appropriate style is evident
2
The narrative, real or imagined, provides uneven, cursory elaboration using partial and
uneven details, dialogue, and/or description:
experiences, characters, setting, and/or events are unevenly developed
connections to source materials may be ineffective, awkward, or vague but do not
interfere with the narrative
narrative techniques are uneven and inconsistent
partial or weak use of sensory, concrete, and figurative language that may not advance
the purpose
inconsistent or weak attempt to create appropriate style
1
The narrative, real or imagined, provides minimal elaboration using few or no details,
dialogue, and/or description:
experiences, characters, setting, and/or events may be vague, lack clarity, or confusing
connections to source materials, if evident, may detract from the narrative
use of narrative techniques may be minimal, absent, incorrect, or irrelevant
may have little or no use of sensory, concrete, or figurative language; language does not
advance and may interfere with the purpose
little or no evidence of appropriate style
NS
Insufficient (includes copied text)
In a language other than English
Off-topic
Off-purpose
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 6
Score
Conventions
Grade 3 Narrative Description
Conventions
2
The response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions:
adequate use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar
usage, and spelling
1
The response demonstrates a partial command of conventions:
limited use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage,
and spelling
0
The response demonstrates little or no command of conventions:
infrequent use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar
usage, and spelling
NS
Insufficient (includes copied text)
In a language other than English
Off-topic
Off-purpose
Conventions are scored holistically per grade-level CCSS expectations considering the following
guidelines:
Variety: A range of errors includes sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage,
and spelling
Severity: Basic errors are more heavily weighted than higher-level errors.
Density: The proportion of errors to the amount of writing done well. This includes the ratio of
errors to the length of the piece.
Appendix A provides the grade-level convention charts used during scoring.
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 7
Grade 3
Narrative - Organization and Purpose
Sample 1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 1
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The organization of the narrative provides little focus. There is no discernible plot, only a series of
events (going across the sea...learning how to live...finding food). The response is brief, and there
is little attempt to establish a setting or characters beyond "Ounce it was a little pilgrim he was
making his journey on the maflower." Few transitional strategies are evident, and there is no
organization of an event sequence (the student mainly provides statements about the difficulty of
travelling on a ship across the sea). The opening (Ounce it was a little pilgrim...) and closure
(pepole today are adle to travl quickly) are weak.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 8
Grade 3
Narrative - Organization and Purpose
Sample 1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 2
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The organization of the narrative provides little focus. There is little discernible plot, and little
attempt to establish a setting, narrator or characters (there is a minimal attempt to establish the
character of a child who wants to get on the Mayflower.) There are few transitional strategies, and
little organization of an event sequence (there is a brief description of the child watching the
Mayflower, seeing it is gone, and then asking the narrator if he wants to go with him.) The narrative
lacks an opening and closure.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 9
Grade 3
Narrative - Organization and Purpose
Sample 1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 3
Furry Heroes
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The organization of the narrative provides little focus. There is little discernible plot, but there is a
minimal attempt to establish the character of a dog named "Blue." A few transitional strategies are
present (until something bit him...Till the next someone...so he went). Little organization of an
event sequence is present in this brief response (the opening sentence is confusing and makes the
plot difficult to follow). The opening (A normal dog was sleeping...) and closure (...everyone was
happy) are weak.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 10
Grade 3
Narrative - Organization and Purpose
Sample 1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 4
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The organization of the narrative is somewhat sustained. There is a discernible plot (a child's
journey on the Mayflower). The setting is minimally maintained (aboard the Mayflower), and
characters are minimally developed (a child named Conrad, his uncle, and his parents.) There is an
uneven use of appropriate transitional strategies (Then he heard... So in a mouth... But in 6
mounth...) and an uneven sequence of events. The opening (This is a story about a child that was
cures) and closure (But in 6 mounth they came to the new world) are weak.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 11
Grade 3
Narrative - Organization and Purpose
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 5
Furry Heroes
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The organization of the narrative is somewhat sustained. There is a discernible plot (the narrator
and a pet turtle help a squid and a shark). The setting is minimally maintained (the sea), and the
narrator and characters are minimally developed (Me and my pet trtal silver like to save sea
creachers). There is little variety in the use of transitional strategies (Then when I looked... Then
when we got home). Gaps in the narrative lead to an uneven sequence of events (the narrative
jumps from giving the squid and shark medicine, to the narrator being at home and Silver laying
eggs.) The opening (Me and my pet trtal silver like to save sea creachers) and closure (That was
some advencher) are adequate.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 12
Grade 3
Narrative - Organization and Purpose
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 6
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The organization of the narrative is somewhat sustained. Some inference is required to know that
the plot is about a day on the Mayflower. The setting is maintained (onboard the Mayflower), and
characters are minimally developed (Dave...helped out by moping the deck). There is little variety
in the use of transitional strategies (so when he was done...when he was done... When dinner was
over...) and an uneven sequence of events. The opening (They were on there way to the new
world) and closure (...it was time for bed the end) are weak.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 13
Grade 3
Narrative - Organization and Purpose
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 7
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The organization of the narrative is adequately sustained, with a maintained focus. There is an
evident plot about a family's trip on the Mayflower, and the setting (onboard the Mayflower) and
characters (Chris and his family) are adequately maintained. There is adequate use of a variety of
transitional strategies to clarify relationships between ideas (finally they arrived on the
Mayflower...Life wasn't even close to easy on the Mayflower, but the Pilgrims' and Chrises family
put seasoning on their food to make it taste better) and an adequate sequence of events. The
opening (Once there was a boy...) is adequate, but there is no closure.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 14
Grade 3
Narrative - Organization and Purpose
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 8
Furry Heroes
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The organization of the narrative is adequately sustained and the focus is maintained. There is an
evident plot about a guinea pig that saves his owner. The setting (the swenson house) is
adequately maintained, and the character of Harry the guinea pig is adequately developed (But
harry would not stop now. He ran through several flames). Adequate transitional strategies are
utilized to create an adequate sequence of events from beginning to end (One late summer
afternoon...Then he ran over... He finally arrived...). The opening (This is a story about a guinie pig
that saved his owners) and closure (Then he was known as a life saver) are effective and provide a
sense of unity to the response.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 15
Grade 3
Narrative - Organization and Purpose
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 9
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 16
The organization of the narrative is adequately sustained and the focus is maintained. There is an
evident plot about a child on the Mayflower. The setting (onboard the Mayflower) is adequately
maintained, and the character of a pilgrim child on the Mayflower is adequately developed (...he
dreamed that he was starving on the ship like other pilgrims do... He said, I don't like this trip). The
response uses a variety of transitional strategies to maintain an adequate sequence of events from
beginning to end (So he got worried... While he was inside... When he was getting tired...). An
adequate opening is present (A child pelgrim was on the Mayflour...). The closure, which makes
the point that the pilgrims now have all the things they did not have when they were on the
Mayflower, is also adequate (But the ship stopped...Him and the others is thankful because Native
americans helped them have fresh food, more clothes and happines).
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 17
Grade 3
Narrative - Organization and Purpose
Sample4-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 10
Furry Heroes
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 18
The organization of the narrative is fully sustained and the focus is clear and maintained
throughout. An effective plot about a horse that saves stray kittens provides a sense of unity and
completeness. The setting is effectively established and characters are skillfully developed (Avery
stuck her head in a box full of glass...Avery took care of the kittens and slept with them in the barn
stalls...Abby decided to keep the kitten...). Consistent use of transitional strategies help convey a
logical sequence of events (...one day Avery jumped over the fence...the next day hundreds of
people came to visit...Now Avery got several awards). The opening effectively introduces the
characters (Avery was a stray horse when she was very young a girl named Abby found her and
decided to take care of her) and the closure effectively shows the culmination of the characters
work saving kittens (...they raised more than a hundred dollars each week).
SCORE POINT
4
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 19
Grade 3
Narrative - Organization and Purpose
Sample4-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 11
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 20
The organization of the narrative is fully sustained and the focus is clear and maintained
throughout. An effective plot about a boy's journey to the new world creates a sense of unity and
completeness. The setting, divided between the boat and Plymouth, MA, is effectively established,
and the characters are effectively developed (He got on the bot complaining...He said with a loud
booming voice...'Oh hony, have my jacket') The student uses a variety of transitional strategies,
including dialogue, to move the plot forward and create a natural and logical sequence of events
('Sereaslly, that's the only thing we can eat'? Asked Jack. 'Yes'. Said his mother. 'But mom'! 'now
stop complaining and eat your dinner'! 'O,ok'. 'Actually, that was pretty good' Said jack). An
effective opening introduces the main character and the setting (Jack Skeen started his long,
boaring but merackulesjerney to the new world in sixteen twenty). The effective closure of the
narrative provides a sense of resolution for the characters by showing that they have achieved their
goal of reaching the new world (And there was lots and lots to be thankful for. So long story short.
AND THEY LIVED HAPELLY EVER AFTER).
SCORE POINT
4
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 21
Grade 3
Narrative - Development and Elaboration
Sample 1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 1
Furry Heroes
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The narrative provides minimal elaboration. The student uses few details to elaborate on
characters or setting, and events are vague (they found a baby seal they took it home and heeled
it). There is limited use of narrative techniques (events are an unelaborated list). The response
does not utilize sensory or concrete language to advance the narrative purpose. There is only a
very limited attempt to imitate the style of a story (“Once upon a time…”, “They lived happily ever
after”).
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 22
Grade 3
Narrative - Development and Elaboration
Sample 1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 2
Furry Heroes
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The narrative provides minimal elaboration with few details, no dialogue, and little description.
Experiences, characters, setting and events are vague because the student does not stop to
elaborate (the narrative is mostly a list of events). The use of narrative techniques is minimal (my
dog was pulling my shirt in the derection of the fire). There is little use of sensory or concrete
language to advance the narrative purpose (I was so proud of my dog), and there is little awareness
of a writing style.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 23
Grade 3
Narrative - Development and Elaboration
Sample 1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 3
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The narrative provides minimal elaboration with few details and little description. The student uses
simple language, experiences are “told” rather than “shown” (he saw new animals and ohter cool
stuff and that was good), and narrative techniques are minimal (the food went bad). The student
uses general rather than specific language to advance the plot (a child that was cures... borded the
ship) and little awareness of style.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 24
Grade 3
Narrative - Development and Elaboration
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 4
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The narrative provides cursory elaboration using partial and uneven details and description.
Experiences, characters, setting and events are unevenly developed. However, the student does
attempt some sentence-to-sentence elaboration of Dave mopping the deck. The student uses
some details from the source materials (had biscuits and dried vegetables), but the narrative
techniques used are uneven (the student provides details about what Dave and Greg did together,
but the details are presented as a list, with no elaboration). There is partial use of concrete
language to advance the purpose of the narrative (he went near the eag of the deck he was
moping and he almost fell over in to. But he cot his blnce) and some attempt at creating a
narrative style.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 25
Grade 3
Narrative - Development and Elaboration
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 5
Furry Heroes
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The narrative provides minimal elaboration using partial and some details and description.
Experiences, characters, setting, and events are unevenly developed, with mostly listed elaboration
(But his owner Josh moved to Mexico... The dog had to help many people alone now...The dog
helped save 29 cats, 77 birds, 47 people, and 36 dogs). Narrative techniques are uneven with
weak use of concrete language (The dog and his owner saved some animals like cats, dags, birds
and other animals. Once they saved a family of robins in a burning tree). There is an attempt to
“sound like” a story, but because the story is a’’ “telling” rather than “showing” the student is not
entirely successful.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 26
Grade 3
Narrative - Development and Elaboration
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 6
Furry Heroes
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The narrative provides uneven elaboration using partial and uneven details and description.
Experiences and characters are unevenly developed. The student provides some character
development by allowing the audience to know the thoughts of the narrator (So, I thought what am
I going to do?...I thought, how can a dog get a cat out? Even if I can't), but most of the experiences
lack elaboration (Next we tried to call help. That did not work eather...Next I was looking for a
poster...But, I did not find a poster). Narrative techniques are uneven, with some weak
descriptions (small little cat) and some partial use of descriptive language (I tiptoed over there. I
peeked over at it). There is some awareness of audience and style with the integration of
onomatopoeia (Click Clack!) and internal dialogue (I thought, how can a dog get a cat out?...).
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 27
Grade 3
Narrative - Development and Elaboration
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 7
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The narrative provides adequate elaboration using details and description to develop the story of a
girl's journey on the Mayflower. Experiences (there was no kitchen...they were cooking with the
firebox), characters (Anny had to were the same dress for the whole trip), setting (on the Mayflower
boat), and events are adequately developed and connections to source materials contribute to the
narrative (Native Americans taugth the Pilgrams how to hunt for birds and deer... to plant corn,
barley and peas). There is adequate use of narrative techniques, and specific details are
connected with sentence-to-sentence elaboration (they need good weather also because if a spark
fell down on the Mayflower boat the whole boat will be burned...) and concrete language (they
needed the food dry and if they were cooking with the fireboxes then they need good weather) that
generally advance the narrative. A generally appropriate, matter-of-fact (the biggest problem was
the food) style is evident.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 28
Grade 3
Narrative - Development and Elaboration
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 8
Furry Heroes
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The narrative provides adequate elaboration using details and description to develop the story of a
horse that saves a kitten. Experiences, characters (a plain old horse named Marie. She loved to
run fast and to practice jumping), and events are adequately developed. There is adequate use of
narrative techniques including some foreshadowing in the first paragraph (She never thought her
speed was fast enough to save someones life). There is adequate use of sensory and concrete
language (Marie ran as fast as she could to were she herded the person yelling) and a generally
appropriate style is evident.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 29
Grade 3
Narrative - Development and Elaboration
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 9
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The narrative provides adequate elaboration using details and description. Experiences (It was so
crowded I had to sleep at the bottom of the ship), characters, setting, and events are adequately
developed, and connections to the source materials contribute to the narrative (...this food called
'ship's biscuits'... There wasn't enough water so I had to find something else to drink). Narrative
techniques are adequately used to generally illustrate the experience (Once I bit it my teeth started
bleeding), and there is adequate use of descriptive language (I feel frightened once I see a spider).
There is a distinctive sense of style. The reader can hear the voice through repeated use of caps
and subjective reactions to conditions on the ship (I NEVER want YOU to go on a trip like that ever.
But if you do, watch out for the holes).
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 30
Grade 3
Narrative - Development and Elaboration
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 10
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The narrative provides adequate elaboration using details and description. Experiences (They
meet Native Americans and they help each other so they can survive), setting, and events are
adequately developed, and connections to the source materials contribute to the narrative (They
were going to be on board for a long time...2 months past...When spring comes the pilgrims learn
how to plant corn, peas and they learn how to hunt for birds and deer). The response makes
adequate use of narrative techniques (Lots of people got sea sick or screamed when the boat
moved suddenly) and descriptive language (When the boat moved suddenly they put there hands
in the air and yelled WOOOOHOOOO!!!!!!!!!!). A generally appropriate style is evident.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 31
Grade 3
Narrative - Development and Elaboration
Sample4-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 11
Furry Heroes
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The narrative provides thorough, effective elaboration using relevant details and description.
Experiences (Abby decided to keep the kitten and name it Spots), characters (Avery took care of
the kittens and slept with them in the barn), and events are clearly developed. The narrative uses
the source materials to guide the story (the story of Avery and Abby closely parallels the source
materials that describe a dog that rescues kittens and its owner who keeps the kittens and starts a
fund to help cats). The student uses narrative techniques such as description to illustrate the
experience (...Avery jumped over the fence and raced to the end of the street...) and descriptive
language that clearly advances the purpose (...named it pumpkin because it was the color orange
and was very plump). The narrative is enhanced by an effective, appropriate style that conveys the
heroism of Avery.
SCORE POINT
4
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 32
Grade 3
Narrative - Development and Elaboration
Sample 4-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 12
Furry Heroes
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The narrative provides thorough, effective elaboration using relevant details and description to
develop the story of how Thorn the hamster got his name. Experiences (They were all having a
really good time and they wanted to play a game), characters (He didn't care if a leaf thorn was
pushing into his body...), and events are clearly developed. The response uses a variety of
narrative techniques including description (Max spun and spun until he got super close to plant he
was alirgic to) and foreshadowing (Max didn't name his hamster Thorn for nothing) to illustrate the
experience. The writer effectively uses descriptive language (He stuck his tonge out, started
spinning in circles and puffed his cheaks up) that clearly advances the purpose and an effective,
appropriate style that leads to the resolution of how Thorn got his name.
SCORE POINT
4
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 33
Grade 3
Narrative - Development and Elaboration
Sample4-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 13
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 34
The narrative provides thorough, effective elaboration using relevant details, dialogue, and
description. Experiences (...some times they ate the food that went bad exept the passengers
could not taste it because the men ho coocked and handed the food out put spices on them to
cover it up), characters ('Sereaslly, that's the only thing we can eat'? Asked Jack. 'Yes'. Said his
mother. 'But mom'! 'now stop complaining and eat your dinner'! 'O,ok'), setting and events are
clearly developed. Connections to the source materials enhance the narrative (Two months after
the passengers left... they reeched the new world... 'b,brrr,m,m,mom its co, cold'. Wimpered Jack).
The writer effectively uses dialogue as a narrative technique to advance the story ('Oh great, I'm
stuck in a ship, have to ask the capten were the bathroom is and can't eat anything for like 3
hours, just great') and effectively uses descriptive language (He said with a lould booming voice...
Shreeked Jack a little scared). There is an effective, appropriate style that enhances the narrative
(the writer uses dialogue to provide the audience with insight into characters and events).
SCORE POINT
4
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 35
Grade 3
Conventions
Sample0-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 1
Bats
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
This response demonstrates little command of conventions. There is a variety of basic errors,
including grammar usage (determiners and plural nouns: bat make a eco, Bat help farmers), and
spelling (cope, nigt, lisin, fare). The proportion of errors to the amount of writing done well is
significant.
SCORE POINT
0
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 36
Grade 3
Conventions
Sample0-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 2
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
This response demonstrates little command of conventions. The proportion of errors to the
amount of writing done well in this brief response is significant. There is a variety of basic errors
including punctuation (misplaced period, missing end period), capitalization (failing to capitalize
the first word in the third sentence, the name of the ship and the holiday), and spelling (fand, treky,
allong).
SCORE POINT
0
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 37
Grade 3
Conventions
Sample0-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 3
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
This response demonstrates little command of conventions. There is a variety of basic errors in
this brief response, including sentence formation (one long run-on sentence), punctuation (none,
except for one correct contraction), capitalization (not capitalizing the first word in the response
and the name of the ship), grammar usage (ounce it was a little pilgrim), and spelling (pepole,
makeing, souned).
SCORE POINT
0
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 38
Grade 3
Conventions
Sample1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 4
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
This brief response demonstrates a partial command of conventions. There is limited use of
correct sentence formation (The were dieing when they got of the ship it was sad) and spelling
(arond, on, The). However, grammar usage, punctuation and capitalization are adequate.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 39
Grade 3
Conventions
Sample1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 5
Furry Heroes
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
This response demonstrates a partial command of conventions with some variety. There is limited
use of correct sentence formation (I let go of the liesh my dog ran as fast he could and went inside
the bulding), grammar usage (He still see the first cat, he rescus animal and humen in need), and
spelling (windo, waking, moth). However, punctuation and most capitalization are adequate in this
lengthier response.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 40
Grade 3
Conventions
Sample1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 6
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
This response demonstrates a partial command of conventions. There is some variety of errors,
but the errors are neither dense nor severe. There is adequate use of capitalization, and most of
the punctuation is correct. However, there are a few errors in sentence formation (In the life of a
pilgrim was pretty rough), grammar usage (drinked), and spelling (stoped, befour, living, alot).
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 41
Grade 3
Conventions
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 7
Inventions
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
This response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions. Though the response is brief,
there are very few errors for the amount of writing present. Sentence formation, punctuation,
spelling, and grammar usage are all adequate, and there is only one capitalization error (rover).
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 42
Grade 3
Conventions
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 8
Astronauts
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
This response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions. There are few errors for the
amount of writing present in this lengthier response. There are no grade-level errors in sentence
formation, and only one capitalization error (failing to capitalize I in the third paragraph ). Some
errors are present in grammar usage (like to be astronaut, for a hour), spelling (wounder, excise),
and punctuation (missing a few end of sentence question marks).
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 43
Grade 3
Conventions
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 9
Pilgrims
Grade 3 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Appendix A provides the grade-level convention charts used during scoring.
This response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions. There are few errors for the
amount of writing present in this lengthier response. In sentence formation there are two run-on
sentences, one punctuation error (pilgrims houses), two grammar usage errors (maybe sound fun,
more hungrier), and two capitalization errors (pilgrim, rose).
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 44
Grade 6 Explanatory Performance Task Full Writes
The following sixth grade explanatory rubrics and baseline anchor set are used to anchor the scoring
of student responseswritten to explanatory tasks at grade 6. Each scoring sample is scored for three
traits: organization/purpose (4 points possible), evidence/elaboration (4 points possible), and
conventions (2 points possible).
Score
Organization/Purpose
Grade 6 Explanatory Description
Organization/Purpose
4
The response has a clear and effective organizational structure, creating a sense of unity
and completeness. The organization is fully sustained between and within paragraphs. The
response is consistently and purposefully focused:
thesis/controlling idea of a topic is clearly communicated, and the focus is strongly
maintained for the purpose and audience
consistent use of a variety of transitional strategies to clarify the relationships between
and among ideas
effective introduction and conclusion
logical progression of ideas from beginning to end; strong connections between and
among ideas with some syntactic variety
3
The response has an evident organizational structure and a sense of completeness.
Though there may be minor flaws, they do not interfere with the overall coherence. The
organization is adequately sustained between and within paragraphs. The response is
generally focused:
thesis/controlling idea of a topic is clear, and the focus is mostly maintained for the
purpose and audience
adequate use of transitional strategies with some variety to clarify the relationships
between and among ideas
adequate introduction and conclusion
adequate progression of ideas from beginning to end; adequate connections between
and among ideas
2
The response has an inconsistent organizational structure. Some flaws are evident, and
some ideas may be loosely connected. The organization is somewhat sustained between
and within paragraphs. The response may have a minor drift in focus:
thesis/controlling idea of a topic may be somewhat unclear, or the focus may be
insufficiently sustained for the purpose and/or audience
inconsistent use of transitional strategies and/or little variety
introduction or conclusion, if present, may be weak
uneven progression of ideas from beginning to end; and/or formulaic; inconsistent or
unclear connections between and among ideas
1
The response has little or no discernible organizational structure. The response may be
related to the topic but may provide little or no focus:
thesis/controlling idea may be confusing or ambiguous; response may be too brief or
the focus may drift from the purpose and/or audience
few or no transitional strategies are evident
introduction and/or conclusion may be missing
frequent extraneous ideas may be evident; ideas may be randomly ordered or have an
unclear progression
NS
Insufficient (includes copied text)
In a language other than English
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 45
Off-topic
Off-purpose
Score
Evidence/Elaboration
Grade 6 Explanatory Description
Evidence/Elaboration
4
The response provides thorough elaboration of the support/evidence for the
thesis/controlling idea that includes the effective use of source material. The response
clearly and effectively develops ideas, using precise language:
comprehensive evidence (facts and details) from the source material is integrated,
relevant, and specific
clear citations or attribution to source material
effective use of a variety of elaborative techniques*
vocabulary is clearly appropriate for the audience and purpose
effective, appropriate style enhances content
3
The response provides adequate elaboration of the support/evidence for the
thesis/controlling idea that includes the use of source material. The response adequately
develops ideas, employing a mix of precise and more general language:
adequate evidence (facts and details) from the source material is integrated and
relevant, yet may be general
adequate use of citations or attribution to source material
adequate use of some elaborative techniques*
vocabulary is generally appropriate for the audience and purpose
generally appropriate style is evident
2
The response provides uneven,cursory elaboration of the support/evidence for the
thesis/controlling idea that includes uneven or limited use of source material. The
response develops ideas unevenly, using simplistic language:
some evidence (facts and details) from the source material may be weakly integrated,
imprecise, repetitive, vague, and/or copied
weak use of citations or attribution to source material
weak or uneven use of elaborative techniques*; development may consist primarily of
source summary
vocabulary use is uneven or somewhat ineffective for the audience and purpose
inconsistent or weak attempt to create appropriate style
1
The response provides minimal elaboration of the support/evidence for the
thesis/controlling idea that includes little or no use of source material. The response is
vague, lacks clarity, or is confusing:
evidence (facts and details) from the source material is minimal, irrelevant, absent,
incorrectly used, or predominantly copied
insufficient use of citations or attribution to source material
minimal, if any, use of elaborative techniques*
vocabulary is limited or ineffective for the audience and purpose
little or no evidence of appropriate style
NS
Insufficient (includes copied text)
In a language other than English
Off-topic
Off-purpose
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 46
*Elaborative techniques may include the use of personal experiences that support the controlling idea.
Score
Conventions
Grade 6 Explanatory Description
Conventions
2
The response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions:
adequate use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar
usage, and spelling
1
The response demonstrates a partial command of conventions:
limited use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage,
and spelling
0
The response demonstrates little or no command of conventions:
infrequent use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar
usage, and spelling
NS
Insufficient (includes copied text)
In a language other than English
Off-topic
Off-purpose
Conventions are scored holistically per grade-level CCSS expectations considering the following
guidelines:
Variety: A range of errors includes sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage,
and spelling.
Severity: Basic errors are more heavily weighted than higher-level errors.
Density: The proportion of errors to the amount of writing done well. This includes the ratio of
errors to the length of the piece.
Appendix A provides the grade-level convention charts used during scoring.
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 47
Grade 6
Explanatory - Organization and Purpose
Sample1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 1
MARTIAL ARTS
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The response has little discernible organizational structure. Although the response is related to the
topic, it has problems maintaining focus. The response begins by suggesting the reader pretend
that the school wants to offer martial arts classes. The response than identifies the different
varieties of martial arts as if each is going to be explained in the response. It then focuses,
however, on the process of and troubleshooting for putting the classes in place (by having avote).
Few transitional strategies are evident (Or, On the other hand, Plus), but the ideas on how to get
student input or judge student interest in martial arts are randomly ordered. A one-sentence
introduction (Pretend that your school wants to have Martial Art . . . .) is present, and there is no
conclusion. When considered holistically, this response receives a score of 1 for
Organization/Purpose.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 48
Grade 6
Explanatory - Organization and Purpose
Sample1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 2
MARTIAL ARTS
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
This brief response has little discernible organizational structure. The response begins by
identifying a few advantages in adding martial arts to the curriculum (very exciting, can teach you .
. . lessons, strategies, and techniques . . . relax your mind), but then moves, without transition, to a
new idea about how many martial arts and where these martial arts are practiced. Each of these
ideas can be reordered without affecting meaning. There are some simple attempts at transitions
(Truly, To sum up). The introduction and conclusion are very brief and do little to help the reader
follow the essay. Taken as a whole, this response represents a score of 1 for
Organization/Purpose..
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 49
Grade 6
Explanatory - Organization and Purpose
Sample1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 3
USING THE INTERNET WISELY
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The response has little discernible organizational structure. This response begins with a weak
thesis (Once we get on the computers, everyone should be careful when you research about the
information. There are a few things to do to make sure that the websites you are on give you
accurate, and useful information). A progression of ideas is present from explaining where to find
accurate information (. . . with .edu or .gov) to having to use a .com website. An embedded
transition is used effectively to step through the information (Usually they don‟t have that many ads
either . . . .). Other basic transitions help connect ideas (So . . . , If you can‟t then . . .). Although
there is connectivity between ideas, this response is not sufficiently sustained to receive more than
a 1 for Organization/Purpose.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 50
Grade 6
Explanatory - Organization and Purpose
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 4
IMMIGRATION
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 51
The response has an inconsistent organizational structure with evident flaws. The controlling idea
of the piece is that “[t]imes are sometimes hard for people, so they might have to move to a better
place.” The reader is left to determine what the connection is to “pushes” and “pulls.” The first
body paragraph introduces new technology as a driving force for “pulling” immigrants to America,
but then lists a few “pushes” that are unrelated to technology (. . . crops had failed and . . . Civil
War . . .). The response finishes with an extremely weak conclusion. Holistically, the response
receives a score of 2 for Organization/Purpose.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 52
Grade 6
Explanatory - Organization and Purpose
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 5
USING THE INTERNET WISELY
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 53
The response has an inconsistent organizational structure with evident flaws. The response is
adequately sustained, however. The response begins with a simple introduction describing the
writer’s background and the two types of consideration the writer feels are relevant to safe Internet
usage (basic facts, risks and responsibilities). The first paragraph begins adequately, with a topic
sentence indicating that the writer will discuss the types of sites and how to use those sites,
followed by a random list of ideas that tracks that road map. A brief concluding sentence (You must
know these thing for research) adequately concludes this paragraph. The second paragraph,
however, is not organized as well. The lack of a clear topic sentence leaves the reader guessing
whether these are the “risks” that were foreshadowed in the opening. No variety in transitional
strategies is present and the conclusion merely repeats the ideas presented in the introduction.
The uneven progression of ideas from beginning to end and the lack of clarity result in a holistic
Organization/Purpose score of 2 for this response.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 54
Grade 6
Explanatory - Organization and Purpose
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 6
IMMIGRATION
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 55
The response has an evident organizational structure and a sense of completeness. The response
is adequately sustained and clearly focused. The response begins with an adequate introduction,
using a rhetorical question that invites the reader to consider the pushes” and “pulls” that forced
and lured immigrants to America. The response maintains a clear focus on these concepts
throughout, using them to adequately organize the response. Adequate transitions are used
between paragraphs (One push reason . . . A pull reason . . . As you can see) and internally (Even
the tradition . . . Due to this event . . .What makes it even more amazing . . . .). Holistically, this
response receives a score of 3 in Organization/Purpose.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 56
Grade 6
Explanatory - Organization and Purpose
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 7
USING THE INTERNET WISELY
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 57
The response has an evident organizational structure and a sense of completeness. The response
is adequately sustained and generally focused. The writer begins by adequately identifying three
keys to Internet safety: spotting the dots, identifying the website author, and protecting personal
information. These ideas are adequately used as topic sentences for the body paragraphs. The
first body paragraph identifies three “dot” types, .gov, .edu, and .com, followed by a comment
regarding each. Although this structure is formulaic, the transition to the .com characterization
clarifies the connection for the reader (The dot that isn't as reliable as the others is the .com dot).
The second paragraph adequately progresses from identifying the type of personal information that
one needs to be careful with to the ramifications of carelessness with this type of information. A
brief sentence summarizing this paragraph (This is way you have to be careful about what you put
out there) is used to adequately transition to the next paragraph. The third paragraph uses
functional internal transitions (Also, . . . One more thing . . . ) to list reasons why one needs to know
the source of the information on a website. Once again, the writer uses an adequate concluding
sentence to complete this paragraph. Although functional, the conclusion does nothing more than
mirror the introduction. Adequate transitional strategies and progression of ideas from beginning to
end result in a holistic Organization/Purpose score of 3 for this response.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 58
Grade 6
Explanatory - Organization and Purpose
Sample4-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 8
IMMIGRATION
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 59
The response has a clear and effective organizational structure, creating a sense of unity and
completeness. It is fully sustained, and consistently and purposefully focused. The opening
paragraph begins with a sharp and effective thesis (These people came because of hardships in
their country, opportunities in America, and of Americas modern technology.). Although functional
transitions are present between and within paragraphs throughout this response, transitions are
weak at times (Also, Finally, Lastly). There is a logical progression of ideas from beginning to end
from the hardships faced by immigrants in paragraph one to the opportunities to overcome these
hardships in paragraph two to the new technology in America in paragraph three. The conclusion
goes beyond simply restating the information in the introduction by using the “push” and “pull
concepts from the source material to synthesize the ideas, and, in total, the response receives a
score of 4 for Organization/Purpose.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
4
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 60
Grade 6
Explanatory - Organization and Purpose
Sample4-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 9
USING THE INTERNET WISELY
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 61
The response has a clear and effective organizational structure, creating a sense of unity and
completeness. The response is fully sustained and consistently and purposefully focused. The
response begins with an effective introduction that highlights, without listing, the basic concepts to
be addressed more fully in the body of the essay. The first body paragraph logically progresses
from alerting the reader that one needs to look beyond the veneer of a website to explaining how
“urls” work to specific types of websites (.edu, .museum, .lib) to describing specifically the .com,
which is most prone to problems because of its open and commercial characteristics. An effective
summary sentence concludes this paragraph (Always pay attention to the URL to make sure that
the site is informative and reliable.). The remaining body paragraphs take a similar approach with
privacy concerns and with determining accuracy of information. Some basic transitions are used on
occasion (First, Also, Next) and although there is some overuse of the conjunction “but,” the term is
used to successfully establish a helpful contrast to help clarify relationships for the reader (e.g.,
The internet is filled with information, but if you have a household computer, decide with your
parents or guardian to decide . . . .). An effective conclusion completes the response that, when
consideredas a whole, receives a score of 4 for Organization/Purpose.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
4
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 62
Grade 6
Explanatory - Evidence and Elaboration
Sample 1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 1
MARTIAL ARTS
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The response provides minimal support for the controlling idea and supporting ideas. Other than
the names of the types of martial arts, no information from the source material is used in the
response. Rather than explaining the characteristics of the martial arts identified in the source
material, the writer describes options for deciding what martial arts classes to offer to students and
various options for the process to sign up for such a class. Listed support for options for class sign
up is provided, with the exception of one scenario in which one of the classes, Kung Fu, fills up.
Another section of that class can be created so the kids can have the class they want and get stuck
in a class they don‟t like. Vocabulary is limited and there is little evidence of appropriate style.
Holistically, this response receives a score of 1 for Evidence/Elaboration.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to specifically and explicitly reference their sources by name or number as
do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 63
Grade 6
Explanatory - Evidence and Elaboration
Sample 1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 2
MARTIAL ARTS
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The response provides minimal support for the controlling idea and supporting ideas. Little source
material is integrated (. . . practiced throughout the world . . ., from Source 2, What’s Kung Fu?) or
is vaguely used. The idea that martial arts as a stress reliever is repeated in the first and last
paragraphs and may have been derived from Source 3, Aikido: A Japanese Martial Art. All of the
characteristics of martial arts identified in the response are listed, with the exception of a minor
extension on mind relaxation leading to stress reduction (. . .many people say it is a good way to
relax your mind and relieve yourself of stress.). Although some attempt to enhance the vocabulary
and style through the use of the term “very” is used, it is still limited. Holistically, this response
receives a score of 1 for Evidence/Elaboration.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 64
Grade 6
Explanatory - Evidence and Elaboration
Sample 1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 3
IMMIGRATION
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The response provides minimal support for the controlling idea and supporting ideas and includes
little use of source material. The response begins by explaining that immigration from Europe,
Germany, and England was motivated by crop failures and the resultant starvation. These
populations, according to the response, sought new farmland in America to raise crops. Source 1,
Moving to America, does note the crop failures in Ireland and mentions that many Europeans came
to America to avoid hunger. While there is some overlap, the use is not completely correct. The next
attempt to use source material comes from Source 3, Gold Rush! Chinese Move to California.
Reference to this source is imprecise (Years later . . .) and sometimes not contained in the source
material (no references to silver mining or building steamboats in Europe in sources). Minimal
elaboration regarding the process that created the motivation for European immigration is made (. .
. crops were failing . . . starvation . . . to plant new crops . . . to own farming land . . .). Explanation
of Chinese immigration is similarly elaborated (…gold rush…Chinese came…built railroads…). The
response concludes with a list of a few advancements that resulted from immigration (steamboats
to travel faster . . . invent new things). Vocabulary is limited and there is no evidence of
appropriate style. Given these considerations, and considered holistically, this response receives a
score of 1 for Evidence/Elaboration.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 65
Grade 6
Explanatory - Evidence and Elaboration
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 4
MARTIAL ARTS
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 66
The response provides cursory support for the controlling idea and supporting ideas. Although little
source material is used, this response does contain an element of style generally appropriate for
audience and purpose in the use of sounds that may be heard during a martial arts act to begin
each body paragraph. Each paragraph integrates detail from each of the sources (Source 1, Getting
a Kick out of Taekwondo black belt; Source 2, What’s Kung Fu moves inspired by many
animals; Source 3, Aikidio: A Japanese Martial Art physical as well as mental strength . . . self-
defense only . . . not used in competition . . .). The response unevenly elaborates using listed
support with minimal extension (for Taekwondo, one can learn how to fight and suceed all the way
up to . . . black belt; for Kung Fu, animal inspiration leads to fighting gracefully; and for Aikido, for
self-defense only . . . not used in competition). Simplistic language is used throughout. Holistically,
this response receives a score of 2 for Evidence/Elaboration.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 67
Grade 6
Explanatory - Evidence and Elaboration
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 5
USING THE INTERNET WISELY
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 68
The response provides uneven, cursory support for the controlling idea and supporting ideas.
Ideas are elaborated unevenly. Four points are made: that the Internet can be useful, unhelpful,
and harmful, and that the various types of websites are described by their “dot” designation (e.g.,
.com). The first body paragraph of the response, discussing the usefulness of the Internet, uses
listed support (report, essay, science project, or just . . . curiosity.). Although all of the sources
mention Internet usefulness, Source 1, The Good, the Bad, and the Just Plain Awful: How to Judge
Web Sites, was probably the primary source for this information. The second point regarding ways
in which the internet is “unhelpful” uses listed support with minor extension (lying or…fake fact
[o]r…pop up for no reason like a commercial or an add trying to sell something.). Information for
this point was derived from Source 2, How to Best Use Technology. The writer’s third point, that the
Internet can be harmful, uses listed support with minor extension (talks behind someone's back, or
embarrases . . . spread bad rummors or hateful thing . . . do something without the person's
approval or their knowledge). The last point the writer makes is to classify websites by their “dot”
source. The .com example extends the listed support by providing a scenario in which an
advertisement might appear due to the commercial nature of the site. Source 1 contains this
information. Vocabulary is generally appropriate for the audience and purpose, and a weak attempt
to create an appropriate style is made. Word choice often remains vague (sell something, bad
rummors) and attempts to create style are weakened by a lack of precision at the idea level
(Internet is a powerful tool that takes resposabilities). Although the writer vaguely attempts to use
information from the source material, the overall lack of elaboration results in a score of 2 for
Evidence/Elaboration.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 69
Grade 6
Explanatory - Evidence and Elaboration
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 6
MARTIAL ARTS
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 70
The response provides cursory support for the controlling idea and supporting ideas. Each of the
body paragraphs simply summarizes information contained in the respective source materials.
Information used to support paragraph one regarding Taekwondo is summarized from Source 1,
Getting a Kick out of Taekwondo. The writer uses listed detail that can be reordered without
damaging meaning to explain why Taekwondo goes beyond fun (can lead to Olympics, many people
practice, way of life for masters). These unconnected ideas fail to build depth of elaboration.
Paragraph two utilizes information from Source 2, What’s Kung Fu? This paragraph contains listed
detail as support as well. Source 3, Aikido: A Japanese Martial Art, is the basis for information in
paragraph three of the response. Once again, the response lists information from the source
material as support (meaning of the word in Japanese and focus on harmonizing energy and
defense). Although elaboration is weak, this response does use clearly appropriate vocabulary and
style given the content, audience, and purpose. Holistically, this response receives a 2 for
Evidence/Elaboration.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 71
Grade 6
Explanatory - Evidence and Elaboration
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 7
USING THE INTERNET WISELY
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 72
The response provides cursory support for the controlling idea and supporting ideas using limited
source material. The response makes three points about proper Internet usage: the “dot” impacts
website quality, internet privacy, and website source relation to information quality. The writer uses
information contained in Source 1, The Good, the Bad, and the Just Plain Awful: How to Judge Web
Sites, to explain the types of “dots” and how the dot can be used to evaluate website quality.
Source 2, How to Best Use Technology, is the basis for information in the second body paragraph
relating to Internet privacy. The writer begins to use a general layered approach that builds and
connects ideas (Giving this stuff away…) and that is bolstered by a specific list of data one should
keep private (. . . passwords, addresses, bank accounts . . .).. The third point the writer makes is to
be certain to know the website source. The basis for this content is found in Source 3, Using the
Internet for School Reports. Once again, the writer begins to integrate source material within a
general layered approach, but the ideas are more separate than connected though they all relate
to the topic sentence. Vocabulary is generally appropriate for the audience and purpose, and a
generally appropriate style is evident. Given the degree of source summary compared to the
quantity and quality of elaboration and integration, the response represents a high 2 for
Evidence/Elaboration.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 73
Grade 6
Explanatory - Evidence and Elaboration
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 8
MARTIAL ARTS
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 74
The response provides adequate support for the controlling idea and supporting ideas. The
response adequately elaborates ideas, employing a mix of precise and more general language. The
response begins with a contrast of the types of martial arts discussed in the sources, explaining
that Taekwondo is the writer’s first choice as an after-school activity. The writer goes beyond merely
summarizing the source material to integrating and synthesizing the information from across the
sources to advocate for Taekwondo over Kung Fu and Aikido because it uses your feet and hands
to preform it. Facts about Taekwondo (uses feet and hands and teaches restraint/self-control) are
taken from Source 1, Getting a Kick out of Taekwondo. Support for Kung Fu is derived from Source
2, What’s Kung Fu? Once again, the writer moves beyond source summary, to integrate the
information by suggesting that the positive reinforcement of a “great achievement” would make
them go back and take the class again and again. The writer uses information from Source 3,
Aikido: A Japanese Martial Art, in explaining why Aikido would be another good choice. The writer
adequately integrates this information with details from the source material to support the notion
that Aikido would allow students to experience a sport that another culture performs/does. A
layered approach to elaboration is used throughout the response, building depth. Vocabulary is
generally appropriate for the audience and purpose, and a generally appropriate style is evident.
The response receives a score of 3 for Evidence/Elaboration.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 75
Grade 6
Explanatory - Evidence and Elaboration
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 9
USING THE INTERNET WISELY
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 76
The response provides adequate support for the controlling idea and supporting ideas. The writer
adequately integrates information from Source 1, The Good, the Bad, and the Just Plain Awful: How
to Judge Web Sites, in the first point, that it is important to know how to tell a good website from a
bad one. Although not deeply elaborated, the writer distills the relevant portions of this source for
the reader without merely summarizing the source (. . . org websites usually just try to convince you
to use their product and .com sources have many ads that lead to non-valuable information.). The
writer uses layered elaboration to integrate information from Source 2, How to Best Use
Technology. Ideas build and connect to flesh outthe writer’s point about proper Internet conduct
and privacy, culminating in the “what if my grandma saw this?” example used from the source.
Source 3, Using the Internet for School Reports, is used by the writer to explain the pitfalls of using
untrustworthy sources. Two specific examples are used to adequately illustrate this point: one
based on timeliness of the information (Today‟s News) and the other based on source reliability
(howler monkeys breathe through their gills). Vocabulary and style are generally appropriate for the
audience and purpose. Although predominately general, source material is integrated and relevant.
The response adequately elaborates ideas, employing a mix of precise and more general language.
Holistically, this response receives a 3 for Evidence/Elaboration.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 77
Grade 6
Explanatory - Evidence and Elaboration
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 10
USING THE INTERNET WISELY
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Safest Ways to use Technology
As a member of the Technology Club I have been asked to provide information to
those students that will be using new computers. I am going to explain the risks, and
responsibilities that go along with this tool, as well as being sure of things that you do
on a website when using the Internet. I will describe to you these three topics in full
detail and explainations.
First, I will explain the risks that go along with using the Internet. When you are
typing website adresses make sure that you are careful. For example kids websites
that ends with ".com" may not be the same as if you were to use ".org". There are
hundreds of ways to now connect with friends from Social Networking, countless
things to view, and links to see and read about, you can upload pictures and text
informatin in just a push of a button. Also you could look on the home page to see if
this is the right website that you want to see or one that the information on the page
is something that you are interested in reading about. Maybe if you want to look on a
new website that you have never been on before you could check this with your
parents, teacher, gaurdian,etc. to see if the website is appropiate to use. If you can e-
mail the author of the website that is also a good source to use, you can ask when
the website was last updated, ask about the different topics that are on the website,
and why the website was put out for users. Does your gardian approve of this
website id so When are you allowed to get on it? Which website are you allowed to
see?
Next, I will tell you about the responsibilities that you need to use when
searching the web or even just using your computer for a different reason. Say you
are researching for a school project that is coming up. Websites will give real true
facts, So ".edu" can be fun and they come from schools and universities, Does the
usage tend to be reliable? If the website adress ends with ".org" then it would mostly
likely come from museums and or libraries and can be a good site to use.Then if a
website adress ends with ".com" then they come from commercials Anyone could
make a website using .com so therefore most will not be a reliable source to use.
trhey are mostly looking to try and convince you to buy something off of their
website. Then when you do they might not even get to you what you spent your
money on and bought.Which in my opinion would be a waste of time and money.
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 78
Lastly, I'm going to tell you how to be sure of things you do on a website.
When you are on a website adress be sure the links, posts, pictures, and videos are
appropriate for you to read,watch,and see. Before you post something ask your self:
What if a family member saw this? Would this post ruin someones reputation? What
would people think if they saw this post? When we are on Social networks we tend to
be able to talk alot of talk but when we are face to face we then tend to show respect
to one another. You should remind yourslef that when you are on the internet that
you should still treat people the way that you want to be treated so be careful and
aware of that.Keep personal information about yourslef private.You shouldnt give
anyone passwords, cell phone numbers, or most importantly adresses. When online
you should be sure that you know who you are talking with, just as if you were
walking in the neighborhood and would avoid any strangers that walk by you.
I have gone over all the major proceedures in using a new computer and the
internet. I explained the risks, responsibilities, and to be sure of things you do while
you are online.I hope that you can be safe with your computer and know to think
twice before you do something that you know is the wrong thing to do online. I think
eith having a new computer it's a good way to be able to strart fresh with it and try
again.
The response provides adequate support for the controlling idea and supporting ideas. The
response begins explaining the risks of Internet usage followed by a series of tips derived from
multiple sources. The writer uses the information from Source 1, The Good, the Bad, and the Just
Plain Awful: How to Judge Web Sites, using layered elaboration to describe the distinction between
each of the “dots” and the relative qualities of each as to reliability (Anyone could make a website
using .com so therefore most will not be reliable source to use.). Reordering these sentences,
particularly regarding the .com concerns, would result in lost meaning. Some of the tips are merely
listed. For example, the tip suggesting that one consult with an adult about website reliability,
taken from Source 2, How to Best Use Technology, is listed with a minor extension using a
rhetorical question (Does your gardian approve of this website id so When are you allowed to get
on it?). Source 3, Using the Internet for School Reports, is the basis for information integrated in
paragraph 3. The writer uses scenarios and rhetorical questions in a layered approach to
adequately explain the effect of inappropriate Internet behavior (What if a family member saw
this?) and breaches of privacy (just as if you were walking in the neighborhood and would avoid
any strangers that walk by you.). Vocabulary is generally appropriate for the audience and purpose.
The use of rhetorical questions contributes to an effective, appropriate style,enhancing content.
The response adequately elaborates ideas, employing information from a variety of sources.
Holistically, the response remains at the 3 level for Evidence/Elaboration, though moving toward
the 4 level.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 79
Grade 6
Explanatory - Evidence and Elaboration
Sample4-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 11
IMMIGRATION
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 80
The response provides thorough and convincing support for the controlling idea and supporting
ideas by effectively integrating source material that is relevant and specific. The response clearly
and effectively elaborates ideas, using precise language. This response begins with the “hardship”
motivation for immigration using information from Source 2, Changes in America: The “Pushes”
and “Pulls” for Immigrants. Multiple examples are used to effectively explain the hardships that
prompted an increase in immigration (Russian Jews fleeing persecution, Southern Italians came for
land, Europeans to escape conflict and poverty). The “opportunities” paragraph is equally well
elaborated with examples gathered primarily from Source 1, Moving to America (Europeans for
jobs, Irish for food). This paragraph does a particularly good job of integrating source material
through synthesis of these examples into the broader concept of “resources.” The last factor
driving immigration during this period discussed in the response is America’s new technology. The
writer synthesizes and integrates information from across sources, including substantial detail and
statistics from the source material found in Sources 1, 2, and 4 (Chart: American Population and
Industrial Grown, 1860-1910). Clearly appropriate vocabulary for audience and purpose and
effective style contribute to the response (wake up call . . . packed up their belongings and came to
America…a very promising country . . .). The response effectively uses source material to clearly
and effectively elaborate. Holistically, this response achieves a score of 4 for Evidence/Elaboration.
Note regarding citations or attributions to source material: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions
did not direct students to reference their sources by name or number as do the Field Test task
instructions.
SCORE POINT
4
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 81
Grade 6
Conventions
Sample0-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 1
Cursive Writing
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The response demonstrates little or no command of conventions. Four types of errors are present:
spelling (what, hoew, yo) punctuation (dont), grammar usage (its), and sentence formation (run-
together sentences). Density of a variety of errors, and severity in sentence formation and spelling
in this short response result in a score point of 0.
SCORE POINT
0
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 82
Grade 6
Conventions
Sample0-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 2
Cursive Writing
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The response demonstrates little or no command of conventions. A variety of errors is present in
this response, including spelling (wold), capitalization (i for I and at the beginning of sentences),
grammar usage (its for it’s, there for their), and sentence formation (several run-together
sentences). When compared to the proportion of writing done well, the variety and severity of
errors, particularly in grammar usage and sentence formation, result in a score point of 0 for this
response.
SCORE POINT
0
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 83
Grade 6
Conventions
Sample0-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 3
Cursive Writing
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The response demonstrates little or no command of conventions. Three types of errors are present
in this response: spelling (poeple, hand writting, wite, nad, Usallly), one instance of grammar usage
(its for it’s) and punctuation (apostrophes in contractions). Severity is present in the misspelling of
basic words at this grade level. Although a smaller variety of errors is present, the severity and
density of errors, when compared to the writing done well, result in a score point of 0 for this
response.
SCORE POINT
0
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 84
Grade 6
Conventions
Sample1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 4
Cursive Writing
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 85
The response demonstrates a partial command of conventions. A variety of errors is present in this
response including spelling (keybored, breath, alot, sypport), sentence formation (comma splice),
capitalization (many instances of incorrectly failing to capitalize the first word of sentences and
“national Hanwriting day”), punctuation (grandma’s, cursives, dont), and grammar usage (skill for
skills). Although severity exists in spelling and capitalization errors, the response does use commas
as well as interrupters to assist the reader. The variety, severity, and density of errors, when
compared to what is written well, result in a score point of 1 for this response.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 86
Grade 6
Conventions
Sample1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 5
Cursive Writing
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 87
The response demonstrates a partial command of conventions. A variety of errors is present in the
response, including sentence formation (a few comma splices), capitalization (i for I in many
instances), grammar usage (in for an, aloud for allowed, use for used, your for you’re), and
punctuation (wont). Grammar usage errors are considered severe given their frequency and variety.
Given the proportion of errors to the amount of writing done well, this response receives a score
point of 1.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 88
Grade 6
Conventions
Sample1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 6
Cursive Writing
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 89
The response demonstrates a partial command of conventions. A variety of errors appear in the
response: spelling (hand writing, multiplaction, subraction, asignments), punctuation (missing
comma), capitalization (one failure to capitalize at the beginning of a sentence), grammar usage (of
for have, used for use), and sentence formation (run-together sentences). Although errors in
grammar usage are considered severe, higher grade-level words are spelled correctly. Given the
proportion of errors to the amount of writing done well, this response receives a score point of 1.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 90
Grade 6
Conventions
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 7
Cursive Writing
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 91
The response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions. Three types of errors are found
in the response: sentence formation (run-together and comma splice), punctuation (apostrophe in
contraction, missing comma, and incorrect use of quotations), and grammar usage (right for write,
although used correctly elsewhere in response). No errors are considered severe. Most of the
errors encountered are due to the writer’s inability to successfully use quoted material. Given the
proportion of errors to the amount of writing done well, this response receives a score point of 2.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 92
Grade 6
Conventions
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 8
Cursive Writing
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 93
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 94
The response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions. Three types of errors are
present in the response: spelling (valuble, curive, becasue), grammar usage (teached for taught,
your for you’re, their for there), and punctuation (incorrect period for a question mark). None of the
errors in the response are considered severe. The response contains a substantial portion written
well, including the use of complex sentences and well-placed commas. This relatively lengthy
response receives a score point of 2.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 95
Grade 6
Conventions
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 9
Cursive Writing
Grade 6 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Appendix A provides the grade-level convention charts used during scoring.
The response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions. Four types of errors are
present in the response: spelling (electronis, usally), capitalization (missing a capital letter at the
beginning of one sentence), and one sentence formation error (fragment). None of the errors are
considered severe. No repetition or pattern of errors is found in this moderate-length response.
Considering the proportion of errors to the amount of writing done well, this response receives a
score point of 2.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 96
Grade 11 Argumentative Performance Task Full Writes
The following eleventh-grade argumentative rubrics and baseline set are used to anchor the scoring
of student responses written to argumentative tasks at grade 11. Each scoring sample is scored for
three traits: organization/purpose (4 points possible), evidence/elaboration (4 points possible), and
conventions (2 points possible).
Score
Organization/Purpose
Grade 11 ArgumentativeDescription
Organization/Purpose
4
The response has a clear and effective organizational structure, creating a sense of unity
and completeness. The organization is fully sustained between and within paragraphs. The
response is consistently and purposefully focused:
claim is introduced, clearly communicated, and the focus is strongly maintained for the
purpose and audience
consistent use of a variety of transitional strategies to clarify the relationships between
and among ideas
effective introduction and conclusion
logical progression of ideas from beginning to end; strong connections between and
among ideas with some syntactic variety
alternate and opposing argument(s) are clearly acknowledged or addressed*
3
The response has an evident organizational structure and a sense of completeness.
Though there may be minor flaws, they do not interfere with the overall coherence. The
organization is adequately sustained between and within paragraphs. The response is
generally focused:
claim is clear, and the focus is mostly maintained for the purpose and audience
adequate use of transitional strategies with some variety to clarify relationships
between and among ideas
adequate introduction and conclusion
adequate progression of ideas from beginning to end; adequate connections between
and among ideas
alternate and opposing argument(s) are adequately acknowledged or addressed*
2
The response has an inconsistent organizational structure. Some flaws are evident, and
some ideas may be loosely connected. The organization is somewhat sustained between
and within paragraphs. The response may have a minor drift in focus:
claim may be somewhat unclear, or the focus may be insufficiently sustained for the
purpose and/or audience
inconsistent use of transitional strategies and/or little variety
introduction or conclusion, if present, may be weak
uneven progression of ideas from beginning to end; and/or formulaic; inconsistent or
unclear connections among ideas
alternate and opposing argument(s) may be confusing or not acknowledged *
1
The response has little or no discernible organizational structure. The response may be
related to the claim but may provide little or no focus:
claim may be confusing or ambiguous; response may be too brief or the focus may drift
from the purpose and/or audience
few or no transitional strategies are evident
introduction and/or conclusion may be missing
frequent extraneous ideas may be evident; ideas may be randomly ordered or have
unclear progression
alternate and opposing argument(s) may not be acknowledged *
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 97
NS
Insufficient (includes copied text)
In a language other than English
Off-topic
Off-purpose
*Acknowledging and/or addressing the opposing point of view begins at grade 7.
Score
Evidence/Elaboration
Grade 11 ArgumentativeDescription
Evidence/Elaboration
4
The response provides thorough and convincing elaboration of the support/evidence for
the claim and argument(s) including reasoned, in-depth analysis and the effective use of
source material. The response clearly and effectively develops ideas, using precise
language:
comprehensive evidence (facts and details) from the source material is integrated,
relevant, and specific
clear citations or attribution to source material
effective use of a variety of elaborative techniques*
vocabulary is clearly appropriate for the audience and purpose
effective, appropriate style enhances content
3
The response provides adequate elaboration of the support/evidence for the claim and
argument(s) that includes reasoned analysis and the use of source material. The response
adequately develops ideas, employing a mix of precise with more general language:
adequate evidence (facts and details) from the source material is integrated and
relevant, yet may be general
adequate use of citations or attribution to source material
adequate use of some elaborative techniques*
vocabulary is generally appropriate for the audience and purpose
generally appropriate style is evident
2
The response provides uneven, cursory elaboration of the support/evidence for the claim
and argument(s) that includes some reasoned analysis and partial or uneven use of source
material. The response develops ideas unevenly, using simplistic language:
some evidence (facts and details) from the source material may be weakly integrated,
imprecise, repetitive, vague, and/or copied
weak use of citations or attribution to source material
weak or uneven use of elaborative techniques*; development may consist primarily of
source summary or may rely on emotional appeal
vocabulary use is uneven or somewhat ineffective for the audience and purpose
inconsistent or weak attempt to create appropriate style
1
The response provides minimal elaboration of the support/evidence for the claim and
argument(s) that includes little or no use of source material. The response is vague, lacks
clarity, or is confusing:
evidence (facts and details) from the source material is minimal, irrelevant, absent,
incorrectly used, or predominantly copied
insufficient use of citations or attribution to source material
minimal, if any, use of elaborative techniques*; emotional appeal may dominate
vocabulary is limited or ineffective for the audience and purpose
little or no evidence of appropriate style
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 98
NS
Insufficient (includes copied text)
In a language other than English
Off-topic
Off-purpose
*Elaborative techniques may include the use of personal experiences that support the argument(s).
Score
Conventions
Grade 11 Argumentative Description
Conventions
2
The response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions:
adequate use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar
usage, and spelling
1
The response demonstrates a partial command of conventions:
limited use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage,
and spelling
0
The response demonstrates little or no command of conventions:
infrequent use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar
usage, and spelling
NS
Insufficient (includes copied text)
In a language other than English
Off-topic
Off-purpose
Conventions are scored holistically per grade-level CCSS expectations considering the following
guidelines:
Variety: A range of errors includes sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage,
and spelling
Severity: Basic errors are more heavily weighted than higher-level errors.
Density: The proportion of errors to the amount of writing done well. This includes the ratio of
errors to the length of the piece.
Appendix A provides the grade-level convention charts used during scoring.
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 99
Grade 11
Argumentative - Organization and Purpose
Sample 1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 1
Archeological Controversies
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The response has little or no discernable organizational structure. The response is related to the
claim but provides little or no focus.
Claim is confusing (“I STRONGLY AGREE THE BRITISH MUSEUM TO ACT RESPONSIBLY AND
CONSIDERATELY BEARING IN MIND THE BENEFIT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND
HUMAN CIVILATION AS A WHOLE”), embedded within a brief response.
No transitional strategies are evident.
Introduction and conclusion are not apparent.
Ideas seem randomly ordered (e.g.,“…THE LEGAL ARUGUMENT FOR RETURNING THE ROSETTA
STONE TO EGYPT FRANCE RECENTLY RETURNED SOME EGYPTIAN PAINTING FRAGMENTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNESCO AGREEMENT. THE LEGAL POSSESSION OF THE STONE BY
ENGLAND IS BASED ON A COLONIAL DISPUTE BETWEEN ENGLAND AND FRANCE.). Alternate
and opposing arguments are not acknowledged except with the seemingly random phrase “ON
THE OTHER HAND.”
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 100
Grade 11
Argumentative - Organization and Purpose
Sample 1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 2
Public Art
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The response has little discernable organizational structure. The response is related to the claim
but provides little or no focus.
The claim is mildly confusing (“Public[ly funded] art is a great way to to get people from out of
town to come and visit”) and is somewhat off the topic of public vs. private funding for art.
Transitional strategies do little to guide the reader (e.g.,“…might want to move here. When
people move here…”) or build the argument.
The response lacks an introduction and conclusion.
Ideas seem randomly ordered (e.g.,“Public art is a great way to to get people from out of town
to come and visit. When people come to town they may realize just how cool this place is and
might want to move here. When people move here the they have to pay taxes…”). Some
concession to the opposition (e.g.,“Now for the people who say it‟s a bad idea because we are
spending to much money…”) makes the progression of the “argument” in paragraph two
marginally clearer than in paragraph one.
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 101
Grade 11
Argumentative - Organization and Purpose
Sample 1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 3
Cell Phones
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 102
The response has little discernable organizational structure. The response is related to the claim
but provides little or no focus.
Claim is ambiguous (i.e. the final paragraph states “Cellphones have their bads and goods, but
definitely more goods than bads”), although most of the essay presents information that more
or less favors cell phones.
. Few transitional strategies are attempted (e.g., “…but however…”; Cell phones have also
become…”; “…however nowadays…”; “As you can see…””); however, the transitions do not
serve to advance a reasoned argument.
Introduction is missing and conclusion is weak (e.g., As you can see, cell phones have
increased knowledge of a lot of users and its not a waste of time…”).
Frequent extraneous ideas are evident (e.g.,“You just cant live without you phone, living without
your phone is like living in a cave with no news. Texting has become the most famous way to
reach one of your friends.).
Opposing argument is acknowledged, but not effectively dealt with (e.g., I do admit however
that phones does cause students to sometimes have a bad grade on a class because of the
obsession of texting in class.).
Score: 1 +
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 103
Grade 11
Argumentative - Organization and Purpose
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 4
Apprenticeship
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 104
The response has an inconsistent organizational structure, and flaws are evident, and some ideas
may be loosely connected. The response is somewhat sustained; the response may have a minor
drift.
Claim is somewhat muddled (e.g., America has no reason to switch it‟s learning process to
that of what a different country does. The claim is later referred to as “learning program,”
learning environment,” “educational system,” “preffered way to be tought,” etc., and it’s never
really made clear what the writer is referring to (traditional college vs. 2-3 year work
internships).
Response shows inconsistent use of transitional strategies; some are simple, repetitive, one-
word transitions (e.g., but, so); others are more successful in creating connections between
paragraphs (i.e. “…in Germany maybe doing it their way with internships is better. But in
America, our uniform way is working just fine. Internships are a great thing in any learning
environment…”). Regardless, the transitions do little to build a strong argument.
Introduction is weak; conclusion is somewhat clearer but very brief (i.e.“There are clearly pros
and cons to each argument made but I believe that the learning program that is already in use
should be kept with and is doing just fine.).
The strategy for acknowledging the opposing argument is confusing (i.e. “Consider America and
Germany to be kids enrolled at a school. Every kid in that school will have a much different
preferred way to be tought the information. America likes to be tought in a very straight
forward way where as Germany likes a hands on educational system. Countries are the same
way. Because of the specialized industries in Germany maybe doing it their way with
internships is better. But in America, our uniform way is working just fine.”).
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 105
Grade 11
Argumentative - Organization and Purpose
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 5
Public Art
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 106
The response has an inconsistent organizational structure. Some flaws are evident, and some
ideas may be loosely connected. The response is somewhat sustained; the response may have a
minor drift.
Despite being somewhat confused about the difference between public and private art, there is
a clear claim about public funding for art: “Cities and government should not be paying money
to have public art pieces put up around towns….”
Some transitional strategies are present (e.g., “Moreover…”; There are also…”; Once again…”)
although they are more effective within paragraphs than between paragraphs.
Introduction is present. Conclusion simply repeats much of the introduction.
Progression of ideas is formulaic (e.g., “…it could raise taxes, the art could get ruined, and
some people could find the art offensive.; “…paying for cities to have public art pieces could
raise the money of taxes…”; “…the art pieces that are made could get ruined…”; …people
might find the public art to be rude or offensive.; Once again it might not be such a good
idea, as it could affend people, get damaged, or cost everyone else money.).
Opposing argument is barely acknowledged (e.g., Both public art and art found in a museam
are beautiful to look at.).
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 107
Grade 11
Argumentative - Organization and Purpose
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 6
Fracking
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 108
The response has an inconsistent organizational structure. Some flaws are evident and some ideas
may be loosely connected. The response is somewhat sustained and the response may have a
minor drift.
Claim is clear: We should oppose the plan for drilling for natural gas by fracking.”
Little variety in transitional strategies (e.g.,“Some might say…”; “Some could say…”; It is
said…”).
Introduction and conclusion are present but weak. The conclusion, although formulaic, is
stronger than the introduction.
The essay is organized by counterclaims, which are then rebutted in each paragraph. The
counterclaims are presented in no apparent order and with no apparent connection between
the counterclaims.
Score: 2 +
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 109
Grade 11
Argumentative - Organization and Purpose
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 7
Fracking
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 110
The response has an evident organizational structure and a sense of completeness. Though there
may be minor flaws, they do not interfere with overall coherence. The organization is adequately
sustained between and within paragraphs, and the response is generally focused.
The claim is clear: “…I understand that a great amount of job and economical opportunities are
going to come out of hydraulic fracturing, but we must put the environment before ourselves
this time around”).
The response shows good use of transitional strategies throughout (e.g.,“The same is true…”;
“Fracking also…”; Although it has been said…”; “As great of an idea as this is…”).
Introduction and conclusion are adequate. Although the introduction could be stronger (the
context for the argument is not clear: what does electricity running our lives have to do with
fracking?), the conclusion is more robust, in part because it goes beyond repeating the
introduction.
Despite a lack of physical indentations where ideas change and physical “paragraphing” might
be, there is an adequate and discernable progression of ideas from beginning to end with
adequate connections between ideas: For each aspect of the fracking process, the response
describes corresponding problems.
Opposing arguments are adequately addressed (e.g.,“Although it has been said that fracking is
going to help our economy it is truly just going to worsen it. A main cause of this would be the
fact that if we allow fracking the pollution will affect our agricultural growth. We cannot farm
on soiled land with polluted water...).
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 111
Grade 11
Argumentative - Organization and Purpose
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 8
Public Art
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 112
The response has an evident organizational structure and a sense of completeness. Though there
may be minor flaws, they do not interfere with overall coherence. The organization is adequately
sustained between and within paragraphs, and the response is generally focused.
Claim is clear (“Public art is a misuse of the government‟s money”), and the focus is mostly
maintained for the purpose and audience (the writer’s attempt to comment on high-stakes
tests does not interfere with coherence, although it is somewhat inappropriate for the
audience).
Adequate use of transitional strategies, both within and between paragraphs, with some variety
(e.g.,“This is because…”; “Other reasons…”; “Government funded art is not just…, but ….”).
Introduction and conclusion are adequate; both are formulaic, but the conclusion is particularly
repetitive and is not an effective argumentative closing.
Adequate progression of ideas from beginning to end; adequate connections between and
among ideas.
Opposing arguments are adequately acknowledged (e.g., The art may look great to some
people but as a government you need to look at how these PUBLIC decisions affect everyone;
Things such as health care and infrastructure affect everyone just as public art does. The
difference is that the first two help people while the last amuses people at best.).
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 113
Grade 11
Argumentative - Organization and Purpose
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 9
Fracking
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 114
The response has an evident organizational structure and a sense of completeness. Though there
may be minor flaws, they do not interfere with overall coherence. The organization is adequately
sustained between and within paragraphs, and the response is generally focused.
The claim is clear (e.g.,“…we have chosen to oppose the plan for hydraulic fracking.).
The response shows adequate use of transitional strategies between paragraphs (The most
glaring problem…”; “Another problem…”; “Finally…”) and within paragraphs (if…then…”; “And
when; so; For instance).
Introduction is rather weak (the attempt to frame the argument is somewhat mechanical), but
the conclusion is adequate in its attempt to get to the importance of the issue.
There is adequate progression of ideas from beginning to end: Paragraphs two and three both
deal anecdotally with environmental (mostly water) issues; paragraph four deals with energy
dependence. There are adequate connections between and among ideas
Opposing arguments are adequately addressed (e.g.,The energy company swears it will keep
its wells clean, but that hasn‟t been the case...; “Energy companies say the chemicals can‟t
escape the pipes, yet it has been found that the pipes aren‟t 100% crack-free.).
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 115
Grade 11
Argumentative - Organization and Purpose
Sample4-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 10
Fracking
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 116
The response has a clear and effective organizational structure, creating a sense of unity and
completeness. The response is fully sustained between and within paragraphs, and the response
is consistently and purposefully focused.
Claim is introduced and clearly communicated: “…the answer is to frack as it is both
economically beneficial and environmentally friendly.” Tight focus is strongly maintained for the
purpose, audience, and task.
Consistent use of subtle transitional strategies to clarify the relationships between and among
ideas
Introduction and conclusion are brief but effective, with the conclusion going beyond what’s
been stated in the introduction.
There is logical progression of ideas from beginning to end. The argument builds to its
strongest point: the benefits of natural gas and the obliteration of the energy crisis, which is
then emphasized in the conclusion. There are strong connections between and among ideas
with some syntactic variety (If America were to take full advantage of the natural gas potential
then there would not be an energy crisis. How can anyone deny the potential of clean energy in
the form of natural gas?)
Opposing views are clearly acknowledged and addressed (i.e. problem-solution).
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
4
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 117
Grade 11
Argumentative Evidence and Elaboration
Sample 1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 1
Cell Phones
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The response provides minimal support/evidence for the argument and claim that includes little or
no use of source material. The response’s expression of ideas is vague, lacks clarity, or is
confusing:
Evidence from the source material is relevant but minimal, general, and not well integrated.
For example, there is a reference to cell phones along with computers and tablets, with the
explanation that the “majority use cell phones because they are wireless and have the “ability
to communitate and browse” which computers and tablets also have. There is however, an
attempt to use general details to address the opposing point of view (“…cell phone should be
banned is when students have test, exams,…”)
No use of citations or attribution to source material.
Elaborative techniques consist mostly of general repetition such as “In high school we so a lot
of research. We do research for Colleges, Universities, jobs and careers…). Vocabulary is
limited and ineffective for audience and purpose (e.g.,“…they‟ll have to use it for many
research projects. In high school we do a lot of research. We do research for…).
The vocabulary is limited but appropriate for the audience and purpose.
The style is appropriate although not especially convincing.
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference or attribute
their sources by name or number as do the Field Test and as will all future administrations of
Smarter Balanced full write task instructions.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 118
Grade 11
ArgumentativeEvidence and Elaboration
Sample 1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 2
Archeological Controversies
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 119
The response provides minimal support/evidence for the argument and claim, which is never
clearly stated and includes little use of source material. The expression of ideas is vague, and lacks
clarity.
Evidence from the source material is sometimes inaccurate (i.e. “The Rosetta Stone was once
taken from Egypt by a French invader…”) and often consists primarily of source summary.
There are attempted citations and attribution to source materials (e.g.,“A letter written by a
Concerned Citizen sent to The British Museum…”; While an interview with Professor Mann, a
renowned scholar of ancient Egypt, who explains his views of why England should be able to
keep the Rosetta Stone. The professor says…”).
Some elaborative techniques include minimal explanations, mostly copied or closely
paraphrased (e.g.,“…the chance of more tourists seeing the historical artifact is greater by
being in the United Kingdom already since the United Kingdom already had over 28 million
tourist visit in 2012.).
Vocabulary is often wording taken directly from the source material, often causing confusion
(i.e. The Rosetta Stone “would be much safer being in England because of Egypt's protest riots
when several artifacts were destroyed.” Was the destruction a cause or an effect of the riots?)
The response reflects an attempt at an objective, convincing style (e.g., with an unpunctuated
rhetorical question and such phrases as “many say and “the writer speaks of…,”) but the lack
of clarity diminishes the effectiveness of this attempt.
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 120
Grade 11
ArgumentativeEvidence and Elaboration
Sample 1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 3
Fracking
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 121
The response provides minimal support/evidence for the argument and claim that includes
minimal use of source material. The expression of ideas is vague, and lacks clarity.
Evidence from the source material is minimal (e.g., it is environmentally destructive” and it is a
good source of gas and money).
No use of citations or attribution to the source material are evidenced.
Minimal use of elaborative techniques include definitions copied from the source (i.e.,
Hydraulic fracking is the process by which hundreds of gallons of…”) and predicting general
good and bad effects (e.g., “contaminate … with cancer-causing…” and “…put a lot of money
into flow…”). A vague compromise solution (“I propose that we frack, but only at a minimun.”)
is offered and somewhat elaborated (e.g., “check the water supply for chemicals … and if there
is a trace of the chemicals we shoul shut it down immediatly and clean the water”).
Vocabulary is limited and does not serve the argumentative purpose (e.g., It is good because it
provides a lot of natural gas to the people who need it and will put a lot of money into flow
around the country. But I still do not think it is a good process to mass produce.”).
Although not inappropriate, the style is not convincing
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 122
Grade 11
ArgumentativeEvidence and Elaboration
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 4
Public Art
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 123
The response provides uneven, cursory support/evidence for the argument and claim that includes
some reasoned analysis and partial or uneven use of source material. The response expresses
ideas unevenly, using simplistic language.
Some evidence from the source material is weakly integrated. For example, in paragraph 2 the
quoted material (“It is said that the greatest arts „represents an individual point of view…’”)
lacks context. Other evidence is repetitive (i.e. paragraph 3 is primarily a repeat of paragraph
2).
Some source materials are quoted, but not attributed or cited; other references are missing.
Weak use of elaborative techniques. For example, elaborative explanations are often too vague
to be helpful (e.g., “...involvement of the government in public arts have caused the removal of
great arts…”). In another example, Statistics have also shown that art can survive and flourish
without the need of government's funds is followed by examples of 16
th
century artists, rather
than a reasoned rebuttal of the opposing point of view.
Vocabulary use is uneven (e.g.,“Public Art should be funded volunteerly…”; The government
funds are not needed to help proceed with the inspiration of public arts; “…artists are able to
inquire the freedom to create art).
Weak attempt to create a convincing argumentative style. Despite the attempt to contextualize
the issue (“Throughout the years, public art has caused inspiration and patriotism”) and
present a reasoned argument, the repetition and awkward integration of information keep the
writing from being convincing.
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 124
Grade 11
ArgumentativeEvidence and Elaboration
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 5
Cell Phones
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 125
The response provides uneven support/evidence for the argument and claim that includes some
reasoned analysis and partial or uneven use of source material. The response expresses ideas
unevenly, using simplistic language.
Some evidence from the source is weakly integrated (For example, using data such as 95% of
people between the ages of 18 and 29 use their phone…” as support for high school teens
(most of whom are not 18) using cell phones in school would require more explanation). Other
evidence is general and repetitive. There is no attempt to deal with the opposing point of view
Weak use of citations but does attribute some information to the source material (e.g.,“…the
Bring Your Own Technology idea proposed in source three.; According to high school teacher
Jamie Williams…”).
Some evidence is somewhat elaborated (i.e. Most teenagers use their phones daily.
[therefore] They are familiar with the technology.[therefore] Instead of taking the time to teach
students how to use programs on the computer, let them use cell phones instead”). Other
evidence lacks the elaboration that would validate the support (i.e. The convenience of having
[the cell phone] allows them to be more creative.” How? Why?).
Vocabulary is uneven: there is some awkwardness (“Teachers would have a much more easier
time with…”) and some repetition (“convenient”).
The style is generally sincere (the reasonable use of rhetorical questions, framed as “if….then
and finishing with “since….we should definitely …” contribute to a convincing tone).
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 126
Grade 11
ArgumentativeEvidence and Elaboration
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 6
Archeological Controversies
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 127
The response provides uneven support/evidence for the argument and claim that includes some
reasoned analysis and partial or uneven use of source material. The response expresses ideas
unevenly, using simplistic language.
The response uses evidence from the source material that focuses only on artifact safety (i.e.
If the Rosetta Stone was to be sent back, what were to happen if there was another riot?”).
Therefore, the use of source material is limited to that narrow focus.
No use of citations or attribution to the source material are evidenced.
Some evidence is elaborated by implying an extreme potential outcome: “Rioters, anarchists,
and all of the other misfits aim to make change, and what better change is to attack the main
person, idea, and in this case, exhibit?” In paragraph 3, there is an attempt to deepen the
argument by elaborating the point (protecting artifacts) through analogy (The Declaration of
Independence).
Vocabulary use is somewhat inappropriate for a formal argument in places. (“Now I don‟t want
to be stereotypical,” “misfits,” “If the United States were a riot country…”).
Despite some lapses in formality, there is a moderate sense of audience awareness (personal
appeal of Declaration of Independence, rhetorical questions, recognition of opposing point of
view) that make this essay somewhat convincing.
Score: 2+
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 128
Grade 11
ArgumentativeEvidence and Elaboration
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 7
Fracking
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 129
The response provides adequate support/evidence for the argument and claim that includes
reasoned analysis and the use of source material. The response adequately expresses ideas,
employing a mix of precise with more general language.
The response integrates many pieces of evidence from the sources, some of which is well-
integrated (e.g.,“Although it has been said that fracking is going to help our economy it is truly
just going to worsen it. A main cause of this would be the fact that if we allow fracking the
pollution will affect our agricultural growth. We cannot farm on soiled land with polluted water,
which will lead to a decline in our economic gains by agriculture.); some of which is not
(“Fracking also continues our downward drop into global warming because it contributes to
climate change.”)The introduction does acknowledge the opposing point of view.
There is no use of citations or attribution to source material.
Adequate use of some elaborative techniques. For example, some evidence is elaborated
through cause and effect (i.e. “…if we allow fracking the pollution will affect our agricultural
growth. We cannot farm on soiled land with polluted water, which will lead to a decline in our
economic gains by agriculture”). An attempt is made to elaborate by analogy; however, to be
more effective, more explanation would be needed (e.g.,“Millions of gallons of a mixture of
water, sand, and various chemicals are being pushed into the earth in order to keep the
fissures open. That is like putting a drug into our veins in order to keep our energy up.).
Vocabulary is generally appropriate for the audience and purpose. Occasional imprecise usage
(“decline in our economic gains” and “humanistic selfish ways”) does not detract from the
overall achievement of the argumentative purpose.
Generally appropriate style is evident. Response uses personal appeal to our humanity (“Now I
understand … but…,” “the economy is important but quite frankly it is not as important as our
environment,” don‟t want our community becoming “toxic wastelands…”) to achieve a
convincing, if not compelling, argument.
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 130
Grade 11
ArgumentativeEvidence and Elaboration
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 8
Cell Phones
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 131
The response provides adequate support/evidence for the argument and claim that includes
reasoned analysis and the use of source material. The response adequately expresses ideas,
employing a mix of precise with more general language.
Adequate evidence from the source material is integrated and relevant For example, the writer
pulls a specific piece of evidence from the source (“According to source one, 64% of
people…”), qualifies the use of that data (although most people in high school are not 18…, it
can be deduced…”) and validates it as support for the claim.
Adequate use of citations and attribution to source material (e.g., According to source one…; In
source two…).
Adequate use of some varied elaborative techniques. For example, rhetorical questions,
although a bit overused, do serve to elaborate some examples such as “If a kid wants to use
his cell phone for beneficial purposes, then why punish him for the kids who‟s texting?” The
writer also uses anecdotal evidence (i.e. Williams) and attempts to elaborate by predicting how
much more productive school would be if others would follow this example.
Vocabulary is generally appropriate for the audience and purpose (e.g., “integral part,”
personal responsibility,” “productive purposes,” “hover over you”) although there are some
lapses such as “kids
The style is generally appropriate and sincere; the conclusion in particular is well crafted to
appeal to the audiences’ sense of reason (i.e. “Administration needs to stop fearing [and] start
promoting….”).
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 132
Grade 11
ArgumentativeEvidence and Elaboration
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 9
Cell Phones
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 133
The response provides adequate support/evidence for the argument and claim that includes
reasoned analysis and the use of source material. The response adequately expresses ideas,
employing a mix of precise with more general language.
Evidence selected from the source material is more general than specific data, but it is
adequately integrated and relevant. (e.g.,“Schools spend a vast amount of money on pencils,
papers, text books, and many other more supplies. With the use of cell phones, online text
books can be used and instead of using so many pieces of paper, students could type their
assignments and send them via internet.).
Adequate (though simplistic) use of citations and attribution to source material (e.g.,“There are
also various assignments in which cell phones can be utilized (Source #2); “…students could
type their assignments and send them via internet (Source #3).).
Adequate use of some elaborative techniques. For example, the response provides examples
and explanations for supporting evidence. (i.e. “The debate over whether or not the usage of
cell phones in the classroom should be allowed had been on-going. Some disagree with the
proposal because they believe that students will get distracted or cheat on tests or
assignments. However, the use of cell phones will be mediated and rules will be implemented
to keep order. Some would include: making the students turn off their calling and text
messaging services, making the students connect to the school‟s wifi which would block
inappropriate websites, and not allowing the use of phones during tests which would be taken
on paper.”).
Vocabulary is generally appropriate for the audience and purpose (e.g.,“usage of these cellular
devices would be very beneficial,” “the use of cell phones will be mediated and rules will be
implemented”).
Generally appropriate style is evident and contributes to an overall convincing piece (i.e. It is
unnecessary to argue any longer over this topic…” "Some provide arguments against cell
phones in classrooms, but their problems have easy solutions.”).
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 134
Grade 11
ArgumentativeEvidence and Elaboration
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 10
Fracking
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 135
The response provides adequate support/evidence for the argument and claim that includes
mostly reasoned analysis and the use of source material. The response adequately expresses
ideas, employing a mix of precise with more general language.
Most of the evidence consists of source-based examples such as “grimy, gritty gasoline” water
from Pennsylvania, and examples of potential problems such as toxic chemicals” that “can‟t
escape their pipes” that admittedly aren‟t 100% crack-free.” Although the evidence could be
stronger, it is relevant and well integrated.
There are no citations or attribution to source material.
There are some elaborative techniques such as positing causality (i.e. and when residents
have too much pollution in their plumbing, the city condemns their houses and they must move
out. It's already difficult to sell a house in these economic times, and it's even more so if the
house is condemned.”). The writer also elaborates by acknowledging the opposing point of view
(decreased energy dependence and cost savings of fracking) and then rebutting through
questioning the worth” of the environment and humanity.
Vocabulary use such as “glaring problem” and “massacre of the environment” suggest a strong
position without going too far beyond the limits of reasoned argument.
Generally appropriate style is evident throughout, although the conclusion is particularly effective in
appealing to the audience by bringing a global perspective to the argument, making a call to action,
and maintaining the personalization used in the introduction (“we” and “let‟s”).
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 136
Grade 11
ArgumentativeEvidence and Elaboration
Sample3-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 11
Apprenticeship
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 137
The response provides adequate support/evidence for the argument and claim that includes
reasoned analysis and the use of source material. The response adequately expresses ideas,
employing a mix of precise with more general language.
Adequate evidence from the source materials is mostly integrated and relevant (i.e. paragraph
two is especially strong in using source material to build the argument rather than merely
accumulating “evidence” from the source). The rebuttal to the opposing points of view are also
skillfully embedded (“unlike in a four-year college,” “much faster than the education at a
college). On the other hand, paragraph three is less successful in integrating evidence from
the sources. In addition, there was much more concrete information that could have been
selected from the sources but wasn’t
Quoted sources are cited; other sources are not attributed/cited.
Adequate use of some elaborative techniques: The entire essay develops the argument through
comparison between Germany and the United States secondary training programs, elaborating
on the benefits of the German model. As mentioned, paragraph two builds the argument
especially well by defining and explaining all the outcomes (e.g., the program gives “…hands-on
training on their actual profession, unlike in a four year college that may or may not provide
this experience. Also, this hands on training is much faster than the education at a college,
most of which will actually help later in life; This can cut the learning time in half, providing a
much more efficient system of learning. This concept also guarantees a job ready for every
graduate...”).
Vocabulary is generally appropriate for the audience and contributes to the effectiveness of the
argumentative purpose (“prevalent idea,” “efficient means of improving the overall life,” “good
overall perspective”)
The style is not overly formal or didactic, but the sincerity of the response comes through (e.g.,
Unlike just emphasizing attending a four-year college or university, the German-style
apprenticeship in the United States will actually make a difference in the lives of students,”
and, in the conclusion, “…this is the very reason that”)
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
3
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 138
Grade 11
ArgumentativeEvidence and Elaboration
Sample4-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 12
Archeological Controversies
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 139
The response provides thorough and convincing support/evidence for the argument(s) and claim
that includes reasoned analysis and the effective use of source material (evidence such as facts
and details). The response clearly and effectively expresses ideas, using precise language.
Comprehensive evidence from the source material is integrated, relevant, and specific. For
example, the writer takes evidence from the source (“Great Britain attracts twice as many
tourists as Egypt does”), interprets it (“that‟s 14 million people,” “…housing the Rosetta Stone
and other…”), and then stresses the consequences of that evidence (greater accessibility),
making clear the warrant or supporting principle (such treasures should be shared by all
people).
There are clear citations or attributions to source materials (e.g., “…according to source #3…”;
“As stated in source #1…”; “Also as Professor Mann asserts in the interview feature in Source
# 3…).
Effective use of a variety of elaborative techniques (e.g., The writer uses elaborative
techniques, such as specific examples and expert opinions to address the opposing point of
view by acknowledging and then rebutting that position (e.g., Some individuals insist
onancient artifacts)).
Vocabulary is clearly appropriate for the audience and purpose, contributing to the credibility of
the writer (e.g., “…the security and impeccable preservation that these museums can offer
their artifacts makes them the ideal locations.”; “…protesters in the 2011 Cairo revolution
demolished several priceless mummies in the Egyptian museum.).
Effective, appropriate style enhances content. For example, the writer sets the context for the
argument by personalizing the subject with his style: “I enjoy…Whether I am examining a
mummy or admiring…I always cherish any opportunity I have…at a museum.” This style draws
the reader in, setting up the thesis: “However, these chances to savor…are slowly dwindling.”).
NOTE: The Pilot Test full-write task instructions did not direct students to reference their sources
by name or number as do the Field Test task instructions.
SCORE POINT
4
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 140
Grade 11
Conventions
Sample0-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 1
Cell Phones
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The response demonstrates little command of conventions. A variety of errors in sentence
formation (i.e. run together sentence), punctuation (i.e. missing comma and apostrophe), spelling
(e.g.,highschools, scheduale, futrther, efficantly, destracted, htey, tought, techonolgy, thius),
capitalization (i.e. at the beginning of sentences and the pronoun “I”), and grammar usage
(e.g.,their for there, then for than, cell phone for cell phones) are present in the response. There
are errors in basic skills (i.e.capitalization, spelling). There is a high proportion of errors in
comparison to the amount of writing done correctly.
SCORE POINT
0
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 141
Grade 11
Conventions
Sample0-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 2
Apprenticeship
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The response demonstrates little command of conventions. A variety of errors in punctuation (i.e.
missing periods at the end of sentences, missing apostrophe), capitalization (e.g., the pronoun “I”,
at the beginning of sentences, and the proper noun “German”), and spelling (e.g.,feild for field,
then for them, wat for what) are present in the response. There are errors in basic skills (i.e.
missing periods, capitalization of proper nouns). There is a high proportion of errors in comparison
to the amount of writing done correctly.
SCORE POINT
0
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 142
Grade 11
Conventions
Sample0-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 3
Kenya Technology
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 143
The response demonstrates little command of conventions. A variety of errors in sentence
formation (i.e. fragment in fourth paragraph.), punctuation (i.e. missing commas, missing
apostrophe), basic capitalization (i.e. at the beginning of sentences), grammar usage (e.g.,is for
has, their for they’re, love ones for loved ones, them self for themselves), and spelling
(e.g.,cellphone for cell phone, essayer for easier, habitents for inhabitants, diesisesfor diseases,
reproved for improved) are present in the response. There are errors in basic skills (i.e.
capitalization, grammar usage). There is a high proportion of errors in comparison to the amount of
writing done correctly.
SCORE POINT
0
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 144
Grade 11
Conventions
Sample1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 4
Archeological Controversies
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The response demonstrates a partial command of conventions. A variety of errors in sentence
formation (i.e. run-together sentences in paragraph 1 and 3), punctuation (i.e. missing quotation
marks, comma errors, missing period), and grammar usage (i.e. subject-verb agreement) are
present in the response. There are some errors in basic skills. There is a moderate amount of
writing done correctly in proportion to errors.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 145
Grade 11
Conventions
Sample1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 5
Kenya Technology
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 146
The response demonstrates a partial command of conventions. A variety of errors in punctuation
(e.g.,peoples for people’s), capitalization (e.g.,there for There, Peoples for peoples), grammar usage
(e.g.,cell phones has for cell phones have, there is for there are, cure it for cure them, had for
have), a lack parallelism in grammar usage, and spelling (e.g.,heath for health, possible for
possibly, of for on, then for than) are present in the response. There are some errors in basic
grammar (i.e. subject-verb agreement) and basic capitalization (i.e. at the beginning of a sentence).
There is a moderate amount of writing done correctly in proportion to errors.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 147
Grade 11
Conventions
Sample1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 6
Kenya Technology
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 148
The response demonstrates a partial command of conventions. Errors are primarily in spelling
(subsciptions for subscriptions, poeple for people, practives for practices, imporving for improving,
becomign for becoming, buisness for business, opperate for operate, finincial for financial,
effciencyfor efficiency, advecement for advancement). Note that a misspelled word is considered
one error regardless of how many times it is used. There is a moderate amount of writing done
correctly in proportion to errors.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 149
Grade 11
Conventions
Sample1-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 7
Kenya Technology
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
The response demonstrates a partial command of conventions. There are few errors present
(everyday for every day), but the response is too brief to demonstrate full command of conventions.
SCORE POINT
1
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 150
Grade 11
Conventions
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 8
Apprenticeship
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 151
The response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions. Some errors in sentence
formation (i.e. fragments in paragraph 3) and grammar usage (where for when, its for it’s) are
present in the response. A missing word (e.g. …led Germany to the country…), and transposition of
words (e.g. Compared the to US…) are also of note. There are relatively few errors in proportion to
the amount of writing done correctly.
SCORE POINT
2
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 152
Grade 11
Conventions
Sample2-Point
Baseline Anchor Response 9
Public Art
Grade 11 ELA Full-Write Response from 2013 Smarter Balanced Pilot Test
Response
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 153
Appendix A provides the grade-level convention charts used during scoring.
The response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions. There are errors in
capitalization (“when…” for “When…”), punctuation (cities for cities’), grammar usage (e.g. …there
has been examples for …there have been examples…), and spelling (e.g., Haratio for Horatio,
intrest for interest) present in the response. These are relatively few in proportion to the amount of
writing done correctly.
SCORE POINT
2
APPENDIX A: Convention Charts
CONVENTIONS
Students are expected to demonstrate grade-level skills in conventions as specified in the CCSS as well as
those specified for earlier grades.
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 155
Conventions
* Students are expected to demonstrate grade-level skills in conventions as specified in the CCSS as well as those
specified for earlier grades.
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 156
* Students are expected to demonstrate grade-level skills in conventions as specified in the CCSS as well as those specified for
earlier grades.
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 157
CONVENTIONS
* Students are expected to demonstrate grade-level skills in conventions as specified in the CCSS as well as those
specified for earlier grades.
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 158
* Students are expected to demonstrate grade-level skills in conventions as specified in the CCSS as well as those specified for
earlier grades.
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 159
* Students are expected to demonstrate grade-level skills in conventions as specified in the CCSS as well as those specified for
earlier grades.
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 160
* Students are expected to demonstrate grade-level skills in conventions as specified in the CCSS as well as those specified for
earlier grades.
Smarter Balanced English/Language Arts Scoring Guide 161
* Students are expected to demonstrate grade-level skills in conventions as specified in the CCSS as well as those
specified for earlier grades.