8
Journal of International Women’s Studies Vol. 22, No. 12 November 2021
under the hashtag #NiUnaMenos, but the main goal of all of these protests was to fight against
misogynist violence. Moreover, unlike previous social movements, the use of social media, such
as Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Twitter, changed the depth and scope of these protests
and led to an unprecedented speed in helping transmit their messages, strategies, identities, and
goals.
The COVID-19 pandemic that spread pervasively throughout Latin America had two
contrasting effects on the #NiUnaMenos movement. On the one hand, when the pandemic began
spreading around the world, it became clear that measures intended to contain it were exacerbating
gender-based violence (also known as the “second pandemic”); thus, the demands of social
movements like #NiUnaMenos added new urgency to this pervasive problem. On the other hand,
COVID-19 created new challenges for activists and their demonstrations, a core strategy of their
campaigns, which were no longer safe and in many cases, banned or limited by governmental
policy. Hence, some women’s groups became more creative by organizing virtual #NiUnaMenos
protests in an attempt to hold leaders accountable for their inaction, but with mixed effects (San
Diego Tribune, 2020; Telam, 2020).
This paper attempts to shed light on the pervasive violence against women and girls
(VAWG) in Latin America, and explores the significant role of social media in raising awareness
of this regional deep-seated crisis. Overall, the #NiUnaMenos movement was the spark that ignited
the flame; a single hashtag spread with force with the help of both social media outlets and the
mobilization of women that stood behind it. It still rests to see whether a post-COVID-19 Latin
America will intensify the urgency to adopt policies that deal with violence against women and
girls in the region and whether protest movements will continue pressuring governments to
implement them effectively.
Literature Review and Methodology
In broad terms, diffusion refers to the process by which institutions, practices, behaviors,
or norms are transmitted among individuals and/or social systems. The process “involves a set of
assumptions about the nature of systems, how they interact, and how the environmental context
will affect the units studied” (Most et al., 1989; Gurowitz, 2007). According to McAdam, Tarrow,
and Tilly (2001, p.68) diffusion is the ‘‘transfer in the same or similar shape of forms and claims
of contention across space or across sectors and ideological divides.’’ Indeed, the nature, forms,
and consequences of the diffusion of policy are complex subjects because they can be studied at
several levels of analysis and may refer to distinctive processes (Piatti-Crocker, 2017, 2019).
Diffusion models have been employed to interpret the spread of wars, democratic regimes, free
markets, and gender mainstreaming (Piatti-Crocker, 2011, 2017, 2019; True and Mintrom, 2001).
Certainly, some similarity must be present, but in many cases, diffusion includes a process of
adaptation that reflects the receiving group’s cultural or institutional circumstances. Most et al.
(1989, p. 938) assert that diffusion models may be conceived in a general framework, “where there
are linkages between some state’s policy and other previously occurring factors, which are external
to the state.” In addition, frequent interactions between domestic and international forces have
broadened the policy process to a larger array of groups, including those traditionally considered
less powerful, such as those concerned with the advancement of gender issues (True and Mintrom,
2001, p. 38).
Research on social movements has long recognized that ideas, organizational, cultural, and
tactical strategies and repertoires can spread transnationally among a diverse number of social
Journal of International Women's Studies, Vol. 22, Iss. 12 [2021], Art. 2