2
have changed from 9 to 1 in our favor to 8 to 5 against us. This indicates the swiftness of the tempo
of communist victories and American defeats in the Cold War. As one of our outstanding historical
figures once said, "When a great democracy is destroyed, it will not be because of enemies from
without but rather because of enemies from within." The truth of this statement is becoming
terrifyingly clear as we see this country each day losing on every front.
At war's end we were physically the strongest nation on Earth and, at least potentially, the most
powerful intellectually and morally. Ours could have been the honor of being a beacon in the desert
of destruction, a shining, living proof that civilization was not yet ready to destroy itself.
Unfortunately, we have failed miserably and tragically to arise to the opportunity.
The reason why we find ourselves in a position of impotency is not because our only powerful,
potential enemy has sent men to invade our shores, but rather because of the traitorous actions of
those who have been treated so well by this nation. It has not been the less fortunate or members of
minority groups who have been selling this nation out, but rather those who have had all the
benefits that the wealthiest nation on earth has had to offer -- the finest homes, the finest college
education, and the finest jobs in government we can give.
This is glaringly true in the State Department. There the bright young men who are born with silver
spoons in their mouths are the ones who have been worst.
Now I know it is very easy for anyone to condemn a particular bureau or department in general
terms. Therefore, I would like to cite one rather unusual case -- the case of a man who has done
much to shape our foreign policy.
When Chiang Kai-shek was fighting our war, the State Department had in China a young man
named John S. Service. His task, obviously, was not to work for the communization of China.
Strangely, however, he sent official reports back to the State Department urging that we torpedo
our ally Chiang Kai-shek and stating, in effect, that communism was the best hope of China.
Later, this man -- John Service -- was picked up by the Federal Bureau of Investigation for turning
over to the communists secret State Department information. Strangely, however, he was never
prosecuted. However, Joseph Grew, the undersecretary of state, who insisted on his prosecution,
was forced to resign. Two days after, Grew's successor, Dean Acheson, took over as undersecretary
of state, this man -- John Service -- who had been picked up by the FBI and who had previously
urged that communism was the best hope of China, was not only reinstated in the State Department
but promoted; and finally, under Acheson, placed in charge of all placements and promotions.
Today, ladies and gentlemen, this man Service is on his way to represent the State Department and
Acheson in Calcutta -- by far and away the most important listening post in the Far East.
Now, let's see what happens when individuals with communist connections are forced out of the
State Department. Gustave Duran, who was labeled as, I quote, "a notorious international
communist," was made assistant secretary of state in charge of Latin American affairs. He was taken
into the State Department from his job as a lieutenant colonel in the Communist International
Brigade. Finally, after intense congressional pressure and criticism, he resigned in 1946 from the
State Department -- and, ladies and gentlemen, where do you think he is now? He took over a high-