Arizona Senate Research Staff, 1700 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85007
PHOTO TRAFFIC
ENFORCEMENT
INTRODUCTION
Photo enforcement systems, commonly referred to as photo
radar, utilize digital cameras, computers and radar sensors to detect
violations of speed limit and red light laws.
There are two types of photo radar systems: fixed and mobile. A
fixed photo radar system is the most common form of photo radar and
can be installed on the side of a road or mounted overhead in gantries.
A mobile photo radar system is mounted on a mobile device that
usually takes one of two basic forms: 1) a photo radar camera or
sensor that can be moved from one fixed location to the next; or 2) a
photo radar camera or sensor that is mounted in a van or tethered to a
vehicle.
Photo radar typically utilizes two cameras to identify the vehicle
and driver involved in speeding or red light violations. One camera
produces an image of the oncoming drivers face while the other
camera is used to identify the vehicles rear license plate.
The Phoenix metropolitan area was an early adopter of photo
radar systems. In 2005, the City of Scottsdale implemented a year-
long demonstration program to evaluate the efficacy of photo radar
detection systems on a 7.8-mile long portion of the Loop 101 within
the Scottsdale city limits. This program was the first of its kind
throughout the United States. Numerous cities in Arizona utilize the
technology, including Scottsdale, Chandler, Mesa, Paradise Valley,
Tempe, Prescott and Tucson.
1
ARIZONA USAGE OF PHOTO ENFORCEMENT
Arizona law allows the use of photo radar for violations of either
speed or traffic signs, signals or markings. The use of photo radar on
state highways was prohibited by Laws 2016, Chapter 55.
Under most contracts in Arizona, when traffic violations are
detected using photo radar, the photo radar vendor receives evidence
Note to Reader:
The Senate Research Staff
provides nonpartisan, objective
legislative research, policy
analysis and related assistance
to the members of the Arizona
State Senate. The Issue Briefs
series is intended to introduce a
reader to various legislatively
related issues and provide
useful resources to assist the
reader in learning more on a
given topic. Because of
frequent legislative and
executive activity, topics may
undergo frequent changes.
Nothing in the Brief should be
used to draw conclusions on
the legality of an issue.
Arizona State Senate
Issue Brief
November 10, 2022
1
ADOT: Final Report 596
Arizona Senate Research Staff, 1700 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85007
of the violation. Pursuant to Laws 2018, Chapter
123, the evidence of a violation must be reviewed
by a law enforcement agency before a citation is
issued. Upon validation, a traffic citation is filed
against the registered owner of the vehicle in the
appropriate municipal court having jurisdiction
over the violation. After the citation is filed,
notice is sent by mail to the vehicles registered
owner. If the owner does not respond, a process
server may be sent to serve the complaint to the
owner in person or may leave copies at the
owners home with another resident of suitable
age and discretion. If the person in the
photograph is not the registered owner of the
vehicle, municipalities may allow the owner to
identify the driver and transfer responsibility for
the traffic citation; however, the person does not
have to identify who is in the photo.
2
Local municipalities using photo radar
systems must display signs indicating to drivers
on the road that a photo radar system is present
and operational. Photo radar systems may not be
placed within 600 feet of a posted speed limit
change, except in school crossing zones, and
speed limit signs must be placed in specified
locations within the photo radar zone.
3
A person who receives a notice of violation
(notice) in the mail for speeding or running a red
light that is obtained using photo radar does not
have to respond to the notice or identify who is in
the photo. The notice must state that the notice is
not a court-issued document and the recipient is
not obligated to identify the person or respond,
but failure to respond may result in official
service that may result in an additional fee being
levied Alternative or substitute forms of service
of process may be used to notify an individual of
a photo enforcement violation citation. An
individuals driving privileges may not be
suspended or revoked as a result of a citation that
is served by alternative service e of process.
4
Photo Traffic Enforcement 2
Photo enforcement systems may not be used
on a state highway to identify violators of traffic
control or speed restrictions.
5
There have been
various legislative measures introduced in the last
several years to completely ban photo radar in
Arizona, however, the Legislature has not passed
or referred a measure of this nature at this time.
ADDITIONAL REFERENCES
Arizona Department of Public Safety
http://www.azdps.gov
Arizona Department of Transportation
Technical Evaluation of Photo Enforcement
for Freeways – Final Report 596
National Conference of State Legislatures
Traffic Safety Review: State Speed and Red-
Light Camera Laws and Programs
2
A.R.S. § 28-1602
3
A.R.S. §§ 28-1203 and 28-1204
4
A.R.S. § 28-1602
5
A.R.S. § 28-1206