mail or its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all
copies of this message and any attachments.
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 12:37 AM
>; Leslie M. Brickner
>
>
Subject: [External] Request
! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCPSS. Do not click links
or open attachments, unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.
Hi Julie,
I’ve heard that the Pointers United group has asked you to set up a meeting with Kirsten
Coombs. We really hope that you don’t agree to do that.
Laura and I have been very passionate supporters of the superintendent’s plan to use
redistricting to address the educational inequities in the county. We strongly believe that
redistricting is a powerful tool to help economically disadvantaged children. While we both
love PRES and would be so sad to have to leave this wonderful school, if our polygons
moving will help improve the inequity problem, then we are in favor of the move. Maybe
it’s because we both are products of diverse public schools growing up, but we just don’t
think that moving to Swansfield as opposed to Clarksville will be in any way a negative
outcome for
I know the P.U. group is citing the Clemens Crossing meeting with Jen Mallo as precedent
for you asking for Kirsten to meet with them, but they are very different situations. The CC
polygons only came into play with the BOE very late in the game, so their community didn’t
have a chance to publicly testify to the board. Our situation is the opposite—the Pointers
Run polygons move to Swansfield was part of the original superintendent’s plan, and
hundreds of us in the neighborhood took advantage of the opportunity to speak to the Board,
in person at the public hearings and in writing. There is no reason for them to meet with
Kirsten, other than to try and pressure her to move the Pointers Run polygons to Clarksville
in accordance with their desired outcome.
We are so disappointed that the P.U. group has put you in this position. They have asked
you, in effect, to support their efforts to lobby the board for their desired redistricting
outcome by arranging for this meeting with Kirsten. This is a really unreasonable and, I
think, unethical thing for them to have done, since everyone is aware that HCPSS personnel
need to stay neutral in the redistricting fray.
We hope that you will not agree to arrange for this meeting.
Warm regards,
Dan & Laura Newberger