20 Purposes and Functions of the Federal Reserve System
Function
Conducting Monetary
Policy
The Federal Open Market Committee sets
U.S. monetary policy in accordance with its
mandate from Congress: to promote maximum
employment, stable prices, and moderate long-
term interest rates in the U.S. economy.
3
The Federal Reserve’s Monetary Policy Mandate
and Why It Matters .............................................. 23
How Monetary Policy Aects the Economy .......................27
Monetary Policy in Practice ......................................32
Monetary Policy Implementation ................................ 38
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 21
hat is monetary policy? It is the Federal Reserve’s actions, as a
central bank, to achieve three goals specified by Congress: maximum
employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates in
the United States (figure 3.1).
The Federal Reserve conducts the nation’s monetary policy by managing
the level of short-term interest rates and influencing the availability and
cost of credit in the economy. Monetary policy directly affects interest
rates; it indirectly affects stock prices, wealth, and currency exchange
rates. Through these channels, monetary policy influences spend-
ing, investment, production, employment, and inflation in the United
States. Effective monetary policy complements fiscal policy to support
economic growth.
While the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy goals have not changed for
many years, its tools and approach to implementing policy have evolved
W
Figure 3.1. The Federal Reserve’s statutory mandate
The Federal Reserve conducts monetary policy in pursuit of three goals set for it by Congress. The three mandated goals are
considered essential to a well-functioning economy for consumers and businesses.
Traditional
monetary policy
Nontraditional
monetary policy
Mandate
1. Maximum employment
2. Stable prices
3. Moderate long-term
interest rates
Forward
guidance
Helps the public
better understand
policymakers’
intentions about the
future course of
monetary policy
Large-scale
asset purchases
Provide additional
stimulus to interest-
sensitive spending,
affect the economy
through the same
channels as traditional
monetary policy
Open market
operations
Inuence
supply of
balances in the
federal funds
market, supply of
money and credit
in the economy
Reserve
requirements
Inuence
demand for
balances in the
federal funds
market, supply of
money and credit
in the economy
Discount
window lending
Inuences supply
of balances in the
federal funds
market, supply of
money and credit
in the economy
22 Conducting Monetary Policy
over time. Prior to the financial crisis that began in 2007, the Federal
Reserve bought or sold securities issued or backed by the U.S. govern-
ment in the open market on most business days in order to keep a key
short-term money market interest rate, called the federal funds rate, at
or near a target set by the Federal Open Market Committee, or FOMC
(figure 3.2). (The FOMC is the monetary policymaking arm of the Fed-
eral Reserve.) Changes in that target, and in investors’ expectations of
what that target would be in the future, generated changes in a wide
range of interest rates paid by borrowers and earned by savers.
To support the economy during the financial crisis that began in 2007
and during the ensuing recession, the FOMC lowered its target for the
federal funds rate to near zero at the end of 2008. It then began to
use less traditional approaches to implementing policy, including buy-
ing very large amounts of longer-term government securities to apply
downward pressure on longer-term interest rates. In addition, the Fed-
eral Reserve’s communication of its assessment of the outlook for the
economy and its intentions regarding the federal funds rate became
a more important policy tool. In the fall of 2014, with the economy
having made substantial progress toward maximum employment, the
FOMC announced key elements of its plans for normalizing monetary
policy when appropriate. In December 2015, the FOMC decided that
economic conditions and the economic outlook warranted starting
the process of policy normalization and voted to raise its target for the
federal funds rate.
“Congress has entrusted the Federal Reserve with great responsibilities. Its decisions affect the well-being of every
American and the strength and prosperity of our nation. That prosperity depends most, of course, on the produc-
tiveness and enterprise of the American people, but the Federal Reserve plays a role too, promoting conditions that
foster maximum employment, low and stable inflation, and a safe and sound financial system.”
— Chair Janet Yellen, Nov. 14, 2013
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 23
The Federal Reserves Monetary
Policy Mandate and Why It Matters
The Federal Reserve was created by Congress in 1913 to provide the
nation with a safer, more flexible, and more stable monetary and finan-
cial system. The Federal Reserve Act states that the Board of Governors
and the FOMC should conduct monetary policy “so as to promote
effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and mod-
erate long-term interest rates.” This statutory mandate ties monetary
policy to the broader goal of fostering a productive and stable U.S.
economy.
The statutory mandate is achieved when most people
looking
for work are gainfully employed, and when prices for goods and
services are, on average, relatively stable. Stable prices for goods
Figure 3.2. The federal funds rate over time
The effective federal funds rate is the interest rate at which depository institutions—banks, savings institutions (thrifts), and
credit unions—and government-sponsored enterprises borrow from and lend to each other overnight to meet short-term
business needs. The target for the federal funds rate—which is set by the Federal Open Market Committee—has varied widely
over the years in response to prevailing economic conditions.
7.0
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
.5
0
Percent
1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015
Effective federal funds rate
Target federal funds rate
Target federal funds range
24 Conducting Monetary Policy
and services contribute importantly to achieving
three economic
outcomes: (1) maximum sustainable economic growth,
(2) maximum
sustainable employment, and (3) moderate long-term
interest rates.
When the average of prices of a broad collection of goods and ser-
vices is stable and believed likely to remain so, changes in the prices
of individual goods and services serve as clear guides for
efficient
resource allocation in the U.S. economy. This then
contributes to
higher standards of living for U.S. citizens.
Moreover, stable prices encourage saving and capital formation
because when the risks of erosion of asset values resulting from
inflation—and the need to guard against such losses—are mini-
mized,
households are encouraged to save more and businesses are
encouraged to invest more.
The Federal Reserve’s other responsibilities—promoting financial system
stability (section 4), supervising and regulating financial institutions
and activities (section 5), fostering payment and settlement system
safety and efficiency (section 6), and promoting consumer protection
and community development (section 7)—contribute to the nation’s
economic well-being by supporting a smoothly functioning financial
system.
To promote public understanding of how the Federal Reserve interprets
its statutory mandate, the FOMC released its “Statement on Longer-
Run Goals and Monetary Policy Strategy” in January 2012. This state-
ment explains the FOMC’s longer-run goals and its strategy for setting
monetary policy to achieve them. In the statement, the FOMC also
established a numerical longer-run goal for inflation: In the Commit-
tee’s judgment, an annual rate of increase of 2percent in the price
index for personal consumption expenditures—an important price mea-
sure for consumer spending on goods and services—is most consistent,
over the longer run, with meeting the Federal Reserve’s statutory man-
date to promote both maximum employment and price stability. The
FOMC reaffirms its goals statement at its January meeting each year.
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 25
Low and stable inflation. Because the nation’s inflation rate over
the longer run is primarily determined by monetary policy, the Fed-
eral Reserve can work directly to ensure that the U.S. economy ben-
efits from low and stable inflation. Low and stable inflation helps the
economy operate efficiently. When inflation is low and stable, individu-
als can hold money without having to worry that high inflation will
rapidly erode its purchasing power. Moreover, households and busi-
nesses can make more accurate longer-run financial decisions about
borrowing and lending and about saving and investment. Longer-term
interest rates are also more likely to be moderate when inflation is low
and stable.
In contrast, deflation—which occurs when the prices of goods and ser-
vices are falling, on average—would increase the burden of household
and business debts after adjusting for the decline in prices. Moreover, if
inflation persisted near zero, short-term interest rates would likely also
be quite low and monetary policymakers might not be able to reduce
interest rates enough to support the economy when it is at risk of slid-
ing into recession. (Note that the terms “policymakers,” “monetary
policymakers,” and “FOMC policymakers” are used interchangeably in
this section.) As a result, monetary policy that aims to keep inflation at
2percent over the longer run helps to maintain a productive and well-
functioning economy, leading to increases in employment and to higher
standards of living for U.S. citizens. In this way, the goal of achieving
maximum employment in the economy is closely linked with the goal
of 2percent inflation.
Maximum employment. The goal of maximum employment stands
on an equal footing with price stability as an objective of monetary pol-
icy. However, policymakers recognize that factors other than monetary
policy largely determine the maximum level of employment that can
be sustained without leading to higher inflation. These factors include
trends in the size and makeup of the population, changes in the types
of jobs and skills needed in the workforce, and other policies such as
those affecting education and training. Consequently, it would not be
appropriate for the FOMC to specify a fixed goal for employment.
26 Conducting Monetary Policy
Policymakers consider a range of indicators in making their assessments
of labor market conditions consistent with maximum employment,
recognizing that those assessments are necessarily uncertain and may
change. All FOMC participants present their views on the longer-run
outlook for economic activity and unemployment four times each year,
in their Summary of Economic Projections. In those projections, partici-
pants report the unemployment rate they expect over the longer run.
For example, in the projections released in March 2016, FOMC partici-
pants’ estimates of the longer-run normal unemployment rate ranged
from 4.7 to 5.8percent, with a median estimate of 4.8percent.
The Federal Reserve’s goals for maximum employment and 2percent
inflation are generally complementary. For example, when inflation
is below 2percent and the FOMC judges that conditions in the labor
market are not as strong as those that the Committee views as con-
sistent with maximum employment, the FOMC can keep interest rates
temporarily low to promote higher employment and return inflation to
2percent. Of course, the FOMC may, at times, face situations in which
its goals are not complementary; for example, inflation might be above
2percent even as employment is below its maximum level. The FOMC
has indicated in its “Statement on Longer-Run Goals and Monetary
Policy Strategy” that, in such a situation, it would follow a balanced
approach to achieving its goals, taking into account how close or far
employment is from its maximum level and how close or far inflation is
from 2percent. (The “Statement on Longer-Run Goals and Monetary
Policy Strategy” is available on the Federal Reserve Board’s website at
www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy.)
Because monetary policy actions influence inflation and employment
with a lag, the FOMC’s decisions are based on its assessments of the
medium-term outlook for the economy and the potentially different
time horizons over which employment and inflation could be expected
to return to levels consistent with the Committee’s mandate. In addi-
tion, the FOMC considers any risks associated with the economic out-
look, including risks to the financial system that could impede attaining
the Committee’s goals.
Longer-run views aid
monetary policy
FOMC participants present
their views on the longer-
run outlook for economic
activity and unemployment
four times each year in
their Summary of Economic
Projections, available on
the Federal Reserve Board’s
website at
www.federalreserve.gov/
monetarypolicy/
fomccalendars.htm.
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 27
How Monetary Policy
Affects the Economy
FOMC policymakers set monetary policy to foster financial conditions
they judge to be consistent with achieving the Federal Reserve’s statu-
tory mandate of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate
long-term interest rates.
Monetary policy affects the U.S. economy—
and the
achievement of the statutory mandate—primarily through
its influence on the availability and cost of money and credit in the
economy.
As conditions in the economy change, the Committee adjusts mon-
etary policy accordingly, typically by raising or lowering its target for
the federal funds rate. A change in the target for the federal funds rate
normally will be accompanied by changes in other interest rates and in
financial conditions more broadly; those changes will then affect the
spending decisions of households and businesses and thus will have
implications for economic growth, employment, and inflation.
Effect of Changes in Federal Funds Rate Target
on Financial Markets and Spending
Short-term interest rates. Short-term interest rates—for example, the
rate of return paid to holders of U.S. Treasury bills or commercial paper
(a short-term debt security) issued by private companies—are affected
by changes in the level of the federal funds rate.
Short-term interest rates would likely decline if the FOMC reduced
its target for the federal funds rate, or if unfolding events or Federal
Reserve communications led the public to think that the FOMC would
soon reduce the federal funds rate to a level lower than previously
expected. Conversely, short-term interest rates would likely rise if the
FOMC increased the funds rate target, or if unfolding events or Federal
Reserve communications prompted the public to believe that the funds
rate would soon be moved to a higher level than had been anticipated.
Monetary policy: Easing
and tightening defined
The FOMC changes
monetary policy primarily by
raising or lowering its target
for the federal funds rate,
the interest rate for overnight
borrowing between banks.
Lowering the target rate
represents an “easing”
of monetary policy, while
increasing the target rate is a
“tightening” of policy.
28 Conducting Monetary Policy
These changes in short-term market interest rates resulting from a
change in the FOMC’s target for the federal funds rate typically are
transmitted to medium- and longer-term interest rates, such as those
on Treasury notes and bonds, corporate bonds, fixed-rate mortgages,
and auto and other consumer loans. Medium- and longer-term inter-
est rates are also affected by how people expect the federal funds rate
to change in the future. For example, if borrowers and lenders think,
today, that the FOMC is likely to raise its target for the federal funds
rate substantially over the next several years, then medium-term inter-
est rates today will be appreciably higher than short-term interest rates.
Generally speaking, the effect on short-term interest rates of a single
change in the FOMC’s target for the federal funds rate will be some-
what larger than the effect on longer-term rates because long-term
rates typically reflect the expected course of short-term rates over a
long period. However, the influence of a change in the FOMC’s target
for the federal funds rate on longer-term interest rates can also be sub-
stantial if it has clear implications for the expected course of short-term
rates over a considerable period.
Longer-term interest rates and stock prices. Changes in longer-
term interest rates usually also affect stock prices, and because many
individuals hold some stocks either directly or indirectly (through a
mutual fund or as part of a pension plan), the change in stock prices
will have implications for personal wealth. For example, if longer-term
interest rates decline, then investors may decide to purchase stocks,
thus bidding up stock prices. Moreover, lower interest rates may lead
investors to anticipate that the economy will be stronger and profits
will be higher in the future, and this expectation may add further to the
demand for stocks.
Dollar exchange rates and international trade. Changes in mon-
etary policy can also affect the value of the U.S. dollar in international
currency markets. For example, if monetary policy causes interest rates
to fall in the United States, yields on U.S. dollar assets will look less
favorable to international investors. With U.S. dollar assets less attrac-
Open market purchases of
longer-term securities
Prior to the 2007–09
financial crisis, the Federal
Reserve’s Open Market Desk
typically bought Treasury
securities with an average
maturity of about three
years. Since 2008, the Desk
purchased securities with
longer remaining maturi-
ties in order to increase the
effects of the purchases on
longer-term interest rates,
and purchased mortgage-
backed securities to reduce
the cost and increase the
availability of credit for the
purchase of homes.
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 29
tive, international investors may invest less in dollar-denominated assets,
lowering the value of the dollar in foreign exchange markets. A fall in
the value of the dollar will tend to boost U.S. exports because it reduces
the price that residents of other countries would need to pay in their
own currencies for U.S. goods and services. Moreover, a dollar deprecia-
tion means that U.S. residents’ purchases of imported products become
more expensive, giving U.S. consumers and firms an incentive to pur-
chase domestically produced goods and services instead of foreign ones.
Eects on wealth and spending. Regardless of whether they result
from an actual or expected change in monetary policy, the changes in
longer-term interest rates, stock prices, and the foreign exchange value
of the dollar will affect a wide range of spending decisions made by
households and businesses. For example, when the FOMC eases mon-
etary policy (that is, reduces its target for the federal funds rate), lower
interest rates on consumer loans will elicit greater spending on durable
goods (long-lasting manufactured goods) such as televisions and auto-
mobiles. Lower mortgage rates will make buying a house more afford-
able and lead to more home purchases. In addition, lower mortgage
rates will encourage homeowners to refinance their mortgages, freeing
up some cash for other purchases. For individuals holding stocks either
directly, through mutual funds, or as part of a retirement plan, higher
stock prices will add to wealth, helping to spur more spending. Invest-
ment projects that businesses previously believed would be only mar-
ginally unprofitable will become attractive because of reduced financ-
ing costs, particularly if businesses expect their sales to rise.
Degree of Slack or Overheating
FOMC policymakers, in determining the appropriate position or
“stance” of monetary policy, must assess the current and likely future
degree of slack or overheating in the economy. Because measuring the
maximum sustainable level of employment or the potential output of
the national economy is a complex undertaking, and inherent uncer-
tainties surround any particular estimate, policymakers consider a wide
range of indicators of resource utilization when thinking about appro-
priate monetary policy.
What is dollar
depreciation?
On August 15, 2008, $1
could be exchanged for
110.48 Japanese yen(¥).
Over the next several
months, the U.S. dollar
depreciated against the
yen—a period when the
FOMC was reducing its
target for the federal funds
rate. By mid-December2008,
$1 would purchase
only ¥90.68.
30 Conducting Monetary Policy
If resources are underused—for example, employment is below what
policymakers judge to be its maximum sustainable level and seems
likely to remain below—then they have scope for easing monetary
policy to move the economy to its full employment level. Conversely,
if resource utilization appears likely to remain above the level associ-
ated with maximum employment, then policymakers may judge that
a tighter monetary policy is necessary to prevent inflation from rising
above 2percent.
Other Factors Affecting Monetary Policy
Monetary policy affects the economy with a lag. Although the
channels through which the FOMC’s monetary policy decisions are
transmitted to financial conditions and the economy are reasonably
straightforward, monetary policy affects the economy with a lag. This
means that an FOMC policy decision will not change consumer or busi-
ness spending immediately. When the FOMC adjusts monetary policy,
it expects that the adjustment will affect economic conditions in the
future, and that those economic conditions will differ from what they
would have been in the absence of the policy adjustment. Thus, in
setting monetary policy, policymakers must not only evaluate current
economic conditions, they must also forecast how the economy is likely
to evolve over the next few years.
Anticipated factors. Monetary policy is not the only influence on the
economy. Many other factors can affect spending, output, employ-
ment, and inflation.
Some of these factors can be anticipated and factored into the FOMC’s
policymaking. For example, the government influences demand in the
economy through changes in taxes and spending programs, which are
often anticipated. Indeed, the economic effects of a tax cut may pre-
cede its actual implementation if businesses and households increase
their spending in anticipation of lower taxes. In addition, forward-look-
ing financial markets may build anticipated fiscal events into the level
and structure of interest rates.
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 31
Demand shocks. Other factors that affect spending on goods and
services can come as a surprise and can influence the economy in
unforeseen ways. Examples of these “demand shocks” include shifts in
consumer and business confidence or unexpected changes in the credit
standards that banks and other lenders apply when they consider mak-
ing loans. Once a demand shock is identified, monetary policy can be
used to address it.
For instance, if consumer and business confidence falter and spending
slows, the FOMC can ease monetary policy, lowering interest rates to
help move spending back up. But because data and other informa-
tion on the state of the economy are not available immediately, it can
take time before a demand shock is identified and, given that policy
actions operate with a lag, an even longer time before it is countered.
Thus, demand shocks—even ones that can be addressed by monetary
policy—can push the economy away from the Federal Reserve’s goals
of maximum employment and price stability for a time.
Supply shocks. Other shocks can affect the production of goods and
services and their prices by affecting the costs associated with produc-
tion or the technology used in production.
Examples of such “supply shocks” include crop losses due to extreme
weather and slowdowns in productivity growth relative to what would
have occurred otherwise—these sorts of adverse supply shocks tend to
raise prices and reduce output (and also employment). A disruption in
the oil market that reduces the supply of oil and increases its price sub-
stantially can also raise other prices and reduce output because oil is an
input to the production of many products. In the face of these adverse
supply shocks, FOMC policymakers can attempt to counter the loss
of output by easing monetary policy and making financial conditions
more conducive to spending; alternatively, policymakers can attempt to
counter the rise in prices by tightening policy.
32 Conducting Monetary Policy
As discussed, the FOMC has indicated in its “Statement on Longer-
Run Goals and Monetary Policy Strategy” that, in such a situation, it
would follow a balanced approach to achieving its goals, taking into
account how close or far employment is from its maximum level and
how close or far inflation is from 2percent. Of course, the economy
can also experience beneficial supply shocks, such as technological
breakthroughs or reductions in the cost of important raw materials, and
these beneficial supply shocks can both lower prices and boost output.
Monetary Policy in Practice
How are monetary policy decisions made? The members of the Board
of Governors and the presidents of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks gather
at the Board’s office in Washington, D.C., for eight regularly scheduled
meetings of the FOMC each year to discuss economic and financial
conditions and deliberate on monetary policy. If necessary, FOMC par-
ticipants may also meet by video conference at other times. The Federal
Reserve Bank of New York carries out the policy decisions made at
FOMC meetings primarily by buying and selling securities as authorized
by the FOMC.
Federal Open Market Committee Meetings
At its meetings, the FOMC considers three key questions: How is the
U.S. economy likely to evolve in the near and medium term, what is the
appropriate monetary policy setting to help move the economy over
the medium term to the FOMC’s goals of 2percent inflation and
maximum employment, and how can the FOMC effectively communi-
cate its expectations for the economy and its policy decisions to the
public? For a closer look at FOMC meeting deliberations and open
market operations, see box 3.1 and figure 3.3, respectively.
Keeping Policy in Step with Evolving Economic Conditions
As discussed, the FOMC’s overall approach to its decisionmaking is
described in its statement on its longer-run goals and its strategy for
Overview of the Federal
Reserve System and
theFOMC
See section 1 for an overview
of the Federal Reserve
System and the FOMC.
Box 3.1. What Happens at an FOMC Meeting
In preparation for each FOMC meeting, policymakers analyze economic and financial developments and update their forecasts
of economic activity, employment, and inflation over the near and medium term. The materials that they and their staffs
review include a wide range of U.S. and inter national economic and financial data, statistical and judgmental economic
forecasts, and analyses of alternative policy approaches. Participants also consult business, consumer, and financial industry
contacts to hear their perspectives on economic and financial conditions and the outlook.
The staff of the Federal Reserve Banks
collect and summarize information on
current economic conditions in their
Districts. An overall summary, com-
monly known as the Beige Book, is
released to the public one week before
the FOMC meeting. (The Beige Book is
available at www. federalreserve.gov/
monetarypolicy/beigebook/default.
htm.) At about the same time, the
staff of the Federal Reserve Board
distributes to all FOMC participants its
analysis of the economy, its economic
forecasts, and an analysis of several
policy options that span the range of
plausible monetary policy responses
to the current and expected economic
situation. Economic research groups at
the Reserve Banks separately brief their
Bank presidents on relevant economic
developments and policy choices. Using
these materials, FOMC participants for-
mulate their preliminary views on the
economic outlook and the appropriate
policy response in preparation for their
meeting in Washington.
During the first part of the meeting, the
Federal Reserve governors and Reserve
Bank presidents receive briefings that
review the operations of the System
Open Market Desk at the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York and recent
economic and financial developments
in the United States and abroad. Each
Bank president around the table then
takes a turn presenting his or her views
on economic conditions in his or her
District, and both the presidents and
governors offer their assessments of
recent developments and the outlook.
After a staff presentation on options
for monetary policy, participants again
share their individual judgments of how
policy should be conducted over the
period prior to the next FOMC meet-
ing, how they expect policy to evolve
over the medium run, and how the
Committee’s policy intentions should be
communicated to the public. While all
participants are included in the discus-
sions, the policy decision rests with the
voting members of the FOMC—the
members of the Board of Governors,
the president of the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York, and four of the
Bank presidents (on a rotating basis).
For more information on the FOMC
and other key Federal Reserve entities,
see section 2. For an in-depth look at
what happens at an FOMC meeting,
see the speech that former Federal
Reserve Governor Elizabeth A. Duke
delivered in October 2010, “Come
with Me to the FOMC,” available at
www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/
speech/duke20101019a.htm.
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 33
setting monetary policy to achieve them. In practice, however, selecting
policy tools to implement the FOMC’s policy strategy is not clear cut.
The U.S. and global economies are complex and evolving, and changes
in monetary policy take time to affect economic activity, employment,
and inflation.
Moreover, monetary policy is just one of the factors determining the
pace of domestic economic activity, employment, and inflation. Accord-
ingly, in making their assessment of how the economy is likely to evolve
As discussed, the FOMC has indicated in its “Statement on Longer-
Run Goals and Monetary Policy Strategy” that, in such a situation, it
would follow a balanced approach to achieving its goals, taking into
account how close or far employment is from its maximum level and
how close or far inflation is from 2percent. Of course, the economy
can also experience beneficial supply shocks, such as technological
breakthroughs or reductions in the cost of important raw materials, and
these beneficial supply shocks can both lower prices and boost output.
Monetary Policy in Practice
How are monetary policy decisions made? The members of the Board
of Governors and the presidents of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks gather
at the Board’s office in Washington, D.C., for eight regularly scheduled
meetings of the FOMC each year to discuss economic and financial
conditions and deliberate on monetary policy. If necessary, FOMC par-
ticipants may also meet by video conference at other times. The Federal
Reserve Bank of New York carries out the policy decisions made at
FOMC meetings primarily by buying and selling securities as authorized
by the FOMC.
Federal Open Market Committee Meetings
At its meetings, the FOMC considers three key questions: How is the
U.S. economy likely to evolve in the near and medium term, what is the
appropriate monetary policy setting to help move the economy over
the medium term to the FOMC’s goals of 2percent inflation and
maximum employment, and how can the FOMC effectively communi-
cate its expectations for the economy and its policy decisions to the
public? For a closer look at FOMC meeting deliberations and open
market operations, see box 3.1 and figure 3.3, respectively.
Keeping Policy in Step with Evolving Economic Conditions
As discussed, the FOMC’s overall approach to its decisionmaking is
described in its statement on its longer-run goals and its strategy for
Overview of the Federal
Reserve System and
theFOMC
See section 1 for an overview
of the Federal Reserve
System and the FOMC.
Box 3.1. What Happens at an FOMC Meeting
In preparation for each FOMC meeting, policymakers analyze economic and financial developments and update their forecasts
of economic activity, employment, and inflation over the near and medium term. The materials that they and their staffs
review include a wide range of U.S. and inter national economic and financial data, statistical and judgmental economic
forecasts, and analyses of alternative policy approaches. Participants also consult business, consumer, and financial industry
contacts to hear their perspectives on economic and financial conditions and the outlook.
The staff of the Federal Reserve Banks
collect and summarize information on
current economic conditions in their
Districts. An overall summary, com-
monly known as the Beige Book, is
released to the public one week before
the FOMC meeting. (The Beige Book is
available at www. federalreserve.gov/
monetarypolicy/beigebook/default.
htm.) At about the same time, the
staff of the Federal Reserve Board
distributes to all FOMC participants its
analysis of the economy, its economic
forecasts, and an analysis of several
policy options that span the range of
plausible monetary policy responses
to the current and expected economic
situation. Economic research groups at
the Reserve Banks separately brief their
Bank presidents on relevant economic
developments and policy choices. Using
these materials, FOMC participants for-
mulate their preliminary views on the
economic outlook and the appropriate
policy response in preparation for their
meeting in Washington.
During the first part of the meeting, the
Federal Reserve governors and Reserve
Bank presidents receive briefings that
review the operations of the System
Open Market Desk at the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York and recent
economic and financial developments
in the United States and abroad. Each
Bank president around the table then
takes a turn presenting his or her views
on economic conditions in his or her
District, and both the presidents and
governors offer their assessments of
recent developments and the outlook.
After a staff presentation on options
for monetary policy, participants again
share their individual judgments of how
policy should be conducted over the
period prior to the next FOMC meet-
ing, how they expect policy to evolve
over the medium run, and how the
Committee’s policy intentions should be
communicated to the public. While all
participants are included in the discus-
sions, the policy decision rests with the
voting members of the FOMC—the
members of the Board of Governors,
the president of the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York, and four of the
Bank presidents (on a rotating basis).
For more information on the FOMC
and other key Federal Reserve entities,
see section 2. For an in-depth look at
what happens at an FOMC meeting,
see the speech that former Federal
Reserve Governor Elizabeth A. Duke
delivered in October 2010, “Come
with Me to the FOMC,” available at
www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/
speech/duke20101019a.htm.
34 Conducting Monetary Policy
in the near and medium term, policymakers take into account a range
of other influences on the economy. Some can readily be built into eco-
nomic forecasts. For example, federal, state, and local tax and spending
policies have important and relatively predictable effects on household
and business spending and are typically budgeted in advance. Even so,
the range of uncertainty about the effects of some predictable factors
may be wide.
And, of course, some economic developments—such as shifts in
consumer and business confidence, changes in the terms under which
banks extend loans, or disruptions to oil or agricultural supplies—can
occur suddenly and with little warning. Finally, the actions of other
central banks and fiscal authorities abroad also play a role through the
effects on international trade and global financial flows and exchange
rates.
How the FOMC Determines Its Monetary Policy Stance
FOMC policymakers use a broad range of information to assess trends
in the U.S. economy and to judge the appropriate stance of monetary
policy. They analyze the most up-to-date economic data and review
reports and surveys from business and financial market contacts. In
addition, they use various tools for forecasting economic developments
and evaluating the effects of monetary policy decisions. Statistical mod-
els can help analyze how changes in economic conditions may affect
the outlook for economic activity, employment, and inflation, and
how the level of the target federal funds rate might respond to those
changes. Simulations of these models, including results using a variety
of policy rules that relate the setting of the target federal funds rate to
the objectives of monetary policy, can provide some indication of how
monetary policy is likely to affect the economy over the longer run.
Because policy actions take time to affect the economy and inflation,
policymakers may assess the effects of their policies by looking at
various indicators that are likely to respond more quickly to changes
in the federal funds rate. Over the years, policymakers have at times
monitored indicators such as the monetary aggregates (measures of the
Using statistical models in
monetary policy analysis
Federal Reserve staff use
statistical economic models
to help the FOMC forecast
economic developments
and evaluate the effects of
monetary policy decisions.
For more detail on these
models, see “The FRB/US
Model: A Tool for Macro-
economic Policy Analysis”
at www.federalreserve.gov/
econresdata/notes/feds-
notes/2014/a-tool-for-macro-
economic-policy-analysis.
html.
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 35
stock of money), changes in Treasury yields and private-sector interest
rates and the levels of those rates for securities that mature at different
times in the future, and exchange rates. Importantly, to be valuable to
policymakers, these and other possible policy guides must have a close,
predictable relationship with the ultimate goals of monetary policy, but
this has not always been the case.
Figure 3.3. How the Federal Reserve conducts open market operations
When the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) sets monetary policy that, for example, requires adding liquidity to the
banking system to spur economic activity, it instructs the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s (FRBNY) Open Market Desk to
purchase U.S. Treasury securities in the open market.
FRBNY DESK
PRIMARY DEALERS
GROCERIES
BUSINESSES AND INDIVIDUALS
FOMC
decides to
reduce the
target for the
federal funds
rate
1 2
instructs FRBNY
Desk to purchase
securities
purchases securities in the highly
liquid market for U.S. Treasury
securities from one of the designated,
approved primary dealers
ensure that the market for U.S. Treasury
securities is liquid—in other words, they are
always willing to sell securities and always
willing to buy securities
3 4
5
credits account that the primary
dealer’s bank holds at FRBNY in
exchange for securities
with the added funds in their accounts at
the FRBNY, banks can make more loans to
businesses and individuals
7
the securities acquired are assets,
and the bank accounts credited with
the payment are liability items on the
Federal Reserve’s balance sheet
6
with increased opportunity to borrow,
businesses and individuals are able to
purchase mortgages, cars, and other items,
boosting spending in the economy
8
BANKS
FED BALANCE SHEET
Assets Liabilities
U.S.
Treasury
securities
Accounts at
FRBNY held
by banks of
primary
dealers
Note: A more detailed explanation of open market operations, including information on the Open Market Desk’s purchases
and sales of securities, is available on the website of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, www.newyorkfed.org/markets/.
36 Conducting Monetary Policy
Forward Guidance Signals
the FOMC’s Policy Intentions
In addition to adjusting the target for the federal funds rate, the
FOMC also can influence financial conditions by communicating how
it intends to adjust policy in the future. Since March 2009, when the
federal funds rate was effectively at its lower bound, this form of com-
munication, called “forward guidance,” has been an important signal
to the public of the FOMC’s policy intentions. For example, when the
FOMC said in its March 2009 postmeeting statement that it intended
to keep the target for the federal funds rate “exceptionally low” for
“an extended period,” its goal was to cause financial market partici-
pants to adjust their expectations to assume a longer period of lower
short-term interest rates than they had previously expected and, thus,
put downward pressure on long-term interest rates to provide more
support for the economic recovery.
Between 2009 and 2014, the FOMC revised its forward guidance
several times, strengthening its intent to put downward pressure on
interest rates when the economy appeared to be operating at a lower
level than desirable and, more recently, revising it to clarify how, when
the time was appropriate, the Committee would make the decision to
raise the target federal funds rate.
What Monetary Policymakers
Say to the Public
While the use of forward guidance as a policy tool is relatively new, the
Federal Reserve has had a long-standing commitment to communicate
regularly with the public and Congress concerning its monetary policy
activities and the pursuit of its mandate. While some communications
are required by statute, most represent an effort by the Federal Reserve
to increase the transparency of its policy decisions and operations.
Statements after FOMC meetings. Since 1994, the Federal Reserve
has issued statements announcing FOMC decisions. In recent years,
those statements have summarized the Committee’s judgment about
the appropriate conduct of monetary policy over the intermeeting
FOMC postmeeting
statements
The release of postmeeting
communications often
provides the broader context
for FOMC policy decisions.
See the FOMC’s most recent
postmeeting statement at
www.federalreserve.gov/
monetarypolicy/
fomccalendars.htm. For more
detailed information on the
history of FOMC commu-
nications, see “A Modern
History of FOMC Commu-
nication: 1975–2002”
at www.federalreserve.
gov/monetarypolicy/files/
FOMC20030624memo01.
pdf.
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 37
period and provided guidance about the factors that the FOMC will
consider in setting policy as economic and financial developments
evolve. The postmeeting statements also indicate which FOMC mem-
bers voted for an action, and which members, if any, dissented from
it. At times, the FOMC also issues broader statements that represent
the consensus of almost all participants. An example of a consensus
statement is the “Statement on Longer-Run Goals and Monetary Policy
Strategy” that was discussed earlier in this section.
Meeting minutes. Detailed minutes of FOMC meetings are released
three weeks after each meeting. The minutes cover all policy-related
topics that receive a significant amount of attention during the meet-
ing. They describe the views expressed by the participants, the risks and
uncertainties attending the outlook, and the reasons for the Commit-
tee’s decisions. The minutes can help the public interpret economic
and financial developments and better understand the Committee’s
decisions. As an official record of the meeting, the minutes identify all
attendees and include votes on all authorized policy operations.
Summary of Economic Projections. Beginning in late 2007, Fed-
eral Reserve policymakers began to publish economic projections, the
“Summary of Economic Projections,” four times each year. Those pro-
jections, published along with the FOMC postmeeting statement, now
provide participants’ assessments of the most likely outcomes for real
gross domestic product growth, the unemployment rate, inflation, and
the federal funds rate over the medium term and over the longer run.
Each participant bases his or her projection on his or her assessment of
appropriate monetary policy and assumptions about the factors likely
to affect economic outcomes. In April 2011, the Federal Reserve Chair
began to hold press briefings following each of the four FOMC meet-
ings per year at which participants provide their projections. At the
press conferences, the Chair discusses current and prospective mon-
etary policy and presents a summary of the participants’ projections.
Testimonies to Congress, speeches, and transcripts. The FOMC’s
communication of its policy actions and intentions extends well beyond
FOMC postmeeting press
conferences
In April 2011, the Federal
Reserve Chair began to hold
press briefings following
each of the four FOMC
meetings per year at which
participants provide their
economic projections. For
more information, see
www.federalreserve.
gov/ monetarypolicy/
fomccalendars.htm.
38 Conducting Monetary Policy
the postmeeting statements and minutes. By statute, the Federal
Reserve Chair testifies twice each year on economic developments and
monetary policy before the congressional committees that oversee
the Federal Reserve. At those times, the Board of Governors delivers
the semiannual Monetary Policy Report to Congress that discusses the
conduct of monetary policy and economic developments and prospects
for the future. In addition, the Chair and other Board members appear
frequently before Congress to report and answer questions on eco-
nomic and financial market developments and on monetary and regula-
tory policy. Many Federal Reserve policymakers regularly give public
speeches. And a wide range of documents, including transcripts of the
FOMC meetings, is made available after a five-year lag.
Communicating with other organizations. Federal Reserve officials
also maintain regular channels of communication with officials of other
U.S. and foreign government agencies, international organizations, and
foreign central banks on subjects of mutual concern.
Although the Federal Reserve’s policy objectives are limited to economic
outcomes in the United States, it is mutually beneficial for macroeco-
nomic and financial policymakers in the United States and in other
countries to maintain a continuous dialogue. This dialogue enables
the Federal Reserve to better understand and anticipate influences on
the U.S. economy that emanate from abroad. It also helps the Federal
Reserve and other central banks work together to address common
economic challenges and threats to the global financial system.
Monetary Policy Implementation
The Federal Funds Market
At the end of any business day, a depository institution may need to
borrow funds overnight to make payments on its own behalf or on
behalf of its customers, to cover a shortfall in its balances held at the
What is a depository
institution?
Depository institutions
(also referred to as banks
interchangeably here) include
commercial banks, savings
institutions, credit unions,
and U.S. branches and agen-
cies of foreign banks. In early
2016, there were more than
12,500 depository institu-
tions in the United States
with accounts at the Federal
Reserve.
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 39
Federal Reserve, or to meet reserve requirements imposed by the Federal
Reserve Board (see box 3.2). An institution that finds itself with excess
funds on hand at the end of the business day can arrange to lend those
funds overnight to another depository institution in the federal funds
market. When banks borrow and lend in the federal funds market, the
exchange of funds is reflected in the accounts they hold at the Federal
Reserve—funds banks hold in these accounts are known as reserve bal-
ances. Since late 2008, the Federal Reserve has paid interest on banks’
reserve balances (for a discussion, see box 3.3).
In many ways, this process is analogous to what happens when an
individual makes a private loan to another individual. When one person
borrows from another, balances from the checking account of the
lender are transferred to the checking account of the borrower. Simi-
larly, when a depository institution lends funds to another depository
institution in the federal funds market, reserve balances in the lender’s
“checking account” at the Federal Reserve are transferred to the Fed-
eral Reserve account of the borrower.
Box 3.2. Banks Must Meet Reserve Requirements Set by the Federal Reserve Board
The Federal Reserve Board, by law, sets reserve requirements on all depository institutions: They are required to hold cash in
their vaults or reserve balances at the Federal Reserve (or a combination of the two) in an amount equal to a certain fraction
of their deposits.
Since the early 1990s, these require-
ments have been applied only to the
trans action deposits held at banks—
that is, accounts such as checking
accounts or interest-bearing accounts
that offer unlimited checking privileges.
The Board sets a required reserve ratio
within limits prescribed by the Federal
Reserve Act, and that ratio determines
the fraction of deposits that a bank
must hold as vault cash or reserve bal-
ances. The Federal Reserve infrequently
adjusts the required reserve ratio.
A bank may choose to hold reserve
balances in excess of the requirement
as a means of protecting against an
overdraft in its Federal Reserve account
or to reduce the risk of failing to hold
enough balances to satisfy its reserve
requirement. More generally, a bank’s
desired level of reserve balances is likely
to depend upon the volume of, and
uncertainty about, payments flowing
through its Federal Reserve account.
To read more about reserve require-
ments, see the Federal Reserve Board’s
website at www.federalreserve.
gov/monetarypolicy/reservereq.htm.
Additional discussion about the evol-
ution of reserve requirements can be
found in the Federal Reserve Bulletin
reports “Open Market Operations
in the 1990s,” www.federalreserve.
gov/pubs/bulletin/1997/199711lead.
pdf and “Reserve Requirements:
History, Current Practice, and Potential
Reform,” www.federalreserve.gov/
monetarypolicy/0693lead.pdf.
40 Conducting Monetary Policy
To be more precise, only depository institutions (banks, savings institu-
tions, credit unions, and U.S. branches of foreign banks) and selected
other institutions (the Federal Home Loan Banks and other government-
sponsored enterprises) are permitted to hold accounts at the Federal
Reserve. Banks use these accounts to make and receive payments
in much the same way that a customer would use his or her check-
ing account at a commercial bank. The interest rate on federal funds
transactions is called the federal funds rate. For many years before the
2007–09 financial crisis, the FOMC carried out monetary policy by set-
ting a target for the federal funds rate.
Monetary Policy before the
2007–09 Financial Crisis
Open market operations. Over the years, the Federal Reserve has
relied upon open market operations to manage conditions in the
federal funds market and to keep the federal funds rate at the target
level set by the FOMC. The Open Market Desk (the Desk) at the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York conducts open market operations by buying
or selling securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury or U.S.
government agencies (figure 3.4).
Box 3.3. The Federal Reserve Pays Interest on Required Reserve Balances and
Excess Balances
In 2006, Congress authorized the Federal Reserve to pay interest on reserve balances beginning in 2011. However, the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 accelerated this authority, and the Federal Reserve began paying interest
on reserve balances in October 2008. The Federal Reserve also pays interest on balances held in excess of the reserve
requirement. The interest rates on reserve balances and on excess balances are both set by the Board of Governors.
The payment of interest on balances
maintained to satisfy reserve balance
requirements is intended to eliminate
or reduce the implicit tax that reserve
requirements impose on depository
institutions. The interest rate paid
on excess balances gives the Federal
Reserve an additional tool for the
conduct of monetary policy. By raising
or lowering the interest rate paid on
excess reserves (the IOER rate), the
Federal Reserve can change the attrac-
tiveness of holding excess balances and
thus affect the federal funds rate and
other short-term market interest rates.
More detailed information on the inter-
est on required reserve balances and
excess reserve balances is available on
the Federal Reserve Board’s website at
www.federalreserve.gov/monetary
policy/reqresbalances.htm.
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 41
The Federal Reserve Act requires that the Desk conduct its purchases
and sales in the open market. To do so, the Desk has established
relationships with securities dealers known as primary dealers that are
active in the market for U.S. government securities. For example, in
an open market purchase, the Desk would buy eligible securities from
primary dealers (at prices determined in a competitive auction). The
Federal Reserve would pay for those securities by crediting the reserve
accounts that the banks used by the primary dealers maintain at the
Federal Reserve. (The banks, in turn, would credit the dealers’ bank
accounts.) In this way, the open market purchase leads to an increase
in reserve balances. A greater supply of reserve balances would tend
to put downward pressure on the federal funds rate, as banks would
be willing to lend their excess funds at somewhat lower interest rates.
In contrast, an open market sale would reduce reserve balances and
put upward pressure on the federal funds rate. Each business day, the
Figure 3.4. Traditional monetary policy: Tools for achieving the targeted federal funds rate
Tool What is it? How does it work? Who uses it?
Reserve requirements The percentage of deposits
that commercial banks and
other depository institutions
must hold as reserves.
Reserve requirements create
a stable demand for reserves.
The Federal Reserve then
adjusts the supply of reserves
through open market opera-
tions to keep the level of the
federal funds rate close to
the target rate established
by the Federal Open Market
Committee (FOMC).
Determined by the Board of
Governors (within ranges
specified by the Federal
Reserve Act).
Open market operations Purchases or sales—tempo-
rary or permanent—of U.S.
government and agency se-
curities in the open market.
Each purchase or sale of
securities directly affects the
volume of reserves in the
banking system and thus
the level of the federal funds
rate.
Directed by the FOMC;
conducted by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York
(in competitive operations
with primary dealers).
Discount window lending Depository institutions can
borrow from a Federal Re-
serve Bank.
Credit provided by the Feder-
al Reserve’s discount window
supplies balances and can
help address pressures in the
federal funds market.
Reserve Banks lend to de-
pository institutions; interest
rate charged is determined
by the Board of Governors.
42 Conducting Monetary Policy
Desk would determine the quantity of open market operations neces-
sary to keep the federal funds rate at the FOMC’s target after taking
into account factors in the market for federal funds, including banks’
estimated funding needs.
Discount window lending. If a depository institution finds that its
need for overnight funding cannot be satisfied in the federal funds
market or similar markets, it can borrow from the Federal Reserve’s
discount window, and the proceeds of the loan would be added to the
institution’s balance in its reserve account at the Federal Reserve. Rules
Box 3.4. Discount Window Lending as a Monetary Policy Tool
When the Federal Reserve Act became law in 1913, the Federal Reserve was authorized to lend only to banks that were
members of the Federal Reserve System. At the time, this included all nationally chartered banks and those state-chartered
banks that had chosen to join the System. Today, by law, all depository institutions that offer transactions accounts subject to
reserve requirements can borrow from the Federal Reserve.
At first, the Federal Reserve lent
primarily by “discounting” short-term
commercial loans owned by banks.
In essence, the Federal Reserve made
a loan by purchasing the commercial
loans for less than their face value,
with the difference between the
purchase price and the face value (the
discount) representing interest the
Federal Reserve received on its loan.
Originally, these loans were made at
a special lending window at each of
the Reserve Banks called the discount
window. For that reason, over time,
Federal Reserve lending to deposi-
tory institutions became known as
“discount window lending.” Today,
most extensions of credit by the Fed-
eral Reserve are made in the form of
advances—loans backed by collateral
pledged by the borrower—rather than
as discounts, but the term “discount
window” is still used to refer to the
facilities through which the Federal
Reserve lends to depository institutions.
Because a bank would be unlikely to
borrow in the federal funds market
at an interest rate much higher than
the discount rate, the availability of
discount window loans at an interest
rate above the targeted federal funds
rate has acted as an upper limit on the
funds rate and helped to keep it close
to the FOMC’s target. The volume of
discount window lending and borrow-
ing is usually relatively small.
Depository institutions have access to
three types of discount window lend-
ing—primary credit, secondary credit,
and seasonal credit.
Primary credit is available to generally
sound depository institutions on a very
short-term basis, typically overnight,
but at times for longer periods. To
assess whether a depository institu-
tion is in sound financial condition,
its Reserve Bank regularly reviews the
institution’s condition, using supervi-
sory ratings and data on the adequacy
of the institution’s capital. Depository
institutions are not required to seek
alternative sources of funds before
requesting occasional advances of
primary credit, but primary credit
is expected to be used as a backup
source of funding rather than a routine
one. Because primary credit is the Fed-
eral Reserve’s main discount window
program, the Federal Reserve and oth-
ers in the banking industry at times use
the term “discount rate” specifically to
refer to the primary credit rate.
Secondary credit may be available to
depository institutions that are eligible
to borrow from the discount window
but that do not meet the criteria for
(continued on the next page)
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 43
governing access to the discount window are established by the Federal
Reserve Act and by the regulations issued by the Board of Governors;
after posting collateral, depository institutions can borrow from the
discount window at interest rates set by the Reserve Banks, subject to
review and determination by the Board.
Since early 2003, interest rates for discount window loans have been
set above the target for the federal funds rate. As a result, depository
institutions have generally borrowed from the discount window in
significant volume only when overall market conditions have tightened
enough to push the federal funds rate above the discount rate. Prior to
primary credit. Secondary credit is
extended on a very short-term basis,
typically overnight. The financial condi-
tion of secondary credit borrowers is
generally less sound than the financial
condition of primary credit borrowers.
For that reason, the rate on secondary
credit has typically been 50 basis points
above the primary credit rate—to com-
pensate for the greater risk of credit
loss, although the spread can vary
as circumstances warrant. Secondary
credit is available to help a depository
institution meet backup liquidity needs
when its use is consistent with the
borrowing institution’s timely return
to a reliance on market sources of
funding or with the orderly resolution
of a troubled institution’s difficulties.
Secondary credit may not be used to
fund an expansion of the borrower’s
assets.
Seasonal credit is designed to help
small depository institutions manage
significant seasonal swings in their
loans and deposits. Seasonal credit
is available to depository institutions
that can demonstrate a clear pattern
of recurring swings in funding needs
throughout the year—these institutions
are usually located in agricultural or
tourist areas. Borrowing longer-term
funds from the discount window dur-
ing periods of seasonal need allows
institutions to carry fewer liquid assets
during the rest of the year and makes
more funds available for local lending.
The seasonal credit rate is based on
market interest rates.
Credit terms. By law, depository
institutions that have either transaction
accounts or nonpersonal time deposits
that are subject to reserve require-
ments may borrow from the discount
window. U.S. branches and agencies
of foreign banks with transaction
accounts or nonpersonal time deposits
are also eligible to borrow under the
same general terms and conditions
that apply to domestic depository
institutions.
By law, all discount window loans must
be secured to the satisfaction of the
lending Reserve Bank. The Federal
Reserve generally accepts as collat-
eral for discount window loans any
assets that meet regulatory standards
for sound asset quality. This category
of assets includes most performing
loans and most high-grade securities.
Reserve Banks must be able to establish
a legal right to be first in line to take
possession of and, if necessary, sell all
collateral that secures discount window
loans in the event of default. The col-
lateral cannot be an obligation of the
pledging institution.
Assets accepted as collateral are
assigned a lendable value deemed
appropriate by the Reserve Bank.
Lendable value is the maximum loan
amount that can be backed by that
asset and is calculated as the value
of the asset, less a deducted amount
referred to as the “haircut”—that is,
the loan is limited relative to the value
of the collateral to provide a cushion
in case the value of the collateral falls.
This haircut helps to protect the Federal
Reserve from loss should the borrower
fail to repay the loan.
44 Conducting Monetary Policy
the financial crisis that began in the summer of 2007, discount window
borrowing was infrequent (see box 3.4 for additional detail).
Monetary Policy during and after the
2007–09 Financial Crisis
The crisis in global financial markets that began during the summer of
2007 became particularly severe during 2008. One way that the Federal
Reserve responded to the crisis was by expanding its lending through
the discount window to banks that were experiencing shortages of
liquidity. In addition, the Federal Reserve introduced a variety of pro-
grams, using legal authority provided by Congress in several sections
Figure 3.5. Selected assets of the Federal Reserve, August 2007–December 2015
As the 2007–09 crisis intensied, the Federal Reserve introduced a variety of programs—and expanded its balance sheet in the
process—to address nancial institutions’ need for short-term liquidity and strains in many markets.
5,000
4,500
4,000
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Total
assets
Securities held outright
Support
for specic
institutions**
All
liquidity
facilities*
Billions of dollars
* “All liquidity facilities” includes term auction credit, primary credit, secondary credit, seasonal credit, Primary Dealer Credit
Facility, Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility, Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan
Facility, Commercial Paper Funding Facility, and central bank liquidity swaps.
** “Support for specic institutions” includes Maiden Lane LLC, Maiden Lane II LLC, Maiden Lane III LLC, and support to
American International Group (AIG).
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, statistical release H.4.1, “Factors Affecting Reserve Balances,”
www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41.
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 45
of the Federal Reserve Act, which were designed to address financial
institutions’ need for short-term liquidity and strains in many markets.
The Federal Reserve also established dollar liquidity swap arrangements
with several foreign central banks to address dollar funding pressures
abroad. These programs are discussed in greater detail in box 3.5
“Extraordinary Liquidity Provision during the 2007–09 Financial Crisis.”
Together, these policy initiatives greatly increased the size of the Federal
Reserve’s balance sheet as shown in figure 3.5. (For more detail on the
balance sheet, see the discussion on page 52 and box 3.6 on page 53
“Under standing the Federal Reserve’s Balance Sheet.”)
Figure 3.6. Reaching the “zero bound”
The federal funds rate neared its “zero bound” in December 2008. Around that time, the Federal Reserve began to use
nontraditional policy tools to boost economic activity.
7.0
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
.5
0
Percent
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015
Effective federal funds rate
Target federal funds rate
Target federal funds range
Source: Intended federal funds rate. See the Monetary Policy section of the Board’s website, www.federalreserve.gov. For the
federal funds rate target, see www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/openmarket.htm. For the federal funds effective rate,
see https://apps.newyorkfed.org/markets/autorates/fed%20funds.
46 Conducting Monetary Policy
Another way that the Federal Reserve responded to the crisis was
through its traditional policy tool, the federal funds rate. Beginning in
the fall of 2007, the FOMC cut its target for the federal funds rate and
by the end of 2008, that target had been reduced from 5¼percent to
a range of 0 to ¼percentage point (figure 3.6). While this monetary
easing was substantial, with the federal funds rate at nearly zero, the
FOMC could no longer rely on reducing that rate to provide much fur-
ther support for the economy.
Although the Federal Reserve’s initial responses to the crisis helped
financial markets to recover and function more normally, the recession
in the U.S. economy that began in December of 2007 was particularly
severe and long-lasting. With the federal funds rate near zero, the
FOMC turned to two less conventional policy measures—large-scale
asset purchases and forward guidance.
Large-scale asset purchases. In late 2008, the Federal Reserve began
purchasing longer-term securities through a series of large-scale asset
Box 3.5. Extraordinary Liquidity Provision during the 2007–09 Financial Crisis
In response to the financial crisis, the Federal Reserve provided liquidity to firms and markets in a variety of ways. Initially,
the Federal Reserve eased the terms on primary credit, the principal type of discount window credit that the Federal Reserve
extends to depository institutions. As the crisis intensified, however, the Federal Reserve provided liquidity in nontraditional
ways to firms and markets outside of the banking system.
In some cases, the Federal Reserve used
its regular authorities in new ways.
Even after easing the terms on primary
credit, banks were highly reluctant to
borrow primary credit out of concern
that borrowing from the Federal
Reserve would indicate that the bank
was experiencing financial difficulties.
As a result, the eased terms on primary
credit did not significantly reduce the
pressures on bank funding markets.
To address the banks’ concerns, the
Federal Reserve conducted regular
auctions of fixed quantities of discount
window credit. Because the credit was
extended through a market mecha-
nism, and because funds were provided
several days after the auction, banks
were less concerned that borrowing
would signal weakness and were less
reluctant to borrow. At the same time,
because dollar funding markets are
global, strains in foreign dollar markets
were contributing to volatility in U.S.
financial markets. To counter these
strains, the Federal Reserve estab-
lished foreign currency swap lines with
several foreign central banks. Under
the lines, the Federal Reserve provided
the foreign central bank with dollars,
which those central banks could lend
to financial institutions in their local
markets, and received foreign currency
in exchange.
During the financial crisis, the Federal
Reserve used its emergency lending
(continued on the next page)
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 47
purchase programs, thereby putting downward pressure on longer-
term interest rates, easing broader financial market conditions, and
thus supporting economic activity and job creation. Between December
2008 and August 2010, the Federal Reserve purchased $175billion in
direct obligations of the government-sponsored entities Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks as well as $1.25tril-
lion in mortgage-backed securities (MBS) guaranteed by Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae. These purchases were intended to help
reduce the cost and increase the availability of credit for the purchase
of homes.
In addition, between March 2009 and October 2009, the Federal
Reserve purchased $300billion of longer-term Treasury securities.
Later, in the face of a sluggish economic recovery, the Federal Reserve
expanded its asset holdings in a second purchase program between
November 2010 and June 2011, buying an additional $600billion of
longer-term Treasury securities.
authority to establish broad-based
lending facilities to provide liquidity
to financial markets other than the
interbank market that were important
for the provision of credit to U.S. busi-
nesses and households. In particular,
many critical financial institutions that
depended on short-term funding were
not depository institutions and so could
not borrow from the discount window
when the liquidity of short-term fund-
ing markets deteriorated. Moreover,
a material fraction of business and
household loans were funded through
securitizations; when markets for
securitized products deteriorated, the
supply of credit to businesses and
households declined, further weak-
ening the economy. Federal Reserve
emergency lending facilities were
established to provide liquidity to the
market for repurchase agreements, or
repos, the commercial paper market,
and the asset-backed securities market.
A facility was also established to help
money market mutual funds meet the
heavy withdrawals that occurred after
the failure of Lehman Brothers.
Lastly, the Federal Reserve used its
emergency authority to provide sup-
port to certain specific institutions in
order to avert disorderly failures that
could have led to even more severe
dislocations and strains for the financial
system as a whole and harmed the U.S.
economy.
All Federal Reserve lending during the
financial crisis was well collateralized
and every loan was repaid in full, on
time, and with interest. In most cases,
the interest rate charged on the loans
was above those that prevailed in
normal times. As a consequence, the
lending wound down, with many bor-
rowers even repaying their loans early,
as the financial situation improved.
Similarly, all dollar liquidity provided to
foreign central banks via the swap lines
was repaid, and the Federal Reserve
earned fees for providing the service.
As shown in figure 3.5 on page 44,
liquidity provision through broad-based
facilities peaked at about $1.5trillion in
early 2009. For detailed information on
these liquidity provisions, see the Fed-
eral Reserve Board’s website at www.
federalreserve.gov/ monetarypolicy/bst.
htm.
48 Conducting Monetary Policy
Maturity extension program. Between September 2011 and Decem-
ber2012, the Federal Reserve undertook a “maturity extension pro-
gram” or MEP. Under the MEP, the Federal Reserve bought $667billion
of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 to 30years and
sold an equivalent value of Treasury securities with remaining maturities
of 3years or less. The MEP added to the downward pressure on longer-
term interest rates without affecting the size of the Federal Reserve’s
balance sheet.
Open-ended asset purchases. Finally, with considerable slack remain-
ing in the economy (as evidenced by an unemployment rate of more
than 8percent), in September 2012 the FOMC began making addi-
tional purchases of MBS at a pace of $40billion per month. In Janu-
ary2013, these MBS purchases were supplemented by $45billion per
month in purchases of longer-term Treasury securities. Unlike its first
two asset purchase programs and the MEP, in which the total size of
the program was announced at the time the program was undertaken,
the Federal Reserve’s third asset purchase program was open-ended.
The FOMC indicated that it would continue to purchase assets until
the outlook for the labor market had improved substantially so long
as inflation and expected inflation remained stable, and so long as the
benefits of the purchases continued to outweigh their costs and risks.
In December 2013, the FOMC began to slow the pace of its asset
purchases. It continued to slow the pace of purchases at its subsequent
meetings, concluding its third asset purchase program in October 2014.
Box 3.6 illustrates the effects of the Federal Reserve’s asset purchase
programs on its holdings of securities (on the asset side of the balance
sheet) and the corresponding increase in deposits of depository institu-
tions or reserve balances (on the liability side of the balance sheet).
Since the summer of 2010, the Federal Reserve has continued to rein-
vest the proceeds of securities that mature or prepay. Maturing Treasury
securities are reinvested in Treasury securities, while principal payments
on holdings of agency debt and agency MBS are reinvested in agency
MBS. By reinvesting, the Federal Reserve continues to hold a large
Reinvestment to slow as
the economy improves
The FOMC indicated
in December2015 that
it expects to cease or
commence phasing out
reinvestments well after it
begins increasing the target
range for the federal funds
rate. The timing of this
step will depend on how
economic and financial
conditions and the economic
outlook evolve.
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 49
amount of longer-term securities and thereby maintains downward
pressure on longer-term interest rates.
Forward guidance. In addition to its asset purchase programs, the
FOMC used “forward guidance”—that is, it provided information
about its intentions for the federal funds rate—to influence expecta-
tions about the future course of monetary policy. In December 2008,
when the Committee reduced the target for the federal funds rate to
nearly zero, it indicated in its postmeeting statement that it expected
that “weak economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low
levels of the federal funds rate for some time.” As the economic effects
of the crisis worsened, the FOMC amended its forward guidance in
order to help the public understand the Committee’s thinking about
the future course of policy.
The forward guidance language in the FOMC’s postmeeting state-
menthas taken different forms since the onset of the financial crisis.
In March 2009, as the economic downturn worsened, the Committee
changed the forward guidance to indicate that the federal funds rate
could remain at exceptionally low levels “for an extended period.” In
August 2011, the Committee began using calendar dates in its policy
statement in order to indicate the period over which it expected eco-
nomic conditions to warrant maintaining the federal funds rate near
zero. As economic conditions did not improve in line with the Com-
mittee’s expectations, the calendar date in the forward guidance was
extended.
Later, in its December 2012 statement, the FOMC replaced the date-
based forward guidance with language indicating the economic
conditions that the Committee expected to see before it would begin
to consider raising its target for the federal funds rate. When the Com-
mittee added the economic conditionality to its statement in December
2012, it also indicated a variety of other economic factors that it would
take into account before raising interest rates.
50 Conducting Monetary Policy
The FOMC’s communications about likely future settings of its target
for the federal funds rate and its other policy tools have continued to
evolve. In particular, since the Committee began to normalize mon-
etary policy by modestly raising its target for the federal funds rate in
December of 2015, it has indicated that monetary policy is not on a
predetermined path and that its policy decisions will depend on what
incoming information tells policymakers about whether a change in
policy is necessary to move the economy toward, or keep it at, maxi-
mum employment and 2percent inflation.
Monetary Policy Normalization
Monetary policy has been consistently accommodative in recent years
as the FOMC sought to counter the economic effects of the financial
crisis and support the recovery from the Great Recession. In late 2015,
when the unemployment rate was at or near levels that policymak-
ers judge consistent with maximum employment, the Federal Reserve
began taking steps to “normalize” the stance of monetary policy in
order to continue to foster its macroeconomic objectives. The term
“normalization” refers to steps the FOMC is taking to return short-term
interest rates to more-normal levels and reduce the size of the Federal
Reserve’s balance sheet.
In December 2015, the FOMC began the normalization process by
raising its target range for the federal funds rate by ¼percentage
point—the first change since December 2008—bringing the target
range to 25 to 50 basis points. The FOMC based its decision on the
considerable improvement in labor market conditions during 2015 and
reasonable confidence that inflation, which had been running below the
Committee’s objective, would rise to 2percent over the medium term.
During normalization, the FOMC is continuing to set a target range for
the federal funds rate and communicate its policy through this rate.
To keep the federal funds rate in its target range, the Federal Reserve
uses two administered rates, the interest rate the Federal Reserve pays
on excess reserve balances (the IOER rate, discussed in box 3.3 “The
Federal Reserve Pays Interest on Required Reserve Balances and Excess
The Federal Reserve’s
changing approach to
policy implementation
For a primer on the frame-
work the Federal Reserve
is using for monetary
policy normalization, see
“Monetary Policy 101: The
Fed’s Changing Approach
to Policy Implementation”
at www.federalreserve.gov/
econresdata/feds/2015/
files/2015047pap.pdf.
What is a reverse
repurchase agreement?
In a reverse repurchase
agreement, or “reverse
repo,” the Federal Reserve
Open Market Desk sells a
security to an eligible reverse
repo counterparty with an
agreement to purchase it
back at a specified date in
the future. For more detailed
information on reverse repos
or the Federal Reserve’s over-
night reverse repo facility, see
www.federalreserve.gov/
monetarypolicy/overnight-
reverse-repurchase-
agreements.htm.
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 51
Balances” on page 40) and the interest rate it pays on overnight reverse
repurchase agreements (the ON RRP rate).
Overnight reverse repurchases. During normalization, the Com-
mittee is using an overnight reverse repurchase (ON RRP) facility as a
supplementary tool as needed to help control the federal funds rate.
In an ON RRP operation, an eligible financial counterparty provides
funds to the Federal Reserve in exchange for Treasury securities on the
Federal Reserve’s balance sheet and is paid the ON RRP rate; the follow-
ing day, the funds are returned to the counterparty and the securities
are returned to the Federal Reserve. In general, any counterparty that
is eligible to participate in ON RRP operations should be unwilling to
invest funds overnight with another counterparty at a rate below the
ON RRP rate. The FOMC plans to use the ON RRP facility only to the
extent necessary and will phase it out when it is no longer needed to
help control the funds rate.
Policy implementation during normalization. By paying interest on
reserves and offering ON RRPs, the Federal Reserve is providing safe,
liquid investments for banking institutions and ON RRP counterparties.
The Federal Reserve intends to set the IOER rate equal to the top of the
FOMC’s target range for the federal funds rate and the ON RRP rate
equal to the bottom of the target range. Increasing these two rates
puts upward pressure on short-term market rates, including the federal
funds rate, as investors are less willing to accept a lower rate elsewhere.
Other policy tools. Other supplementary tools, such as term depos-
its offered through the Federal Reserve’s Term Deposit Facility and
term reverse repurchase agreements, will also be used, if needed, to
put upward pressure on money market interest rates and so help to
control the federal funds rate and keep it in the target range set by the
FOMC. Term deposits are like interest-bearing certificates of deposit
that depository institutions hold at Federal Reserve Banks for a specified
length of time; the Board of Governors sets the interest rate on term
deposits. Funds placed in term deposits are transferred from the reserve
The FOMC’s communications about likely future settings of its target
for the federal funds rate and its other policy tools have continued to
evolve. In particular, since the Committee began to normalize mon-
etary policy by modestly raising its target for the federal funds rate in
December of 2015, it has indicated that monetary policy is not on a
predetermined path and that its policy decisions will depend on what
incoming information tells policymakers about whether a change in
policy is necessary to move the economy toward, or keep it at, maxi-
mum employment and 2percent inflation.
Monetary Policy Normalization
Monetary policy has been consistently accommodative in recent years
as the FOMC sought to counter the economic effects of the financial
crisis and support the recovery from the Great Recession. In late 2015,
when the unemployment rate was at or near levels that policymak-
ers judge consistent with maximum employment, the Federal Reserve
began taking steps to “normalize” the stance of monetary policy in
order to continue to foster its macroeconomic objectives. The term
“normalization” refers to steps the FOMC is taking to return short-term
interest rates to more-normal levels and reduce the size of the Federal
Reserve’s balance sheet.
In December 2015, the FOMC began the normalization process by
raising its target range for the federal funds rate by ¼percentage
point—the first change since December 2008—bringing the target
range to 25 to 50 basis points. The FOMC based its decision on the
considerable improvement in labor market conditions during 2015 and
reasonable confidence that inflation, which had been running below the
Committee’s objective, would rise to 2percent over the medium term.
During normalization, the FOMC is continuing to set a target range for
the federal funds rate and communicate its policy through this rate.
To keep the federal funds rate in its target range, the Federal Reserve
uses two administered rates, the interest rate the Federal Reserve pays
on excess reserve balances (the IOER rate, discussed in box 3.3 “The
Federal Reserve Pays Interest on Required Reserve Balances and Excess
The Federal Reserve’s
changing approach to
policy implementation
For a primer on the frame-
work the Federal Reserve
is using for monetary
policy normalization, see
“Monetary Policy 101: The
Fed’s Changing Approach
to Policy Implementation”
at www.federalreserve.gov/
econresdata/feds/2015/
files/2015047pap.pdf.
52 Conducting Monetary Policy
balances of participating institutions into a term deposit account at
the Federal Reserve for the life of the term deposit, thereby draining
reserves from the banking system.
The balance sheet. As the policy normalization process proceeds, the
Federal Reserve’s securities holdings—and the supply of reserve bal-
ances—will be reduced in a gradual and predictable manner primarily
by ceasing to reinvest repayments of principal on securities held in the
portfolio. As of October 2016, the FOMC had not decided when to
begin tapering or ceasing its reinvestments and did not anticipate sell-
ing agency MBS as part of the normalization process, although limited
sales might be warranted in the longer run to reduce or eliminate
residual holdings. The FOMC will announce the timing and pace of any
sales in advance.
The FOMC intends that the Federal Reserve will, over the longer run,
hold no more securities than necessary to implement monetary policy
efficiently and effectively, and that it will hold primarily Treasury securi-
ties, thereby minimizing the effect of Federal Reserve holdings on the
allocation of credit across sectors of the economy.
e Federal Reserve System Purposes & Functions 53
Box 3.6. Understanding the Federal Reserve’s Balance Sheet
The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet, published weekly, contains a great deal of information about the scale and scope of
its operations. For decades, market participants have closely studied the evolution of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet to
understand important details about the implementation of monetary policy.
The table below shows the major asset
and liability categories on the Federal
Reserve’s balance sheet. Conventional
open market operations and large-
scale asset purchases affect the Federal
Reserve’s balance sheet in a similar
fashion. For example, when the Open
Market Desk at the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York purchases a security
in the open market, Federal Reserve
assets increase by the value of the
security purchased. A corresponding
increase is recorded on the liability side
of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet
to reflect payment for the security; the
liability item “deposits of depository
institutions” rises when the account
that the seller’s depository institution
holds at the Federal Reserve is credited.
Simplied view of the Federal Reserve balance sheet, as of January 20, 2016
The Federal Reserve publishes data weekly regarding its balance sheet.
Assets (millions of dollars) Liabilities (millions of dollars)
Treasury securities held outright 2,461,396 Federal Reserve notes in circulation 1,369,051
Agency debt and mortgage-backed
securities holdings
1,750,275 Deposits of depository institutions 2,412,078
Other assets 277,169 Capital and other liabilities 707,711
Total 4,488,840 Total 4,488,840
Note: More detailed information on the balance sheet is available on the Federal Reserve Board’s website,
www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst.htm. The H.4.1 statistical release, “Factors Affecting Reserve Balances,”
is published every Thursday at www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/.