International Conference on Technology, Engineering and Science (IConTES), October 26-29, 2019, Antalya/Turkey
281
analysis, MSA. Using these statistical techniques, TV was measured, capabiilities were evaluated and risks were
reduced. Then, production was made according to work flow. The whole process was controlled according to
the determined control plan. Dimensional measurements control and performance tests have been performed on
the completed product and it has been proved that it meets customer requirements and company requirements.
The product, which has been approved, has been sent to the customer with all documents in accordance with the
packaging and transportation conditions determined by the joint decision of the company and the customer.
Thanks to the communication established between the customer and the company in the whole process from the
order to the delivery of the product to the customer, many studies became easy to understand and unnecessary
time losses were prevented. The customer has reviewed and approved the new product and documents. The
APQP model was approved as an evaluation model for new product performance by the top management due to
the advantages of APQP technique such as ensuring the right production of the product at one time and thus
reducing the labor, time, cost and scrap rates, detecting and eliminating the failures at the source before
supplying them to the customer, ensuring customer satisfaction, preparing the control plan for the product. Since
85% of the production is a new product, APQP technique has been used in the production of all products. In this
way, the company has achieved a significant advantage over its competitors in terms of both price and quick
return to the customer. As a result, it is aimed to increase the current market rate of the enterprise and to enter
new markets.
In the production of new products, the APQP model is frequently used by companies in the automotive and
aerospace sectors, which have a mass production system. Unlike these sectors and production systems, our work
was carried out in the air conditioning and refrigeration sector and a company that has an order-based
production system. The results of our study show that, the companies applying the APQP model in the NPD
process, which have an order-based production system and which have high product and production costs, will
have gains such as reduced product cycle times, increased productivity, reduced costs, increased customer
satisfaction. In addition, increasing the quality of the final product, providing competitive advantage, increasing
the existing market share, increasing the opportunities to enter new markets are among the other advantages. As
a result, companies that follow a systematic approach such as APQP to evaluate and control their new product
implementation process can ensure continuous improvement of company and reduce the cost, time, labor and
customer losses in the process and hence increase their profitability rates.
As a result of this study, the APQP model, which is thought to be beneficial for the new product implementation
processes in the automotive and aerospace sectors with only mass production systems, has been proven to be
beneficial for the air-conditioning and cooling sector with order-based production systems. In future studies,
APQP model can be developed for enterprises with production systems other than mass production and order-
based production systems. Academic studies can be conducted on generic APQP models for enterprises with
order-based production systems. Similar studies can be conducted in sectors other than air conditioning and
refrigeration, automotive, automotive sub-industry.
References
Armstrong, G., Kotler, P., Saunders, J., & Wong, V. (2005). New-product development and product life-cycle
strategies. In Principles of marketing (4th ed.) (pp. 579-619). UK: Prentice Hall Financial Times Press.
Baldan, F. J., Benítez, J. M., Fuente, M. J., Sainz-Palmero, G. I., & Sanchez-Fernandez, A. (2018). Fault
detection based on time series modeling and multivariate statistical process control. Chemometrics and
Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 182(2018), 57-69.
Book, B., Fick, W., Hopkins, R., Minkler, R., & Williams, C. (2008). Plan and define program. In Advanced
product quality planning and control plan (2nd ed.) (pp. 7-14). USA: Chrysler LLC, & Ford and
General Motors Press.
Cooper, R. G. (2000, July/August). Doing it right: Winning with new products. Retrieved from www.stage-
gate.com.
Desai, A., Mital A., & Subramanian, A. (2008). Developing successful products. In Product development (pp.
17-36). UK: Butterworth Heinemann Press.
Duru, N., Koç, K. H, & Taş, Y. (2011). İşletmelerde hatasızlığa yönelim, altı sigma ve hata türü etkileri analizi.
Ormancılık Dergisi, 7(1), 56-57.
Ernst, H. (2002). Success factors of new product development: A review of the empirical literature.
International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(1), 1–40.
Kaushik, P., Khanduja, D., & Mittal, K. (2012). Evidence of APQP in quality improvement: An SME case
study. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 7(1), 20-27
Khanna, V. K. (2005). Role of APQP and PPAP in supply chain management. Paradigm, 9(2), 86-95.