1
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES MANUAL
North Carolina Division of Aging and Adult Services
Adult Services Section
Revised: February 2021
2
APS MANUAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.
Introduction
A. Structure of Manual
B. Statement of Philosophy and Purpose
C. Basic Principles
II.
Legal Base
A. North Carolina General Statutes Related to APS Practice (Chapter 108A)
B. North Carolina Administrative Code Related to APS Practice (10A NCAC 71A)
C. Definitions (Guidance based on North Carolina General Statute 108A-101)
III.
Confidentiality and Release of Information
A. Statutory Requirements Related to APS Confidentiality and Release
of Information
B. Administrative Code Related to APS Confidentiality and Release
of Information
C. Social Work Practice Related to APS Confidentiality and Release of
Information
IV.
Adult Protective Services Intake
A. Statutory Requirements Related to APS Intake
B. Administrative Code Related to APS Intake
C. Social Work Practice Related to APS Intake
1. Receiving Reports
a. Continuous Access to APS Intake
b. Documenting the Report
c. Guidelines for Conducting a Thorough APS Intake
(1)
Skills and Strategies for APS Intake
(2)
Skills for Gathering Information Related to Disability
2. Screening Reports
a. Screening Criteria
b. APS Intake and Law Enforcement
c. Conflict of Interest When Screening
d. Reports Received Regarding Individuals Under Guardianship
e. Determining Initiation Timeframe
3. Notices Related to Intake
a. Initial Notice to Reporter
b. Initial Notice to the District Attorney and/or Law Enforcement
3
V.
Adult Protective Services Evaluation
A. Statutory Requirements Related to APS Evaluation
B. Administrative Code Related to APS Evaluation
C. Social Work Practice Related to APS Evaluation
1. APS Initiation
a. Diligent Efforts
b. Private Interview
c. Barriers to Initiation
(1)
Disabled Adult Cannot be Located
(2)
Disabled Adult Has Been Involuntarily Committed
(3)
DSS’ Evaluation Authority is Challenged
d. Crisis Intervention at Initiation or During the Evaluation Process
e. Emergency at Initiation
2. Conducting a Thorough Evaluation
a. Time Frames for APS Evaluation
b. Key Elements of APS Evaluation
c. Focus of the APS Evaluation
d. Six Domains of the APS Evaluation
(1)
Social Support
(2)
Environment
(3)
Economic Functioning
(4)
Mental/Emotional Functioning
(5)
Activities of Daily Living/Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
(6)
Physical Health
e. Essential Services
f. Legal Interventions Available During Evaluation
(1)Administrative Search and Inspection Warrant
(2)Order to Freeze Assets and Authorize Inspection
of Financial Records
(1)
Subpoena Directing the Release of Financial Records
3. Evaluating APS in Facilities
a. Licensure Issues vs. Protective Services
b. Screening Criteria and Decision Related to APS in Facilities
c. Responsibility of DSS in County of Residence Related to
APS in Facilities
d. Receiving Reports from the Division of Health Services
Regulation Related to APS in Facilities
e. Initiating the Evaluation Related to APS in Facilities
f. Steps in Evaluation Related to APS in Facilities
g. Review of Facility Records
h. Thorough Evaluation as it Relates to APS in Facilities
4
i. Written Report as it Relates to APS in Facilities
j. Dual Role as Supervisory Agency as it Relates to APS in Facilities
k. Planning and Mobilizing Protective Services as it Relates to APS in
Facilities
4. Case Decision Following a Thorough APS Evaluation
a. Time Frames Related to the Case Decision
b. Types of Case Decisions
(1)
Unconfirmed/Unsubstantiated
(2)
Confirmed/Unsubstantiated
(3)
Confirmed/Substantiated
c. Case Decision Terms Defined
(1)
Confirmation
(2)
Substantiation
(3)
Unsubstantiation
d. Guidelines Related to Case Decision Criteria
(1)
Determining if the Adult is Disabled
(2)
Determining Maltreatment
(3)
Determining the Need for Protection
e. Documenting the Case Decision
f. Adult Protective Services-Registry (DAAS-5026)
g. Case Decision and its Relationship to Capacity to Consent
5. Determining Capacity to Consent After Case Decision
a. Guidelines for Assessing the Adult’s Capacity to Consent
to Protective Services
b. Documentation of Capacity to Consent to Protective Services
6. Notices Following Evaluation
a. Notice to Reporter
b. Written Report
c. Notice to Administrator
VI.
Obtaining Service Authorization for Adult Protective Services
A. Statutory Requirements Related to Service Authorization
B. Administrative Code Related to Service Authorization
C. Social Work Practice Related to Service Authorization
1. Disabled Adult Has Capacity
a. Adult Has Capacity and Consents to Protective Services
b. Adult Has Capacity to Consent Caretaker Interference
c. Adult has Capacity and Refuses Offer of Protective Services
2. Disabled Adult Does Not Have Capacity
a. Surrogate Decision-Maker Authorizes Protective Services
b. Protective Services Order Authorizes Protective Services
c. Emergency Order Authorizes Protective Services
d. Ex-Parte Order Authorizes Protective Services
5
VII.
Planning and Mobilizing Essential Services
A. Statutory Requirements Related to Service Authorization
B. Administrative Code Related to Service Authorization
C. Social Work Practice Related to Service Authorization
1. Development of a Service Plan
2. Provision of Essential Services
3. Payment for Essential Services
VIII.
Reassessment and Termination
A. Statutory Requirements Related to Service Authorization
B. Administrative Code Related to Service Authorization
C. Social Work Practice Related to Service Authorization
IX.
Special Circumstances
A. Conflict of Interest
B. County of Residence/County of Location
C. Movement During the APS Process
D. Repeated Reports Regarding Same Adult
E. Natural Disasters/Emergency Operations
F. Reporting Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation in DHHS Divisions, Facilities, and
Schools
G. Undocumented Persons
H. Veterans Administration Request for Patient Information
X.
Legal Alternatives and Supplements to Adult Protective Services
A. Introduction
B. Civil Commitments
C. Guardianship Proceedings
D. Power of Attorney
E. Advance Directives
F. Substitute Payee
XI.
Provision of Services with Federal and State Funds
A. Introduction
B. Provision of Protective Services for Disabled Adults
XII.
Administration of Adult Protective Services
A. Introduction
B. Staffing
C. Agency Policies
D. Case Record
6
E. Use of Community Resources
F. Working with the Court and Law Enforcement
G. Inter-County Cooperation
H. APS Data Collection
I. Record Retention
XIII.
Appendices
A. 8 Basic Principles for Adult Protective Services
B. The Six Domains
C. Conflict of Interest Protocol
D. County of Residence/County of Location
E. Types of Surrogate Decision Makers
F. Adult Movement During the APS Process
G. APS Flow Chart
H. Critical APS Time Frames
I. APS Staffing Sheet
7
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES MANUAL
I. INTRODUCTION
8
I.
Introduction
A. Structure of Manual
A systematic process has been established which county departments shall follow when
providing Adult Protective Services. The process begins with establishing an effective
procedure for receiving and screening referrals and continues through closure of the
Adult Protective Services (APS) case. This manual is arranged accordingly and contains
detailed descriptions of the law, administrative code, and recommended social work
practice that Departments of Social Services shall use in carrying out their
responsibilities. Statutory requirements, administrative codes and recommended social
work practices are given for each step in the APS process, as well as for other relevant
topics.
Recommended social work practice provides interpretation and guidance to departments
in carrying out Adult Protective Services per statutory requirements and administrative
code. Each section of the APS process is divided into three main subsections including
the General Statute in bold, Administrative Code (State Policy) in bold, and then
Recommended Social Work Practice in regular font. Links to appendices and
recommended forms are located within each section and are evidenced by hyperlinks.
B. Statement of Philosophy and Purpose
Protective Services for Adults is a critical and multifaceted service. It is based on an
acute awareness of the vulnerability of adults with disabilities to various forms of
maltreatment. Maltreatment can present as abuse, neglect, or exploitation. Adult
Protective Services includes provisions in General Statutes for reporting maltreatment,
evaluation of maltreatment and intervention when services are necessary to protect the
adult.
The Adult Protective Services statute was developed to provide assistance to adults with
disabilities when they are unable to take care of themselves, and if they have no one
able, willing, or responsible to seek their essential services. These adults may live alone,
live with a family member acting as caregiver, or live with someone unrelated and acting
as their caregiver. They may live in private homes, residential care facilities, hospitals,
state institutions, or be homeless. Adult Protective Services is diverse by nature and
deals with persons of varying cultural, ethnic, religious, and economic backgrounds. At its
core, Adult Protective Services shall preserve the rights of the adult to make choices,
therefore consideration of that ethical responsibility is essential.
C. Basic Principles
The following basic principles, as outlined in Appendix A shall serve as a foundation in
the practice of Adult Protective Services (hereafter referred to as APS):
The right to self-determination is a basic principle of APS
Disabled adults should be treated with honesty, care and respect
The least restrictive alternative shall be used whenever possible
9
Give highest priority to the family and other support systems as resources when
appropriate
Inadequate or inappropriate intervention can be more harmful than no intervention
Protection of disabled adults is a shared community responsibility
The emphasis in APS is always on the need for protective services rather than
evaluation of Incidents
The disabled adult’s confidentiality and right to privacy should always be respected
Protective services for disabled adults encompass a wide array of services and activities
which are intended to remedy abuse, neglect and exploitation. This manual presents the
various aspects of adult protective services, including the protective services general
statute, alternatives to adult protective services, and administration of the service.
General statute, administrative code, and recommended social work practice assist
supervisors and social workers in carrying out an adult protective services program which
is beneficial to its disabled adults and is consistent with the requirements governing its
provision.
10
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES MANUAL
II.
LEGAL BASE
11
II.
Legal Base
A. North Carolina General Statutes Related to APS Practice (Chapter
108A)
§ 108A-14. Duties and responsibilities
(a)
The director of social services shall have the following duties and
responsibilities:
(3) To administer the programs of public assistance and social services
established by this Chapter under pertinent rules and regulations;
(14)
To receive and evaluate reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation of
disabled adults and to take appropriate action as required by the Protection of
the Abused, Neglected, or Exploited Disabled Adults Act, Article 6 of this
Chapter, to protect these adults.
(15)
To receive and evaluate reports of financial exploitation of disabled adults,
to investigate credible reports of financial exploitation under Article 6A of this
Chapter, and to take appropriate action to protect these adults.
(b)
The director may delegate to one or more members of his staff the authority to
act as his representative. The director may limit the delegated authority of his
representative to specific tasks or areas of expertise. The director may designate,
subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Labor, additional personnel
outside his staff to issue youth employment certificates.
§ 108A-15. Social services officials and employees as public guardians
The director and assistant directors of social services of each county may serve as
guardians for adults adjudicated incompetent under the provisions of Chapter 35A,
and they shall do so if ordered to serve in that capacity by the clerk of superior
court having jurisdiction of a guardianship proceeding brought under either
Article.
§ 108A-99. Short title: Article 6A
This Article may be cited as the "Protection of the Abused, Neglected, or Exploited
Disabled Adult Act." (1973, c. 1378; s. 1; 1975, c. 797; 1981, c. 275, s. 1.)
§ 108A-100. Legislative intent and purpose
Determined to protect the increasing number of disabled adults in North Carolina
who are abused, neglected, or exploited, the General Assembly enacts this Article
to provide protective services for such persons. (1973, c. 1378, s. 1; 1975, c. 797;
1981, c. 275, s.1.)
§ 108A-101. Definitions
(a)
The word "abuse" means the willful infliction of physical pain, injury or mental
anguish, unreasonable confinement, or the willful deprivation by a caretaker of
12
services which are necessary to maintain mental and physical health.
(b)
The word "caretaker" shall mean an individual who has the responsibility for
the care of the disabled adult as a result of family relationship or who has
assumed the responsibility for the care of the disabled adult voluntarily or by
contract.
(c)
The word "director" shall mean the director of the county department of social
services in the county in which the person resides or is present, or his
representative as authorized in G.S. 108A-14.
(d)
The words "disabled adult" shall mean any person 18 years of age or over or
any lawfully emancipated minor who is present in the State of North Carolina
and who is physically or mentally incapacitated due to mental retardation,
cerebral palsy, epilepsy or autism; organic brain damage caused by advanced
age or other physical degeneration in connection therewith; or due to
conditions incurred at any age which are the result of accident, organic brain
damage, mental or physical illness, or continued consumption or absorption of
substances.
(e)
A "disabled adult" shall be "in need of protective services" if that person, due
to his physical or mental incapacity, is unable to perform or obtain for himself
essential services and if that person is without able, responsible, and willing
persons to perform or obtain for his essential services.
(f)
The words "district court" shall mean the judge of that court.
(g)
The word "emergency" refers to a situation where (i) the disabled adult is in
substantial danger of death or irreparable harm if protective services are not
provided immediately, (ii) the disabled adult is unable to consent to services,
(iii) no responsible, able, or willing caretaker is available to consent to
emergency services, and (iv) there is insufficient time to utilize procedure
provided in G.S. 108A-105.
(h)
The words "emergency services" refer to those services necessary to maintain
the person's vital functions and without which there is reasonable belief that
the person would suffer irreparable harm or death. This may include taking
physical custody of the disabled person.
(i)
The words "essential services" shall refer to those social, medical, psychiatric,
psychological or legal services necessary to safeguard the disabled adult's
rights and resources and to maintain the physical or mental well-being of the
individual. These services shall include, but not be limited to, the provision of
medical care for physical and mental health needs, assistance in personal
hygiene, food, clothing, adequately heated and ventilated shelter, protection
from health and safety hazards, protection from physical mistreatment, and
protection from exploitation. The words "essential services" shall not include
taking the person into physical custody without his consent except as provided
13
for in G.S. 108A-106 and in Chapter 122C of the General Statutes.
(j)
The word "exploitation" means the illegal or improper use of a disabled adult or
his resources for another's profit or advantage.
(k)
The word "indigent" shall mean indigent as defined in G.S. 7A-450.
(l)
The words "lacks the capacity to consent" shall mean lacks sufficient
understanding or capacity to make or communicate responsible decisions
concerning his person, including but not limited to provisions for health or
mental health care, food, clothing, or shelter, because of physical or mental
incapacity. This may be reasonably determined by the director or he may seek a
physician's or psychologist's assistance in making this determination.
(m)
The word "neglect" refers to a disabled adult who is either living alone and not
able to provide for himself or herself the services which are necessary to
maintain the person's mental or physical health or is not receiving services
from the person's caretaker. A person is not receiving services from his
caretaker if, among other things and not by way of limitation, the person is a
resident of one of the State-owned psychiatric hospitals listed in G.S. 122C-
181(a)(1), the State- owned Developmental Centers listed in G.S. 122C-181(a)(2),
or the State-owned Neuro-Medical Treatment Centers listed in G.S. 122C-
181(a)(3), the person is, in the opinion of the professional staff of that State-
owned facility, mentally incompetent to give consent to medical treatment, the
person has no legal guardian appointed pursuant to Chapter 35A, or guardian
as defined in G.S. 122C- 3(15), and the person needs medical treatment.
(n)
The words "protective services" shall mean services provided by the State or
other government or private organizations or individuals which are necessary
to protect the disabled adult from abuse, neglect, or exploitation. They shall
consist of evaluation of the need for service and mobilization of essential
services on behalf of the disabled adult. (1973, c. 1378, s. 1; 1975, c. 797; 1979,
c. 1044, ss. 1-4;1981, c. 275, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 34; 1987, c. 550, s. 24; 1989, c.
770, s. 29; 1991, c. 258, s. 2; 2007-177, s. 4.)
§ 108A-102. Duty to report; content of report; immunity
(a)
Any person having reasonable cause to believe that a disabled adult is in need
of protective services shall report such information to the director.
(b)
The report may be made orally or in writing. The report shall include the name
and address of the disabled adult; the name and address of the disabled adult's
caretaker; the age of the disabled adult; the nature and extent of the disabled
adult's injury or condition resulting from abuse or neglect; and other pertinent
information.
(c)
Anyone who makes a report pursuant to this statute, who testifies in any
judicial proceeding arising from the report, or who participates in a required
evaluation shall be immune from any civil or criminal liability on account of
14
such report or testimony or participation, unless such person acted in bad faith
or with a malicious purpose. (1973, c. 1378, s. 1; 1975, c. 797; 1981, c. 275, s. 1.)
§ 108A-103. Duty of director upon receiving report
(a)
Any director receiving a report that a disabled adult is in need of protective
services shall make a prompt and thorough evaluation to determine whether the
disabled adult is in need of protective services and what services are needed.
The evaluation shall include a visit to the person and consultation with others
having knowledge of the facts of the particular case. When necessary for a
complete evaluation of the report, the director shall have the authority to review
and copy any and all records, or any part of such records, related to the care
and treatment of the disabled adult that have been maintained by any
individual, facility or agency acting as a caretaker for the disabled adult. This
shall include but not be limited to records maintained by facilities licensed by
the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. Use of
information so obtained shall be subject to and governed by the provisions of
G.S. 108A-80 and Article 3 of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes. The director
shall have the authority to conduct an interview with the disabled adult with no
other persons present. After completing the evaluation the director shall make a
written report of the case indicating whether he believes protective services are
needed and shall notify the individual making the report of his determination as
to whether the disabled adult needs protective services.
(b)
The staff and physicians of local health departments, area mental health,
developmental disabilities, and substance abuse authorities, and other public
or private agencies shall cooperate fully with the director in the performance of
his duties. These duties include immediate accessible evaluations and in-home
evaluations where the director deems this necessary.
(c)
The director may contract with an agency or private physician for the purpose
of providing immediate accessible medical evaluations in the location that the
director deems most appropriate.
(d)
The director shall initiate the evaluation described in subsection (a) of this
section as follows:
1)
Immediately upon receipt of the complaint if the complaint alleges a
danger of death in an emergency as defined in G.S. 108A-101(g).
2)
Within 24 hours if the complaint alleges danger of irreparable harm in an
emergency as defined by G.S. 108A-101(g).
3)
Within 72 hours if the complaint does not allege danger of death or
irreparable harm in an emergency as defined by G.S. 108A-101(g).
4)
Repealed by Session Laws 2000, c. 131, s. 1.
The evaluation shall be completed within 30 days for allegations of abuse or
neglect and within 45 days for allegations of exploitation. (1973, c. 1378, s. 1;
1975, c. 797; 1981, c. 275, s. 1; 1985, c. 589, s. 35; c. 658, s. 1; 1985 (Reg. Sess.,
1986), c. 863, s. 6; 1991, c. 636, s. 19(c); 1997-443, s. 11A.118(a); 1999-334, s.
15
1.10; 2000-131, s. 1.
§ 108A-104. Provision of protective services with the consent of the person;
withdrawal of consent; caretaker refusal.
(a)
If the director determines that a disabled adult is in need of protective services,
he shall immediately provide or arrange for the provision of protective services,
provided that the disabled adult consents.
(b)
When a caretaker of a disabled adult who consents to the receipt of protective
services refuses to allow the provision of such services to the disabled adult,
the director may petition the district court for an order enjoining the caretaker
from interfering with the provision of protective services to the disabled adult.
The petition must allege specific facts sufficient to show that the disabled adult
is in need of protective services and consents to the receipt of protective
services and that the caretaker refuses to allow the provision of such services.
If the judge finds by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the disabled
adult is in need of protective services and consents to the receipt of protective
services and that the caretaker refuses to allow the provision of such services,
he may issue an order enjoining the caretaker from interfering with the
provision of protective services to the disabled adult.
(c)
If a disabled adult does not consent to the receipt of protective services, or if he
withdraws his consent, the services shall not be provided. (1973, c. 1378, s. 1;
1975, c. 797; 1981, c. 275, s. 1.)
§ 108A-105. Provision of protective services to disabled adults who lack the
capacity to consent; hearing, findings, etc.
(a)
If the director reasonably determines that a disabled adult is being abused,
neglected, or exploited and lacks capacity to consent to protective services,
then the director may petition the district court for an order authorizing the
provision of protective services. The petition must allege specific facts
sufficient to show that the disabled adult is in need of protective services and
lacks capacity to consent to them.
(b)
The court shall set the case for hearing within 14 days after the filing of the
petition. The disabled adult must receive at least five days' notice of the
hearing. He has the right to be present and represented by counsel at the
hearing. If the person, in the determination of the judge, lacks the capacity to
waive the right to counsel, then a guardian ad litem shall be appointed pursuant
to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 17, and rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense
Services. If the person is indigent, the cost of representation shall be borne by
the State.
(c)
If, at the hearing, the judge finds by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that
the disabled adult is in need of protective services and lacks capacity to
consent to protective services, he may issue an order authorizing the provision
of protective services. This order may include the designation of an individual
or organization to be responsible for the performing or obtaining of essential
16
services on behalf of the disabled adult or otherwise consenting to protective
services in his behalf. Within 60 days from the appointment of such an
individual or organization, the court will conduct a review to determine if a
petition should be initiated in accordance with Chapter 35A; for good cause
shown, the court may extend the 60 day period for an additional 60 days, at the
end of which it shall conduct a review to determine if a petition should be
initiated in accordance with Chapter 35A. No disabled adult may be committed
to a mental health facility under this Article.
(d)
A determination by the court that a person lacks the capacity to consent to
protective services under the provisions of this Chapter shall in no way affect
incompetency proceedings as set forth in Chapters 33, 35 or 122 of the General
Statutes of North Carolina, or any other proceedings, and incompetency
proceedings as set forth in Chapters 33, 35, or 122 shall have no conclusive
effect upon the question of capacity to consent to protective services as set
forth in this Chapter. (1973, c. 1378, s. 1; 1975, c. 797; 1977, c. 725, s. 3, 1979, c.
1044, s. 5; 1981, c. 275, s. 1; 1985, c. 658, s. 2; 1987, c. 550, s. 25; 2000-144, s.
36.)
§ 108A-106. Emergency intervention; findings by court; limitations; contents of
petition; notice of petition; court authorized entry of premises; immunity of
petitioner.
(a)
Upon petition by the director, a court may order the provision of emergency
services to a disabled adult after finding that there is reasonable cause to
believe that:
a.
A disabled adult lacks capacity to consent and that he is in need of
protective service;
b.
An emergency exists; and
c.
No other person authorized by law or order to give consent for the
person is available and willing to arrange for emergency services.
(b)
The court shall order only such emergency services as are necessary to
remove the conditions creating the emergency. In the event that such services
will be needed for more than 14 days, the director shall petition the court in
accordance with G.S. 108A-105.
(c)
The petition for emergency services shall set forth the name, address, and
authority of the petitioner; the name, age and residence of the disabled adult;
the nature of the emergency; the nature of the disability if determinable; the
proposed emergency services; the petitioner's reasonable belief as to the
existence of the conditions set forth in subsection (a) above; and facts showing
petitioner's attempts to obtain the disabled adult's consent to the services.
(d)
Notice of the filing of such petition and other relevant information, including the
factual basis of the belief that emergency services are needed and a description
of the exact services to be rendered shall be given to the person, to his spouse,
or if none, to his adult children or next of kin, to his guardian, if any. Such
notice shall be given at least 24 hours prior to the hearing of the petition for
17
emergency intervention; provided, however, that the court may issue immediate
emergency order ex parte upon finding as fact (i) that the conditions specified
in G.S. 108A-106(a) exist; (ii) that there is likelihood that the disabled adult may
suffer irreparable injury or death if such order be delayed; and (iii) that
reasonable attempts have been made to locate interested parties and secure
from them such services or their consent to petitioner's provision of such
service; and such order shall contain a show-cause notice to each person upon
whom served directing such person to appear immediately or at any time up to
and including the time for the hearing of the petition for emergency services
and show cause, if any exists, for the dissolution or modification of the said
order. Copies of the said order together with such other appropriate notices as
the court may direct shall be issued and served upon all of the interested
parties designated in the first sentence of this subsection. Unless dissolved by
the court for good cause shown, the emergency order ex parte shall be in effect
until the hearing is held on the petition for emergency services. At such
hearing, if the court determines that the emergency continues to exist, the court
may order the provision of emergency services in accordance with subsections
(a) and (b) of this section.
(e)
Where it is necessary to enter a premises without the disabled adult's consent
after obtaining a court order in compliance with subsection (a) above, the
representative of the petitioner shall do so.
(f)
(1) Upon petition by the director, a court may order that:
a.
The disabled adult's financial records be made available at a certain day
and time for inspection by the director or his designated agent; and
b.
The disabled adult's financial assets be frozen and not withdrawn, spent
or transferred without prior order of the court.
(2)
Such an order shall not issue unless the court first finds that there is
reasonable cause to believe that:
a. A disabled adult lacks the capacity to consent and that he is in need of
protective services;
b. The disabled adult is being financially exploited by his caretaker; and
c. No other person is able or willing to arrange for protective services.
(3)
Provided, before any such inspection is done, the caretaker and every
financial institution involved shall be given notice and a reasonable opportunity
to appear and show good cause why this inspection should not be done. And,
provided further, that any order freezing assets shall expire ten days after such
inspection is completed, unless the court for good cause shown, extends it.
(g)
No petitioner shall be held liable in any action brought by the disabled adult if
the petitioner acted in good faith. (1975, c. 797; 1981, c. 275, s. 1; 1985, c. 658, s.
3.)
18
§ 108A-107. Motion in the cause
Notwithstanding any finding by the court of lack of capacity of the disabled adult
to consent, the disabled adult or the individual or organization designated to be
responsible for the disabled adult shall have the right to bring a motion in the
cause for review of any order issued pursuant to this Article. (1973, c. 1378, s. 1;
1975, c. 797; 1981, c. 275, s. 1.)
§ 108A-108. Payment for essential services
At the time the director, in accordance with the provisions of G.S. 108A-103 makes
an evaluation of the case reported, then it shall be determined, according to
regulations set by the Social Services Commission, whether the individual is
financially capable of paying for the essential services. If he is, he shall make
reimbursement for the costs of providing the needed essential services. If it is
determined that he is not financially capable of paying for such essential services,
they shall be provided at no cost to the recipient of the services. (1975, c. 797;
1981, c. 275, s. 1.)
§ 108A-109. Reporting abuse
Upon finding evidence indicating that a person has abused, neglected, or exploited
a disabled adult, the director shall notify the district attorney. (1975, c. 797; 1981, c.
275, s. 1.)
§ 108A-110. Funding of protective services
Any funds appropriated by counties for home health care, boarding home, nursing
home, emergency assistance, medical or psychiatric evaluations, and other
protective services and for the development and improvement of a system of
protective services, including additional staff, may be matched by State and
federal funds. Such funds shall be utilized by the county department of social
services for the benefit of disabled adults in need of protective services. (1975, c.
797; 1981, c. 275, s. 1.)
§ 108A-111. Adoption of standards
The Department and the administrative office of the court shall adopt standards
and other procedures and guidelines with forms to insure the effective
implementation of the provisions of this Article.
§ 108A-112. Legislative intent and purpose
Determined to fight the growing problem of fraud and financial exploitation
targeting disabled and older adults in North Carolina, the General Assembly enacts
this Article to facilitate the collection of records needed to investigate and
prosecute such incidents. (2013-337, s. 4.)
§ 108A-113. Definitions
As used in this Article, the following definitions apply:
1)
Customer. - A person who is a present or former holder of an account with a
financial institution.
2)
Disabled adult. - An individual 18 years of age or older or a lawfully
emancipated minor who is present in the State of North Carolina and who is
19
physically or mentally incapacitated as defined in G.S. 108A-101(d).
3)
Financial exploitation. - The illegal or improper use of a disabled adult's or
older adult's financial resources for another's profit or pecuniary advantage.
4)
Financial institution. - A banking corporation, trust company, savings and
loan association, credit union, or other entity principally engaged in lending
money or receiving or soliciting money on deposit.
5)
Financial record. - An original of, a copy of, or information derived from a
record held by a financial institution pertaining to a customer's relationship
with the financial institution and identified with or identifiable with the
customer.
6)
Investigating entity. - A law enforcement agency investigating alleged
financial exploitation of a disabled adult or an older adult, or a county
department of social services investigating alleged financial exploitation of a
disabled adult.
7)
Law enforcement agency. - Any duly accredited State or local government
agency possessing authority to enforce the criminal statutes of North
Carolina.
8)
Older adult. - An individual 65 years of age or older.
9)
Promptly. - As soon as practicable, with reasonable allowance to be made
for the time required to retrieve older data or records that are not readily or
immediately retrievable due to their current storage media. (2013- 337, s. 4.)
§ 108A-114. Financial institutions encouraged to offer disabled adult and older
adult customers the opportunity to submit a list of trusted persons to be contacted
in case of financial exploitation.
All financial institutions are encouraged, but not required, to offer to disabled adult
and older adult customers the opportunity to submit, and periodically update, a list
of persons that the disabled adult or older adult customer would like the financial
institution to contact in case of suspected financial exploitation of the disabled
adult or older adult customer. No financial institution, or officer or employee
thereof, who acts in good faith in offering to its customer the opportunity to submit
and update a list of such contact persons may be held liable in any action for
doing so. (2013-337, s. 4.)
§ 108A-115. Duty to report suspected fraud; content of report; immunity for
reporting
(a)
Any financial institution, or officer or employee thereof, having reasonable
cause to believe that a disabled adult or older adult is the victim or target of
financial exploitation shall report such information to the following:
1)
Persons on the list provided by the customer under G.S. 108A-114, if
such a list has been provided by the customer. The financial institution
may choose not to contact persons on the provided list if the financial
institution suspects that those persons are financially exploiting the
disabled adult or older adult.
2)
The appropriate local law enforcement agency.
20
3)
The appropriate county department of social services, if the customer is
a disabled adult.
(b)
The report may be made orally or in writing. The report shall include the name
and address of the disabled adult or older adult, the nature of the suspected
financial exploitation, and any other pertinent information.
(c)
No financial institution, or officer or employee thereof, who acts in good faith in
making a report under this section may be held liable in any action for doing so.
(2013-337, s. 4.)
§ 108A-116. Production of customers' financial records in cases of suspected
financial exploitation; immunity; records may not be used against account owner.
(a)
An investigating entity may, under the conditions specified in this section,
petition the district court to issue a subpoena directing a financial institution to
provide to the investigating entity the financial records of a disabled adult or
older adult customer. The petition shall be filed in the county of residence of
the disabled adult or older adult customer whose financial records are being
subpoenaed. The court shall hear the case within two business days after the
filing of the petition. The court shall issue the subpoena upon finding that all of
the following conditions are met:
1)
The investigating entity is investigating, pursuant to the investigating
entity's statutory authority, a credible report that the disabled adult or
older adult is being or has been financially exploited.
2)
The disabled adult's or older adult's financial records are needed in order
to substantiate or evaluate the report.
3)
Time is of the essence in order to prevent further exploitation of that
disabled adult or older adult.
(b)
Delivery of the subpoena may be effected by hand, via certified mail, return
receipt requested, or through a designated delivery service authorized pursuant
to 26 U.S.C. § 7502(f)(2) and may be addressed to the financial institution's local
branch or office vice president, its local branch or office manager or assistant
branch or office manager, or the agent for service of process listed by the
financial institution with the North Carolina Secretary of State or, if there is
none, with the agent for service of process listed by the financial institution in
any state in which it is domiciled. (b1) A financial institution may challenge the
subpoena by filing a motion to quash or modify the subpoena within ten days
after receipt of delivery of the subpoena pursuant to subsection (b) of this
section. The subpoena may be challenged only for the following reasons:
1)
There is a procedural defect with the subpoena.
2)
The subpoena contains insufficient information to identify the records
subject to the subpoena.
3)
The financial institution is otherwise prevented from promptly complying
with the subpoena.
21
4)
The petition was filed or subpoena requested for an improper purpose or
based upon insufficient grounds.
5)
The subpoena subjects the financial institution to an undue burden or is
otherwise unreasonable or oppressive.
Within two business days after the motion is filed, the court shall hear the
motion and issue an order upholding, modifying, or quashing the subpoena.
(c)
Upon receipt of a subpoena delivered pursuant to subsection (b) of this section
identifying the disabled adult or older adult customer or, if the subpoena is
challenged pursuant to subsection (b1) of this section, entry of a court order
upholding or modifying a subpoena, a financial institution shall promptly
provide to the head of an investigating entity, or his or her designated agent,
the financial records of a disabled adult or older adult customer.
(d)
All produced copies of the disabled adult's or older adult's financial records, as
well as any information obtained pursuant to the duty to report found in G.S.
108A-115, shall be kept confidential by the investigating entity unless required
by court order to be disclosed to a party to a court proceeding or introduced
and admitted into evidence in an open court proceeding.
(e)
No financial institution or investigating entity, or officer or employee thereof,
who acts in good faith in providing, seeking, or obtaining financial records or
any other information in accordance with this section, or in providing testimony
in any judicial proceeding based upon the contents thereof, may be held liable
in any action for doing so.
(f)
No customer may be subject to indictment, criminal prosecution, criminal
punishment, or criminal penalty by reason of or on account of anything
disclosed by a financial institution pursuant to this section, nor may any
information obtained through such disclosure be used as evidence against the
customer in any criminal or civil proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
information obtained may be used against a person who is a joint account
owner accused of financial exploitation of a disabled adult or older adult joint
account holder, but solely for criminal or civil proceedings directly related to
the alleged financial exploitation of the disabled adult or older adult joint
account holder.
(g)
The petition and the court's entire record of the proceedings under this section
is not a matter of public record. Records qualifying under this subsection shall
be maintained separately from other records, shall be withheld from public
inspection, and may be examined only by order of the court. (2013-337, s. 4;
2014- 115, s. 44(a).)
22
§ 108A-117. Notice to customer; delayed notice
(a)
Upon the issuance of a subpoena pursuant to G.S. 108A-116, the investigating
entity shall immediately provide the customer with written notice of its action
by first-class mail to the customer's last known address, unless an order for
delayed notice is obtained pursuant to subsection (b) of this section. The notice
shall be sufficient to inform the customer of the name of the investigating entity
that has obtained the subpoena, the financial records subject to production
pursuant to the subpoena, and the purpose of the investigation.
(b)
An investigating entity may include in its application for a subpoena pursuant
to G.S. 108A-116 a request for an order delaying the customer notice required
pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. The court issuing the subpoena may
order a delayed notice in accordance with subsection (c) of this section if it
finds, based on affidavit or oral testimony under oath or affirmation before the
issuing court, that all of the following conditions are met:
1)
The investigating entity is investigating a credible report that the adult is
being or has been financially exploited.
2)
There is reason to believe that the notice will result in at least one of the
following:
a. Endangering the life or physical safety of any person.
b. Flight from prosecution.
c. Destruction of or tampering with evidence.
d. Intimidation of potential witnesses.
e. Serious jeopardy to an investigation or official proceeding.
f. Undue delay of a trial or official proceeding.
(c)
Upon making the findings required in subsection (b) of this section, the court
shall enter an ex parte order granting the requested delay for a period not to
exceed 30 days. If the court finds there is reason to believe that the notice
may endanger the life or physical safety of any person, the court may order that
the delay be for a period not to exceed 180 days. An order delaying notice shall
direct that:
1)
The financial institution not disclose to any person the existence of the
investigation, of the subpoena, or of the fact that the customer's financial
records have been provided to the investigating entity for the duration of
the period of delay authorized in the order;
2)
The investigating entity deliver a copy of the order to the financial
institution along with the subpoena that is delivered pursuant to G.S. 108-
116(b); and
3)
The order be sealed until otherwise ordered by the court.
(d)
Upon application by the investigating entity, further extensions of the delay of
notice may be granted by order of a court in the county of residence of the
disabled adult or older adult customer whose financial records are being
23
subpoenaed, upon a finding of the continued existence of the conditions set
forth in subdivisions (1) and (2) of subsection (b) of this section, and subject to
the requirements of subsection (c) of this section. If the initial delay was
granted for a period not to exceed 30 days, the delay may be extended by
additional periods of up to 30 days each and the total delay in notice granted
under this section shall not exceed 90 days. If the initial delay was granted for a
period not to exceed 180 days, the delay may be extended by additional periods
of up to 180 days each and may continue to be extended until the court finds
the notice would no longer endanger the life or physical safety of any person.
(e)
Upon the expiration of the period of delay of notice granted under this section,
including any extensions thereof, the customer shall be served with a copy of
the notice required by subsection (a) of this section.
B. North Carolina Administrative Code Related to APS Practice (10A
NCAC)
Subchapter 71A Protective Services for Adults SECTION - .0100 - GENERAL
10A NCAC 71A .0101 INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT
Rules in this Subchapter govern the provision of protective services for adults with
funds administered by the Division of Social Services. Included are requirements
which must be met by county departments of social services in carrying out their
responsibilities for the protection of disabled adults under Article 6, Chapter 108A
of the General Statutes.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983.
10A NCAC 71A .0102 DEFINITIONS
(a)
"Immediately" as specified in G.S. 108A-103(d), shall mean responds with no
delay as soon as a county department of social services receives a report
that:
1)
an adult is alleged to be disabled as defined in G.S. 108A-101(d);
2)
an adult is alleged to be abused, neglected, or exploited as defined in
G.S. 108A-101(a), (j), or (m); and
3)
an adult is alleged to be in need of protective services as defined in
G.S. 108A-101(e).
(b)
"A life-threatening situation" shall be considered an emergency as defined
in G.S. 108A-101(g).
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; S.L. 1999-334; Temporary Adoption Eff.
September 28, 1999; Eff. July 17, 2000.
24
SECTION .0200 - ACCEPTANCE AND EVALUATION OF PROTECTIVE SERVICES
REPORTS
10A NCAC 71A .0201 ACCEPTANCE OF REPORTS
(a)
The county department of social services shall accept all reports alleging an
abused, neglected, or exploited disabled adult is in need of protective
services. This includes anonymous reports. If the county department
determines that the address of the disabled adult given in the report is in
another county, the department shall refer the person making the report to
the appropriate county department. The county department receiving the
original report shall follow up to make sure the appropriate county has
received the report.
(b)
The department of social services shall make arrangements for 24-hour
coverage to receive calls and take appropriate action.
(c)
Notwithstanding provisions in 10A NCAC 71A .0801 through .0803, the
director may immediately tell the District Attorney's office and local law
enforcement agencies when there is reason to believe that physical harm
may occur to the disabled adult. This would include sharing evidence of
abuse or neglect the agency has to date.
History Note: Authority G.S. 108A-103; 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983;
Amended Eff. December 1, 1991; July 1, 1990; Temporary Amendment Eff.
December 12, 1995; Amended Eff. April 1, 1997.
10A NCAC 71A .0202 RECEIPT OF ORAL REPORT
The social worker receiving an oral report shall explain to the complainant (the
person making the report) that the department will notify the complainant of the
results of the evaluation. The social worker shall determine from the complainant
whether the complainant wants the notification to be oral or written.
10A NCAC 71A .0203 REPORTS REGARDING COUNTY OFFICIALS
(a)
When a report is received alleging abuse, neglect or exploitation of a
disabled adult by a social services board member, department of social
services staff member, county commissioner, or the county manager, the
county department shall notify the regional office immediately. The regional
office will assign the report to another county department for evaluation.
(b)
In addition to specified instances in (a) of this Rule in which reports must be
assigned to another county, the county department shall consult the
regional office whenever it seems that evaluation of a report may present the
appearance of a conflict of interest.
(c)
If the evaluation does not substantiate the report, the department which
conducted the evaluation will refer the case back to the county of residence
so that alternative services may be offered.
25
(d)
If the evaluation substantiates the report, the agency which conducted the
evaluation will seek authorization for services, including petitioning the
court when necessary. The petition shall be filed in the county of residence
and shall include the reason for filing by an agency in another county.
(e)
The agency which conducted the evaluation will act as case manager for
protective services in coordination with the agency in the county of
residence. The county of residence will be responsible for paying for
services in accordance with rules in Section.0400 of this Subchapter, and for
any expenses for medical, psychological or other examinations and legal
services incurred by the county which conducted the evaluation.
History Note: Authority G.S. 108A-103; 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983;
Amended Eff. July 1, 1990.
10A NCAC 71A .0204 TIME FRAME TO INITIATE EVALUATION
(a)
Evaluation of reports involving an emergency as defined in G.S. 108A-101(g)
shall be initiated within 24 hours of receipt of the report.
(b)
Evaluation of other reports of a need for protective services shall be initiated
within 72 hours after receipt of a report.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983.
10A NCAC 71A .0205 INITIATION OF EVALUATION
The evaluation is initiated by a visit to the adult about whom the report is made. If
the adult cannot be located, efforts to locate the adult within the 24- or 72-hour
time limit, as appropriate, shall be documented in the case record. Such efforts to
locate the adult shall constitute initiation of the evaluation.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983.
10A NCAC 71A .0206 STEPS IN EVALUATION
The complete evaluation shall include:
1)
The visit to the person, which means that the person must be seen by the
social worker. The social worker will make as many visits as are necessary
to determine whether the adult is disabled; abused, neglected or exploited;
and in need of protective services.
2)
Consultation with others who have knowledge of the facts of the situation.
This includes individuals identified by the person making the report, as well
as individuals mentioned by the disabled adult who may have information
pertinent to the evaluation.
3)
Medical, psychological or psychiatric evaluations when necessary to
determine whether the adult is disabled; abused, neglected or exploited; and
in need of services; and to determine what services are needed.
26
History Note: Authority G.S. 108A-103; 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983;
Amended Eff. July 1, 1990.
10A NCAC 71A .0207 FOCUS OF EVALUATION
The evaluation must determine:
1)
whether or not the adult is disabled in accordance with the statutory
definition in G.S. 108A-101(d);
2)
whether or not the adult is abused, neglected or exploited as defined in G.S.
108A-101(a)(j) or (m);
3)
whether or not the adult is in need of protective services as defined in G.S.
108A-101(e);
4)
whether or not the adult lacks the capacity to consent to protective services.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983.
10A NCAC 71A .0208 CONDUCTING A THOROUGH EVALUATION
A thorough evaluation of the protective services report shall include identifying
indicators of abuse, neglect, or exploitation and the disabled adult's strengths and
limitations by assessing the following functional areas:
1)
physical health;
2)
mental health;
3)
social support;
4)
activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living;
5)
financial support; and
6)
physical environment.
History Note: Authority G.S. 108A-103; 143B-153; Eff. December 1, 1991.
10A NCAC 71A .0209 SUBSTANTIATION OF THE REPORT
(a)
Following completion of the evaluation a determination shall be made as to
whether the report is substantiated.
(b)
A report is substantiated when:
1)
the adult is determined to be disabled as defined in G.S. 108A-101(d);
2)
the adult is determined to be abused, neglected or exploited as
defined in G.S. 108A-101(a), (j), or (m); and
3)
the adult is determined to be in need of protective services as defined
in G.S. 108A-101(e).
(c)
A report is unsubstantiated if any one of the three conditions in
Subparagraphs (b)(1), (2), and (3) of this Rule are not met.
27
SECTION .0300 - UNSUBSTANTIATED REPORTS: SUBSTANTIATED REPORTS:
REFUSAL OF SERVICES
10A NCAC 71A .0301 UNSUBSTANTIATED REPORT: OFFER OF SERVICES
When the evaluation of the report indicates that the allegations are not
substantiated, an offer shall be made to the individual of any available and
appropriate agency services. The social worker shall explain such services to the
individual. In addition, the social worker shall provide information about other
community services and shall offer to refer the person to such resources.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983.
10A NCAC 71A .0302 SUBSTANTIATED REPORT: ADULT REFUSES SERVICES
(a)
When the evaluation of a report indicates that the allegations are
substantiated and the disabled adult is capable of making responsible
decisions and refuses the receipt of protective services, the social worker
must respect that decision and terminate contact with the adult. Prior to
doing so, the social worker shall explain the services available to the adult
and that the adult may call the agency to request assistance, if needed.
(b)
Documentation shall be made of the social worker's explanation and offer of
services and of the adult's refusal to accept services. The social worker
shall obtain from the adult a signed statement of his refusal of services or
shall document in the record the attempt to obtain such a signed statement.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983.
SECTION .0400 - PAYMENT FOR ESSENTIAL SERVICES
10A NCAC 71A .0401 ESSENTIAL SOCIAL SERVICES
(a)
For essential social services that the county makes available, the
individual's responsibility for payment shall be determined in accordance
with rules in 10A NCAC 71R .0500.
(b)
For essential social services that the county does not make available, an
individual is deemed financially incapable of paying if his income is less
than 60 percent of the state's established income as codified in 10A NCAC
71R .0500.
History Note: Authority G.S. 108A-108; 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983;
Amended Eff. July 1, 1990.
10A NCAC 71A .0402 ESSENTIAL MEDICAL SERVICES
For essential medical services, an individual is deemed financially incapable of
paying if he meets the eligibility criteria for Title XIX (Medicaid). Essential medical
services must be provided at no charge to a Medicaid - eligible person, whether or
not the needed services are available under Medicaid.
28
SECTION .0500 - RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITIES
10A NCAC 71A .0501 GENERAL REQUIREMENT
(a)
In accordance with provisions of G.S. 108A-103 and the rules in Section
.0200 of this Subchapter, the department of social services in the county in
which the facility is located shall evaluate reports of abused, neglected, or
exploited disabled adults in need of protective services who are specifically
named patients or residents of nursing, combination, and residential care
facilities. This includes reports regarding patients or residents who are
placed from other counties.
(b)
Complaints received by the county department of social services regarding
general conditions or violations of standards in nursing and combination
facilities and residential care facilities licensed under G.S. 122C shall be
referred to the Division of Health Service Regulation.
(c)
Complaints received by the county department of social services regarding
general conditions or violations of standards in residential care facilities
licensed under G.S. 131D-2 shall be followed up by the adult home specialist
in accordance with the specialist's ongoing responsibility for supervision of
these facilities.
History Note: Authority G.S. 108A-103; 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983;
Amended Eff. December 1, 1991; July 1, 1990.
10A NCAC 71A .0502 NOTICE TO ADMINISTRATOR
(a)
The county director will not inform the administrator prior to the first visit to
the facility that a protective services report has been received, except in
specific instances where the county director thinks the assistance of the
administrator will be needed in conducting the evaluation.
(b)
The county director shall provide the administrator of a nursing,
combination, or residential care facility with a written summary of the
nature of the protective services report, whether or not evidence of abuse,
neglect or exploitation was found, and whether or not a need for protective
services was substantiated. The written summary to the administrator shall
be limited to the following:
1)
acknowledgement that a protective services report was received on a
specified patient or resident of the facility;
2)
the specific allegations in the report (the complainant shall not be
named);
3)
whether or not evidence of abuse, neglect or exploitation was found;
4)
whether or not the need for protective services was substantiated;
5)
a general statement as to how the conclusion was reached (the names of
persons who were contacted during the evaluation to obtain information
shall not be given).
29
History Note: Authority G.S. 108A-103; 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983;
Amended Eff. December 1, 1991; July 1, 1990.
10A NCAC 71A .0503 REPORT TO REGULATORY AGENCIES
(a)
A copy of the written report required by Rule .0901 of this Subchapter shall
be sent to the Division of Health Service Regulation, within 30 days of
completion of the evaluation. If the identity of the person making the
protective services report and the names of individuals who provide
information about the disabled adult are needed by the Division of Health
Service Regulation in order to carry out an investigation, that information
shall be shared verbally with the Division on request.
(b)
When evidence of financial exploitation is found in Medicaid - funded
facilities, the county department of social services shall send a copy of the
written report to the Division of Medical Assistance, as well as to the
Division of Health Service Regulation.
(c)
When, in the course of an evaluation, evidence of abuse, neglect or
exploitation is found, the county director shall notify the Division of Health
Service Regulation immediately by telephone. In addition, the county
director shall inform the Division of Health Service Regulation as to whether
or not the need for protective services will be substantiated.
(d)
When, in the course of an evaluation, it appears that a report of a need for
protective services will not be substantiated, but the county director finds
violations of licensure standards, such violations shall be reported
immediately to the appropriate supervisory agency. Reports of violations of
standards in nursing and combination facilities and residential care facilities
licensed under G.S. 122C shall be made to the Division of Health Service
Regulation. Reports of violations of standards in residential care facilities
licensed under G.S. 131D-2 shall be made to the adult home specialist in the
county department of social services.
History Note: Authority G.S. 108A-103; 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983;
Amended Eff. December 1, 1991; July 1, 1990.
10A NCAC 71A .0504 INTER-COUNTY COORDINATION
The department in the county in which a nursing, combination, or residential care
facility is located has primary responsibility for providing protective services to
adults in that facility. That department shall notify the department in the adult's
county of residence when a protective services report on the adult is substantiated
and shall inform the department in the county of residence of the plan for
protective services. The department in the county of residence shall cooperate and
assist to the extent possible in the provision of protective services.
History Note: Authority G.S. 108A-103; 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983; Amended
Eff. December 1, 1991.
30
SECTION .0600 - STATE MENTAL HEALTH: MENTAL RETARDATION: SUBSTANCE
ABUSE SERVICES INSTITUTIONS
10A NCAC 71A .0601 EVALUATIONS OF ABUSE: NEGLECT AND EXPLOITATION
(a)
The county department of social services shall initiate its evaluation in
accordance with the time frame in Rule .0204 of this Subchapter.
(b)
When the report comes from a source other than the facility administration,
the county department shall inform the chief administrator of the involved
facility of the report as appropriate and of applicable state law.
(c)
The county department shall notify the complainant that the department is
making an evaluation.
(d)
Upon completion of the evaluation, the department shall set forth its
findings and proposed actions in writing to:
1)
the chief administrator of the involved facility;
2)
the disabled adult's legal guardian, if any.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983; Amended Eff.
July 1, 1990.
10A NCAC 71A .0602 REPORTS OF NEED FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT FOR
RESIDENTS
(a)
Rules in Section .0200 of this Subchapter shall be followed by the county
department of social services in carrying out the evaluation of reports of
need for medical treatment made in accordance with G.S. 108A-101(m).
(b)
After completing the evaluation, if it is reasonably determined that the
person needs protective services, the county department shall petition the
district court and request a hearing on the matter. The petition must present
the need for specific medical treatment, as well as other circumstances
substantiating neglect and request that an individual or organization be
designated to consent to the medical treatment. If an emergency exists, the
department shall petition the district court for an order to provide
emergency services.
(c)
After the court's decision is made, the county department shall send to the
institution the findings of the court.
(d)
When the county department is designated by the court, the director or his
designee shall verbally communicate to the institution consent for medical
treatment. This shall be done immediately after the judgment is made, to be
followed by written consent.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983.
31
SECTION .0700 - INTER-COUNTY RESPONSIBILITY
10A NCAC 71A .0701 COOPERATION IN COMPLETING EVALUATIONS
The department of social services in the county in which a disabled adult is
located shall cooperate in carrying out the evaluation of a protective services
report when the department of social services in the adult's county of residence
has received the report and is responsible for the evaluation. Cooperation shall
include prompt performance of any activities within the scope of protective
services necessary to insure the protection of the disabled adult. In such cases,
the department in the county in which the adult is located shall inform the
department in the county of residence in advance of any medical, psychological or
other examinations necessary to complete the protective services evaluation. The
county of residence shall be financially responsible for such examinations and for
all necessary legal expenses incurred in providing protective services.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983; Amended Eff. July 1,
1990.
10A NCAC 71A .0702 MOVEMENT OF ADULT TO ANOTHER COUNTY
(a)
If a disabled adult who moves to another county has consented to the
provision of protective services and no court order is involved, the county
department providing protective services shall ask the disabled adult to
consent for information to be shared with the department in the new county
of residence. If the adult does not consent, the department providing
protective services shall not share information with the department in the
new county of residence. If the adult consents, the department shall notify
the department in the new county of residence of the disabled adult's
situation. The department in the new county of residence shall contact the
disabled adult to determine whether or not protective services continue to
be needed and, if so, if the disabled adult consents to their provision.
(b)
If the department in the original county of residence has been providing
protective services under a court order, the department shall file a motion in
the court to be relieved of responsibility because the disabled adult has
moved to another county. The department shall make a protective services
referral to the department in the new county of residence. The department in
the new county of residence shall evaluate the adult's current situation to
determine whether or not protective services are needed and, if so, shall
request authority to provide services.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983; Amended Eff.
July 1, 1990.
SECTION .0800 - CONFIDENTIALITY
10A NCAC 71A .0801 COLLATERAL CONTACTS
Collateral contacts with persons knowledgeable about a disabled adult's situation
may be made without the adult or caretaker's consent when such contacts are
32
necessary to complete a protective services evaluation.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983
10A NCAC 71A .0802 IDENTITY OF COMPLAINANT AND OF INDIVIDUALS WHO
HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF THE SITUATION
The identity of the complainant and of individuals who have knowledge of the
situation of the disabled adult shall be kept confidential unless the court requires
that such persons' identities be revealed with the exceptions that:
1)
the complainant's name and the names of individuals who have
knowledge of the situation of the disabled adult may be given verbally
to the Division of Health Service Regulation when requested by that
agency in order to carry out its investigation, and
2)
to the District Attorney's office and to law enforcement agencies
which are prosecuting or conducting a criminal investigation of
alleged abuse, neglect or exploitation of a disabled adult.
History Note: Authority G.S. 108A-103; 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983; Amended
Eff. December 1, 1991; Temporary Amendment Eff. December 12, 1995; Amended
Eff. April 1, 1997.
10A NCAC 71A .0803 SPECIFIC FINDINGS
Specific findings of the evaluation shall be kept confidential and shall not be
released without consent of the disabled adult or court order, except that the
department of social services at its discretion may share information about the
adult with other persons or agencies without the adult or caretaker's consent to
the extent necessary to provide protective services. When evidence of abuse,
neglect, or exploitation is found, and upon request of the district attorney or law
enforcement agencies, such information shall be sent to help with a criminal
investigation or prosecution of abuse, neglect or exploitation.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; 108A-80(d); Eff. November 1, 1983;
Temporary Amendment Eff. December 12, 1995; Amended Eff. April 1, 1997.
10A NCAC 71A .0804 REFERRAL TO ANOTHER COUNTY
When a client who is receiving protective services under court order moves from
one county to another, a protective services referral may be made by the first
county to the second county without the client's consent. When the second county
requests information in order to conduct its evaluation, the first county shall
provide the needed information, including all information about the protective
services report, results of the evaluation, and services provided to remedy the
protective services problem.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983.
33
10A NCAC 71A .0805 RELEASE OF SPECIFIC FINDINGS TO OTHER
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
Federal, state, and law enforcement agencies may be sent copies of the written
report as specified in Rule .0901 of this Subchapter when the results of the adult
protective services evaluation indicate violations of statutes, rules, or regulations
enforced by these agencies.
History Note: Authority G.S. 108A-103; 143B-153; Eff. December 1, 1991.
10A NCAC 71A .0806 ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES REGISTER
(a)
Information submitted by county departments of social services to the Adult
Protective Services Register is confidential. Non-identifying statistical
information and general information about the scope, nature and extent of
adult abuse, neglect and exploitation in North Carolina is not subject to this
Rule of confidentiality.
(b)
Access to the Adult Protective Services Register is restricted to:
1)
the County Department of Social Services,
(A)
in order to identify whether an adult who is the subject of an
Adult Protective Services evaluation has been previously
reported and evaluated under G.S. 108A, Article 6 in any county
in the state; or
(B)
in order to share client specific information with an out-of-state
protective services agency to assure that protective services
will be made available to an adult previously served in North
Carolina as quickly as possible for the purpose of preventing
further abuse, neglect or exploitation; or
(C)
in order to share client specific information with law
enforcement agencies to assure that protective services will be
made available to an adult as quickly as possible;
2)
the Division of Social Services staff,
(A)
in order to perform duties pertinent to managing and
maintaining the Register and monitoring, auditing, evaluating or
facilitating the administration of other state and federal
programs regarding Adult Protective Services based on
information in the Register, or
(B)
in order to share client specific information with an out-of-state
protective services agency to assure that protective services
will be made available to an adult previously served in North
Carolina as quickly as possible for the purpose of preventing
further abuse, neglect or exploitation; and
3)
individuals who receive approval to conduct studies of cases in the
Adult Protective Services Register.
(A)
Such approval must be requested in writing to the Director,
Division of Social Services. The written request will specify and
34
be approved on the basis of:
i. an explanation of how the findings of the study have
potential for expanding knowledge and improving
professional practices in the area of prevention,
identification and treatment of adult abuse, neglect and
exploitation;
ii. a description of how the study will be conducted and how
the findings will be used;
iii. a presentation of the individual's credentials; and
iv. a description of how the individual will safeguard the
information.
(B)
Access will be denied when in the judgment of the Director
the study will have minimal impact on either knowledge or
practice.
History Note: Authority G.S. 108A-80; 108A-103; 143B-153; Eff. March 1,
1993.
SECTION .0900 - DOCUMENTATION AND REPORTS
10A NCAC 71A .0901 WRITTEN REPORT OF THE EVALUATION
(a)
Written reports shall be completed when:
1)
the adult protective services evaluation was conducted on a patient or
resident of a facility as defined in G.S. 131E-101, 131D-2(a)(3), or 122C;
or
2)
evidence of abuse, neglect or exploitation is found.
(b)
After completing the evaluation, the written report shall be compiled,
including the following information:
1)
the name, address, age and condition of the adult;
2)
the allegations (the written report shall not include the identity of the
person making the complaint);
3)
the evaluation including the agency's findings and supporting
documents (e.g. psychological, medical report);
4)
conclusions;
5)
recommendations for action.
History Note: Authority G.S. 108A-103; 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983;
Amended Eff. December 1, 1991.
35
10A NCAC 71A .0902 CARETAKER INTERFERENCE: PETITION TO COURT
In preparation for petitioning the court for an order enjoining a caretaker from
interfering with the provision of protective services, the social worker shall
document:
1)
the date, time and circumstances under which the disabled adult's
consent for services was given; and
2)
the attempts which were made to obtain the caretaker's consent
including:
a)
the circumstances under which the caretaker's consent was
requested; and
b)
the information provided to the caretaker before asking for the
caretaker's consent.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983.
10A NCAC 71A .0903 PROTECTIVE SERVICES PETITION TO COURT
In preparation to petition the court for an order authorizing the provision of
protective services, the social worker must document the facts which show that:
1)
the disabled adult is being abused, neglected, or exploited; and
2)
the adult lacks the capacity to consent to such services.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983.
10A NCAC 71A .0904 EMERGENCY PETITION TO COURT
The information required by G.S. 108A-106(c) to be included in the petition shall be
documented in the agency file.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983.
10A NCAC 71A .0905 FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION: PETITION TO COURT
In preparation to petition the court under G.S. 108A-106(f), documentation must be
made of specific information indicating that:
1)
the adult lacks the capacity to consent;
2)
the adult is in need of protective services;
3)
the adult is being financially exploited; and
4)
no one else is able or willing to arrange for protective services.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983; Amended July 1990
36
10A NCAC 71A .0906 REPORT TO DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Notification to the district attorney in accordance with G.S. 108A-109 shall be in
written form and shall include the information specified in Rule .0901 of this
Section.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983.
10A NCAC 71A .0907 REPORT TO THE COMPLAINANT
a)
The required notice to the complainant may be oral or in writing at the
discretion of the complainant and shall be made immediately on completing
the evaluation. It shall include a statement of whether or not the report was
substantiated and, if so, a statement that the agency is providing continued
services.
b)
Documentation shall be made of when and how the notice is given.
c)
In order to protect the client's confidentiality, the notice shall not include
specific findings of the evaluation.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983.
10A NCAC 71A .0908 CASE RECORD
A separate record, or a separate section of an existing record, shall be established
to contain information on protective services provided to an adult, including the
following:
1)
the report of a need for protective services;
2)
the written report by the department;
3)
any court documents about the case; and
4)
other information relative to the evaluation of the report and the
provision of protective services.
History Note: Authority G.S. 108A-103; 143B-153; Eff. November 1, 1983
37
C. Definitions (Guidance based on North Carolina General Statute
108A-101)
Disabled Adult
Any person 18 years of age or over or any lawfully emancipated minor who is present
in the state of North Carolina and who is physically or mentally incapacitated due to
an intellectual or developmental disability, cerebral palsy, epilepsy or autism; organic
brain damage caused by advanced age or other physical degeneration in connection
therewith; or due to conditions incurred at any age which are the result of accident,
organic brain damage, mental or physical illness, or continued consumption or
absorption of substances. A lawfully emancipated minor is a juvenile 16 or older for
whom a judicial decree of emancipation has been entered by the district court, or who
is or has been married.
The adult must be alleged to be incapacitated due to a disability to be considered a
disabled adult. The worker shall consider the alleged disabled adult’s functional ability
to meet their essential needs or to arrange for those needs to be met.
Abuse
The willful infliction, by a caretaker, of physical pain, injury or psychological harm,
mental anguish, unreasonable confinement, or the willful deprivation of goods or
services, that are necessary to meet essential needs or to avoid physical or
psychological harm.
The reporter may not always use the term abuse when making a report. Outlined
below is additional information that may help the social worker receiving the report
understand what constitutes abuse:
To be considered abuse under the statute a “caretaker” must inflict the pain,
injury, mental anguish or deprivation. Physical/mental abuse by other
individuals should be evaluated for possible neglect.
The pain, injury, mental anguish and/or deprivation must be willful to be
considered abuse.
Mental anguish may be exhibited as fear, emotional pain or distress. The intent
of the behavior of the perpetrator is typically to threaten, humiliate, ridicule, or
change the behavior of the disabled adult.
Pain may be exhibited as physical or emotional suffering secondary to physical
evidence of the disabled adult, threats of injury, unreasonable confinement, or
willful deprivation.
Physical mistreatment or emotional suffering secondary to results of abuse
varies. Results may be exhibited by observable bruises, broken bones, welts,
burns, emotional distress, anxiety, fear or other changes in behavior.
Caretaker
Individual who has the comprehensive responsibility for the care of the disabled adult
as a result of family relationship or who has assumed responsibility for the care of the
disabled adult voluntarily or by contract.
38
Caretaker includes but is not limited to:
An individual such as a family member, friend, or neighbor who has informally
assumed or been given comprehensive responsibility for ensuring that the
disabled adult's needs are met, which may include making decisions for the
disabled adult; or
An operator or their representatives of a nursing, combination or residential
care facility, state mental health, or substance abuse facility; or
An individual or organization that has been appointed general guardian,
guardian of the person, or guardian of the estate, or to whom the disabled adult
has given a durable power of attorney.
Note: A caretaker does not include individuals or organizations that provide specific,
limited services to the disabled adult voluntarily or by contract, such as an in-home
aide, adult day care program, home health aide, or hospital.
Neglect
Neglect refers to a disabled adult who is either living alone and not able to provide for
himself or herself the services which are necessary to maintain the person’s mental or
physical health or is not receiving services from his or her caretaker. Neglect is
referred to as either self- neglect or caretaker neglect. It is important to consider that a
failure to maintain one’s physical or mental health can be a form of neglect.
Self-Neglect
A disabled adult is not (A) obtaining essential food, clothing, shelter, and medical
care; (B) obtaining goods and services necessary to maintain physical health, mental
health, or general safety; or (C) managing one’s own financial affairs.
There are many factors that can lead to self-neglect including undiagnosed and/or
untreated mental health needs, substance abuse, physical and cognitive impairments,
social isolation, limited finances and lack of knowledge of available resources.
Examples of self-neglecting behaviors and characteristics can include but are not
limited to improper eating habits, inadequate personal hygiene, misuse of medications
or other substances, living in an unsafe environment, and wandering.
Caretaker Neglect
The failure of a caretaker, fiduciary, guardian, or power of attorney to provide the
goods or services that are necessary to maintain the health or safety of a disabled
adult. Caretaker neglect occurs when the person(s) responsible for the disabled adult
does not (A) obtain essential food, clothing, shelter, and medical care; (B) obtain
goods and services necessary to maintain physical health, mental health, or general
safety; or (C) manage financial affairs. It’s important to remember that a caretaker
does not have to be a family member and they do not have to reside in the same
home as the disabled adult. Caretaker neglect can occur in the home or in institutional
settings.
Exploitation
Exploitation is the fraudulent or otherwise illegal, unauthorized, or improper act or
39
process of an individual, including a caregiver or fiduciary, that uses the resources of
a disabled adult for monetary or personal benefit, profit, or gain, or that results in
depriving a disabled adult of rightful access to, or use of, benefits, resources,
belongings, or assets. Exploitation does not have to be by the caretaker to meet the
statutory definition.
Exploitation of the Person
The improper use of a disabled adult by another can be considered exploitation of the
person. Exploitation of the person can range from sexual activity to uncompensated
work.
Exploitation of Assets
Exploitation involves the improper use of a person’s assets and finances by another
person or entity for their profit or advantage. Financial exploitation is not based on
whether the disabled adult’s essential needs are met or whether their bills are paid.
Examples of a disabled adult’s resources used for another’s gain includes:
Allegations of property deeded or willed improperly
Misuse of guardianship and powers of attorney
Signatures on documents caused by undue influence, deception or coercion
Theft, sale or misuse of prescribed medications
Use of the disabled adult’s Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) card without
permission.
In Need of Protective Services
A disabled adult is in need of protective services if that person, due to his or her
physical or mental incapacity, is unable to perform or obtain for himself or herself
essential services and if that person is without able, responsible, and willing persons
to perform or obtain essential services for them.
Essential Services
All social, medical, psychiatric, psychological or legal services necessary to safeguard
the disabled adult's rights and resources and to maintain the physical or mental well-
being of the individual. These services shall include, but not be limited to, the
provision of medical care for physical and mental health needs, assistance in personal
hygiene, food, clothing, adequately heated and ventilated shelter, protection from
health and safety hazards, protection from physical mistreatment, and protection from
exploitation.
40
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES MANUAL
III.
CONFIDENTIALITY & RELEASE INFORMATION
41
III.
Confidentiality and Release of Information
A. Statutory Requirements Related to APS Confidentiality and Release
of Information
There are no statutory requirements specific to Adult Protective Services Law.
However, G.S. 108A-80 addresses confidentiality of records and authorizes the Social
Services Commission to adopt rules and regulations governing access to case files
for social services and public assistance programs. The rules established by the
Social Services Commission are contained in the North Carolina Administrative Code,
Subchapter 69, Confidentiality and Access to Client Records, and Subchapter 71A,
Protective Services for Adults, Section .0800, Confidentiality.
B. Administrative Code Related to APS Confidentiality and Release of
Information
10A NCAC 69 .0202 OWNERSHIP OF RECORDS
All client information is the property of the agency, and employees of the
agency shall keep this information confidential, except as provided by the rules
of this Chapter.
Original client records shall not be removed from the premises by individuals
other than agency staff authorized to access the client's records, except by a
court order.
10A NCAC 69 .0301 RIGHT OF ACCESS
(a)
Confidentiality of information about himself or herself is the right of the
client. Upon written or verbal request, the client shall be able to review or
obtain without charge a copy of the information in his or her records with
the following exceptions:
1)
information that the agency is required to keep confidential by state or
federal statutes, rules, or regulations;
2)
confidential information originating from another agency as provided
for in Rule .0102 of this Chapter; or
3)
information that would breach another individual's right to
confidentiality under State or federal statutes, rules, or regulations as
determined by the agency.
(b)
The agency shall provide access to the client's records within five business
days after the receipt of the request.
10A NCAC 69 .0304 PROCEDURES FOR REVIEW OF RECORDS
(a)
The director or his or her delegated representative shall be present when the
client reviews the record. The director or his or her delegated representative
must document in the client record the review of the record by the client.
42
(b)
Upon written request from the client, his or her personal representative,
including an attorney, may have access to review or obtain without charge, a
copy of the information in his or her record. The client may permit the
personal representative to have access to his or her entire record or may
restrict access to certain portions of the record.
10A NCAC 69 .0401 PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING CONSENT FOR RELEASE
OF INFORMATION
(c)
No individual shall release any client information that is owned by the State
Division of Social Services or the county departments of social services or
request the release of information regarding the client from other agencies
or individuals, without obtaining a signed consent for release of information.
The procedure for disclosure without obtaining consent shall be in
accordance with Section .0500 of this Subchapter.
(d)
The consent for release of information shall be on a form provided by the
agency or shall contain the following:
1)
The name of the provider and the recipient of the information;
2)
The extent of information to be released;
3)
The name and dated signature of the client;
4)
A statement that the consent is subject to revocation at any time
except to the extent that action has been taken in reliance on the
consent; and
5)
The length of time the consent is valid.
(e)
The client may alter the form to contain other information, including:
1)
A statement specifying the date, event, or condition upon which the
consent may expire even if the client does not expressly revoke the
consent; or
2)
A specific purpose for the release.
(f)
The following persons may consent to the release of information:
1)
The client;
2)
The legal guardian if the client has been adjudicated incompetent; or
3)
The county department of social services if the client is a minor and in
the custody of the county department of social services.
43
(g)
Prior to obtaining a consent for release of information, the director or
delegated representative shall explain the meaning of informed consent. The
client shall be told the following:
1)
Contents to be released;
2)
That the information is needed to verify eligibility;
3)
That the client can give or withhold the consent and the consent is
voluntary; and
4)
That there are statutes, rules, and regulations protecting the
confidentiality of the information.
(h)
Directors and their delegated representatives shall release client information
in accordance with the Rules of this Section, court orders, and any
applicable State statutes or federal regulations.
(i)
Whenever client information is disclosed, in accordance with rules of this
Section, the director or delegated representative shall document the reason
for the disclosure in the client record including placing a copy of the signed
consent in the client record.
10A NCAC 69 .0501 DISCLOSURE WITHIN THE AGENCY
b) Client information from the service record may be disclosed without client
consent under the following circumstances:
1)
to other employees of the county department of social services for
purposes of making referrals, supervision, consultation or
determination of eligibility;
2)
to another county department of social services when a different
county department of social services is providing services to aclient;
3)
to another county department of social services to the extent
necessary to facilitate the provision of a service requested by a
referring county department of social services; or
4)
between the county department of social services and the State
Division of Social Services for purposes of supervision and reporting.
10A NCAC 69 .0502 DISCLOSURE FOR THE PURPOSE OF RESEARCH
Client information may be disclosed without client consent to individuals
approved by the Department of Health and Human Services to conduct studies
of client records. The request to conduct a study shall be in writing and be
approved based upon:
1)
an explanation of how the findings of the study may expand
knowledge and improve professional practices;
2)
a description of how the study will be conducted and how the findings
will be used;
3)
a description of the individual's credentials in the area of research;
4)
a description of how the individual will safeguard information; and
5)
a written assurance that no report will contain the names of
44
individuals or any other information that makes individuals
identifiable.
10A NCAC 69 .0503 DISCLOSURE FOR PURPOSES OF ACCOUNTABILITY
Client information may be disclosed without the consent of the client to federal,
State, or county employees for the purpose of monitoring, auditing, evaluating,
or to facilitate the administration of other State and federal programs, provided
that the need for the disclosure of confidential information is justifiable for the
purpose, as determined by the agency, and that safeguards, as described in 45
CFR 205.50, which is incorporated by reference with subsequent amendments
and editions and available free of charge at http://www.ecfr.gov/ are maintained
to protect the information from re-disclosure.
10A NCAC 69 .0504 DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO OTHER LAWS
(a)
Client information may be disclosed without the consent of the client for
purposes of complying with the rules of this Section, court orders, and any
applicable State and federal regulations.
(b)
When information is released without the client's consent, the client shall be
informed of the disclosure in writing to explain what information was
released, how it was released, and how to contact the privacy official. The
writing informing the client of the disclosure shall be documented in the
record.
10A NCAC 69 .0601 INFORMATION NEEDS OF SERVICE PROVIDERS
Agencies may disclose client information to service providers only to the extent
necessary to determine the service requirements, and to provide eligibility
information for reporting purposes.
10A NCAC 71A .0201 ACCEPTANCE OF REPORTS
(c)
Notwithstanding provisions in 10A NCAC 71A .0801 through .0803, the
director may immediately tell the District Attorney's office and local law
enforcement agencies when there is reason to believe that physical harm
may occur to the disabled adult. This would include sharing evidence of
abuse or neglect the agency has to date.
10A NCAC 71A .0502 NOTICE TO ADMINISTRATOR
(a)
The county director will not inform the administrator prior to the first visit to
the facility that a protective services report has been received, except in
specific instances where the county director thinks the assistance of the
administrator will be needed in conducting the evaluation.
(b)
The county director shall provide the administrator of a nursing,
combination, or residential care facility with a written summary of the nature
of the protective services report, whether or not evidence of abuse, neglect
or exploitation was found, and whether or not a need for protective services
was substantiated. The written summary to the administrator shall be limited
to the following:
45
1)
acknowledgement that a protective services report was received on a
specified patient or resident of the facility;
2)
the specific allegations in the report (the complainant shall not be
named);
3)
whether or not evidence of abuse, neglect or exploitation was found;
4)
whether or not the need for protective services was substantiated;
5)
a general statement as to how the conclusion was reached (the names
of persons who were contacted during the evaluation to obtain
information shall not be given).
10A NCAC 71A .0503 REPORT TO REGULATORY AGENCIES
(a)
A copy of the written report required by Rule .0901 of this Subchapter shall
be sent to the Division of Health Service Regulation, within 30 days of
completion of the evaluation. If the identity of the person making the
protective services report and the names of individuals who provide
information about the disabled adult are needed by the Division of Health
Service Regulation in order to carry out an investigation, that information
shall be shared verbally with the Division on request.
(b)
When evidence of financial exploitation is found in Medicaid - funded
facilities, the county department of social services shall send a copy of the
written report to the Division of Medical Assistance, as well as to the
Division of Health Service Regulation.
(c)
When, in the course of an evaluation, evidence of abuse, neglect or
exploitation is found, the county director shall notify the Division of Health
Service Regulation immediately by telephone. In addition, the county
director shall inform the Division of Health Service Regulation as to whether
or not the need for protective services will be substantiated.
(d)
When, in the course of an evaluation, it appears that a report of a need for
protective services will not be substantiated, but the county director finds
violations of licensure standards, such violations shall be reported
immediately to the appropriate supervisory agency. Reports of violations of
standards in nursing and combination facilities and residential care facilities
licensed under G.S. 122C shall be made to the Division of Health Service
Regulation. Reports of violations of standards in residential care facilities
licensed under G.S. 131D-2 shall be made to the adult home specialist in the
county department of social services.
10A NCAC 71A .0702 MOVEMENT OF ADULT TO ANOTHER COUNTY
(a)
If a disabled adult who moves to another county has consented to the
provision of protective services and no court order is involved, the county
46
department providing protective services shall ask the disabled adult to
consent for information to be shared with the department in the new county
of residence. If the adult does not consent, the department providing
protective services shall not share information with the department in the
new county of residence. If the adult consents, the department shall notify
the department in the new county of residence of the disabled adult's
situation. The department in the new county of residence shall contact the
disabled adult to determine whether or not protective services continue to
be needed and, if so, if the disabled adult consents to their provision.
(b)
If the department in the original county of residence has been providing
protective services under a court order, the department shall file a motion in
the court to be relieved of responsibility because the disabled adult has
moved to another county. The department shall make a protective services
referral to the department in the new county of residence. The department in
the new county of residence shall evaluate the adult's current situation to
determine whether or not protective services are needed and, if so, shall
request authority to provide services.
10A NCAC 71A .0801 COLLATERAL CONTACTS
Collateral contacts with persons knowledgeable about a disabled adult's
situation may be made without the adult or caretaker's consent when such
contacts are necessary to complete a protective services evaluation.
10A NCAC 71A .0802 IDENTITY OF COMPLAINANT AND OF INDIVIDUALS WHO
HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF THE SITUATION
The identity of the complainant and of individuals who have knowledge of the
situation of the disabled adult shall be kept confidential unless the court
requires that such persons' identities be revealed with the exceptions that:
1)
the complainant's name and the names of individuals who have
knowledge of the situation of the disabled adult may be given verbally
to the Division of Health Service Regulation when requested by that
agency in order to carry out its investigation, and
2)
to the District Attorney's office and to law enforcement agencies
which are prosecuting or conducting a criminal investigation of
alleged abuse, neglect or exploitation of a disabled adult.
10A NCAC 71A .0803 SPECIFIC FINDINGS
Specific findings of the evaluation shall be kept confidential and shall not be
released without consent of the disabled adult or court order, except that the
department of social services at its discretion may share information about the
adult with other persons or agencies without the adult or caretaker's consent to
the extent necessary to provide protective services. When evidence of abuse,
neglect, or exploitation is found, and upon request of the district attorney or law
enforcement agencies, such information shall be sent to help with a criminal
investigation or prosecution of abuse, neglect or exploitation.
47
10A NCAC 71A .0804 REFERRAL TO ANOTHER COUNTY
When a client who is receiving protective services under court order moves
from one county to another, a protective services referral may be made by the
first county to the second county without the client's consent. When the second
county requests information in order to conduct its evaluation, the first county
shall provide the needed information, including all information about the
protective services report, results of the evaluation, and services provided to
remedy the protective services problem.
10A NCAC 71A .0805 RELEASE OF SPECIFIC FINDINGS TO OTHER
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
Federal, state, and law enforcement agencies may be sent copies of the written
report as specified in Rule .0901 of this Subchapter when the results of the
adult protective services evaluation indicate violations of statutes, rules, or
regulations enforced by these agencies.
10 NCAC 71A.0806 ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES REGISTER
(a)
Information submitted by county department of social services to the Adult
Protective Services Register is confidential. Non-identifying statistical
information and general information about the scope, nature and extent of
adult abuse, neglect and exploitation in North Carolina is not subject to this
Rule of confidentiality.
(b)
Access to the Adult Protective Services Register is restricted to:
1)
the county department of social services, (A) in order to identify
whether an adult who is the subject of an Adult Protective Services
evaluation has been previously reported and evaluated under G.S.
108A, Article 6 in any county in the state; or (B) in order to share client
specific information with an out-of-state protective services agency to
assure that protective services will be made available to an adult
previously served in North Carolina as quickly as possible for the
purpose of preventing further abuse, neglect or exploitation; or (C) in
order to share client specific information with law enforcement
agencies to assure that protective services will be made available to
an adult as quickly as possible;
2)
the Division of Social Services staff, (A) in order to perform duties
pertinent to managing and maintaining the Register and monitoring,
auditing, evaluating or facilitating the administration of other state and
federal programs regarding Adult Protective Services based on
information in the Register, or (B) in order to share client specific
information with an out-of-state protective services agency to assure
that protective services will be made available to an adult previously
served in North Carolina as quickly as possible for the purpose of
preventing further abuse, neglect or exploitation; and
48
3)
individuals who receive approval to conduct studies of cases in the
Adult Protective Services Register.
(A)
Such approval must be requested in writing to the Director,
Division of Social Services. The written request will specify
and be approved on the basis of:
i. an explanation of how the findings of the study
have potential for expanding knowledge and
improving professional practices in the area of
prevention, identification and treatment of adult
abuse, neglect and exploitation;
ii. a description of how the study will be conducted
and how the findings will be used;
iii. a presentation of the individual's credentials; and
iv. a description of how the individual will safeguard
the information.
(B)
Access will be denied when in the judgment of the
Director the study will have minimal impact on either
knowledge or practice.
10A NCAC 71A .0901 WRITTEN REPORT OF THE EVALUATION
(a)
Written reports shall be completed when:
1)
the adult protective services evaluation was conducted on a patient or
resident of a facility as defined in G.S. 131E-101, 131D-2(a)(3), or 122C;
or
2)
evidence of abuse, neglect or exploitation is found.
(b)
After completing the evaluation, the written report shall be compiled,
including the following information:
1)
the name, address, age and condition of the adult;
2)
the allegations (the written report shall not include the identity of the
person making the complaint);
3)
the evaluation including the agency's findings and supporting
documents (e.g. psychological, medical report);
4)
conclusions;
5)
recommendations for action.
49
10A NCAC 71A .0906 REPORT TO DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Notification to the district attorney in accordance with G.S. 108A-109 shall be in
written form and shall include the information specified in Rule .0901 of this
Section.
C. Social Work Practice Related to APS Confidentiality and Release of
Information
Maintaining a disabled adult’s confidentiality and understanding when and how to
release information are important considerations for staff in county departments of
social services. Individuals and families receiving services from the DSS are entitled
to decide when and what information is to be shared with others about their situation.
Confidentiality in Adult Protective Services has some unique issues due to the
involvement of a legal mandate, possible court action, the right to self-determination
and the right to privacy.
Information Sharing
While confidentiality is a critical component of APS, there will be opportunities when
APS programs should share information with each other. Information released from
APS records should be limited to only the information necessary for the provision of
protective services. A county DSS should share information with another DSS
regarding a disabled adult’s involvement with APS. Information on a disabled adult’s
APS history may be shared without the disabled adult’s consent when the DSS
receives a call from another county or state that has current involvement with the
disabled adult and requests the information because it would assist in their ability to
thoroughly complete an evaluation. APS may release information to:
APS staff who are directly involved with the disabled adult’s current evaluation
or service provision.
Service providers if the information is necessary for the provision of protective
services.
Inter-departmental staff of other programs when information related to the
disabled adult’s situation is necessary for the provision of protective services
The District Attorney and Law Enforcement who are investigating abuse,
neglect, or exploitation.
Specific findings of an adult protective service evaluation are confidential and are
never released without consent of the disabled adult, the disabled adult’s legal
guardian, or a court order except as described above. If the disabled adult consents,
the confidential information is released. If the disabled adult refuses to consent or is
unable to consent, the confidential information is not released unless a legal guardian,
legal representative, or court issues an order directing the release of the information.
A court order is any oral or written order from a judicial official (judge, clerk, or
magistrate) which explicitly directs the release of a disabled adult’s information. Oral
orders should be documented in the disabled adult’s record to reflect the date, time,
and substance of the order, as well as the officer who issued the order.
50
A subpoena is issued at the request of a party requiring a witness to appear in court,
or in some cases requiring a witness to produce certain documents. A judicial official
or an attorney may issue subpoenas, although a judicial official rarely issues them.
While a subpoena issued by an attorney has the sanction of the court, it is not a court
order as defined in the preceding paragraph.
Confidential information should not be released in response to a court order or a
subpoena without first consulting the agency attorney. It is their role to determine what
response should be given to either a court order or a subpoena.
Information contained within the DSS disabled adult’s record such as financial
statements and medical and psychiatric evaluations obtained from another agency or
individual provider is disclosed according to the confidentiality rules/regulations
imposed by the furnishing agency or individual provider. If a court order is received
requesting this type of confidential information, and the information cannot be
disclosed by the DSS due to the provisions of the other agency’s or individual
provider’s release of information, the judicial official who issued the court order should
be referred to the agency or individual provider who provided the information to the
county department of social services.
The county director or his delegated representatives may disclose information from
the case record with authorized agencies or individuals. This sharing of information
does not require consent from the disabled adult, guardian, or legal representative.
The director is to use his judgment based on administrative code to determine when
an agency/individual is authorized to receive such information.
When deciding who is authorized, the county director should consider what
involvement the other agency or individual has in the evaluation, intervention,
treatment, or court action phases of adult protective services. When the department
involves another agency in protective services for a disabled adult, it may be
necessary to share information about the disabled adult's condition or situation to
facilitate the provision of appropriate services. In such cases, the department should
share only the specific information needed by the other agency in order to provide
appropriate services.
The identity of the reporter must not be revealed in any oral or written report except by
order of a court. It may be disclosed verbally to the Division of Health Service
Regulation as necessary to carry out their evaluation and to the District Attorney's
office and to local law enforcement agencies when prosecuting or conducting a
criminal evaluation of alleged abuse, neglect or exploitation of a disabled adult.
Agencies or individuals that may receive information while providing or facilitating the
delivery of protective services would include but not be limited to:
Local Management Entities and Providers
Public Health Departments
Health and Mental Health Providers
Department of Health and Human Services Personnel responsible for licensing
or approval of nursing/combination facilities, adult care homes, group homes
51
Home and Community Care Block Grant Providers
The agency attorney may also have access to information in the case record when
preparing for and presenting a case in court or when advising on a case.
Social workers shall not reveal specific information about the disabled adult when
making collateral contacts during a protective services evaluation. The collateral
contacted may be curious to know why the county department is seeking information
about the disabled adult. Response to such questions should be in general terms
about the agency's concern for the disabled adult and need for information to
determine whether or not the agency can provide assistance. If the collateral
questions the agency's authority to inquire about the disabled adult, it may be helpful
to explain that the law requires that the agency evaluate any situation where a person
may need assistance. Each department of social services agency should have an
interagency plan outlining how information shall be shared based on Administrative
Code and the Recommended Social Work practice.
52
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICE MANUAL
IV.
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICE INTAKE
53
IV.
Adult Protective Services Intake
A. Statutory Requirements Related to APS Intake
§ 108A-102. Duty to report, content of report, immunity
(a)
Any person having reasonable cause to believe that a disabled adult is in need
of protective services shall report such information to the director.
(b)
The report may be made orally or in writing. The report shall include the name
and address of the disabled adult; the name and address of the disabled adult's
caretaker; the age of the disabled adult; the nature and extent of the disabled
adult's injury or condition resulting from abuse or neglect; and other pertinent
information.
(c)
Anyone who makes a report pursuant to this statute, who testifies in any
judicial proceeding arising from the report, or who participates in a required
evaluation shall be immune from any civil or criminal liability on account of
such report or testimony or participation, unless such person acted in bad faith
or with a malicious purpose.
§ 108A-103. Duty of director upon receiving report
(a) Any director receiving a report that a disabled adult is in need of protective
services shall make a prompt and thorough evaluation to determine whether the
disabled adult is in need of protective services and what services are needed.
(d)
The director shall initiate the evaluation described in subsection (a) of this
section as follows:
1)
Immediately upon receipt of the complaint if the complaint alleges a danger
of death in an emergency as defined in G.S. 108A-101(g).
2)
Within 24 hours if the complaint alleges danger of irreparable harm in an
emergency as defined by G.S. 108A-101(g).
(3) Within 72 hours if the complaint does not allege danger of death or
irreparable harm in an emergency as defined by G.S. 108A-101(g)
§ 108A-109. Reporting Abuse
Upon finding evidence indicating that a person has abused, neglected, or exploited
a disabled adult the director shall notify the district attorney
§ 108A-115. Duty to report suspected fraud; content of report; immunity for
reporting
(a)
Any financial institution, or officer or employee thereof, having reasonable
cause to believe that a disabled adult or older adult is the victim or target of
financial exploitation shall report such information to the following:
1)
Persons on the list provided by the customer under G.S. 108A-114, if
54
such a list has been provided by the customer. The financial institution
may choose not to contact persons on the provided list if the financial
institution suspects that those persons are financially exploiting the
disabled adult or older adult.
2)
The appropriate local law enforcement agency.
3)
The appropriate county department of social services, if the customer is
a disabled adult.
(b)
The report may be made orally or in writing. The report shall include the name
and address of the disabled adult or older adult, the nature of the suspected
financial exploitation, and any other pertinent information.
(c)
No financial institution, or officer or employee thereof, who acts in good faith in
making a report under this section may be held liable in any action for doing so.
B. Administrative Code Related to APS Intake
10A NCAC 71A .0102 DEFINITIONS
(a)
"Immediately" as specified in G.S. 108A-103(d), shall mean responds with no
delay as soon as a county department of social services receives a report that:
1)
an adult is alleged to be disabled as defined in G.S. 108A-101(d);
2)
an adult is alleged to be abused, neglected, or exploited as defined in
G.S. 108A- 101(a), (j), or (m); and
3)
an adult is alleged to be in need of protective services as defined in G.S.
108A- 101(e).
(b)
"A life-threatening situation" shall be considered an emergency as defined in
G.S. 108A- 101(g).
10A NCAC 71A .0201 ACCEPTANCE OF REPORTS
(a)
The county department of social services shall accept all reports alleging an
abused, neglected, or exploited disabled adult is in need of protective services.
This includes anonymous reports. If the county department determines that the
address of the disabled adult given in the report is in another county, the
department shall refer the person making the report to the appropriate county
department. The county department receiving the original report shall follow up
to make sure the appropriate county has received the report.
(b)
The department of social services shall make arrangements for 24-hour
coverage to receive calls and take appropriate action.
(c)
Notwithstanding provisions in 10A NCAC 71A .0801 through .0803, the director
may immediately tell the District Attorney's office and local law enforcement
agencies when there is reason to believe that physical harm may occur to the
disabled adult. This would include sharing evidence of abuse or neglect the
55
agency has to date.
10A NCAC 71A .0202 RECEIPT OF ORAL REPORT
The worker receiving an oral report shall explain to the complainant (the person
making the report) that the department will notify the complainant of the results of
the evaluation. The worker shall determine from the complainant whether the
complainant wants the notification to be oral or written.
10A NCAC 71A .0203 REPORTS REGARDING COUNTY OFFICIALS
(a)
When a report is received alleging abuse, neglect or exploitation of a disabled
adult by a social services board member, department of social services staff
member, county commissioner, or the county manager, the county department
shall notify the regional office immediately. The regional office will assign the
report to another county department for evaluation.
(b)
In addition to specified instances in (a) of this Rule in which reports must be
assigned to another county, the county department shall consult the regional
office whenever it seems that evaluation of a report may present the
appearance of a conflict of interest.
(c)
If the evaluation does not substantiate the report, the department which
conducted the evaluation will refer the case back to the county of residence so
that alternative services may be offered.
(d)
If the evaluation substantiates the report, the agency which conducted the
evaluation will seek authorization for services, including petitioning the court
when necessary. The petition shall be filed in the county of residence and shall
include the reason for filing by an agency in another county.
(e)
The agency which conducted the evaluation will act as case manager for
protective services in coordination with the agency in the county of residence.
The county of residence will be responsible for paying for services in
accordance with rules in Section .0400 of this Subchapter and for any expenses
for medical, psychological, or other examinations and legal services incurred in
the county which conducted the evaluation.
10A NCAC 71A .0204 TIME FRAME TO INITIATE EVALUATION
(a)
Evaluation of reports involving an emergency as defined in G.S. 108A-101(g)
shall be initiated within 24 hours of receipt of the report.
(b)
Evaluation of other reports of a need for protective services shall be initiated
within 72 hours after receipt of a report.
10A NCAC 71A .0503 REPORT TO REGULATORY AGENCIES
(c)
When, in the course of an evaluation, evidence of abuse, neglect or exploitation
is found, the county director shall notify the Division of Health Service
Regulation immediately by telephone. In addition the county director shall
inform the Division of Health Service Regulation as to whether or not the need
for protective services will be substantiated.
(d)
When, in the course of an evaluation, it appears that a report of a need for
protective services will not be substantiated, but the county director finds
violations of licensure standards, such violations shall be reported immediately
to the appropriate supervisory agency. Reports of violations of standards in
nursing and combination facilities and residential care facilities licensed under
56
G.S. 122C shall be made to the Division of Health Service Regulation. Reports
of violations of standards in residential care facilities licensed under G.S. 131D-
2 shall be made to the adult home specialist in the county DSS.
C. Social Work Practice Related to APS Intake
1. Receiving Reports
a. Continuous Access to APS Intake
It is imperative that members of the community have access to Adult Protective
Services after hours, weekends, holidays, and during periods of inclement weather.
Instructions on how to reach the on-call social worker should be clear on the
agency’s voice mail and website. The Director should ensure coverage as these
(Intake) services are provided during typical work hours, after- hours, weekends
and holidays.
The DSS should have a systematic method, means, and ability to promptly receive
reports of alleged maltreatment. APS systems should establish multiple methods
for receiving reports of alleged maltreatment 24 hours a day, seven days a week
(e.g., toll- free telephone hotline, TTY, fax, web-based, email). Translation services
as well as other methods of communication (e.g. augmentative communication
devices, American Sign Language, Interpreter) shall be easily accessible to the
reporter.
A report shall be taken if someone alleges maltreatment and a reporter shall not be
discouraged to make an APS report.
DSS shall have a staff person on duty to receive and respond to APS reports 24
hours a day, 7 days a week. The DSS shall have capacity to respond to
emergencies with trained APS personnel.
b. Documenting the Report
During APS Intake, DSS should have a standardized process for receiving and
documenting the content of the report, including, but not limited to, information
about:
the alleged disabled adult and his or her circumstances and disability;
the location of the disabled adult;
the alleged type(s) of maltreatment;
the alleged perpetrator, if any;
the level of response needed to be made by APS due to the disabled adult’s
situation (e.g., immediate); and
risks that may be encountered by an APS worker in responding to this report
(e.g., presence of animals, weapons in the home).
Intake includes all activities necessary to receive referrals, determine if screening
criteria are met and will be accepted for an Adult Protective Services evaluation.
Reports can be made in person, by phone, fax, regular mail, web-based, or email.
57
It is imperative that the screening criteria is applied to all methods of reports. When
determining the date and time of the report, date stamps on incoming mail, fax time
stamps, phone calls, and email dates and times shall be used to represent the
actual time of receipt.
c. Guidelines for Conducting a Thorough APS Intake
The quality and thoroughness of information gathered during the intake process,
has an impact on actions and decisions made by the agency. The initial contact
with the DSS is critical in setting the tone and trust between the reporter and the
department. Gathering sufficient information from the reporter allows the agency to:
Identify and locate the disabled adult
Determine if the report meets the statutory guidelines for an evaluation
Assess the situation for emergency intervention
Use of the DAAS-0001 Adult Protective Services Intake will guide the intake
interview. The intake document should be used as a tool to help the social worker
gather information. When the reporter does not know the information, it is important
to document it on the tool as opposed to leaving sections blank or incomplete. APS
intake should not be performed solely by reading the questions on the intake form
to the reporter. Instead, the social worker should listen to the reporter's concerns,
fill in the form as information is offered and use the form to remind him/her of
additional questions to ask.
(1)
Skills and Strategies for APS Intake
Use simple language. The social worker should avoid the use of professional
verbiage when communicating with the reporter. For example, instead of
asking if the adult is in need of protective services, the social worker could
ask if the disabled adult has anyone to help him/her meet their needs. In
addition, the reporter should not be expected to use terms that the General
Statute and Administrative Code utilize to define Adult Protective Services.
The agency will evaluate the allegations and make a determination as to
whether the APS criteria are met when screening the report.
Ask open ended questions. For example, instead of asking whether the adult
is disabled, the social worker could ask the caller to describe any disabilities
the adult has and how they limit him/her.
It is the intake social worker’s job to listen to the reporter’s story; reporters
may be experiencing all kinds of emotions and be anxious about making the
report. Once the reporter has been given an opportunity to share; it may be
necessary to redirect them to gather the needed information to complete the
report.
It is important that the social worker not imply or communicate to the reporter
that they have to “prove” the allegations they are making; the statute states
that “any person having reasonable cause to believe shall report. . .”
58
Explain to the reporter the basic APS process; that sufficient information must
be gathered to enable the agency to determine if there is an alleged need for
protection. Reporters are often in a hurry, are not aware of the criteria
necessary to screen a report and may be more willing to spend time
providing information if they understand the APS process.
It is helpful to clarify the reporter's expectations. The social worker should try
to determine why the report is being made and explain how the agency will
respond. When appropriate, the social worker should explain the limits of the
agency's authority and the disabled adult's right to self-determination.
Maintain an attitude of helpfulness. Instead of focusing exclusively on
whether to screen a referral in or out as APS, the social worker should focus
on the concerns raised in the referral and determining the best way to
address those concerns.
It is helpful to explain confidentiality of the reporter. Although the person
making the report is not required by law to identify themselves, the intake
social worker should encourage him/her to give their name so that they can
be contacted for additional information during the evaluation if necessary.
The social worker should also assure the reporter that their name will be kept
confidential unless a court requires that their identity be revealed. The
reporter’s name may be given verbally to the Division of Health Service
Regulation when requested in order to carry out its evaluation and to the
District Attorney's office or local law enforcement which are prosecuting or
conducting a criminal evaluation.
The social worker should explain that if the reporter provides their name and
contact information, they will be notified of the agency's decision about the
disabled adult’s need for protective services, if they choose. The reporter
should be advised that the notification can be written or verbal and document
the reporter’s preference. The social worker should explain that if the reporter
chooses to remain anonymous, they will not be notified of the screening
decision or outcome of the evaluation.
2) Skills for Gathering Information Related to Disability
At intake, questions should be asked to gather information about the disabled
adult’s ability to function. The social worker must consider the alleged
disabled adult’s functioning to determine incapacitation. Incapacitated as
used in the definition of a disabled adult should not be confused with the
“capacity” to consent or refuse protective services. Capacity is not a
screening criterion and should not be considered at intake.
One way to consider the meaning of incapacitated is to consider whether or
not the disabled adult is alleged to be able to maintain physical and/or mental
functioning. This means, for example, that while one person could be an
amputee and unable to toilet or transfer independently, another person that is
59
also an amputee has home modifications in place or resources secured to
assist them in meeting their toileting and transfer needs. In the example
above, the first individual would be considered incapacitated by their physical
disability, while the second person would not.
As with any illness, questions should be asked about how the disabled adult
is able to function, and in what ways he/she is incapacitated. Frequency,
duration, and intensity of symptoms should be explored with the reporter. The
social worker should inquire if there has been a change in the individual’s
behavior or mental status. Information related to how often the
behavior/changes in mental status occurs, how the changes impact
functioning and how long the symptoms last will provide insight into
determining if the disabled adult is alleged to be incapacitated.
Incapacity can also occur as a result of mental illness, substance use
disorder, intellectual or developmental disabilities and other behavioral or
cognitive impairments.
The allegations of incompetency can come up during an APS intake.
Competency is a legal determination generally made by the clerk of court. If
the reporter talks about the disabled adult’s competency, explore what the
disabled adult is doing or not doing that makes the reporter think the disabled
adult is incompetent. The social worker should inquire if there has been a
change in the individual’s behavior, mental status or physical functioning. For
example, failure to take medications used to treat mental illness does not
always result in the disabled adult being incompetent or incapacitated by
disability.
2. Screening Reports
a. Screening Criteria
NC General Statute sets out three criteria for the APS program. The three criteria
are: 1) alleged to be a disabled adult; (2) alleged to be abused, neglected, and/or
exploited; and (3) alleged to be in need of protective services. When a report is
received in the agency, an initial screening must be made immediately to determine
if it is a protective service report. A report should always be considered protective
services unless the allegations do not meet the three criteria. Every report must be
received and screened since the county department of social services is the sole
agency with authority and responsibility to provide APS. It is important to note that
requests which come to the department for other services may, upon further
exploration, result in an APS Report.
Screening is a process of carefully reviewing the intake information to determine if
the report should be screened in for evaluation, screened out, or referred to a
service or program other than APS. Risk factors are identified to determine the
urgency for initiating an evaluation of screened reports.
60
Since the purpose of the APS law is to provide protection to adults with disabilities
who have been abused, neglected or exploited and are in need of protective
services, it is not applicable in situations where the person has died or no longer
needs protection. For example, if a nursing home resident was allegedly abused by
one of the staff members but the abuse was reported after the family had
intervened and moved the disabled adult to another facility, there would no longer
be a need for protection, and the report could be screened out. If a report is made
about a disabled adult who is deceased and abuse or neglect is alleged as
contributing to the death, the report should be referred to law enforcement, the
district attorney’s office and the county medical examiner for evaluation.
If an adult with a disability is unable to perform or obtain essential services for
themselves, they are in need of protective services unless they have a willing, able
and responsible person(s) to perform or obtain the services for them. At intake it
must be clearly demonstrated that the alleged disabled adult has someone who is
willing, able, and responsible. Exploratory questions should be asked to determine
that a willing, able, responsible party has taken or is taking necessary steps to
protect the disabled adult. Often there is a person who is responsible and willing to
help but is not able due to lack of education, money, poor health etc. In such cases
there is still a need for protective services. Note: Do not screen out a report just
because the alleged perpetrator has a legally executed Power of Attorney or
Guardianship.
In situations when limited information is received from the reporter and they cannot
be reached for further information, the report should be screened using the three
criteria.
Referrals should be screened with a minimum of one supervisor upon receipt of the
referral. Each county DSS should have a protocol in place to ensure that reports
are screened promptly and without delay.
On occasion a county may receive a report that is neither county of residence, nor
county of location. This report should be forwarded immediately to the appropriate
county. It is unacceptable to refuse or prolong screening a report received from
another county DSS because notice by the referring county was not given. While it
is best practice for the sending county DSS to contact the receiving county DSS
when sending referrals, a screening decision must be made upon receipt of the
information regardless of how or from whom the referral was received. Screening
decisions should be made without delay. It is very important that when sending a
referral to another county that direct contact is made with that county. In addition to
faxing the report, contact should be made by phone. Document who was
contacted, how they were contacted and the date and time they were contacted.
Adult Protective Services is available to disabled adults, who are alleged to have
been mistreated and in need of protective services in both residential and facility
settings including hospitals. There may be circumstances requiring collaboration
between the county of residence and the county where the disabled adult
previously resided or plans to return. If a DSS receives a report on a disabled adult
61
that is located in their county but is a resident of another county see Appendix D for
further guidance.
A disabled adult may be hospitalized or in a different setting than where the alleged
abuse, neglect, or exploitation occurred. Different settings may include acute care
facilities, such as medical or psychiatric hospitals, and living arrangements with
family, friends or neighbors. The three screening criteria shall be applied:
the adult is alleged to be disabled;
abused, neglected, or exploited; and
in need of protective services
The social worker should recognize that being hospitalized or in a different setting
than where the mistreatment occurred may not satisfy the disabled adult’s need for
protection. The disabled adult may still either be unable to perform or obtain
essential services for him/herself or may be without an able, responsible, and
willing person to perform or obtain essential services for him/her. The statutory time
frames for initiating an evaluation are to be followed regardless of the location of a
disabled adult. If all three of the screening criteria are met, the referral is
appropriate as an adult protective services report and shall be accepted for
evaluation.
If all three criteria are not met, the referral is not appropriate as an adult protective
services report. If applicable the social worker should make appropriate referrals
including but not limited to:
Other available and appropriate inter-agency services (e.g. Food and
Nutrition Services, SAIH)
Other community agencies (e.g. Public Health, Senior Center)
District Attorney and local law enforcement agencies if evidence of
abuse, neglect or exploitation is reported utilizing the DAAS-0008 Notice
to the DA and/or LE: Initial Notice
Division of Health Service Regulation and the Adult Homes Specialist if
a licensure violation is suspected
Secretary of State’s office
b. APS Intake and Law Enforcement
The decision of whether to immediately contact law enforcement shall be made on a
case by case basis. An example of an instance at intake when it may be appropriate
for the agency to contact law enforcement for immediate protection of the disabled
adult would be if the reporter is alleging that an assault, or any other mistreatment that
would cause injury is taking place or has taken place at the time of the report.
The agency should contact law enforcement if it is believed that a crime has been
committed. Social worker’s safety is also an important consideration. Reported
information such as the presence of firearms, mental health crisis, or substance use
and/or environmental factors may indicate the need for police assistance to promote
the safety of the social worker.
62
There may be instances when police intervention may not be warranted, is
unnecessary and ultimately more harmful to the disabled adult. For instance, if the
agency feels that social work staff can safely, effectively and immediately respond to
the situation, police intervention may not be necessary.
c. Conflict of Interest When Screening
When a report has the appearance of a conflict of interest or a report is received
alleging abuse, neglect or exploitation by a social services board member, department
of social services staff member, county commissioner, or the county manager, the
agency shall reference the Special Circumstances Section of this manual and
Appendix C. Referrals should be screened with a minimum of one supervisor upon
receipt of the referral. Each county DSS should have a protocol in place to ensure that
reports are screened promptly and without delay.
d. Reports Received Regarding Individuals Under Guardianship
A role unique to DSS is the dual responsibility for acting as guardian for incompetent
disabled adults and for receiving APS reports. In order to simultaneously fulfill these
roles, it is necessary to understand two points. First, the DSS as legally appointed
guardian is responsible for all aspects of the welfare, safety, and protection of the
individual under guardianship. This includes acting responsibly to protect the
individual under guardianship from abuse, neglect and/or exploitation. Second, the
DSS is responsible for applying the APS screening criteria to all reports received by
DSS which allege that a disabled adult needs protective services, regardless of the
legal status or living situation of that disabled adult.
When a DSS receives information alleging the need for protective services for a
disabled adult and that same agency has guardianship responsibility for the disabled
adult, all three APS screening criteria are to be considered when deciding whether to
accept the information as an APS report. Particular consideration is to be given to the
third criterion (whether there is a need for protective services). The agency must
decide if it can act in a manner which is able, willing, and responsible to perform or
obtain essential services for the disabled adult. This decision will determine whether
there is a need for protective services for the individual under guardianship. DSS,
acting as guardian, should be able, willing, and responsible to perform or obtain
essential services for the individual under guardianship and is legally obligated to do
so. If the agency does act under its guardianship role to provide or arrange for
essential services to protect the individual under guardianship, the allegations do not
meet the three criteria and therefore constitute a screened-out APS report.
The legal authority and responsibility granted in state statute (G.S. 35A) empowers
and requires any guardian to take actions which are necessary to protect the
individual under guardianship, whether the person under guardianship is living in a
long-term care facility or in the community. This includes the guardian's ability to
make reports to other agencies regarding violations of laws or regulations, to review
records, to authorize treatment and, if necessary, to remove the disabled adult from a
setting where abuse, neglect or exploitation may be taking place.
63
Reports which are screened out for APS because the director is guardian and is
providing protection should be handled like all other screened out reports. All
applicable notices such as referrals to the District Attorney, the Adult Home Specialist,
and/or the Division of Health Service Regulation’s Complaints Investigation Branch,
etc. should be completed in accordance with policy. The purpose of these notices is to
alert agencies with applicable regulatory or legal authority of the information DSS has
received, so that these agencies may take appropriate action under their authority.
Reports received on an individual under guardianship of another DSS or guardianship
corporation should be screened as any other report. Contacting the guardian prior to
making a screening decision should not occur. The screening criteria should be
applied to the report based on the information provided at intake.
In those rare instances when DSS receives a report alleging the need for protective
services on behalf of that agency director's individual under guardianship, and it is
determined the director or his designee is not able, willing, or responsible to provide
or arrange for essential services to protect the individual under guardianship, the
allegations are to be accepted as an APS report and a thorough APS evaluation
completed. Situations where the agency is not able, willing, and responsible to
provide or arrange for essential services to protect the individual under guardianship
include those where a director or any of the director's staff are the alleged
perpetrator(s). These situations constitute a conflict of interest for the agency to
conduct the APS evaluation and the agency should follow the Conflict of Interest
Policy outlined in this manual in Appendix C and the Special Circumstances section.
Some situations which may constitute a conflict of interest include:
Allegations that a DSS guardian failed to authorize medical or mental health
treatment in a timely manner and an individual under guardianship suffers
abuse or neglect
Allegations that a DSS guardian allowed an individual under guardianship to be
exploited by performing manual labor without earning wages or receiving
compensation
Allegations that a DSS guardian allowed an individual under guardianship to
reside in an unsafe environment and the individual under guardianship is being
exploited by people living in that community
e. Determining Initiation Timeframe
Upon determining that allegations received from a reporter constitute an accepted
APS report (i.e. all three APS screening criteria are met), a determination of the
initiation timeframe must be made. Agencies should have a system in place to assure
prompt initiation of the evaluation once it has been determined that the allegations
constitute an accepted APS report.
The requirement to immediately initiate an APS evaluation alleging a “danger of death
in an emergency” means there must be no delay between intake and assignment of
the report to the social worker that will be conducting the evaluation. Once the APS
64
case is assigned, the social worker should immediately proceed to initiate the
evaluation. It is also possible that, while a danger of death is not alleged, there may
exist a danger of irreparable harm for the disabled adult. This may involve physical
irreparable harm but may also include other forms of irreparable harm such as the
loss of housing or the exploitation of assets which cannot be recovered. In such
instances involving a danger of irreparable harm, the case must be initiated within 24
hours of the receipt of the APS report.
All non-emergency APS cases that do not allege death or irreparable harm must be
initiated within 72 hours of the receipt of the APS report.
3. Notices Related to Intake
a. Initial Notice to Reporter
Although neither NC APS Statute nor NC Administrative Code require notice to the
reporter of the result of the screening decision it is considered best practice, if
requested by the reporter, to provide notice of the report being screened in or
screened out utilizing the DAAS-0002 Notice to Reporter: Initial Notice. If the reporter
is anonymous no initial notice will be provided.
b. Initial Notice to the District Attorney and/or Law Enforcement
The term "evidence," as it refers to the DAAS-0008 Notice to the DA and/or LE: Initial
Notice or law enforcement, should be interpreted broadly during intake. Any time the
agency receives information that indicates a disabled adult may have been abused,
neglected by a caretaker, or exploited, and/or there is reason to believe that the
disabled adult may suffer physical harm, the information may be given to the district
attorney and/or law enforcement immediately. This includes referrals that are
screened out at intake. Along with the notice, the social worker should attach any
evidence obtained at intake, such as medical evaluations, photographs, or financial
records for exploitation cases.
Note: The name of the reporter may only be shared verbally upon the request of the
district attorney/law enforcement.
To establish a cooperative working relationship with the district attorney and law
enforcement, it is helpful to arrange a meeting with both to discuss the agency's
responsibility under the law to notify the district attorney upon finding evidence
indicating that a person has abused, neglected, or exploited a disabled adult. The
district attorney may have a preference for how and when they want law enforcement
to be involved in these cases.
65
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES MANUAL
V.
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES EVALUATION
66
V.
Adult Protective Services Evaluation
A. Statutory Requirements related to APS Evaluation
§ 108A-14. Duties and responsibilities.
(a)
The director of social services shall have the following duties and
responsibilities: To receive and evaluate reports of abuse, neglect, or
exploitation of disabled adults and to take appropriate action as required by the
Protection of the Abused, Neglected, or Exploited Disabled Adults Act, Article 6
of this Chapter, to protect these adults. (15) To receive and evaluate reports of
financial exploitation of disabled adults, to investigate credible reports of
financial exploitation under Article 6A of this Chapter, and to take appropriate
action to protect these adults.
§ 108A-101: Definitions
(g)
The word "emergency" refers to a situation where (i) the disabled adult is in
substantial danger of death or irreparable harm if protective services are not
provided immediately, (ii) the disabled adult is unable to consent to services,
(iii) no responsible, able, or willing caretaker is available to consent to
emergency services, and (iv) there is insufficient time to utilize procedure
provided in G.S. 108A-105.
(h)
The words "emergency services" refer to those services necessary to
maintain the person's vital functions and without which there is reasonable
belief that the person would suffer irreparable harm or death. This may include
taking physical custody of the disabled person.
(i)
The words "essential services" shall refer to those social, medical,
psychiatric, psychological or legal services necessary to safeguard the
disabled adult's rights and resources and to maintain the physical or mental
well-being of the individual. These services shall include, but not be limited to,
the provision of medical care for physical and mental health needs, assistance
in personal hygiene, food, clothing, adequately heated and ventilated shelter,
protection from health and safety hazards, protection from physical
mistreatment, and protection from exploitation. The words "essential services"
shall not include taking the person into physical custody without his consent
except as provided for in G.S. 108A-106 and in Chapter 122C of the General
Statutes.
(j)
The word "exploitation" means the illegal or improper use of a disabled adult
or his resources for another's profit or advantage.
(l) The words "lacks the capacity to consent" shall mean lacks sufficient
understanding or capacity to make or communicate responsible decisions
concerning his person, including but not limited to provisions for health or
mental health care, food, clothing, or shelter, because of physical or mental
incapacity. This may be reasonably determined by the director or he may seek a
physician's or psychologist's assistance in making this determination.
67
(m) The word "neglect" refers to a disabled adult who is either living alone and
not able to provide for himself or herself the services which are necessary to
maintain the person's mental or physical health or is not receiving services
from the person's caretaker. A person is not receiving services from his
caretaker if, among other things and not by way of limitation, the person is a
resident of one of the State owned psychiatric hospitals listed in G.S. 122C-
181(a)(1), the State-owned Developmental Centers listed in G.S. 122C-181(a)(2),
or the State-owned Neuro-Medical Treatment Centers listed in G.S.
122C181(a)(3), the person is, in the opinion of the professional staff of that
State-owned facility, mentally incompetent to give consent to medical
treatment, the person has no legal guardian appointed pursuant to Chapter 35A,
or guardian as defined in G.S. 122C-3(15), and the person needs medical
treatment.
(n) The words "protective services" shall mean services provided by the State
or other government or private organizations or individuals which are
necessary to protect the disabled adult from abuse, neglect, or exploitation.
They shall consist of evaluation of the need for service and mobilization of
essential services on behalf of the disabled adult.
§ 108A-103. Duty of director upon receiving report.
(a)
Any director receiving a report that a disabled adult is in need of protective
services shall make a prompt and thorough evaluation to determine whether the
disabled adult is in need of protective services and what services are needed.
The evaluation shall include a visit to the person and consultation with others
having knowledge of the facts of the particular case. When necessary for a
complete evaluation of the report, the director shall have the authority to review
and copy any and all records, or any part of such records, related to the care
and treatment of the disabled adult that have been maintained by any
individual, facility or agency acting as a caretaker for the disabled adult. This
shall include but not be limited to records maintained by facilities licensed by
the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. Use of
information so obtained shall be subject to and governed by the provisions of
G.S. 108A-80 and Article 3 of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes. The director
shall have the authority to conduct an interview with the disabled adult with no
other persons present.
(b)
The staff and physicians of local health departments, area mental health,
developmental disabilities, and substance abuse authorities, and other public
or private agencies shall cooperate fully with the director in the performance of
his duties. These duties include immediate accessible evaluations and in-home
evaluations where the director deems this necessary.
(c)
The director may contract with an agency or private physician for the
purpose of providing immediate accessible medical evaluations in the location
that the director deems most appropriate.
68
(d)
The director shall initiate the evaluation described in subsection (a) of this
section as follows:
(1)
Immediately upon receipt of the complaint if the complaint alleges a
danger of death in an emergency as defined in G.S. 108A-101(g).
(2)
Within 24 hours if the complaint alleges danger of irreparable harm in an
emergency as defined by G.S. 108A-101(g).
(3)
Within 72 hours if the complaint does not allege danger of death or
irreparable harm in an emergency as defined by G.S. 108A-101(g).
§ 108A-106. Emergency intervention; findings by court; limitations; contents of
petition; notice of petition; court authorized entry of premises; immunity of
petitioner.
(e)
Where it is necessary to enter a premises without the disabled adult's
consent after obtaining a court order in compliance with subsection (a) above,
the representative of the petitioner shall do so.
(f)
(1) Upon petition by the director, a court may order that:
a. The disabled adult's financial records be made available at a certain
day and time for inspection by the director or his designated agent; and
b. The disabled adult's financial assets be frozen and not withdrawn,
spent or transferred without prior order of the court.
(2)
Such an order shall not issue unless the court first finds that there is
reasonable cause to believe that:
a. A disabled adult lacks the capacity to consent and that he is in need
of protective services;
b. The disabled adult is being financially exploited by his caretaker; and
c. No other person is able or willing to arrange for protective services.
(3)
Provided, before any such inspection is done, the caretaker and every
financial institution involved shall be given notice and a reasonable
opportunity to appear and show good cause why this inspection should
not be done. And, provided further, that any order freezing assets shall
expire ten days after such inspection is completed, unless the court for
good cause shown, extends it.
Article 6A. § 108A- 112. Legislative intent and purpose.
Determined to fight the growing problem of fraud and financial exploitation
targeting disabled and older adults in North Carolina, the General Assembly
enacts this Article to facilitate the collection of records needed to investigate
69
and prosecute such incidents. (2013-337, s. 4.)
Article 6A. § 108A-113. Definitions.
As used in this Article, the following definitions apply:
(2)
Disabled adult. - An individual 18 years of age or older or a lawfully
emancipated minor who is present in the State of North Carolina and who is
physically or mentally incapacitated as defined in G.S. 108A-101(d).
(3)
Financial exploitation. - The illegal or improper use of a disabled adult's or
older adult's financial resources for another's profit or pecuniary advantage.
(4)
Financial institution. - A banking corporation, trust company, savings and
loan association, credit union, or other entity principally engaged in lending
money or receiving or soliciting money on deposit.
(5)
Financial record. - An original of, a copy of, or information derived from a
record held by a financial institution pertaining to a customer's relationship
with the financial institution and identified with or identifiable with the
customer.
(6)
Investigating entity. - A law enforcement agency investigating alleged
financial exploitation of a disabled adult or an older adult, or a county
department of social services investigating alleged financial exploitation of a
disabled adult…
(8)
Older adult. - An individual 65 years of age or older.
(9)
Promptly. - As soon as practicable, with reasonable allowance to be made
for the time required to retrieve older data or records that are not readily or
immediately retrievable due to their current storage media. (2013-337, s. 4.)
Article 6A. § 108A-114. Financial institutions encouraged to offer disabled adult
and older adult customers the opportunity to submit a list of trusted persons to
be contacted in case of financial exploitation.
All financial institutions are encouraged, but not required, to offer to disabled
adult and older adult customers the opportunity to submit, and periodically
update, a list of persons that the disabled adult or older adult customer would
like the financial institution to contact in case of suspected financial
exploitation of the disabled adult or older adult customer. No financial
institution, or officer or employee thereof, who acts in good faith in offering to
its customer the opportunity to submit and update a list of such contact
persons may be held liable in any action for doing so. (2013-337, s. 4.)
Article 6A. § 108A-115. Duty to report suspected fraud; content of report;
immunity for reporting.
(a)
Any financial institution, or officer or employee thereof, having reasonable
cause to believe that a disabled adult or older adult is the victim or target of
70
financial exploitation shall report such information to the following:
(1)
Persons on the list provided by the customer under G.S. 108A-114, if
such a list has been provided by the customer. The financial institution may
choose not to contact persons on the provided list if the financial institution
suspects that those persons are financially exploiting the disabled adult or
older adult.
(2)
The appropriate local law enforcement agency.
(3)
The appropriate county department of social services, if the customer is
a disabled adult.
(b)
The report may be made orally or in writing. The report shall include the
name and address of the disabled adult or older adult, the nature of the
suspected financial exploitation, and any other pertinent information.
(c)
No financial institution, or officer or employee thereof, who acts in good
faith in making a report under this section may be held liable in any action for
doing so. (2013- 337, s. 4.)
Article 6A. § 108A-116. Production of customers' financial records in cases of
suspected financial exploitation; immunity; records may not be used against
account owner.
(a)
An investigating entity may, under the conditions specified in this section,
petition the district court to issue a subpoena directing a financial institution to
provide to the investigating entity the financial records of a disabled adult or
older adult customer. The petition shall be filed in the county of residence of
the disabled adult or older adult customer whose financial records are being
subpoenaed. The court shall hear the case within two business days after the
filing of the petition. The court shall issue the subpoena upon finding that all of
the following conditions are met:
(1)
The investigating entity is investigating, pursuant to the investigating
entity's statutory authority, a credible report that the disabled adult or older
adult is being or has been financially exploited.
(2)
The disabled adult's or older adult's financial records are needed in order
to substantiate or evaluate the report.
(3)
Time is of the essence in order to prevent further exploitation of that
disabled adult or older adult.
(b)
Delivery of the subpoena may be effected by hand, via certified mail, return
receipt requested, or through a designated delivery service authorized pursuant
to 26 U.S.C. § 7502(f)(2) and may be addressed to the financial institution's local
branch or office vice president, its local branch or office manager or assistant
branch or office manager, or the agent for service of process listed by the
71
financial institution with the North Carolina Secretary of State or, if there is
none, with the agent for service of process listed by the financial institution in
any state in which it is domiciled.
(b1) A financial institution may challenge the subpoena by filing a motion to
quash or modify the subpoena within ten days after receipt of delivery of the
subpoena pursuant to subsection (b) of this section. The subpoena may be
challenged only for the following reasons:
(1)
There is a procedural defect with the subpoena.
(2)
The subpoena contains insufficient information to identify the records
subject to the subpoena.
(3)
The financial institution is otherwise prevented from promptly complying
with the subpoena.
(4)
The petition was filed or subpoena requested for an improper purpose or
based upon insufficient grounds.
(5)
The subpoena subjects the financial institution to an undue burden or is
otherwise unreasonable or oppressive.
Within two business days after the motion is filed, the court shall hear the
motion and issue an order upholding, modifying, or quashing the subpoena.
(c)
Upon receipt of a subpoena delivered pursuant to subsection (b) of this
section identifying the disabled adult or older adult customer or, if the
subpoena is challenged pursuant to subsection (b1) of this section, entry of a
court order upholding or modifying a subpoena, a financial institution shall
promptly provide to the head of an investigating entity, or his or her designated
agent, the financial records of a disabled adult or older adult customer.
(d)
All produced copies of the disabled adult's or older adult's financial records,
as well as any information obtained pursuant to the duty to report found in G.S.
108A-115, shall be kept confidential by the investigating entity unless required
by court order to be disclosed to a party to a court proceeding or introduced
and admitted into evidence in an open court proceeding.
(e)
No financial institution or investigating entity, or officer or employee thereof,
who acts in good faith in providing, seeking, or obtaining financial records or
any other information in accordance with this section, or in providing testimony
in any judicial proceeding based upon the contents thereof, may be held liable
in any action for doing so.
(f)
No customer may be subject to indictment, criminal prosecution, criminal
punishment, or criminal penalty by reason of or on account of anything
disclosed by a financial institution pursuant to this section, nor may any
72
information obtained through such disclosure be used as evidence against the
customer in any criminal or civil proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
information obtained may be used against a person who is a joint account
owner accused of financial exploitation of a disabled adult or older adult joint
account holder, but solely for criminal or civil proceedings directly related to
the alleged financial exploitation of the disabled adult or older adult joint
account holder.
(g)
The petition and the court's entire record of the proceedings under this
section is not a matter of public record. Records qualifying under this
subsection shall be maintained separately from other records, shall be withheld
from public inspection, and may be examined only by order of the court. (2013-
337, s. 4; 2014-115, s. 44(a).)
Article 6A. § 108A-117. Notice to customer; delayed notice.
(a)
Upon the issuance of a subpoena pursuant to G.S. 108A-116, the
investigating entity shall immediately provide the customer with written notice
of its action by first-class mail to the customer's last known address, unless an
order for delayed notice is obtained pursuant to subsection (b) of this section.
The notice shall be sufficient to inform the customer of the name of the
investigating entity that has obtained the subpoena, the financial records
subject to production pursuant to the subpoena, and the purpose of the
investigation.
(b)
An investigating entity may include in its application for a subpoena
pursuant to G.S. 108A- 116 a request for an order delaying the customer notice
required pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. The court issuing the
subpoena may order a delayed notice in accordance with subsection (c) of this
section if it finds, based on affidavit or oral testimony under oath or affirmation
before the issuing court, that all of the following conditions are met:
(1)
The investigating entity is investigating a credible report that the adult is
being or has been financially exploited.
(2)
There is reason to believe that the notice will result in at least one of the
following:
a. Endangering the life or physical safety of any person.
b. Flight from prosecution.
c. Destruction of or tampering with evidence.
d. Intimidation of potential witnesses.
e. Serious jeopardy to an investigation or official proceeding.
f. Undue delay of a trial or official proceeding.
73
(c)
Upon making the findings required in subsection (b) of this section, the
court shall enter an ex parte order granting the requested delay for a period not
to exceed 30 days. If the court finds there is reason to believe that the notice
may endanger the life or physical safety of any person, the court may order that
the delay be for a period not to exceed 180 days. An order delaying notice shall
direct that:
(1)
The financial institution not disclose to any person the existence of the
investigation, of the subpoena, or of the fact that the customer's financial
records have been provided to the investigating entity for the duration of the
period of delay authorized in the order;
(2)
The investigating entity deliver a copy of the order to the financial
institution along with the subpoena that is delivered pursuant to
G.S. 108-116(b); and
(3)
The order be sealed until otherwise ordered by the court.
(d)
Upon application by the investigating entity, further extensions of the delay
of notice may be granted by order of a court in the county of residence of the
disabled adult or older adult customer whose financial records are being
subpoenaed, upon a finding of the continued existence of the conditions set
forth in subdivisions (1) and (2) of subsection (b) of this section, and subject to
the requirements of 11 subsection (c) of this section. If the initial delay was
granted for a period not to exceed 30 days, the delay may be extended by
additional periods of up to 30 days each and the total delay in notice granted
under this section shall not exceed 90 days. If the initial delay was granted for a
period not to exceed 180 days, the delay may be extended by additional periods
of up to 180 days each and may continue to be extended until the court finds
the notice would no longer endanger the life or physical safety of any person.
(e)
Upon the expiration of the period of delay of notice granted under this
section, including any extensions thereof, the customer shall be served with a
copy of the notice required by subsection (a) of this section.
§ 122C-66: Mental Health, Substance Abuse, and Developmental Disabilities Act
of 1985. Protection from abuse and exploitation; reporting. (as amended by S.L.
2015-36)
(b1) The employee of or a volunteer at a facility who witnesses a client become
a victim of a violation of Article 7A or Article 26 of Chapter 14 of the General
Statutes shall report the allegations within 24 hours after witnessing the
violation to one of the following: (i) the department of social services in the
county where the facility serves the client; (ii) the district attorney in the district
where the facility serves the client; or (iii) the appropriate local law enforcement
agency in the city or county where the facility serves the client. A violation of
this section is a Class A1 misdemeanor. No employee making a report may be
threatened or harassed by any other employee or volunteer on account of the
74
report.
(c)
The identity of an individual who makes a report under this section or who
cooperates in an ensuing investigation may not be disclosed without the
reporting individual's consent, except to persons authorized by the facility or by
State or federal law to investigate or prosecute these incidents, or in a
grievance or personnel hearing or civil or criminal action in which the reporting
individual is testifying, or when disclosure is legally compelled or authorized by
judicial discovery. This subsection shall not be interpreted to require the
disclosure of the identity of an individual where it is otherwise prohibited by
law.
(d)
An employee who makes a report in good faith under this section is immune
from any civil liability that might otherwise occur for the report. In any case
involving liability, making of a report under this section is prima facie evidence
that the maker acted in good faith.
(e)
The duty imposed by this section is in addition to any duty imposed by G.S.
7B-301 or G.S. 108A-102.
(g) The county department of social services and the district attorney to whom
a report is made under subsection (b1) of this section shall investigate or
provide for the investigation of each such report.
B. Administrative Code Related to APS Evaluation
10A NCAC 71A .0102 DEFINITIONS
(a)
"Immediately" as specified in G.S. 108A-103 shall mean responds with no
delay as soon as a county department of social services receives a report that:
(1)
an adult is alleged to be disabled as defined in G.S. 108A-101(d);
(2)
an adult is alleged to be abused, neglected, or exploited as defined in
G.S. 108A-101(a), (j), or (m); and
(3)
an adult is alleged to be in need of protective services as defined in G.S.
108A- 101(e). (b) "A life threatening situation" shall be considered an
emergency as defined in G.S. 108A-101(g).
10A NCAC 71A .0201 ACCEPTANCE OF REPORTS
(c)
Notwithstanding provisions in 10A NCAC 71A .0801 through .0803, the
director may immediately tell the District Attorney's office and local law
enforcement agencies when there is reason to believe that physical harm may
occur to the disabled adult. This would include sharing evidence of abuse or
neglect the agency has to date.
10A NCAC 71A .0205 INITIATION OF EVALUATION
The evaluation is initiated by a visit to the adult about whom the report is made.
75
If the adult cannot be located, efforts to locate the adult within the 24- or 72-
hour time limit, as appropriate, shall be documented in the case record. Such
efforts to locate the adult shall constitute initiation of the evaluation.
10A NCAC 71A .0206 STEPS IN EVALUATION
The complete evaluation shall include:
(1)
The visit to the person, which means that the person must be seen by the
worker. The worker will make as many visits as are necessary to determine
whether the adult is disabled; abused, neglected or exploited; and in need of
protective services;
(2)
Consultation with others who have knowledge of the facts of the
situation. This includes individuals identified by the person making the
report, as well as individuals mentioned by the disabled adult who may have
information pertinent to the evaluation;
(3)
Medical, psychological or psychiatric evaluations when necessary to
determine whether the adult is disabled; abused, neglected or exploited; and
in need of services; and to determine what services are needed.
10A NCAC 71A .0207 FOCUS OF EVALUATION
The evaluation must determine:
(1)
whether or not the adult is disabled in accordance with the statutory
definition in G.S. 108A-101(d);
(2)
whether or not the adult is abused, neglected or exploited as defined in
G.S. 108A-101(a)(j) or (m);
(3)
whether or not the adult is in need of protective services as defined in
G.S. 108A-101(e);
(4)
whether or not the adult lacks the capacity to consent to protective
services.
10A NCAC 71A .0208 CONDUCTING A THOROUGH EVALUATION
A thorough evaluation of the protective services report shall include identifying
indicators of abuse, neglect, or exploitation and the disabled adult's strengths
and limitations by assessing the following functional areas:
(1)
physical health;
(2)
mental health;
(3)
social support;
(4)
activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living;
76
(5)
financial support; and
(6)
physical environment.
10A NCAC 71A .0209 SUBSTANTIATION OF THE REPORT
(a)
Following completion of the evaluation a determination shall be made as to
whether the report is substantiated.
(b)
A report is substantiated when:
(1)
the adult is determined to be disabled as defined in G.S. 108A-101(d);
(2)
the adult is determined to be abused, neglected or exploited as defined in
G.S. 108A-101(a), (j), or (m); and
(3)
the adult is determined to be in need of protective services as defined in
G.S. 108A-101(e).
(c)
A report is unsubstantiated if any one of the three conditions in
Subparagraphs (b)(1), (2), and (3) of this Rule are not met.
10A NCAC 71A .0301 UNSUBSTANTIATED REPORT: OFFER OF SERVICES
When the evaluation of the report indicates that the allegations are not
substantiated, an offer shall be made to the individual of any available and
appropriate agency services. The worker shall explain such services to the
individual. In addition, the worker shall provide information about other
community services and shall offer to refer the person to such resources.
10A NCAC 71A .0302 SUBSTANTIATED REPORT: ADULT REFUSES SERVICES
(a)
When the evaluation of a report indicates that the allegations are
substantiated and the disabled adult is capable of making responsible
decisions and refuses the receipt of protective services, the worker must 18
respect that decision and terminate contact with the adult. Prior to doing so, the
worker shall explain the services available to the adult and that the adult may
call the agency to request assistance, if needed.
(b)
Documentation shall be made of the worker's explanation and offer of
services and of the adult's refusal to accept services. The worker shall obtain
from the adult a signed statement of his refusal of services or shall document in
the record the attempt to obtain such a signed statement.
10A NCAC 71A .0501 GENERAL REQUIREMENT
(a)
In accordance with provisions of G.S. 108A-103 and the rules in Section
.0200 of this Subchapter, the department of social services in the county in
which the facility is located shall evaluate reports of abused, neglected, or
exploited disabled adults in need of protective services who are specifically
named patients or residents of nursing, combination, and residential care
77
facilities. This includes reports regarding patients or residents who are placed
from other counties.
(b)
Complaints received by the county department of social services regarding
general conditions or violations of standards in nursing and combination
facilities and residential care facilities licensed under G.S. 122C shall be
referred to the Division of Health Service Regulation.
(c)
Complaints received by the county department of social services regarding
general conditions or violations of standards in residential care facilities
licensed under G.S. 131D-2 shall be followed up by the adult home specialist in
accordance with the specialist's ongoing responsibility for supervision of these
facilities.
10A NCAC 71A .0502 NOTICE TO ADMINISTRATOR
(a)
The county director will not inform the administrator prior to the first visit to
the facility that a protective services report has been received, except in
specific instances where the county director thinks the assistance of the
administrator will be needed in conducting the evaluation.
(b)
The county director shall provide the administrator of a nursing,
combination, or residential care facility with a written summary of the nature of
the protective services report, whether or not evidence of abuse, neglect or
exploitation was found, and whether or not a need for protective services was
substantiated. The written summary to the administrator shall be limited to the
following:
(1)
acknowledgement that a protective services report was received on a
specified patient or resident of the facility;
(2)
the specific allegations in the report (the complainant shall not be
named);
(3)
whether or not evidence of abuse, neglect or exploitation was found;
(4)
whether or not the need for protective services was substantiated;
(5)
a general statement as to how the conclusion was reached (the names of
persons who were contacted during the evaluation to obtain information
shall not be given.)
10A NCAC 71A .0503 REPORT TO REGULATORY AGENCIES
(a)
A copy of the written report required by Rule .0901 of this Subchapter shall
be sent to the Division of Health Service Regulation, within 30 days of
completion of the evaluation. If the identity of the person making the protective
services report and the names of individuals who provide information about the
disabled adult are needed by the Division of Health Service Regulation in order
to carry out an investigation, that information shall be shared verbally with the
78
Division on request.
(b)
When evidence of financial exploitation is found in Medicaid - funded
facilities, the county department of social services shall send a copy of the
written report to the Division of Medical Assistance, as well as to the Division of
Health Service Regulation.
(c)
When, in the course of an evaluation, evidence of abuse, neglect or
exploitation is found, the county director shall notify the Division of Health
Service Regulation immediately by telephone. In addition, the county director
shall inform the Division of Health Service Regulation as to whether the need
for protective services will be substantiated.
(d)
When, in the course of an evaluation, it appears that a report of a need for
protective services will not be substantiated, but the county director finds
violations of licensure standards, such violations shall be reported immediately
to the appropriate supervisory agency. Reports of violations of standards in
nursing and combination facilities and residential care facilities licensed under
G.S. 122C shall be made to the Division of Health Service Regulation. Reports
of violations of standards in residential care facilities licensed under G.S. 131D-
2 shall be made to the adult home specialist in the county department of social
services.
10A NCAC 71A .0504 INTER-COUNTY COORDINATION
The department in the county in which a nursing, combination, or residential
care facility is located has primary responsibility for providing protective
services to adults in that facility. That department shall notify the department in
the adult's county of residence when a protective services report on the adult is
substantiated and shall inform the department in the county of residence of the
plan for protective services. The department in the county of residence shall
cooperate and assist to the extent possible in the provision of protective
services.
10A NCAC 71A .0601 EVALUATIONS OF ABUSE: NEGLECT AND
EXPLOITATION
(a)
The county department of social services shall initiate its evaluation in
accordance with the time frame in Rule .0204 of this Subchapter.
(b)
When the report comes from a source other than the facility administration,
the county department shall inform the chief administrator of the involved
facility of the report as appropriate and of applicable state law.
(c)
The county department shall notify the complainant that the department is
making an evaluation.
(d)
Upon completion of the evaluation, the department shall set forth its
findings and proposed actions in writing to:
79
(1)
the chief administrator of the involved facility;
(2)
the disabled adult's legal guardian, if any.
10A NCAC 71A .0602 REPORTS OF NEED FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT FOR
RESIDENTS
(a)
Rules in Section .0200 of this Subchapter shall be followed by the county
department of social services in carrying out the evaluation of reports of need
for medical treatment made in accordance with G.S. 108A-101(m).
(b)
After completing the evaluation, if it is reasonably determined that the
person needs protective services, the county department shall petition the
district court and request a hearing on the matter. The petition must present the
need for specific medical treatment, as well as other circumstances
substantiating neglect and request that an individual or organization be
designated to consent to the medical treatment. If an emergency exists, the
department shall petition the district court for an order to provide emergency
services.
(c)
After the court's decision is made, the county department shall send to the
institution the findings of the court.
(d)
When the county department is designated by the court, the director or his
designee shall verbally communicate to the institution consent for medical
treatment. This shall be done immediately after the judgment is made, to be
followed by written consent.
10A NCAC 71A .0801 COLLATERAL CONTACTS
Collateral contacts with persons knowledgeable about a disabled adult's
situation may be made without the adult or caretaker's consent when such
contacts are necessary to complete a protective services evaluation.
10A NCAC 71A .0903 PROTECTIVE SERVICES PETITION TO COURT
In preparation to petition the court for an order authorizing the provision of
protective services, the social worker must document the facts which show
that:
(1)
the disabled adult is being abused, neglected, or exploited; and
(2)
the adult lacks the capacity to consent to such services.
10A NCAC 71A .0904 EMERGENCY PETITION TO COURT
The information required by G.S. 108A-106(c) to be included in the petition shall
be documented in the agency file
10A NCAC 71A .0905 FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION: PETITION TO COURT
In preparation to petition the court under G.S. 108A-106(f), documentation must
be made of specific information indicating that:
80
(1)
the adult lacks the capacity to consent;
(2)
the adult is in need of protective services;
(3)
the adult is being financially exploited; and
(4)
no one else is able or willing to arrange for protective services.
C. Social Work Practice Related to APS Evaluation
1. APS Initiation
a. Diligent Efforts
Attempts to locate the disabled adult to initiate the APS evaluation must be
made within the initiation timeframe established during the screening process.
If attempts to locate the disabled adult upon the initial visit and within the
assigned statutory timeframe are unsuccessful, diligent efforts to locate them
should be made throughout the evaluation period. The frequency of diligent
efforts shall be based on the severity of the allegations. Continuous efforts
shall be made to contact the disabled adult. Examples of continuous efforts
should include multiple visits to the home, contacting all collaterals to include
family members and neighbors, contacting the reporter, and phone calls to
community agencies (hospital, law enforcement, home health, homeless
shelters, medical personnel etc.)
If the report alleges abuse or neglect, then continual diligent efforts to locate
the disabled adult should be made for 30 days and if the report alleges
exploitation then continual diligent efforts to locate the disabled adult should be
made for 45 days. This information should be thoroughly documented on the
DAAS-0007 Diligent Efforts to Locate Adult.
*Note: The date of the initial attempt to locate the disabled adult constitutes
initiation of the report if attempts to locate the disabled adult were unsuccessful
and diligent efforts are documented. Under these circumstances, the worker
would document the initial attempt on the DAAS-5026 as the initiation date.
Incorrect County During Initiation
If during initiation of an APS case it is determined that the address of the
disabled adult’s residence is located in a different county, the responding
agency shall immediately notify the county of residence. Use this process to
notify the resident county of a wrong address situation:
1)
Telephone the resident county and document the date, time and
Supervisor/designee contacted. Do not leave a voice mail message; you
81
must speak with the Supervisor/designee.
2)
Send the APS intake report to the resident county by fax or e-mail as
requested and confirm receipt.
Examples include:
*Social worker leaves the agency in County A to initiate a report believed to be
located in county A. The social worker arrives to the residence to initiate the
report and realizes they have crossed into County B. County A would then
follow the above process to alert County B of the APS report. County B is
responsible for initiation and evaluation of the APS report.
*Social worker leaves the agency in county A to initiate a report where the
disabled adult is believed to be located in county A. The social worker arrives
to the residence and is informed that the disabled adult resides in County B.
County A would then follow the above process to alert County B of the APS
report. County B is responsible for initiation and evaluation of the APS report.
b. Private Interview
The evaluation is initiated when a face to face visit is made or attempted with
the disabled adult about whom the report was made. The initial visit should be
unannounced and during the visit, the social worker must see the adult. The
social worker should conduct a private interview with the adult during the visit.
If the adult is not seen during the initial visit, the social worker must document
the reason that the adult was not seen and interviewed. Phone calls to the
disabled adult should not be made prior to initiation and do not constitute
initiation of the evaluation.
c. Barriers to Initiation
There may be circumstances which prevent the social worker from initiating the
evaluation or may serve as barriers to aspects of the initiation. Some of these
situations may include:
1)
Disabled Adult Cannot be Located
To overcome this barrier the social worker should use the DAAS-0007
Diligent Efforts to Locate Adult Tool to document all efforts to locate the
adult.
2)
Adult Has Been Involuntarily Committed (or in hospital isolation that
disallows social worker’s access)
The social worker should continue to monitor the status of the adult through
sources of information available such as family, medical professionals and
others in the adult’s support network. Additionally, it is important that the
social worker document those efforts and continue to gather information to
82
be used to complete the evaluation.
3)
DSS Evaluation Authority is Challenged
If DSS’ authority to initiate the report is challenged by the adult, a caretaker,
other people in the home, or facility staff the social worker should do the
following:
Explain statutory responsibility to see the adult. It may be necessary
to provide a copy of NC General Statute 108A.
If necessary, a request should be made to law enforcement for
assistance to gain access to the adult or ensure a social worker’s
safety.
If needed, to gain access to the adult, the agency may petition the
court for an Administrative Search and Inspection Warrant- AOC CR-
913M.
d. Crisis Intervention at Initiation or During the Evaluation Process
By its very nature, APS is provided to adults experiencing increased
vulnerability and risk. The social worker must be prepared, even during the
initial visit, to provide or arrange for necessary protection of the adult if there is
no one else able, willing, and responsible to do so. Upon initiation of the APS
evaluation and at other times during the APS process there may be
circumstances which require immediate action by the APS social worker which
does not require a court order.
Immediate action can mean arranging for a life-sustaining service such as
food, heat, or medically necessary prescription drugs; or assisting with an
involuntary commitment.
This type of crisis intervention is normally needed to stabilize a one-time crisis
and does not require that a case decision be made to provide intervention. A
crisis requiring a court ordered intervention should not be confused with
situations when an essential, life- sustaining need such as heat, food or
medically necessary prescription drugs are required while the social worker is
completing a thorough APS evaluation. Once the immediate crisis is alleviated
the evaluation shall continue until enough information is gathered to make the
case decision.
e. Emergency at Initiation
An Emergency Ex-Parte AOC-CV-770 APS Petition may be needed in
instances when the adult with a disability is found in circumstances where there
is substantial danger of irreparable harm or death and emergency services
such as a medical assessment, placement or hospitalization are needed and it
is reasonable to believe that the adult lacks capacity. The APS evaluation
process should be compressed to meet the immediate emergency needs of the
83
adult including making the capacity decision. In this type of situation decisions
must be made quickly and the APS social worker must be reasonably sure that
there is no other decision maker available such as a guardian or POA.
Even after the ex-parte order is issued and the immediate emergency
addressed, it may be necessary for the social worker to continue gathering
information, especially if other allegations or concerns not related to the
emergency need to be addressed.
*Note: any time a protective services order or ex-parte order is obtained via
signature by judicial official, evaluation services (202) are terminated and
planning and mobilization services (204) are effective beginning on that date of
signature. The type of service authorization received for protective services
should be documented on the DSS 5027 in the comments section.
2. Conducting a Thorough Evaluation
a. Time Frames for APS Evaluation
Though it is a statutory requirement to render a case decision within 30 or 45
days depending on type of alleged maltreatment, a thorough evaluation must
be completed and concluded when there is sufficient information to make a
case decision. Sufficient information shall mean that all six functional domains
have been thoroughly assessed (Appendix B) and documented. Equally
important is the expectation to expedite the APS process and make the case
decision to protect the adult in life-threatening situations.
b. Key Elements of APS Evaluation
(1)
The adult must be seen by the social worker.
(2)
Observation of the adult in their environment is an important part of the
evaluation.
(3)
Collateral contacts with persons knowledgeable about a disabled adult's
situation may be made without the adult or caretaker's consent when such
contacts are necessary to complete a protective service evaluation. This
includes individuals identified by the person making the report, as well as
individuals noted by the adult who may have information pertinent to the
evaluation or any other person identified by the social worker that will assist in
completing a thorough evaluation.
(4)
Obtain and review records necessary to complete a thorough evaluation
including, but not limited to, medical, financial, psychological, legal (Durable
Power of Attorney, Guardianship, etc.), and tax assessment(s). All information
received should be summarized in the case record. Use the DAAS-0014 Notice
of Request for Records for APS Evaluation.
84
(5)
If an adult's caretaker is an individual, facility or agency that maintains
records related to the care and treatment of the disabled adult, the law
authorizes the review and copying of such records when necessary for a
complete evaluation. If the agency's authority is challenged to access records,
the agency may petition the court for an order requiring compliance with the
law using the Affidavit to Obtain Administrative Inspection Warrant for
Particular Condition or Activity- AOC-CR-913M.
(6)
Evidence gathered during the evaluation includes:
Adult’s statements
Direct observations
Physical evidence (e.g., injuries, cluttered home, no utility service)
Corroborating evidence (e.g., witness statements, physician records,
documents)
Circumstantial evidence
Unobserved/third-party suspicions
Adult’s history
(7)
A thorough evaluation of the allegations in the protective service report shall
include indicators of abuse, neglect or exploitation and the disabled adult's
strengths and limitations by assessing the following six functional domains:
Social Support
Environment
Economic
Mental health
Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Physical Health
(8)
After each domain is evaluated, a summary of findings related to strengths
and identified needs should be documented.
(9)
When conducting evaluations, the APS social worker will benefit from the
input and insight of various community stakeholders serving vulnerable adults.
c. Focus of the APS Evaluation
The focus of the APS evaluation is to determine if adult protective services are
needed. The APS evaluation addresses not only the allegations made by the
reporter but should be a comprehensive assessment of the adult’s life including
all factors affecting the adult and the impact of those factors upon meeting their
essential needs. Gathering thorough information in all six domains is critical to
understanding the individual’s needs and if there are deficits in the adult’s life
which may lead to a need for protective services. By thoroughly assessing all
six domains the social worker may discover areas of maltreatment other than
those alleged in the APS report.
The APS Evaluation Tools are valuable resources for local DSS staff in
85
conducting complete and thorough evaluations. Utilization of the APS tools:
(1)
Provide structure to the evaluation process,
(2)
Ensures coverage of many of the possible areas in which the adult may
have challenges, and
(3)
Sets the foundation for the identification of needs and strengths and
assists in identifying which interventions would be least restrictive if
intervention is necessary.
To document findings of the evaluation use the DAAS-0005 APS Community
Evaluation and the DAAS-0006 APS Facility Evaluation. These are tools for
individuals living in community settings and for individuals living in residential
care facilities and nursing homes.
d. Six Domains of the APS Evaluation
It is important to remember that the evaluation documents information to be
used to make the case decision, based upon the three statutory criteria. The
use of the evaluation in assessing the six domains provides a framework for
the social worker to gain an understanding of the adult’s functioning as it
relates to strengths and areas of need. The APS Evaluation tools provide a
guide for the social worker to use in gathering information. The domains are
comprised primarily of exploratory questions that the social worker should use,
not as a script, but rather as prompts, to better understand the family and their
strengths and needs. The more familiar a social worker becomes with these
questions, the better equipped the social worker will be to thoroughly assess
the adult. All functional domains should be assessed thoroughly throughout the
evaluation.
The following outlines each of the six domains of the assessment, necessary to
complete a thorough evaluation (commonly referenced as SEEMAP)
(1)
Social Support
Information gathered regarding social support will be used to:
Assess the strengths and needs of the adult and their support network
Identify individuals who may serve as a caretaker
Identify individuals, groups, or agencies who may provide essential
services
Determine if the adult has someone willing, able, and responsible to
provide protection
Determine the nature of the support relationship and their impact upon
the adult
Social support isn’t limited to just biological family, it may include friends,
neighbors, service providers or other social groups. It is important to
explore all of these because it may look very different for everyone.
86
The social worker should focus on who is in the adult’s support system,
what they do for the adult, and how they are involved with the adult. There
can be both formal and informal arrangements within the adult’s support
system. Formal supports could include individuals who serve in such roles
as the adult’s caregiver, power of attorney, or guardian; informal supports
could include anyone who has some type of regular contact with the adult. If
the individual is identified as a formal support, it is important to obtain
documentation to confirm this role (e.g. - Powers of Attorney or Letters of
Appointment for a Guardian). It is important that the agency/county attorney
review this documentation to clarify and/or confirm the type and scope of
authority they convey.
Relationships should be assessed to determine how the individual
contributes emotionally, physically, or financially. It is important to assess
how the adult feels about the individual and how responsible they are in
meeting the adults needs. Gathering information in the social domain is
critical in understanding the strengths and weaknesses in the adult’s social
network.
As part of the information gathering the social worker should obtain
demographic information for all household members and determine their
relationship to the adult. This should include determining who lives in the
home and any help received from community agencies.
(2)
Environment
Information gathered regarding the environmental situation will be used to:
Assess the impact of the environment on the adult’s health (ventilation,
unsanitary conditions, animal/insect infestations, food storage)
Assess the impact of the environment on the adult’s safety (mobility,
accessibility, fire hazards, hoarding, neighborhood)
Assess the impact of the environment on the adult’s ability to function
(mobility, structural issues, food preparation, rural/urban, isolation)
Determine if the environment contributes to or detracts from the adult’s
functioning
It is imperative that the social worker have access to the dwelling in which
the adult resides to conduct a complete and thorough assessment of the
environmental situation. Information gathered for the evaluation should be
based upon and consistent with the observations of the social worker during
visits to the home. Observation would include confirmation of the condition
of various functional elements of the environment. For example, observing
that the temperature in a home is “comfortable” or “appropriate” does not
confirm that the HVAC is working properly. Therefore, additional activities
will be necessary to validate that the heating and cooling systems are in
working order.
87
Areas which should be included in the environmental assessment are (not
an all-inclusive list):
The type, location and ownership of the disabled adult’s home
Issues affecting the physical movement of the disabled adult
The safety, adequacy and accessibility of systems of the disabled
adult's home, such as HVAC, electrical, and plumbing
Presence of safety devices such as fire extinguishers and smoke
detectors
The sufficiency of sleeping, bathing, toileting, and cooking or eating
arrangements
Whether the environment contributes to isolation from potential services
or supports
Whether the environment contributes to or detracts from the adult’s
functioning and well-being
(3)
Economic Functioning
Information gathered regarding the economic situation will be used to:
Determine sources of income (Social Security, SSI, Pension,
Retirement, Employment, Child Support, SAIH, in-kind support)
Determine financial accounts/assets (property, savings or banking
accounts, stocks, bonds, CD’s)
Determine expenses (mortgage/rent, utilities, taxes, food, medications,
insurance)
Determine money management (representative payee, POA)
Detect indicators of exploitation of assets (new management of income,
unusual purchases, sudden withdrawals, unusual philanthropy or charity
donations, opening new accounts/credit cards)
Determine irregularities in spending or use of money
Determine adequacy of resources available to meet basic needs
The social worker should perform a comprehensive assessment of the
adult’s economic functioning. While observation (e.g. – are utilities
connected?) and verbal information (e.g. the adult reports information
about income and expenses) are important sources of information, the
social worker should work diligently to gather written financial data such as
bank statements and invoices. Adults, however, are often reluctant to share
information regarding their budget or financial resources. There may be a
variety of obstacles in obtaining financial information, but this should not
prevent the social worker from gathering sufficient information about the
adult’s economic functioning. The social worker should clearly document all
efforts made to secure financial information from the individual, collaterals,
and caregivers. In situations where written documentation is needed but not
willingly provided, it may be necessary for the social worker to utilize tools
such as the Petition for Order to Inspect Financial Records and to Freeze
Assets (AOC-CV-776) or Petition and Order for Issuance of Subpoena
Directing Release of Financial Records (AOC-SP-630) to acquire this
information.
88
(4)
Mental/Emotional Functioning
Information gathered regarding mental/emotional functioning will be
used to:
Determine if the adult has mental health diagnoses
Determine the impact of mental health issues upon functioning
Assist to determine if the adult is mentally incapacitated by their
diagnosis
Gather information useful for making the capacity decision (orientation,
cognition, judgment, memory, and attention)
Assess if the adult is receiving necessary mental health services
Assess compliance with recommended mental health medications and
treatment
(5)
Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Information gathered regarding Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL’s) will be used to:
Assess abilities and needs regarding ADLs (bathing, dressing, eating,
toileting, transferring)
Assess abilities and needs regarding IADLs (money management,
telephone, household chores)
Identify the need for assistance and the source of assistance with
ADLs/IADLs
Provide information used to determine if the disabled adult is
incapacitated by a disability
The social worker should focus on the adult’s functioning to include the
adult’s level of independence or dependence on others to assist with needs.
The social worker should explore the adult’s understanding of their
functional limitations, if any, and the adult’s strategies to meet their
essential needs. In addition to discussion with the adult and his/her support
network, the social worker should observe the adult’s functional ability.
Consequently, it may be appropriate to ask the adult to demonstrate their
ability to perform certain tasks. The questions or observations should
determine if the adult is physically and/or mentally incapacitated and how it
affects the adult’s ability to perform or secure basic tasks of self-care.
(6)
Physical Health
Information gathered regarding physical health will be used to:
Assess strengths and deficits related to physical health
Identify essential needs for health and well-being
Gather information useful for making the capacity decision
Identify concerns regarding non-compliance with medications or medical
treatment
Determine diagnoses, disabilities, and their impact upon functioning
89
Monitor for evidence of physical abuse or neglect
Information regarding physical health may be obtained from various
sources including but not limited to:
Adult’s input
Medical professionals and service providers’ assessments/input
Medical records
Social worker observations
Caretaker information
Family/Friends/Support network input
It is important that the social worker gather information from a variety of
sources to complete a comprehensive assessment of the adult’s physical
health. For example, the adult’s physician may have limited knowledge of
the disabled adult’s health regimen in their home but may be a good source
of information through physical assessments and medical tests.
Conversely, friends and family may provide insight for the social worker into
the daily health-related activities of the adult but may be unaware of the
victim’s diagnoses and physicians’ recommendations. A physical condition,
disease, or diagnosis that limits one person may not limit another. For
example, arthritis and heart disease in one person may not impair that
individual’s functioning while in another it keeps them confined to bed. Each
person and situation are unique.
All information gathered during the evaluation should be documented on the
evaluation tool or in the case record. It is used to inform decision-making
about the nature and extent of services needed by the individual, complete
the case decision and determine capacity. It can be used as evidence
during legal actions brought about by the agency, and it is used to both
obtain and maintain funding for APS staff. Therefore, it is critical that
documentation be concise, organized, legible, and current.
e. Essential Services
Essential services are defined by G.S. 108A-101(i) as “those social,
medical, psychiatric, psychological or legal services necessary to safeguard
the disabled adult’s rights and resources and to maintain the physical or
mental wellbeing of the individual.” This definition includes much more than
what is commonly referred to as “meeting basic needs”, giving the agency
an opportunity to consider how this individual will benefit from a broader
approach to services. Being able to live free from abuse, neglect and
exploitation would be reasonably included in our understanding of essential
needs and would certainly be understood as necessary to maintaining one’s
physical or mental well-being.
90
f. Legal Interventions Available During Evaluation
(1)
Administrative Search and Inspection Warrant
In instances where the adult or his caretaker refuses to cooperate with
the social worker in gaining access to the adult or his/her surroundings,
the social worker should do the following:
Explain the agency's statutory responsibility to evaluate the report
that an adult is disabled and in need of protective services and that
the evaluation will continue.
Document the efforts made to try to obtain cooperation and the
reasons given for refusing to cooperate.
Petition for an Affidavit to Obtain Administrative Inspection Warrant
for Particular Condition or Activity (AOC-CR-913M), if necessary, in
order to gain access to the adult.
(2)
Order to Freeze Assets and Authorize Inspection of Financial
Records
If, during the evaluation, it appears that the adult lacks the capacity to
consent, it may be necessary to obtain a Petition for Order to Inspect
Financial Records and to Freeze Assets (AOC-CV-776). Such an order
serves the purpose of assisting the social worker in completing the
evaluation while at the same time protecting the adult from further
exploitation. (Note: The Freeze/Inspect Order can be utilized at any
point in the APS case including the Planning and Mobilization phase.)
Upon petition, a court may order that:
A disabled adult's financial records be made available at a certain
day and time for inspection by the director or his designated agent;
and
A disabled adult's financial assets be frozen and not withdrawn,
spent or transferred without prior order of the court.
The order will not be issued unless the court finds there is
reasonable cause to believe that:
o
A disabled adult lacks the capacity to consent and that he/she is
in need of protective services;
o
The disabled adult is being financially exploited by his caretaker;
o
No other person is able, willing, or responsible to arrange for
protective services.
Before any inspection is completed, the caretaker and every financial
institution involved shall be given notice and a reasonable opportunity to
appear and show good cause why this inspection should not be done.
Any order freezing assets shall expire ten days after the inspection is
completed unless the court, for good cause shown, extends it. [G.S.
108A 106f]
91
The agency need not wait until the evaluation is complete to petition the
court. The agency should have enough information to demonstrate
reasonable belief that a disabled adult lacks the capacity to consent and
that he/she is in need of protective services, he/she is being financially
exploited by his/her caretaker, and no other person is able, willing, and
responsible to arrange for protective services. Reasonable belief is a
strong suspicion based upon the information gathered by the agency
thus far and is not absolute proof that the above items are true. When
considering the role of a caretaker at this point in the APS process, it is
reasonable to believe a caretaker may be an individual who has
responsibility for or has access to and uses the adult’s finances for their
own personal gain. (Note: It is still required to make the capacity
decision after making the case decision.)
The possibility of petitioning the court for authority to freeze and review
financial records should not be discussed with the adult or caretaker. If
the adult is being exploited, advance warning to the caretaker that a
petition will be filed may result in records being altered or assets being
withdrawn. When preparing the petition with the agency/county attorney,
be as specific as possible in describing the accounts to be frozen. The
agency should assess the impact upon the adult when considering
freezing assets as it could be detrimental to the adult in accessing
necessary resources to meet essential needs.
(3)
Subpoena Directing the Release of Financial Records
In some instances, the Freeze/Inspect Order is not the best option to
obtain access to an adult’s financial records. In such situations, a helpful
tool enacted through NC General Statute 108A, Article 6A is the Petition
and Order for Issuance of Subpoena Directing Release of Financial
Records (AOC-SP-630).
General Statute 108A, Article 6A also amends the definition of older
adults with regard to financial exploitation; allows local departments of
social services and law enforcement agencies access to financial records
under certain situations involving suspected financial exploitation against
older and disabled adults; exempts entities from liability when acting in
good faith to provide, seek, or obtain financial records in situations
involving financial exploitation of older and disabled adults; allows
financial institutions to maintain a list of contacts for customers should
there be a need to report a suspected case of financial exploitation;
requires financial institutions to report suspected fraud, but does not hold
them liable if they acted in good faith.
Some of the advantages of this tool include:
The subpoena allows the local DSS to inspect financial records
without freezing those accounts.
As a condition of the subpoena it is not necessary that the alleged
92
victim lack capacity.
It is possible to request that the notice to the customer (of the
financial institution) be delayed under conditions outlined in general
statute (e.g. when there is concern that notification may allow for
the destruction of or tampering with evidence).
Both local DSSs (for disabled adults) and law enforcement (for elder
adults aged 65 and older) can utilize this subpoena.
If the APS social worker/supervisor elects to utilize the subpoena they
should consult with the agency/county attorney regarding the completion
and submission of a Petition and Order for Issuance of Subpoena
Directing Release of Financial Records (AOC-SP-630).
3. Evaluating APS in Facilities
A document entitled the NCDHHS Working Agreement between DFS and DSS has
been developed between the Division of Health Service Regulation and the
Division of Aging and Adult Services which outlines, in detail, the responsibilities of
each agency with respect to adult protective services in residential care facilities
licensed by the Division of Health Service Regulation.
The same process used to evaluate reports on disabled adults who live in the
community should be used to evaluate reports on adults who live in facilities.
Special considerations for applying the guidelines to facility evaluations are
explained in the following:
a. Licensure Issues vs. Protective Services
The department of social services staff member receiving a report on a person
in a nursing, combination or residential care facility should determine whether
the complaint relates to the treatment of (a) specified resident(s) or general
conditions in the facility. If the complaint relates only to general conditions, the
complainant should be referred to the appropriate licensing authority.
Complaints received on:
Nursing and combination facilities should be referred to the Complaints
Investigation Branch, Division of Health Service Regulation.
Mental health residential facilities should be referred to the Mental Health
Licensure and Certification Section, Division of Health Service Regulation.
Adult Care or Family Care Homes should be referred to the Adult Home
Specialist in the county DSS where the facility is located.
Note: Some referrals involve APS and licensure issues. These referrals should
be referred to the APS unit/social worker and the appropriate supervisory
agency simultaneously.
93
b. Screening Criteria and Decision Related to APS in Facilities
The same screening criteria presented in this manual apply to reports received
on residents of facilities. To be accepted as an APS report the referral must
allege that a disabled adult is abused, neglected and/or exploited and in need of
protective services. The facility, and its staff, meet the definition of caretaker as
they have accepted comprehensive responsibility for the adult’s care. Some
points to consider when applying these criteria to facility situations include:
To meet the definition of abuse, the facility must willfully inflict pain, injury,
mental anguish or deprivation. When another resident harms a facility
resident, the incident is not considered abuse because the perpetrator is
not the adult’s caretaker. If the adult was harmed because the facility did
not provide adequate protection or supervision, caretaker neglect may be
alleged.
To meet the definition of caretaker neglect, there must be a failure on the
part of the facility to provide adequate care or supervision to meet the
needs of the adult.
When someone other than the resident is handling the resident’s finances,
exploitation may be alleged by a facility if the resident's bill has not been
paid. If allegations are made that the bill has not been paid because that
person is using the resident's check for his/her own benefit, the report
should be screened based on the three APS criteria. If screened in, the
focus of protective services should be on stopping and preventing further
exploitation. It is not the DSS agency’s responsibility to collect the past due
bill. Another example of a possible need for protection would be if the
facility is recommending discharging the resident due to the unpaid bill and
alternative living arrangements have not been identified or secured.
The adult must be currently in need of protective services. If someone has
stepped in to provide protection by the time the agency receives the referral,
this criterion is not met. Some examples of this type of situation include:
A facility administrator calls to report that an aide struck a resident. The
administrator has removed the aide and they will no longer have any
contact with the resident. The intake social worker finds the administrator’s
account reasonable and credible. This would not meet the definition of a
need for protective services. However, if the social worker has any reason
to suspect that the aide continues to have access to the adult, or that the
facility staff has not acted to protect the resident, it would be determined
that there is a need for protection and the report potentially screened in.
A family member reports that her mother was severely neglected at an adult
or family care home. The family has already moved her to another facility
where her needs are being met. This would not meet the definition of a
need for protective services. However, if the resident had not been moved
or was currently in the hospital because of the neglect, and could be
returning to the facility, there would potentially be a continued need for
protection and the report screened in.
When cases involving adults residing in facilities are screened out for APS,
the county DSS may still have a concern and need to involve other
94
agencies.
If the allegations are general (e.g. there is inadequate heat, the roof leaks),
these are regulatory issues and should be reported to the Division of Health
Service Regulation.
Reporting to the District Attorney's office may also be appropriate if an
incident such as an assault or patient abuse or neglect has occurred.
A good working relationship with the Regional Long-Term Care
Ombudsman is also important as residents may benefit from their
advocacy. Sharing general concerns with the Ombudsman about the
treatment of residents or patients in a facility does not violate confidentiality
and will ensure that residents’ rights are protected, and concerns
addressed.
The Mental Health Licensure and Certification Section of DHSR should be
notified immediately by phone if the adult is a resident of a mental health
residential facility or an ICF/MR.
c. Responsibility of DSS in County of Residence Related to APS in Facilities
The DSS in the county in which the facility is located is responsible for the
evaluation of a screened in APS report. Any other county DSS with
responsibility to the adult (Medicaid, Guardianship etc.) shall cooperate in the
evaluation and provision of protective services. The adult's needs should be the
foremost consideration of both agencies in a protective service situation.
d. Receiving Reports from the Division of Health Service Regulation Related
to APS in Facilities
Upon receiving reports of the mistreatment of specific residents of facilities, the
Division of Health Service Regulation will inform the reporter that they may
report their concerns to the local DSS as an APS referral. The reporter will be
referred to the DSS in the county where the facility is located. Department of
Health Service Regulation will also collect appropriate referral information and
make a follow-up phone call to the DSS. These procedures are spelled out in
more detail in the DAAS and DHSR Working Agreement. The county
department of social services has the responsibility to screen reports that come
through the Division of Health Service Regulation using the screening criteria
described in APS statute. If the DSS decides that the referral is not appropriate
as an APS report, the working agreement specifies that it will notify DHSR by
the end of the next working day.
e. Initiating the Evaluation Related to APS in Facilities
Prior to initiating the APS evaluation in a facility, the social worker should not
inform the facility administrator (or other facility staff) that a protective services
report has been received, unless the assistance of the administrator will be
necessary to initiate the evaluation. When conducting the APS Evaluation
initiation, the social worker's first priority should be to see the resident about
95
whom a protective services report has been made.
Upon entering the facility, the worker should do the following:
Inform the administrator or, if the administrator is not available, inform the
staff member in charge that the visit is for the purpose of seeing a resident
about whom a protective services report has been received. If the report
alleges that the administrator is the perpetrator the administrator should not
be told the reason for the visit.
Obtain directions to the resident's room and proceed directly to see the
resident.
If access to the facility or to the resident is denied, the social worker should
explain the statutory responsibility and authority to evaluate any report that a
disabled adult is in need of protective services. If necessary, an Affidavit to
Obtain Administrative Inspection Warrant for Particular Condition or Activity
(AOC-CR-913M) can be obtained. The social worker can return with the
assistance of law enforcement, if necessary.
f. Steps in Evaluation Related to APS in Facilities
The APS evaluation process explained earlier in this manual also applies to
APS evaluations for adults in a facility. The APS evaluation shall include:
(1)
visiting the adult,
(2)
making appropriate collateral contacts, and
(3)
obtaining medical, psychological and/or psychiatric evaluations when
necessary.
Some key points regarding evaluations of residents of facilities include:
The adult should be interviewed before discussing the allegations with the
administrator or talking to collateral contacts such as staff or other
residents. The adult should be interviewed alone, and care should be taken
to protect the residents’ privacy.
After visiting the adult, the social worker should talk to other residents
and/or staff members who might have information about the allegations. In
addition, the staff member(s) responsible for the resident's care should be
asked about the allegations. The social worker should be sensitive to
factors such as fear of retaliation from staff or fear of being fired which can
hinder the collection of accurate information. It should be noted that it is
important to interview all persons to include other residents, housekeeping,
CNAs, medication technicians, nurses, etc. who come into contact with the
resident. Due to facility staff working shifts which span 24-hour coverage it
may be necessary to interview those individuals at times other than DSS
hours of operation or at a location other than the facility.
If evidence of abuse, neglect, or exploitation is found during an APS
Evaluation, county DSS staff must notify the Division of Health Service
Regulation immediately via telephone and must follow this communication
with information about the substantiation of the need for protection.
Regardless of the outcome of the APS case decision, if the APS social
96
worker finds violations of facility regulations, this information should be
shared with the appropriate regulatory agency including maintaining contact
with the agency Adult Home Specialist.
g. Review of Facility Records
Facility records are a key source of information when conducting evaluations in
facilities. The APS statute gives the agency the authority to review any and all
records maintained by a caretaker as it relates to the care and treatment of the
disabled adult [G.S. 108A-103(a)]. The social worker should be aware that the
facility maintains various records regarding its residents. Every facility is
different, and every facility keeps their records in various places as well as other
mediums (computer, databases, records, files, or filing cabinets). Types of
records could include Nurses Notes, Medication Administration Records, Visitor
Logs and others. It is important that the APS social worker obtain all records
maintained by the facility applicable to the APS Evaluation. If the social worker
is denied access to the resident's records the social worker’s authority under
G.S. 108A-103(a) should be explained which allows for the review and copying
of records maintained by facilities licensed by the N.C. Department of Health
and Human Services. A court order can be obtained to require compliance with
the APS statute if necessary.
h. Thorough Evaluation as it Relates to APS in Facilities
The social worker should use all the sources of information discussed above
(i.e. interviews with the disabled adult and collateral contacts, expert
evaluations and record reviews) to assess the disabled adult’s functioning in the
six functional domains. The DAAS-0006 APS Facility Evaluation is a
recommended tool which is used to document these areas.
Upon the completion of the APS Evaluation a written summary regarding the
evaluation shall be provided to the administrator of the facility where the adult
resides. The DAAS-0003 Notice to Administrator: Completion of Evaluation may
be used by local DSS staff to provide this summary to the facility administrator.
The information in the summary should be limited to:
(1)
acknowledgement that a protective services report was received on a
specified patient or resident of the facility;
(2)
the specific allegations in the report (the complainant shall not be named);
(3)
whether or not evidence of abuse, neglect or exploitation was found;
(4)
whether or not the need for protective services was substantiated;
(5)
a general statement as to how the conclusion was reached (the names of
persons who were contacted during the evaluation to obtain information
shall not be given).
97
i. Written Report as it Relates to APS in Facilities
The DAAS-0009 Written Report of APS Evaluation conducted on a
patient/resident of a nursing or combination facility shall be sent to the Complaint
Intake Unit of the Division of Health Service Regulation within 30 days of the
completed evaluation. Reports on residents of Mental Health residential facilities
shall be sent to the Mental Health Licensure Section, Division of Health Service
Regulation.
The Written Report of an evaluation conducted on a resident of an adult care
home shall also be sent to the Adult Home Specialist at the DSS (in the county
where the adult care home is located). The Adult Home Specialist shall review
the report for licensure and resident rights violations. After reviewing it, the
specialist shall forward any findings of licensure or residents’ rights violations to
the Division of Health Service Regulation in accordance with procedures outlined
in the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services Adult Care Home
Procedures.
If an APS Evaluation is conducted on a resident of a state-operated facility
serving individuals with mental health needs, developmental disabilities, and/or
substance use disorders a Written Report must be sent to the Administrator of
that facility following the case decision. If applicable, the Written Report for a
resident of the state facility shall also be sent to the resident’s guardian.
When evidence of financial exploitation is found when conducting an APS
Evaluation in a Medicaid-funded facility, the Written Report shall be sent to the
Division of Health Benefits (also known as NC Medicaid) and the Division of
Health Service Regulation.
The Written Report must not contain the name of the reporter nor the names of
people who have knowledge of the situation. This information can be shared
verbally with the Department of Health Services Regulation upon request if it is
needed to carry out their investigation.
j. Dual Role as Supervisory Agency as it Relates to APS in Facilities
The county department of social services has a dual role with residential care
facilities. It serves as the agency that provides Adult Protective Services and
monitoring by the Adult Home Specialist of licensure rules. When possible, it is
recommended a social worker other than the Adult Home Specialist conduct the
APS evaluation. The social worker should understand that the potential
protective needs of the resident named in the APS report is the focus of the
evaluation. The agency's relationship with the facility should be maintained by:
Advising the administrator or supervisor-in-charge on entering and leaving
the facility;
Coordinating closely with the Adult Home Specialist in conducting the
evaluation;
Informing the administrator of the findings from the evaluation using the
98
Notice to the Administrator
It is possible that a facility determines that one of its residents needs medical
treatment to which the adult cannot consent. In such circumstances, a report
alleging the need for protection may be made by facility staff or another
reporter. In such situations, the APS report should be screened by the three
APS criteria. If screened in the evaluation shall be completed and, if applicable,
protection provided. In situations where there is no legal surrogate decision-
maker, authorization will need to be obtained through court action.
k. Planning and Mobilizing Protective Services as it Relates to APS in
Facilities
In planning and mobilizing services the social worker should help the facility, in
conjunction with the resident, family, and others, to develop and implement a
plan for protecting the resident. Examples of protective services plans include
moving a resident to another room or floor to minimize contact with another
abusive resident, or asking the administrator of the facility to provide training to
staff so that a resident will not be victimized again because of inadequate care
such as an improper transfer technique. In some situations, it may be necessary
to move the resident to another facility to provide protection.
4. Case Decision Following A Thorough APS Evaluation
Guidelines Related to the APS Case Decision
The case decision is made using the same three criteria as the screening decision.
Upon the completion of a thorough evaluation, a case shall be staffed with a
supervisor, member of management or their designee and the social worker. The
staffing can include others as designated by supervisor/management. The
questions that must be answered to make a case decision are:
Is the adult incapacitated by disability?
Has the disabled adult been abused, neglected, or exploited or is being
subjected to abuse, neglect, or exploitation?
Is the disabled adult in need of protective services?
It is recommended that the case decision process have a systematic method in
making the determination that is based on a careful and thorough review of all
information gathered at Intake and Evaluation.
Reaching a case decision is the sole responsibility of the department of social
services. Although other agencies may help with the evaluation, the ultimate
responsibility and authority for making the case decision rests with the DSS
evaluating the need for protective services. It is incumbent upon the agency to
ensure that case decisions are based on G.S. 108A. DSS must have determined
that the adult is disabled, has been mistreated and is in need of protection.
99
Further guidance as it pertains to components of the case decision are outlined and
explained in the subsections below:
a. Time Frames Related to the Case Decision
Case decisions must be made within statutory time frames but can, and should,
be concluded earlier when there is enough information to warrant a case
decision. The evaluation should not be held open or extended just to meet the
statutory timeframe. Case decisions shall be compressed or expedited in order
to protect the disabled adult in a life-threatening or emergent situation. If diligent
efforts to locate the disabled adult are unsuccessful during the 30/45-day time
frame, a case decision must be made based upon information obtained during
the evaluation.
b. Types of Case Decisions
There are three different case decisions that can be rendered at the end of a
thorough evaluation. It is the expectation that the documentation will clearly
show how criterion are or are not met in each case.
(1)
Unconfirmed/Unsubstantiated
Social worker does not have enough information to clearly state that the
allegations are true and/or the adult does not meet the definition of
incapacitated by a disability. If allegations are true, but the adult is not
disabled, this is a potential law enforcement issue.
(2)
Confirmed/Unsubstantiated
Social worker has enough information to clearly state that the alleged
maltreatment happened, but the disabled adult does not need protection.
This could be because either the adult is willing, able and responsible to seek
their own essential services or the adult has someone else able, willing, and
responsible to seek essential services. The disabled adult may also have
already been protected from the maltreatment or no longer needs protective
services (e.g. -the disabled adult is deceased).
(3)
Confirmed/Substantiated
Social worker has information to clearly state that the adult is incapacitated
by a disability, alleged maltreatment happened, AND the adult needs
protection.
c. Case Decision Terms Defined
(1)
Confirmation
Confirmation of maltreatment occurs when evidence of abuse, neglect,
100
and/or exploitation of a disabled adult is found during the evaluation. It is
possible to confirm abuse, neglect, and/or exploitation has occurred, but not
substantiate the need for protection because there has been intervention and
the need for protection no longer exists.
(2)
Substantiation
A report is substantiated when the adult is disabled as defined in
G.S. 108A 101(d); the adult is abused, neglected or exploited as defined in
G.S. 108A 101(a)(j) or (m); and the adult is in need of protective services as
defined in G.S. 108A 101(e).
The decision of whether the agency is going to assume responsibility to
protect the abused, neglected and/or exploited disabled adult is based on the
APS criteria being met and authorization being obtained. Once the agency
has obtained authorization from the disabled adult, legally responsible person
or a court order to provide protection the agency must immediately and
without delay begin providing or arranging services needed to protect the
adult.
(3) Unsubstantiation
A report is unsubstantiated if any one of the three criteria for substantiation
are not met. When the evaluation of the report indicates that it is not
substantiated, an offer shall be made to the individual of any available and
appropriate services (if possible). The social worker shall explain such
services to the individual. Although a protective service report may be
unsubstantiated, that does not always mean that the individual does not need
or could not benefit from other services. A visit should be made to the
disabled adult to inform him/her when the APS evaluation has been
completed, and that there will be no further APS involvement unless another
report is received and accepted. When the disabled adult has been minimally
involved in the evaluation due to limited mental capacity and a family
member, POA, or legal guardian has worked with the social worker, that
individual should be informed of the case decision.
If the disabled adult or the adult’s family member(s), POA, or legal guardian
indicate to the adult protective services social worker that they would like to
request services, the social worker should make a referral to the appropriate
agency or service. The referral should include only the information that is
relevant and necessary to process the request for services.
If other agency services are needed and accepted by the adult or his/her
legal representative, the case is closed for APS and opened in the Services
Information System (SIS) for the requested service. The social worker should
follow the guidance in the Services Information System (SIS) Manual for
opening and closing cases on the DSS-5027 form.
101
Since the local DSS is the only agency with statutory authority to provide
adult protective services in NC there is a responsibility to provide protection.
Under no circumstances should a decision be made to unsubstantiate the
need for protective services due to lack of a thorough evaluation, staffing
resources, formal services, access to court systems, legal consultation or
prior history with the same individual who may have refused services in the
past. The thorough APS evaluation, including interview(s) with the disabled
adult, contact with collaterals, other professional’s evaluations, and record
reviews should supply the information needed for making a case decision. If
any element of the case decision is unclear more information may need to be
obtained.
d. Guidelines Related to Case Decision Criteria
(1)
Determining if the Adult is Disabled
The key to determining whether the disabled adult is able to perform or obtain
essential services needed to address the abuse, neglect and/or exploitation
that is occurring is based on their functionality. G.S. 108A-101(e) states that
the disabled adult, due to physical or mental incapacity, is unable to perform
or obtain for himself essential services. Some items to consider when
determining disability are addressed below.
Physical and Mental/Emotional functioning must be assessed as part of the
thorough APS evaluation. At a minimum, information documented in the
Community Evaluation under the sections for Physical Health, Medication,
Activities of Daily Living, Mental/Emotional Health and Self Endangering
Behaviors should provide the basis for determining the adult’s physical and
mental incapacities and how those incapacities limit functioning. A physical or
mental condition, disease, or diagnosis that limits one person may not limit
another. Heart disease or Schizophrenia in one person may not impair their
functioning while in another it completely limits their functioning or decision-
making ability. In every situation a person-centered approach should be used
as every person is unique.
Additionally, just because an adult possesses skills necessary to perform a
task does not mean that they are fully capable of completing that task. The
social worker must determine if the person has the physical, emotional,
intellectual and social skills to conduct activities of daily living and
perform/obtain essential services. For example, an adult may have the
physical ability to clean their home but due to mental illness may not actually
perform this task. An adult may have the mental ability and wherewithal to
take medications but physically cannot open the bottle or see the prescription
to know which medication to take.
Sometimes, an adult’s disability is intermittent in nature. This type of disability
occurs frequently with substance use disorders and mental illness diagnoses.
The social worker should visit the adult at various times to determine the
102
frequency, duration and intensity of the behavior of the individual. In such
cases, it is important to determine whether the disability is prevalent to the
extent that the adult is incapacitated by the disability and unable to seek
essential services.
(2)
Determining Maltreatment
When determining maltreatment, it is important to look at each of the
allegations and all aspects of the person’s functioning. In order to make the
case decision, information should be collected during the evaluation process
from the individual, collaterals, other professionals and various records to
determine if the individual has been abused, neglected or exploited. The
information gathered during the course of the evaluation should determine
the type of mistreatment that has occurred based on the following:
For abuse, the social worker must have found evidence of willful infliction
of pain, injury or mental anguish, unreasonable confinement or the willful
deprivation by a caretaker of services which are necessary to maintain
the mental and physical health of the individual.
For neglect, the social worker must have found evidence that the
individual is not able to provide for themselves the services which are
necessary to maintain their mental or physical health or is not receiving
these services from their caretaker.
For exploitation, the social worker must have found evidence that the
individual or their resources have been illegally or improperly used for
another’s gain.
(3)
Determining the Need for Protection
When determining the need for protection the social worker must describe
how the individual, due to their physical or mental incapacity, is unable to
perform or obtain for themselves essential services and if that person is
without a willing, able and responsible person (all three attributes) to perform
or obtain essential services. For example, the individual would be in need of
protection if the caretaker is willing and responsible to provide protection but
is unable to do so. The following definitions and guidance are provided as
tools to assist when making this critical decision.
A “willing person” is one who voluntarily commits to and is in agreement
to providing or mobilizing the protective services needed by the disabled
adult.
An “able person” is one who is physically capable and has the necessary
skills, means, and know how to provide or mobilize the protective
services needed by the disabled adult.
A “responsible person” is one who appears emotionally mature; has a
history of being trustworthy, reliable, and dependable; and uses good
judgment and sound thinking.
Other questions to consider when determining able, willing and responsible:
Does the individual have a criminal history; if so, how will this affect the
103
individual’s ability to provide protective services and in the agency’s
judgment, is a criminal history check warranted?
What is the individual’s authority (both legal and relational) over the
disabled adult?
What is the individual’s relationship to the disabled adult? Current and
past involvement should be considered.
What is the individual’s knowledge of the disabled adult’s protective
service needs and does there appear to be a willingness to make sure
those needs are met?
What are the individual’s own impairments (physical, mental, substance
abuse or other) which may negatively impact the individual’s ability to
mobilize protective services?
When appropriate, what is the disabled adult’s opinion about the
individual and the disabled adult’s wishes related to him/her?
Unless the agency is reasonably assured that the individual or the identified
person(s) will be able to act comprehensively on behalf of the individual to
provide protective services, the determination must be made that this person
is not able, willing and responsible. If an individual(s) expresses a desire to
become able, willing and responsible but needs the assistance of the agency
to serve in this way, the need for protective services should be substantiated.
The agency would assume responsibility for protection and include the
identified individual(s) in the service plan.
e. Documenting the Case Decision
Once the case decision has been made it should be clearly documented. The
case decision is best documented using the case findings section of the DAAS-
0005 APS Community Evaluation or the DAAS-0006 APS Facility Evaluation
tools.
The documentation should clearly specify how each of the three criteria for
substantiation has been met or how it has not been met. For example, if the
social worker determines that the disabled adult is self-neglecting, the
documentation should provide enough information to understand how the
decision was reached. Once the social worker has described how each of the
criteria has or has not been met, an overall decision on whether the report is
substantiated should be documented.
f. Adult Protective Services-Registry (DAAS-5026)
The DAAS-5026 is used by county staff to enter APS data in XPTR for the APS-
Registry (APS-R). A DAAS-5026 must be completed on all adult protective
services reports received and evaluated by the DSS. The form must be
completed and keyed within 10 working days after the case decision has been
made. The social worker or data entry staff should document the date the
information was entered in the system. The APS-R Manual provides instructions
on completion of the DAAS-5026.
104
g. Case Decision and its Relationship to Capacity to Consent
It is the directive that the staffing team avoid prematurely rendering a capacity
decision before a case decision has been made. The disabled adult's capacity to
consent to protective services is not a factor in making the case decision. The
decision for a disabled adult's capacity should be rendered after a case decision
is made in order to prepare for obtaining service authorization. The case would
be substantiated if all three criteria are met and the adult then given the
opportunity to accept or refuse protective services based upon the capacity
decision.
5. Determining Capacity to Consent after Case Decision
This step in the APS process is one of the most critical and shall be made without
delay following the case decision. The social worker will utilize assessment tools
during their evaluation, conduct interviews, and make observations related to the
adult’s capacity for informed consent. The capacity decision will only be rendered
when there is a case decision made to substantiate the need for protection. It is
recommended that the capacity decision be staffed with APS leadership.
a. Guidelines for Assessing the Capacity to Consent to Protective Services
Assessment of a person's capacity to consent to protective services focuses on
their ability to perceive and understand their situation by conveying a:
(1)
Sufficient understanding of their limitations/deficiencies in their surroundings
(environment);
(2)
Sufficient understanding of their own mental or physical limitations;
(3)
Sufficient understanding of resources available to assist in meeting their
needs; and
(4)
Sufficient understanding of the consequences to him/her if nothing is done to
improve or remedy his/her situation.
Note: Sufficient understanding shall mean that the adult demonstrates an
adequate comprehension of each of the above. An adult may ‘convey’ their
understanding in different ways (e.g. verbal statements, written statements, or
physical cues.)
If a person expresses knowledge in some or all these areas, they may have the
capacity to consent to protective services. Conversely, if they are deficient in some
or all these areas, they may lack the capacity to consent to protective services. The
capacity decision is complex, and care should be taken to evaluate each
component independently as well as how it all intertwines. Through documenting
the adult’s understanding in relation to each of these four areas, the social worker
105
can support the capacity decision as a sum of all parts.
If the agency is unable to determine whether the adult demonstrates sufficient
understanding of their protective service needs, further evaluation by a
psychologist, psychiatrist, physician, clinical social worker or other appropriate
professional may be necessary in order to help determine whether or not the
person has capacity. This information can be used to support the capacity decision
made by the agency. The department of social services is ultimately responsible for
making the decision about the adult's capacity to consent and the decision shall not
be delayed for an inability to receive further capacity clarification from alternative
providers.
Capacity to Consent Decision Example
Below are different versions of the same situation. Each depicts a different capacity
decision. The case situation involves an individual having a gangrenous foot. A
medical provider has recommended amputation as the treatment plan and asserted
that failure to comply with the recommendation may result in death. In all versions
the individual refuses to consent to surgery.
Example Option 1: The individual verbally states that they understand they have
gangrene, that it is serious enough to potentially cause death, and that the
recommended treatment is amputation of the foot. The individual emphatically
refuses surgery because “a man came to my room and told me he would heal my
foot.” The social worker then asks the individual who ‘the man’ is? The social
worker’s evaluation has already indicated that this individual suffers from
paranoid schizophrenia. Further conversation indicates that ‘the man’ is a
delusionary character resulting from their mental illness. On the surface it appears
that they understand the circumstances of their situation, but they are unrealistic
about the consequences. The social worker asks the individual what they will do if
‘the man’ does not intervene. The individual maintains that ‘the man’ will intervene
and they will not ever consent to medical treatment because ‘the man’ will heal
their foot. It
would appear, in this situation, that the individual does not have capacity to consent
to protective services as they have not demonstrated sufficient understanding of
the consequences if nothing is done to remedy the situation or the resources
available to them to remedy the situation.
Example Option 2: The individual verbally states that they understand they have
gangrene, that it is serious enough to potentially cause death, and that the
recommended treatment is amputation of the foot. The individual then states they
prefer to die rather than lose their foot. They are aware that, barring a miracle,
death is likely. They convey understanding that the treatment includes a surgical
procedure and that post-surgical treatment would include rehabilitation and
possibly a prosthesis. The individual states “I’m too old to go through all this.” The
individual explains that they do not want to attend rehab or wear a prosthesis and
are concerned of the potential for further complications from such an extensive
surgery. This would indicate that they understand the circumstances of their
106
situation and that they have the capacity to consent/refuse protective services.
107
Capacity vs. Competency
An important issue to consider is the difference between capacity to consent to
protective services, as defined in G.S. 108A 101(l), and competency as defined in
G.S. 35A 1101(7), the guardianship statute.
These are two separate and distinct concepts, as follows:
An adult’s capacity to consent to protective services is determined by the DSS.
Lack of capacity may be temporary, such as when an adult is incapacitated by
an acute illness, and its effects may be specific and limited.
A judge, on the other hand, must adjudicate an adult incompetent.
Incompetence is typically a long-term condition, and its effects are global.
It is likely that an adult who has been adjudicated incompetent lacks the capacity to
consent to protective services, but conversely, an adult who lacks the capacity to
consent may not be incompetent.
b. Documentation of Capacity to Consent to Protective Services
Once a decision has been made about the adult’s capacity to consent to
protective services, it should be documented thoroughly. It is recommended that
the social worker utilize the Case Findings section of the DAAS-005 APS
Community Evaluation and the DAAS-0013 Determination of Ability to Consent
to Protective Services.
Note: It is important to remember that the capacity decision will determine the
type of service authorization needed to provide protective services.
6. Notices Following Evaluation
a. Notice to the Reporter
The statute requires that after completing the evaluation, the director shall notify
the individual making the report of his determination as to whether the disabled
adult needs protective services. The DAAS-0004 Notice to Reporter: Completion
of Evaluation may be oral or in writing at the discretion of the reporter and shall
be made immediately upon completing the evaluation and making the case
decision. It shall include a statement of whether the report was substantiated
and, if so, a statement that the agency is providing continued services.
Documentation shall be made of when and how the notice is given. In order to
protect the disabled adult’s confidentiality, the notice shall not include specific
findings of the evaluation.
b. Written Report
After completing the evaluation, the director shall complete a DAAS-0009 Written
Report of APS Evaluation indicating whether he believes protective services are
needed.
108
Written reports shall be completed when:
The adult protective services evaluation was conducted on a patient or
resident of a nursing or combination facility; mental health residential facility;
or adult care home; (the DAAS-0003 Notice to Administrator: Completion of
Evaluation see below, serves as the Written Report) or
Evidence of abuse, neglect or exploitation is found (except self-neglect); or
Evidence of financial exploitation is found in Medicaid-funded facilities; or
The results of the APS evaluation indicate violations of statutes, rules, or
regulations enforced by other governmental agencies.
The DAAS-0009 Written Report of APS Evaluation shall include the following
information:
The name, address, age, and condition of the adult;
The allegations (the written report shall not include the identity of the person
making the complaint or other contacts);
The evaluation including the agency's findings and supporting documents
(e.g. psychological, medical report);
conclusions; and
recommendations for action
The Written Report is a separate document filed in the case record and should
not be used as a notice to the complainant. It may be used to provide information
about the results of the APS evaluation to various entities which may require this
notification. Other documentation, such as photographs or expert evaluations,
may be included when forwarding the Written Report. Some examples of the use
of this form include, but are not limited to:
Notification to the District Attorney and Law Enforcement
Notification to the Division of Health Service Regulation
Notification to the Division of Health Benefits when evidence of financial
exploitation is found for an adult residing in a Medicaid-funded facility
Notification to governmental agencies such as the Social Security or
Veterans Administration when an APS evaluation indicates violations of
applicable statutes, rules, or regulations
Notification to Conflict of Interest county
c. Notice to Administrator
The county director shall provide the administrator of a nursing, combination, or
residential care facility with a notice. The DAAS-0003 Notice to Administrator:
Completion of Evaluation is limited to acknowledgement that a protective
services report was received on a specified patient or resident of the facility, the
specific allegations in the report, whether or not evidence of abuse, neglect or
exploitation was found, whether or not the need for protective services was
substantiated, and a general statement as to how the conclusion was reached.
The names of persons who were contacted during the evaluation and the name
of the complainant shall not be given.
109
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES MANUAL
VI.
OBTAINING SERVICE AUTHORIZATION FOR
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES
110
VI.
Obtaining Service Authorization for Adult Protective Services
A. Statutory Requirements Related to Service Authorization
§ 108A-104. Provision of protective services with the consent of the person;
withdrawal of consent; caretaker refusal.
(a)
If the director determines that a disabled adult is in need of protective
services, he shall immediately provide or arrange for the provision of protective
services, provided that the disabled adult consents.
(b)
When a caretaker of a disabled adult who consents to the receipt of
protective services refuses to allow the provision of such services to the
disabled adult, the director may petition the district court for an order enjoining
the caretaker from interfering with the provision of protective services to the
disabled adult. The petition must allege specific facts sufficient to show that the
disabled adult is in need of protective services and consents to the receipt of
protective services and that the caretaker refuses to allow the provision of such
services. If the judge finds by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the
disabled adult is in need of protective services and consents to the receipt of
protective services and that the caretaker refuses to allow the provision of such
services, he may issue an order enjoining the caretaker from interfering with
the provision of protective services to the disabled adult.
(c)
If a disabled adult does not consent to the receipt of protective services, or if
he withdraws his consent, the services shall not be provided.
§ 108A-105. Provision of protective services to disabled adults who lack the
capacity to consent; hearing, findings, etc.
(a)
If the director reasonably determines that a disabled adult is being abused,
neglected, or exploited and lacks capacity to consent to protective services,
then the director may petition the district court for an order authorizing the
provision of protective services. The petition must allege specific facts
sufficient to show that the disabled adult is in need of protective services and
lacks capacity to consent to them.
(b)
The court shall set the case for hearing within 14 days after the filing of the
petition. The disabled adult must receive at least five days' notice of the
hearing. He has the right to be present and represented by counsel at the
hearing. If the person, in the determination of the judge, lacks the capacity to
waive the right to counsel, then a guardian ad litem shall be appointed pursuant
to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 17, and rules adopted by the Office of Indigent Defense
Services. If the person is indigent, the cost of representation shall be borne by
the State.
(c)
If, at the hearing, the judge finds by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence
that the disabled adult is in need of protective services and lacks capacity to
consent to protective services, he may issue an order authorizing the provision
of protective services. This order may include the designation of an individual
111
or organization to be responsible for the performing or obtaining of essential
services on behalf of the disabled adult or otherwise consenting to protective
services in his behalf. Within 60 days from the appointment of such an
individual or organization, the court will conduct a review to determine if a
petition should be initiated in accordance with Chapter 35A; for good cause
shown, the court may extend the 60 day period for an additional 60 days, at the
end of which it shall conduct a review to determine if a petition should be
initiated in accordance with Chapter 35A. No disabled adult may be committed
to a mental health facility under this Article.
(d)
A determination by the court that a person lacks the capacity to consent to
protective services under the provisions of this Chapter shall in no way affect
incompetency proceedings as set forth in Chapters 33, 35 or 122 of the General
Statutes of North Carolina, or any other proceedings, and incompetency
proceedings as set forth in Chapters 33, 35, or 122 shall have no conclusive
effect upon the question of capacity to consent to protective services as set
forth in this Chapter.
§ 108A-106. Emergency intervention; findings by court; limitations; contents of
petition; notice of petition; court authorized entry of premises; immunity of
petitioner.
(a)
Upon petition by the director, a court may order the provision of emergency
services to a disabled adult after finding that there is reasonable cause to
believe that:
(1)
A disabled adult lacks capacity to consent and that he is in need of
protective service;
(2)
An emergency exists; and
(3)
No other person authorized by law or order to give consent for the
person is available and willing to arrange for emergency services.
(b)
The court shall order only such emergency services as are necessary to
remove the conditions creating the emergency. In the event that such services
will be needed for more than 14 days, the director shall petition the court in
accordance with G.S. 108A-105.
(c)
The petition for emergency services shall set forth the name, address, and
authority of the petitioner; the name, age and residence of the disabled adult;
the nature of the emergency; the nature of the disability if determinable; the
proposed emergency services; the petitioner's reasonable belief as to the
existence of the conditions set forth in subsection (a) above; and facts showing
petitioner's attempts to obtain the disabled adult's consent to the services.
(d)
Notice of the filing of such petition and other relevant information, including
the factual basis of the belief that emergency services are needed and a
description of the exact services to be rendered shall be given to the person, to
his spouse, or if none, to his adult children or next of kin, to his guardian, if
any. Such notice shall be given at least 24 hours prior to the hearing of the
petition for emergency intervention; provided, however, that the court may
112
issue immediate emergency order ex parte upon finding as
fact (i) that the conditions specified in G.S. 108A-106(a) exist; (ii) that there is
likelihood that the disabled adult may suffer irreparable injury or death if such
order be delayed; and (iii) that reasonable attempts have been made to locate
interested parties and secure from them such services or their consent to
petitioner's provision of such service; and such order shall contain a show-
cause notice to each person upon whom served directing such person to
appear immediately or at any time up to and including the time for the hearing
of the petition for emergency services and show cause, if any exists, for the
dissolution or modification of the said order. Copies of the said order together
with such other appropriate notices as the court may direct shall be issued and
served upon all of the interested parties designated in the first sentence of this
subsection. Unless dissolved by the court for good cause shown, the
emergency order ex parte shall be in effect until the hearing is held on the
petition for emergency services. At such hearing, if the court determines that
the emergency continues to exist, the court may order the provision of
emergency services in accordance with subsections (a) and (b) of this section.
(e)
Where it is necessary to enter a premises without the disabled adult's
consent after obtaining a court order in compliance with subsection (a) above,
the representative of the petitioner shall do so.
(f)
(1) Upon petition by the director, a court may order that:
a. The disabled adult's financial records be made available at a certain
day and time for inspection by the director or his designated agent;
and
b. The disabled adult's financial assets be frozen and not withdrawn,
spent or transferred without prior order of the court.
(2)
Such an order shall not issue unless the court first finds that there is
reasonable cause to believe that:
a. A disabled adult lacks the capacity to consent and that he is in need of
protective services;
b. The disabled adult is being financially exploited by his caretaker; and
c. No other person is able or willing to arrange for protective services.
(3)
Provided, before any such inspection is done, the caretaker and every
financial institution involved shall be given notice and a reasonable
opportunity to appear and show good cause why this inspection should
not be done. And, provided further, that any order freezing assets shall
expire ten days after such inspection is completed, unless the court for
good cause shown, extends it.
f. No petitioner shall be held liable in any action brought by the disabled
adult if the petitioner acted in good faith.
113
§ 108A-107. Motion in the cause.
Notwithstanding any finding by the court of lack of capacity of the disabled
adult to consent, the disabled adult or the individual or organization designated
to be responsible for the disabled adult shall have the right to bring a motion in
the cause for review of any order issued pursuant to this Article
B. Administrative Code Related to Service Authorization
10A NCAC 71A .0302 SUBSTANTIATED REPORT: ADULT REFUSES SERVICES
(a)
When the evaluation of a report indicates that the allegations are
substantiated and the disabled adult is capable of making responsible
decisions and refuses the receipt of protective services, the worker must 18
respect that decision and terminate contact with the adult. Prior to doing so, the
worker shall explain the services available to the adult and that the adult may
call the agency to request assistance, if needed.
(b)
Documentation shall be made of the worker's explanation and offer of
services and of the adult's refusal to accept services. The worker shall obtain
from the adult a signed statement of his refusal of services or shall document in
the record the attempt to obtain such a signed statement.
10A NCAC 71A .0903 PROTECTIVE SERVICES PETITION TO COURT
In preparation to petition the court for an order authorizing the provision of
protective services, the worker must document the facts which show that:
the disabled adult is being abused, neglected, or exploited; and
the adult lacks the capacity to consent to such services.
10A NCAC 71A .0904 EMERGENCY PETITION TO COURT
The information required by G.S. 108A-106(c) to be included in the petition shall
be documented in the agency file.
10A NCAC 71A .0905 FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION: PETITION TO COURT
In preparation to petition the court under G.S. 108A-106(f), documentation must
be made of specific information indicating that:
(1)
the adult lacks the capacity to consent;
(2)
the adult is in need of protective services;
(3)
the adult is being financially exploited; and
(4)
no one else is able or willing to arrange for protective services.
114
C. Social Work Practice Related to Service Authorization
After substantiating the need for protective services and rendering the capacity
decision the agency must obtain service authorization without delay and prior to
providing protective services. The result of the capacity decision determines the type
of service authorization obtained. There are several different types of service
authorizations based upon the capacity decision including:
Adult has capacity
o Consents to Protective Services
o Refuses Protective Services
Adult does not have capacity
o Adult’s surrogate decision maker authorizes Protective Services (e.g. POA,
Guardian)
o Protective Services Order authorizes Protective Services (e.g. PS order,
Emergency Order, Ex-Parte Order)
Each of these types of authorizations, and the social worker requirements for each,
are outlined below.
1. Disabled Adult Has Capacity
a. Adult has Capacity and Consents to Protective Services
The right of self-determination is a basic principle of protective services for
adults. When the need for protection has been substantiated and the adult has
the capacity for informed consent, the social worker shall clearly explain the plan
of protection based upon the needs identified during the evaluation. The social
worker shall then ask the adult if they wish to accept or refuse protective
services.
If the adult accepts protective services, the agency must provide clear
documentation of their authority to provide protective services. A written
statement of consent to services, signed by the disabled adult, should be
obtained. The disabled adult shall also sign the DSS- 5027 to consent to
mobilization of services. A copy of their signed 5027 including their rights and
responsibilities and their consent to protective services shall be provided to the
adult.
There should be diligent efforts to obtain written consent for protective services.
If the adult is unable to sign but consents to protective services verbally, the
social worker should attempt to have a witness to the adult's verbal consent. The
social worker should document the date, time and circumstances under which
the verbal consent was given.
Once an adult accepts the provision of protective services the social worker shall
move into Planning and Mobilization of Protective Services, SIS code 204.
115
b. Adult has Capacity to Consent - Caretaker Interference
If a disabled adult consents to the receipt of protective services and the adult's
caretaker refuses to allow the provision of such services, the department may
petition the district court for an Order to Enjoin Interference with Protective
Services AOC-CV-782 .The petition must allege specific facts sufficient to show
that:
The disabled adult is in need of protective services;
The disabled adult consents to the receipt of protective services; and
The caretaker refuses to allow the provision of such services
In preparation for petitioning the court for an order enjoining a caretaker from
interfering with the provision of protective services, the social worker shall
document:
The date, time and circumstances under which the disabled adult's consent
for services was given and
The attempts which were made to obtain the caretaker's consent, including
the circumstances under which the caretaker's consent was requested and
the information provided to the caretaker before asking for his/her consent.
Before petitioning the court, the social worker should explore all avenues for
obtaining the caretaker's cooperation. This includes attempting to explain the
disabled adult's need for assistance and the agency's legal responsibility to
provide services in such instances.
The social worker should be sensitive to family relationships and to the dynamics
of such relationships in instances where the disabled adult's caretaker is a
member of his family.
At times the caretaker may verbally agree, but exhibit behavior that prevents the
provision of services. Such behavior may constitute a refusal to cooperate and/or
interference and should be carefully documented in order to provide factual
information in the event court action becomes necessary.
The petition must include specific facts as to how the caretaker is interfering with
the provision of protective services. This is necessary in providing the judge with
sufficient evidence to issue an order enjoining caretaker interference. The form
to be used in petitioning the court is the Order to Enjoin Interference with
Protective Services AOC-CV-782.
If a caretaker refuses to cooperate in the provision of protective services after an
order enjoining his/her interference has been issued the agency shall return to
court and have the caretaker held in contempt.
c. Adult has Capacity and Refuses Offer of Protective Services
The right of self-determination is a basic principle of protective services for
116
adults. When the need for protection has been substantiated and the adult has
the capacity for informed consent, the social worker shall clearly explain the plan
of protection based upon the needs identified during the evaluation. The social
worker shall then ask the adult if they wish to accept or refuse protective
services.
If the adult refuses, the social worker shall clearly document the adult’s refusal to
receive protective services in the case record. A recommended form for the
documentation of the refusal of protective services when an adult has capacity is
the DAAS-0013 Determination of Ability to Consent to Protective Services. This
form combines the capacity decision documentation with the refusal of protective
services documentation.
When an adult has capacity and refuses protective services the social worker
shall make appropriate referrals. The APS case shall then be closed.
2. Disabled Adult Does Not Have Capacity
If the adult lacks the capacity to consent to protective services, only a legally
authorized person such as guardian or durable power of attorney can consent to
protective services. If no legally authorized person is available to consent to or
decline the provision of protective services, then legal authorization must be
obtained in another manner before protective services can be provided.
When there is no legal surrogate decision maker to give consent, protective
services court orders provide a legal mechanism for quick, short term intervention
when a disabled adult who lacks the capacity to consent to services needs
protection. These orders are especially appropriate to use when an adult's lack of
capacity results from a condition which may be corrected or improved through the
provision of protective services.
Legal orders authorizing protective services are discussed in the next sections.
a. Surrogate Decision-Maker Authorizes Protective Services
Surrogate decision makers are individuals who have been granted responsibility
and are authorized to make decisions on behalf of the disabled adult. These
could include Powers of Attorney and Legal Guardians. The type and scope of
authority granted by these tools vary widely and are unique to the adult and their
situation.
The DSS attorney shall review the document to ensure the scope of powers
granted therein are appropriate to authorize the surrogate to consent to
protective services. For example, a healthcare power of attorney may not
authorize the attorney-in-fact to consent to financial transactions necessary to
protect the disabled adult (see Appendix E for types of Surrogate decision
makers).
117
If the surrogate decision maker accepts protective services, they must provide
clear documentation of their authority as well as sign the DSS-5027. A copy of
the signed 5027 shall be provided. If the surrogate decision maker is not acting
in a manner consistent with their authority this should be discussed with the
agency attorney to determine what steps, if any, need to be taken.
b. Protective Services Order Authorizes Protective Services
A protective services order may be an appropriate tool to gain service
authorization when:
the disabled adult needs protective services and lacks capacity
the disabled adult has not designated a surrogate decision maker, or the
designated surrogate decision-maker is unable or unwilling to authorize
protective services
protective services are needed but an emergency does not exist
In preparation to petition the court for an order authorizing the provision of
protective services, the agency must document the facts, which show that:
the disabled adult is being abused, neglected, or exploited and
the adult lacks the capacity to consent to such services
To obtain a protective services order, the agency must file a Petition for Order
Authorizing Protective Services AOC-CV-770 in district court. The petition
specifies the type of order needed. Once the petition is filed, notice is served on
appropriate parties, including the adult, before the hearing.
The court will schedule a hearing within 14 days after the petition is filed. The
disabled adult must receive at least five days’ notice of the hearing. The disabled
adult has the right to be present and represented by counsel at the hearing. If
the judge determines that the adult lacks the capacity to waive the right to
counsel, the court shall appoint a guardian ad litem. If the person is indigent, the
cost of representation shall be borne by the State. [G.S. 108A 105(b)]
If the district court judge finds clear, cogent and convincing evidence at the
hearing that the disabled adult is in need of protective services and lacks the
capacity to consent he may issue an Order Authorizing Protective Services
AOC-CV-773. The order may include the designation of an individual or
organization to be responsible for the performing or obtaining of essential
services on behalf of the disabled adult or otherwise consenting to protective
services on their behalf.
Within 60 days the court will conduct a review of the disabled adult’s situation.
The initial 60-day period can be extended for an additional 60 days if good cause
is shown. Within 60 days from the appointment, the court will conduct a review
to determine if a petition should be initiated in accordance with G.S. 35A.
The agency's authority to provide protective services by court order ends with
the expiration of the 60- or 120-day period specified in the court order. The
118
agency has no authority to continue its involvement with the adult after this
period unless the court review indicates that a guardianship petition should be
initiated or unless the adult consents to the continued provision of services.
c. Emergency Order Authorizes Protective Services
An emergency protective services order may be an appropriate tool to gain
service authorization when there is an urgent need requiring intervention. Upon
Petition for Order Authorizing Emergency Protective Services AOC-CV-770 by
the director, the court may order the provision of emergency services to a
disabled adult after finding there is reasonable cause to believe that:
a disabled adult lacks capacity to consent and is in need of protective
services
an emergency exists; and
no other person authorized by law or order to give consent for the disabled
adult is available and willing to arrange for emergency services
An emergency is a situation where:
the disabled adult is in substantial danger of death or irreparable harm if
protective services are not provided immediately
the disabled adult is unable to consent to services
no responsible, able, and willing caretaker is available to consent to
emergency services; and
there is insufficient time to utilize procedures for a regular order authorizing
protective services
The court shall order only such emergency services as are necessary to remove
the conditions creating the emergency. If such services will be needed for more
than 14 days, the director shall petition the court in accordance with General
Statute.
"Emergency services" are services necessary to maintain the person's vital
functions and without which there is reasonable belief that the person would
suffer irreparable harm or death. This may include taking physical custody of the
disabled person.
The petition for emergency services shall set forth:
the name, address and authority of the petitioner
the name, age and residence of the disabled adult
the nature of the emergency
the nature of the disability if determinable
the proposed emergency services
the petitioners reasonable belief as to the existence of the conditions set
forth in G.S. 108A 106(a); and
facts showing the petitioner’s attempts to get the disabled adult’s consent to
the services
Notice of the filing of such petition and other relevant information, including the
119
factual basis of the belief that emergency services are needed and a description
of the exact services to be rendered, shall be given to the person, to his spouse,
or if none, to his adult children or next of kin, to his guardian, if any. Such notice
shall be given at least 24 hours prior to the hearing of the petition for emergency
intervention.
d. Ex-Parte Order Authorizes Protective Services
A Petition for Order Authorizing Ex-Parte Emergency Services AOC-CV-770 may
be an appropriate tool to gain service authorization when there is an immediate
need requiring intervention.
The court may issue an ex-parte upon finding:
that the conditions specified for obtaining an emergency order [G.S. 108A
106(a)] exist
there is likelihood the disabled adult may suffer irreparable injury or death if
an order is delayed; and
reasonable attempts have been made to locate interested parties and secure
emergency services from them or get their consent to the petitioner’s
provision of emergency services
The length of time for which the adult can go without service or treatment is the
primary factor in determining whether an ex-parte order should be requested. If
death or irreparable harm is expected to result within 24 hours unless services
are provided, it is appropriate to request an immediate emergency order ex-
parte.
Even when an emergency ex-parte order is issued, the petition and hearing
process for emergency services, as described in this section, are to be followed.
The petition for emergency services may be filed before or after the ex-parte
order is issued, depending on the circumstances in each individual case.
The department of social services should notify the court of any persons who
should receive a copy of the emergency ex-parte order. The names of such
persons may be included in the petition for emergency services, if the petition is
filed before the ex-parte order is issued.
The show cause notice in the emergency ex-parte order is included to give
persons an opportunity to present to the court objections to the order, or reasons
that the order should be terminated. This is particularly important as the ex-parte
order is issued without notice and without a hearing that would otherwise provide
opportunity for persons to present to the court any objections or concerns about
the petition for protective services.
In an emergency ex-parte order, the department may be asked to draft the order
for the court and should be prepared to ask the agency attorney to do so.
The ex-parte emergency order shall contain a show cause notice to each person
120
upon whom served, directing such person to appear immediately or at any time
up to and including the time for the hearing of the petition for emergency
services, and show cause, if any exist, for the dissolution or modification of the
said order.
121
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES MANUAL
VII.
PLANNING AND MOBILIZING ESSENTIAL
SERVICES
122
VII.
Planning and Mobilizing Essential Services
A. General Statute Related to Planning and Mobilization
§ 108A-101 Definitions.
(i) The words "essential services" shall refer to those social, medical,
psychiatric, psychological or legal services necessary to safeguard the
disabled adult's rights and resources and to maintain the physical or mental
well-being of the individual. These services shall include, but not be limited to,
the provision of medical care for physical and mental health needs, assistance
in personal hygiene, food, clothing, adequately heated and ventilated shelter,
protection from health and safety hazards, protection from physical
mistreatment, and protection from exploitation. The words "essential services"
shall not include taking the person into physical custody without his consent
except as provided for in G.S. 108A-106 and in Chapter 122C of the General
Statutes.
(n) The words "protective services" shall mean services provided by the State
or other government or private organizations or individuals which are
necessary to protect the disabled adult from abuse, neglect, or exploitation.
They shall consist of evaluation of the need for service and mobilization of
essential services on behalf of the disabled adult.
§ 108A-108. Payment for essential services.
At the time the director, in accordance with the provisions of G.S. 108A-103
makes an evaluation of the case reported, then it shall be determined,
according to regulations set by the Social Services Commission, whether the
individual is financially capable of paying for the essential services. If he is, he
shall make reimbursement for the costs of providing the needed essential
services. If it is determined that he is not financially capable of paying for such
essential services, they shall be provided at no cost to the recipient of the
services.
B. Administrative Code Related to Planning and Mobilization
10A NCAC 71R .0101 SOCIAL SERVICES BLOCK GRANT FUNDED SERVICES
The following services may be reimbursed with Social Services Block Grant
Funds:
(1)
adjustment services for the blind or visually impaired;
(2)
adoption services;
(3)
adult placement services;
(4)
child care services;
(5)
children and adults needing mental health, developmental disability or
substance abuse services;
(6)
community living services;
(7)
day care services for adults;
(8)
delinquency prevention services;
(9)
employment and training support services;
(10)
family planning services;
123
(11)
family preservation services;
(12)
family support services;
(13)
foster care services for adults;
(14)
foster care services for children;
(15)
health support services;
(16)
home health services (includes skilled nursing, physical therapy, speech
therapy, occupational therapy, medical social services and nutrition care);
(17)
housing and home improvement services;
(18)
individual and family adjustment services;
(19)
in-home aide services;
(20)
in-home aide services for the blind;
(21)
intensive family preservation services;
(22)
personal and family counseling;
(23)
preparation and delivery of meals;
(24)
problem pregnancy services;
(25)
protective services for adults;
(26)
protective services for children;
(27)
residential treatment for the emotionally disturbed;
(28)
respite care services;
(29)
transportation services; and
(30)
youth services.
10A NCAC 71R .0103 MANDATED AND OPTIONAL SERVICES
(a)
The following services funded with Social Services Block Grant funds shall
be made available in each county. These services are:
(1)
adjustment services for the blind and visually impaired;
(2)
adoption services;
(3)
child care services;
(4)
in-home aide services for the blind;
(5)
family planning services;
(6)
adult placement services;
(7)
foster care services for adults;
(8)
foster care services for children;
(9)
health support services (sterilization component is optional);
(10)
individual and family adjustment services;
(11)
in-home aide services;
(12)
protective services for adults;
(13)
protective services for children.
(b)
With the exception of those mandated services specified in Paragraph (a) of
this Rule, all other services are optional for purposes of the Social Services
Block Grant.
10A NCAC 71R .0505 MAXIMUM INCOME LEVELS FOR SERVICES
(a)
Sixty Percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines. An individual whose income
unit's gross monthly income is less than 60 percent of the Federal Poverty
Guidelines as published annually in the Federal Register by the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is eligible for transportation
124
services or the federally funded sterilization resource item of health support
services funded under the Social Services Block Grant (Title XX) if available in
the county in which (s)he lives.
(b)
Eighty Percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines. An individual whose
income unit's gross monthly income is less than 80 percent of the Federal
Poverty Guidelines is eligible for the federally funded sterilization resource item
of health support services if available in the county in which (s)he lives and if
conditions for payment as set out in 10A NCAC 71J .0105 have been satisfied.
10A NCAC 71R .0915 PROTECTIVE SERVICES FOR ADULTS
(a)
Primary Service. Protective services for adults are services provided to
correct or prevent further abuse, neglect, exploitation or hazardous living
conditions of individuals 18 years of age or older or lawfully emancipated
minors who are unable to manage their own resources, carry out the activities
of daily living or protect their own interests. Services include acceptance and
evaluation of reports of the need of individuals for protective services; planning
and counseling with such individuals and their relatives or caretakers to
identify, remedy or prevent problems which result in abuse, neglect or
exploitation; assisting in arranging for appropriate alternate living
arrangements in the community or in an institution; and arranging for the
provision of medical, legal and other services as needed and appropriate. Also
included are assistance in arranging for protective placement, guardianship or
commitment when needed as part of the protective services plan, and carrying
out the duties of guardian or representative payee when part of a protective
services plan; and the provision of medical and psychological diagnostic
studies and evaluations where needed to substantiate and assess the
circumstances of abuse or neglect. At its option, the county may provide
advocacy, including legal services, to assure receipt of rights and entitlements
due to adults at risk, and services of lawyers to represent the agency where
court action is necessary to protect adults.
(b)
Components. None.
(c)
Resource Items. None.
(d)
Target Population. "Disabled" adults (18 years or older or lawfully
emancipated minor) who are unable to manage their own resources, carry out
activities of daily living, or protect their own interests.
C. Social Work Practice Related to Service Authorization
Protective Services consists of a thorough evaluation, case decision, capacity
decision, authorization of services, and then mobilization of essential services on
behalf of the disabled adult if the need for protection has been substantiated. The
DSS, without delay, shall develop and move forward with a plan in mobilizing services
necessary for the protection of the disabled adult. Essential services are defined by
statute as those social, medical, psychiatric, psychological or legal services necessary
125
to safeguard the disabled adult's rights and resources and to maintain the physical or
mental well-being of the individual.
Essential services include but are not limited to:
provision of medical care for physical and mental health needs
assistance in personal hygiene
food
clothing
adequately heated and ventilated shelter
protection from health and safety hazards
protection from physical mistreatment; and
protection from exploitation
Essential services shall not include taking the person into physical custody without his
consent, except as provided for in G.S. 108A-106 and in Chapter 122C of the General
Statutes.
1. Development of a Service Plan
Careful development of a DAAS-0011 Service Plan is critical in providing the
necessary protection to the disabled adult. The goal of the service plan is to
improve adult safety, prevent ongoing maltreatment, and improving the disabled
adult’s quality of life. The plan should flow from the evaluation. The adult’s and
family’s strengths, goals, concerns and areas for change identified in each
functional area during the evaluation should be addressed in the service plan.
The plan should be person-centered in addressing the protective service needs of
the adult. The adult should participate to the fullest extent possible and should also
participate in the implementation of the plan. People identified by the disabled
adult, which could include family or other informal supports, should also be involved
in service planning and implementation. Each person designated in the plan should
be knowledgeable of their roles and responsibilities in the implementation of the
protective services plan.
APS is a short term, crisis-oriented service. The service plan should contain goals
that address the need for protection and are SMART (specific, measurable,
achievable, realistic, and time limited.)
A wide range of services should be considered when developing an APS plan.
They can vary from nursing home placement to in-home services to home
delivered meals. The goals which are included in the plan will vary according to
factors such as community resources available and the adult’s personal needs and
choices. Services will also include the social worker's efforts with the adult such as
problem solving or counseling with the adult and their family.
Protection should be provided on a continuum ranging from a very restrictive plan,
such as placement, to a less restrictive plan, such as provision of in-home aide
services several days per week. Often a compromise must be reached between the
126
level of protection the agency considers optimal and the level of protection the
disabled adult is willing to accept.
Some of the basic principles which are important in service planning include:
respecting the integrity and authority of adults to make their own life choices
holding the perpetrators, not the disabled adult, accountable for the
maltreatment
taking into consideration adults’ concepts of what safety and quality of life mean
recognizing resilience and honor the strategies that the disabled adult hasused
in the past to protect themselves; and
redefining success―success is defined by the adult; not what professionals
think is right or safe (National Adult Protective Services Association, 2013)
In addition, for development of the service plan include the following four
recommendations:
identify with the disabled adult the factors that influence intervention risk and
needs
engage the disabled adult and caregiver as appropriate in an ethical manner
with useful strategies to develop mutual goals to decrease risk of maltreatment
determine with the disabled adult and other reliable sources (such as family
members, friends and community partners) the appropriate interventions that
may decrease risk of maltreatment; and
in some cases, the use of a proper Domestic Violence Safety Planning tool is
warranted. (National Adult Protective Services Association, 2013)
Once a service plan has been developed, it must be documented.
Documentation should include:
the strengths and resources identified during the evaluation;
goals for each problem area;
a list of activities which must be completed to reach the goals
identification of individuals to complete each activity (the social worker, the
adult, etc.); and
a time frame for completion of each task
2. Provision of Essential Services
Adult protective services should be a shared community responsibility. Services
from other agencies should be included in the plan as much as possible, and other
community professionals should be involved in the development of the plan and in
the provision of services. Use of a multidisciplinary team to develop and implement
a service plan is ideal.
While there is a consensus in most local communities as to the importance of
serving abused, neglected and/or exploited adults, weak interagency coordination
can inhibit priority attention to this population. DSS should take the lead role as
services' coordinator for assuring that appropriate essential services for APS
disabled adults in need of protective services are obtained and that these
127
individuals receive priority status for the receipt of those services.
Procedures within the department of social services shall be developed that will
enable these disabled adults to receive essential services from the agency on a
priority basis. These may include, but are not limited to, adult day services,
placement services, transportation, and in-home aide services. Referrals should
stipulate that the disabled adult is receiving adult protective services.
These disabled adults shall be given priority status for services when it can be
demonstrated that the service is essential to prevent further abuse, neglect or
exploitation or to stabilize their ability to function without utilizing more restrictive
alternatives such as placement resources.
When another agency is involved in providing essential services, confidentiality
becomes a concern. It is acceptable to share information about the adult's condition
or situation with the other agency to facilitate service provision. However, the APS
social worker should only share the specific information that is needed by the other
agency.
While it is strongly recommended that all disabled adults receiving adult protective
services receive essential services on a priority basis, policies for serving these
older disabled adults on a priority basis have been established for community
service providers who receive Home and Community Care Block Grant funds.
The NC Home and Community Care Block Grant Manual states, that once
community service providers have determined that individuals meet the eligibility
criteria for a given service as specified in the service standard, individuals must be
served on a priority basis, the first priority is: "Older adults for whom the need for
Adult Protective Services has been substantiated by the local department of social
services and the service is needed as part of the adult protective service plan."
When referrals are made for older disabled adults to in home and community-
based services which are funded by the Home and Community Care Block Grant
the social worker should provide the service provider with information that the
disabled adult is receiving adult protective services. This is to help ensure priority
for the receipt of these services.
3. Payment for Essential Services
If it is determined, after a thorough evaluation, that a disabled adult is financially
capable of paying for essential services necessary for their protection, the disabled
adult should be responsible for payment of those services. The disabled adult must
consent to the payment of services. For persons who are determined able to pay
and have capacity to consent to services, refusal to pay for services subject to cost
sharing should not be considered as a refusal of services. Refer to Consumer
Contribution Manual. If the disabled adult does not consent to the payment of
services or if the disabled adult is not financially capable of paying for essential
services necessary for their protection, the DSS shall be responsible for payment of
128
those services to provide the necessary protection, per The Requirements for the
Provision of Social Services Manual. This means that the agency should always
provide the needed services, or arrange for their provision first, and then request
appropriate reimbursement from the adult for agency funds expended in the
provision of such services.
For essential medical services, an individual is deemed financially incapable of
paying if he meets the eligibility criteria for Title XIX-Medicaid. Essential medical
services must be provided at no charge to a Medicaid eligible person, whether or
not the needed services are available under Medicaid.
When an adult who is determined financially able to pay, lacks the capacity to
consent to services and has no one legally authorized to act for him/her, the
agency should consider petitioning for appointment of a guardian. A guardian could
be authorized to manage the adult's resources and reimburse the agency for the
cost of providing needed services. See the Guardianship Manual.
If a caretaker who controls a disabled adult's funds refuses to allow such funds to
be used to pay for essential services, such refusal may constitute abuse, neglect or
exploitation or may constitute caretaker interference.
Situations that constitute a conflict of interest for an agency receiving an APS
referral require the evaluation be conducted by another county DSS. The county
conducting the evaluation acts as the case manager; providing protective services
in coordination with the county of residence. The county of residence is responsible
for paying for essential services and any expenses for medical, psychological or
other examinations and legal services incurred by the county conducting the
evaluation.
129
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICE MANUAL
VIII.
REASSESSMENT AND TERMINATION
130
VIII.
Reassessment and Termination
A. General Statute Related to Reassessment and Termination
None as it relates to Reassessment and Termination
B. Administrative Code Related to Reassessment and Termination
10A NCAC 71R .0603 BASIS FOR DENIAL OR TERMINATION OF SERVICES
a. Reasons for denial of an application for services and reasons for the
termination of services include the following:
(1)
The individual has failed to cooperate with the agency in determining (or
redetermining) eligibility;
(2)
The individual cannot be located to allow for determination (or
redetermination) of eligibility;
(3)
The individual has been determined to be not eligible for the services
requested on the basis that (s)he does not meet (or because of changing
circumstances, no longer meets) the conditions of eligibility for the
program funding sources under which the service is provided or the
definition of the target population for receipt of the service;
(4)
The service is not available in the county in which the individual has legal
residence;
(5)
The service will not be available in sufficient time to ensure its prompt
provision, as set forth in Rules .0802 and .0803 of this Subchapter;
(6)
The agency has exhausted its funds for the provision of the service for
that program year;
(7)
The individual has notified the agency that (s)he no longer wants or
needs the service;
(8)
The agency has determined that the individual is no longer able to avail
himself/herself of the service because (s)he has moved to another county
or has been admitted to an institution;
(9)
The individual has failed to utilize the service or to cooperate in service
delivery;
(10)
The individual is residing in a facility or institution and the funding
source prohibits provision of the service to clients in facilities or
institutions; and
(11)
The individual fails to meet any other conditions set forth in rules in
Chapters 70 and 71 of this Title governing delivery of the service.
b. The agency must document the basis for denial or termination of services on
the notice to the client, except in cases where notice is not required as set forth
in 10A NCAC 67A .0202.
10A NCAC 71R .0606 QUARTERLY REVIEW
a. The agency shall review and document the client's situation and service plan
at least quarterly from the date of application except for clients whose only
service(s) is (are):
131
(1)
transportation;
(2)
child care;
(3)
foster care;
(4)
adoptions; and
(5)
housing and home improvement.
b. The agency shall conduct the review in the month it is due. The month the
quarterly review is due is determined by the month in which the application
was made.
c. The agency must label and date the quarterly review in the record.
C. Social Work Practice Related to Reassessment and Termination
APS is a crisis-oriented service and the adult’s situation should be stabilized as
quickly as possible. While providing protective services, cases should be reassessed
constantly to determine if the need for protection still exists. For example, if the plan
involves significant change for the adult, such as provision of in-home aide services,
attendance at adult day care, or placement into a new residence the case should
remain open long enough to determine that the service plan is providing effective
protection to the disabled adult.
Mobilization of protective services has no set time limits but protection shall be
provided as quickly as possible. If the case remains open at 90 days, from the date
SIS Code 204 services were opened, then a quarterly review shall be completed.
There will be times that some disabled adults never reach a stable point in their lives.
These cases should not be kept open for APS indefinitely. Once an adult no longer
has a need for protective services the case should be transferred to another service,
such as Individual and Family Adjustment, for ongoing follow up.
When closing a case, it is recommended to use a systematic method. The criterion for
case closure should include, but are not limited to:
safety issues have been resolved or mitigated
the adult’s situation is stabilized
referrals have been made to appropriate resources and followed up on
goals of the adult have been attained and documented on the service plan
the adult has moved out of the county’s jurisdiction
the adult having capacity to consent refuses continued services
Steps in terminating the APS case when an adult has consented:
the social worker and supervisor shall staff to determine if the adult’s need for
protective services is resolved and agree that termination of protective services is
appropriate
the social worker shall then visit the disabled adult (and contact other support
members such as family or service providers) to review the service plan and
make referrals to other services if applicable
the social worker shall notify the adult that the need for protection no longer exists
132
and that APS is being terminated
the social worker shall provide the adult with a 10-working day notice of
termination via the DSS-5027- refer to the Requirements for the Provision of
Services Manual Termination Process
if other service providers have been involved as part of the implementation of the
service plan and are to remain involved, they should be notified that the case is
being closed for APS
staff shall ensure all notifications and documentation are complete
staff shall close SIS Code 204 services on the DSS-5027
Steps in terminating the APS case when a court order is involved:
prior to the expiration of the court order authorizing protective services the social
worker and supervisor shall staff to determine if the adult’s need for protective
services is resolved and agree that termination of protective services is
appropriate
the social worker shall then visit the disabled adult (and contact other support
members such as family or service providers) to review the service plan and
make referrals to other services if applicable
the social worker shall inform the adult (or family member) of the expiration date
of the court order authorizing protective services and the intent to terminate the
APS case
staff shall consult with the agency attorney about their recommendation for
termination of protective services provided via court order
staff shall ensure the court order has been dismissed and that all documentation
is complete
staff shall close SIS Code 204 services on the DSS-5027.
133
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES MANUAL
IX.
SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES
134
IX.
Special Circumstances
A. Conflict of Interest
When a report is received alleging abuse, neglect or exploitation by a social services
board member, department of social services staff member, county commissioner, or
the county manager, this constitutes a conflict of interest for an agency receiving an
APS referral and will require the evaluation be conducted by another county DSS. Upon
receiving a report, if the county determines the report constitutes a conflict of interest,
the county receiving the report shall screen the report promptly and without delay. The
county department shall contact the Division of Aging and Adult Services listserv at
DAAS.adult[email protected] for assignment of the report. Guidance on contacting
the listserv can be found in Dear Director Letter AFS-09-2012. Also, please refer to
Appendix C, “Conflict of Interest Protocol.” The county conducting the evaluation acts
fully as the case manager; evaluating all six domains thoroughly, making the case
decision, making the capacity decision and providing protective services in coordination
with the county where the adult lives. The county where the adult lives is responsible for
paying for essential services and any expenses for medical, psychological or other
examinations and legal services incurred by the county conducting the evaluation.
If the evaluation substantiates the report, the agency that conducted the evaluation will
seek authorization for services, including petitioning the court when necessary. The
petition shall be filed in the county where the adult lives and shall include the reason for
filing by an agency in another county.
When a county conducts an evaluation for another county and the report is
unsubstantiated, the DAAS-0009 Written Report of APS Evaluation may be used to
meet the requirement that a referral be made back to the county of residence. It should
contain recommendations for services or referrals that the disabled adult needs or has
requested. The Written Report may also contain information to indicate that further
services were not needed or that the disabled adult refused services.
If a referral for services is indicated, the county that conducted the evaluation should
include with the Written Report any assessment summaries or other information that
would be beneficial to the county of residence. The county of residence would then be
better able to appropriately provide or obtain needed services in a timely manner.
It is not necessary for the county of residence to know all of the specific findings of the
evaluation in order to be able to offer other appropriate services. Examples of specific
findings that might not need to be shared include medical or mental health evaluations
conducted as part of the APS evaluation, details of financial records or other details
about the family situation. If the county conducting the evaluation has received the
disabled adult’s consent for the release of information, then all information except for
the name of the complainant and the collateral contacts may be shared.
B. County of Residence/County of Location
As stated in General Statute definition, 108A-101 (c), the county DSS responsible for
135
protective services is the county DSS where the adult “resides or is present.”
Residence shall be defined as where the adult resides. Refer to the Requirements for
the Provision of Services Manual for definition of residence. *Note: the county of
residence shall be referenced in this section as COR.
Questions to guide counties in determining residence:
What does the reporter state is the adult’s address at the time of intake?
Is the adult located in a place other than the address of their residence? (i.e.
hospital)
Is the adult homeless or transient?
Has the adult been discharged from a facility and an alternative facility has not
been named? It is possible that an adult is located or present in a county other
than the county in which they reside. The county of location shall be referenced
in this section as COL. Based on statutory definition the COR and the COL share
the responsibility for protective services for a disabled adult in their county.
The APS report can be received by either county. The county receiving the report shall
screen the report without delay, based on the three APS criteria. The county of
residence is responsible for directing and ensuring that the APS process is carried out,
including initiation, evaluation, and case decision.
Guidelines when the report is received by the COL:
COL will screen the report
COL will immediately notify the COR of the screened in report
COL will initiate the report if requested by the COR and will comply with all APS
timeframes *Note: If there is an emergency the COL will initiate immediately
while concurrently notifying the COR of the report
The COL shall continue to cooperate with the COR’s directives and provide
information about the evaluation to the COR
The COR is responsible for the case decision and for filing petitions.
Responsibility does not vary depending on the type of legal action needed
Guidelines when the report is received by the COR:
This procedure is based on 10A NCAC 71A .0701 and the DSS can refer to Appendix
D for specific procedures. The disabled adult’s COR is responsible for the case in its
entirety, including the assignment of the SIS number, initiation, evaluation, case
decision and mobilization of protective services. If the disabled adult’s COR cannot be
determined, or the adult is homeless, the COL assumes all responsibilities.
C. Movement During the APS Process
There are times during the APS process the adult may move. Movement can have
multiple meanings and can be temporary or permanent. Addressing movement will
depend on where the social worker is in the APS process.
136
1.
Temporary movement during the APS Process
Temporary movement is when an adult has not established residency in an
alternate county, and they are only temporarily located elsewhere. This could be a
short-term hospital admission or visiting family and friends etc. The county of
residence shall continue the APS process regardless of where the adult is
temporarily located. Staff from the county of residence may choose to visit the
adult where they are temporarily located or may request assistance from the
alternate county. If the social worker elects to visit the adult in the alternate county
it is recommended that the county of residence inform the alternate county that a
visit is being conducted.
2.
New residence established during APS evaluation
When the social worker has confirmed during the evaluation, that the adult has
moved and established residency in another county, the social worker shall make
a case decision based on the information gathered to that point. If the information
confirms maltreatment the social worker shall document these findings in the case
decision. However, the case would be unsubstantiated because protective
services cannot be provided if the adult is no longer in the county conducting the
evaluation. Based on these findings an APS report should be made to the new
county of residence without delay.
3.
New residence established after a substantiated case decision but prior
to consent to services.
The adult has established a new county of residence after the case decision has
been made, but prior to obtaining consent to services, the DSS shall document
confirmation of the adult’s new county of residence and make an adult protective
services report to the adult’s new county of residence without delay. The report
should include relevant information obtained during the evaluation which supports
the alleged need for protection.
4.
New residence established after consenting to protective services
If a disabled adult has established residency in an alternate county after
consenting to the provision of protective services and no court order is involved,
the DSS providing protective services shall ask the disabled adult to consent for
information to be shared with the DSS in the new county of residence. If the adult
consents, the DSS shall notify the new county of residence of the disabled adult's
protective service needs without delay. The DSS in the new county of residence
shall contact the disabled adult to determine whether protective services continue
to be needed and, if so, if the disabled adult consents to their provision. If the adult
does not consent, the DSS providing protective services shall not share
information with the DSS in the new county of residence. *Note: If the original DSS
still believes that the adult is in need of protection, the law requires a report be
made to the DSS in the new county of residence.
5.
Movement of adult while providing protection through a court order
If the DSS in the original county of residence has been providing protective
services under a court order, the DSS shall file a motion in the court to be relieved
of responsibility because the disabled adult has established residency in another
137
county. (*Note: court orders are typically only valid where the order was issued.)
The DSS shall make a protective service referral to the DSS in the new county of
residence. The DSS in the new county of residence shall evaluate the adult's
current situation to determine whether protective services are needed and, if so,
shall request authority to provide services in accordance with policies contained in
this manual. When considering dismissing protective services orders it is essential
the agency attorney be consulted.
D. Repeated Reports Regarding the Same Adult
According to General Statute 108-103 all APS reports must be received and
screened. This is critically important in situations of repeated APS reports on the
same adult. This requirement applies to disabled adults who may already have an
existing APS evaluation (SIS code 202) or mobilization and planning services (SIS
code 204). If the report meets the three APS criteria, it must be screened in and
initiated within timeframes.
Guidelines for receiving multiple reports:
All information received alleging abuse, neglect, or exploitation must be taken
as an APS report.
All APS reports must be screened based on information provided by the
reporter.
All APS reports screened in must be initiated within assigned timeframes (this
applies to adults at any point in the APS process.)
All screened in APS reports must be evaluated and the case decision made
within statutory timeframes of 30 days for abuse and neglect and 45 days for
exploitation.
If the DSS is conducting an APS evaluation (202) and receives additional reports on
the same disabled adult:
Screen each report based on the three APS criteria and assign the initiation
time frame as applicable.
If the report is screened in, it must be initiated within the assigned timeframe,
and the following actions taken:
o All allegations for each report must be addressed in the evaluation
process.
o If the allegations from multiple reports can be addressed within the
assigned timeframe of the initial report, one case decision may be made
for all reports evaluated concurrently.
o If all allegations cannot be addressed for all reports within the assigned
timeframe of the initial report, multiple case decisions may be made
based upon the case decision time frame of each report.
If the DSS is providing APS mobilization and planning (204) and receives additional
reports on the same disabled adult, screen each report based on the three APS
criteria and assign the initiation time frame as applicable. If the report is screened in,
then SIS code 202 will be opened on the DSS-5027 and begin the evaluation. Note: It
is possible to have 202 and 204 services open for the same disabled adult at the
138
same time.
E. Natural Disasters/Emergency Operations
It is recommended that each county DSS has a set of internal policies established with
guidelines and procedures for APS and individuals under guardianship. Each county DSS
should have clear guidelines and procedures that clearly outline the role of APS
supervisors and workers in the event of emergencies in the community, such as natural
disasters (e.g. hurricanes, flooding, earthquakes, severe storms), violent attacks, or other
states of emergency. It is recommended that these policies address the following phases:
Planning for Emergencies Before They Occur:
through multi-agency planning and coordination, understanding the role of APS
and guardianship, as well as the potential resources and limitations of partnering
agencies;
by establishing data systems capable of adequately tracking disabled adults who
may be affected by emergencies; (have a master index of all APS disabled adults
and individuals under guardianship) Note: If the master index is kept electronically
a printed copy may be beneficial in case of power outages;
by establishing a clear chain of command, base of operations, and means to
communicate with social workers;
by creating clear lines of communication and responsibility with first responders,
Neighborhood Emergency Response Teams, Red Cross, etc. before the
emergency has occurred; and
by training social workers on emergency preparedness for when in the office and
when out in the field.
Responding During the Emergency:
Social workers shall not be required to respond to a situation that would put the
worker or his/her family at risk; (contact emergency personnel)
Social workers shall understand the changing nature of emergencies and
demonstrate flexibility of attitude and approach; workers should be clear what their
role is and is not during emergencies; and
by providing all APS and guardianship personnel with emergency personal
protection (e.g., filtering masks, gloves) and emergency equipment (e.g.,
flashlights, two-way radios), as needed, to safely carry out their assigned duties.
Post Disaster Follow-up:
Social Workers should check on individuals under guardianship and APS disabled adults
to ensure safety and provide any necessary referrals or supports.
Please remember it is the county DSS’s responsibility to identify, locate and continue
availability of services for APS disabled adults and individuals under guardianship who
are displaced or adversely affected by a disaster; and respond to new APS cases in
areas adversely affected by a disaster, and provide services in those cases. Please refer
to NC GS 35A and 10A for statutory responsibilities. The Adult Services Listserv will be
available during normal hours for county DSSs and NC 2-1-1 may also be a resource
where a trained call specialist can assist with finding available human services resources
139
in your area.
F. Reporting Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation in DHHS Divisions, Facilities and
Schools
Authority: G.S. 143B-10; G.S. 7B, Subchapter I; G.S. 108A, Article 6; G.S. 122C-66
Directive III-5 states that reports will be made to the county DSS in which the facility is
located if the mistreatment occurred therein, or to the local DSS where the disabled adult
resides if it occurred during a home visit. A contact person may be assigned at a DHHS
facility in order to expedite required notifications to management or reports to the county
DSS and to act as liaison with the DSS.
Determination of the scope, procedures, information necessary to evaluate the report, or
services needed is within the discretion of the county DSS. All DHHS staff are required to
cooperate fully with the DSS in all aspects of the evaluation. When the evaluation is
completed the chief administrative officer or designated contact person is required to
request the adult protective services worker to promptly conduct an on-site review of the
findings of the evaluation, followed by a written report of these findings. The report to the
administrator should be completed in all situations involving an APS evaluation in a state
institution as described in this manual. A meeting with staff of the institution should take
place if the case is substantiated in order to plan protective intervention. Meetings to
review findings in unsubstantiated cases are left to the discretion of the county DSS.
In substantiated cases, DSS should cooperatively work with the facility staff in
establishing a plan for mobilizing essential services on behalf of the disabled adult to help
reduce the risk factors contributing to the mistreatment.
Evaluations in State Operated Healthcare Facilities should follow the outlined steps for
evaluations in this manual.
A working agreement between the Division of Aging and Adult Services and the Division
of Mental Health/Developmental Disabilities and Substance Abuse Services is available.
This agreement outlines procedures for obtaining adult protective services for individuals
requiring medical or surgical treatment that reside in any of North Carolina’s state
operated healthcare facilities.
G. Undocumented Persons
This guidance refers to DSS Administrative Letter No. Adult and Family Services 03-
2002 Nonqualified Aliens and Adult Protective Services (excerpts below) which outlines
the procedures counties are to follow related to Adult Protective Services for
undocumented persons.
There are several points that should be understood when considering the provision of
APS to nonqualified aliens. The policy guidance has been developed in collaboration with
the NC Attorney General's Office and the School of Government and includes the county
DSS's statutory responsibility to respond to APS reports and the limitations placed on
140
public benefits to nonqualified aliens by federal law. The policy guidance has been
discussed and supported by the Adult Services Committee and the Executive Board of
the NC Association of County Directors of Social Services.
County DSSs must accept all reports alleging that an abused, neglected or exploited
disabled adult is in need of protective services regardless of the disabled adult's alleged
immigration status. Various federal civil rights laws and regulations prohibit discrimination
by governmental entities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age
or disability, and failure to accept these reports may constitute discrimination. The APS
screening process is the same for undocumented persons as it is for all other reported
situations; the three screening criteria must still be alleged during the intake process.
County DSSs must evaluate all APS reports regardless of the alleged immigration status
of the disabled adult. The APS statute requires county DSSs to evaluate reports,
determine if protection is needed, and what essential services are needed. This process
remains the same for undocumented persons. The thorough evaluation and steps
required by state law and policy must still be completed.
If a service eligibility is based on immigration status, a determination of immigration
status must be made to aid in the assessment of eligibility for that service. This
determination should be made by the eligibility unit for the particular service (e.g.,
Medicaid) and cannot be made as a means to discontinue the protective services
evaluation. There are many categories of immigration status, and the adult may be
eligible for some services or benefits, or may be found to be a qualified alien, permanent
resident or citizen.
County DSSs must develop service plans in substantiated cases, regardless of the
immigration status of the disabled adult and provide or arrange for services, if needed.
The availability of resources in substantiated cases will depend on the adult’s immigration
status. Eligibility for some services is dependent upon the adult’s classification as a
citizen, qualified alien or nonqualified alien. Services should be provided according to the
adult’s citizenship or immigration status.
Nonqualified aliens are sometimes referred to as "undocumented" persons. It is important
to note that some aliens who do not qualify for "Federal Public Benefits" may be
"documented," i.e., they may be lawfully present in the United States but nevertheless be
nonqualified. For example, an alien in the United States on a tourist visa would be
documented, but nonqualified.
Services and Public Benefits
Citizens and qualified aliens are eligible for a broader range of public benefits than are
nonqualified aliens. The largest group of qualified aliens are persons who are lawfully
admitted for permanent residence in the United States or are permanently residing in the
United States. However, there are other qualified groups such as refugees admitted for
humanitarian reasons, persons granted asylum for religious or political reasons or
persons determined by the U.S. Attorney General to be subject to persecution if they
were to return to their country of origin. The Medicaid Manual at MA-2504 contains
excellent guidance for determining immigration status. Any person who is not considered
141
a qualified alien will be considered a nonqualified alien for purposes of receiving public
benefits.
Intent of Congress to Provide Public Benefits to Aliens
Nonqualified aliens are not eligible for federal, state or local benefits which often fund the
services traditionally used to provide protection in APS cases. The Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996 (PRWOA) limits the provision of
services or benefits to nonqualified aliens living in this country. The intent of Congress in
its passage of the PRWOA was to clearly state that "it continues to be the immigration
policy of the United States that aliens within the Nation’s borders not depend on public
resources to meet their needs, but rather rely on their own capabilities and the resources
of their families, their sponsors, and private organizations". This Act further states that "it
is a compelling government interest to remove the incentive for illegal immigration
provided by the availability of public benefits".
Federal Public Benefits Defined
The PRWOA states that an alien who is not a "qualified alien" is not eligible for programs
and services meeting the definition of a "Federal Public Benefit". A "Federal Public
Benefit" is defined, in part, as "any retirement, welfare, health, disability, public or
assisted housing, post-secondary education, food assistance, unemployment benefit or
any other similar benefit for which payments or assistance are provided to individuals,
households or families by a federal agency or through appropriated federal funds".
State and Local Public Benefits Defined
The PRWOA also restricts eligibility for state and local benefits to nonqualified aliens.
The Act states that a nonqualified alien is not eligible for "State or Local Public Benefits".
These are defined, in part, as "any retirement, welfare, health, disability, public or
assisted housing, post-secondary education, food assistance, unemployment benefit, or
other similar benefit for which payments or assistance are provided to an individual,
household, or family eligibility unit by an agency of a State or local government or by
appropriated funds of a State or local government". An example of a State or local benefit
for which a nonqualified alien is not eligible is State/County Special Assistance.
The PRWOA allows a state to provide state or local benefits to nonqualified aliens, but
only through the enactment of a law subsequent to the PRWOA that affirmatively
provides for such eligibility. The North Carolina General Assembly has not enacted such
a law. Without such a law, states are prohibited from creating any benefits for
nonqualified aliens that would be similar to a federal, state or local benefit as defined in
the PRWOA. This means state and local governments cannot use funds or create
benefits that would replace those prohibited as "Federal Public Benefits". For example, if
a nonqualified alien needs nursing home care and is ineligible for Medicaid because of
his immigration status, neither the state nor county may create a fund to pay for his care
in a nursing home.
U.S. Attorney General Exception for the Provision of Adult Protective Services
The U.S. Attorney General is authorized to establish limited exceptions to the provision of
"Federal Public Benefits", including such services as soup kitchens, short-term shelter or
housing for the homeless, community food banks, and programs for victims of domestic
142
violence. This authorization included within its scope, programs or services that deliver
in-kind services at the community level, serve the purpose of protecting life or safety, and
do not condition the assistance according to the individual's income or resources. In an
order issued by U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno in 1996, she stated that the PRWOA
did not "preclude aliens from receiving police, fire, ambulance, transportation, sanitation,
and other regular, widely available services". She further specified that adult protective
services were among the services determined to be necessary for the protection of life
and safety. It should be noted that the concept of "protection of life and safety" has not
been defined by Congress or any federal agency, and its scope is therefore ambiguous.
Nevertheless, the term is generally thought to pertain to situations of a short duration.
When the federal requirements and exceptions described above are considered in
conjunction with North Carolina's APS law, the resulting requirements are that DSSs
must receive APS reports, complete evaluations, and develop protective service plans.
Federal funding through SSBG and state funding through the State APS Fund may be
used for the social worker's time spent on these functions for the protection of life and
safety, and because APS is a service of short duration. Where problems may arise is in
the provision of essential services traditionally utilized in substantiated APS cases. Since
many of these services and benefits described below fall under the definition of a
"Federal Public Benefit" and were not made exceptions by the Attorney General's 1996
order, nonqualified aliens are not eligible for them.
Programs and Services Considered to be Public Benefits
Programs such as SSI, Food Stamps and Medicare are among those considered to be
"Federal Public Benefits" and cannot be provided to nonqualified aliens. Services funded
by the Social Services Block Grant and Medicaid are also "Federal Public Benefits" and
cannot be provided to nonqualified aliens. The only exception to Medicaid is for the
treatment of an emergency medical condition. This term is defined as "a medical
condition (including emergency labor and delivery) manifesting itself by acute symptoms
of sufficient severity (including severe pain) such that the absence of immediate medical
attention could reasonably be expected to result in (A) placing the patient's health in
serious jeopardy, (B) serious impairment to bodily functions, or (C) serious dysfunction of
any bodily organ or part".
Other programs and services used in APS cases that nonqualified aliens are not eligible
for include: Food and Nutrition Services, the Independent Living Program, Low Income
Energy Assistance Program, Medicare, Medicaid (CAP-DA, which first require Medicaid
eligibility) and Special Assistance.
Obtaining guardianship of a nonqualified alien does not change, nor can it change, the
adult's immigration status. Therefore, federal, state, and local public benefits are not
available to the DSS for a nonqualified alien who becomes an individual under
guardianship of the DSS or any other public agency.
Eligibility will need to be determined separately for each service or benefit needed for the
essential services included in a protective services plan involving a nonqualified alien.
DSSs have the ability to determine immigration status as a part of eligibility for Medicaid
143
and Food and Nutrition Services. Social workers and supervisors should utilize these
resources within their agencies as part of the APS evaluation. The Social Security
Administration may also be able to assist in determining an adult's immigration status.
Once the adult's immigration status is known, eligibility for services and benefits can be
determined.
Other Possible Resources
Resources for nonqualified aliens will obviously be limited. County DSSs should consider
utilizing informal resources in substantiated APS cases such as religious or charitable
organizations to plan and arrange for services to adults who are nonqualified aliens. The
PRWOA exempts all charitable organizations from the requirement to verify the
applicant's immigration status or citizenship. If the charitable organization provides
services or benefits that require immigration status or citizenship to be verified, e.g.,
services funded by SSBG or Medicaid, nonqualified aliens are not eligible for these
services. Most charitable organizations can be identified through their federal tax-exempt
status as a 501(3)c organization.
Other resources may include contacting the Embassy or Consulate of the adult's home
country. Contacting the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) may also be a
possible resource. An adult who is thought to be nonqualified may have had their status
changed, for example, through some amnesty program. The INS may help to restore the
adult's legal status making him eligible for certain benefits. Issues of deportation should
be left up to the INS. Contacting an immigration attorney to assist with these cases and
the various classifications of immigration status may also be useful. The INS may not
always be aware of the serious and immediate nature of the burden placed on
communities when nonqualified aliens need assistance and are not eligible for "public
benefits." Cases involving nonqualified aliens will no doubt require greater coordination of
resources and creativity in identifying and utilizing the limited available resources.
Questions about these cases may be directed to your Adult Programs Representative or
the Adult Services listserv.
H. Veterans Administration Request for Patient Information
Once a County DSS receives a report, opens an evaluation, and needs records from the
VA, a letter is required to be sent to the appropriate VA facility in order for necessary
information to be disclosed to the County DSS. The provisions of Title 5 U.S.C.
552a(b)(7) of the Privacy Act govern the disclosure of requested patient information from
the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The information requested should be the
minimum necessary for investigating suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of
disabled adults for APS. The DAAS-5337-A Request for Patient Information for Veterans
should be completed each time your agency requests any records from a VA Medical
Facility and/or their associated Outpatient, or Community-Based Outpatient Clinic in NC.
These Request for Patient Information letters will need to be issued from the Department
of Health and Human Services, Division of Aging and Adult Services.
144
DHHS has developed the following process to request identifiable Patient Information
from VA facilities in NC upon the receipt of an abuse, neglect, dependency or exploitation
report:
County DSS staff complete and submit the DAAS-5337-A Request for Patient
Information for Veterans form to the VA Listserv at:
[email protected] via encrypted email.
After receiving the completed form, an APR will obtain the required signature.
The signed request will be forwarded to the appropriate VA agency and a courtesy
copy sent to the county DSS Director associated with the request.
VA agency receives the request and sends the requested information directly to
the County DSS specified in the request letter form.
The DSS may follow-up with a VA representative regarding any missing or
delayed information
145
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES MANUAL
X.
LEGAL ALTERNATIVES AND SUPPLEMENTS TO
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES
146
X.
Legal Alternatives and Supplements to Adult Protective
Services
A. Introduction
There are times that adults, due to disability, are no longer able to manage their
personal or financial affairs. In APS there are tools available that can be used to
further or enhance the APS process. This section describes a range of legal
proceedings and supplements including the process for obtaining civil commitments
and guardianship, powers of attorney and advance directives such as living wills and
representative payees. Each has a specific purpose and is only appropriate under
certain conditions.
Adult Protective Services assists adults who are incapacitated by a disability and are
in need of protective services. Adults may not have anyone able, willing, or
responsible to assist them to meet their needs. It may be necessary to use a
combination of the methods described in this section when providing protective
services to a disabled adult and/or their families. The least restrictive method which
will adequately meet the adult's needs for assistance and protection should be
chosen.
B. Civil Commitments
All statutes pertaining to Civil Commitments can be found in Chapter 122C but are
summarized by topic below.
G.S. 122C-211 and 122C-212: Voluntary Admission and Discharges, Competent
Adults, Facilities for the Mentally Ill and Substance Abusers
Any individual in need of treatment for mental illness or substance abuse may seek
voluntary admission at any facility by presenting himself or herself for evaluation to
the facility. A facility may elect not to admit an adult if it determines that the adult does
not need, or cannot benefit from, the care, treatment, habilitation or rehabilitation
available and that the individual is not in need of evaluation by the facility. The facility
shall give to the individual a referral to another facilities or facilities that can provide
treatment.
G.S. 122C-231 to 122C-233 Voluntary Admission and Discharges, Incompetent
Adults, Facilities for the Mentally Ill and Substance Abusers
Incompetent adults must be diagnosed as having a mental illness or a substance
abuse problem and be in need of treatment as a requirement for admission. The
legally responsible person appointed under G.S. 35A acts on the incompetent
person's behalf in applying for admission, consenting to treatment, and receiving legal
notices. Incompetent adults are entitled to a district court hearing within 10 days of
admission to the facility.
147
G.S. 122C-261 and G.S. 122C-262 Part 7 Involuntary Commitment; Facilities for
the Mentally Ill
Addresses criteria for commitments and the procedures which must be followed for
both inpatient and outpatient commitment of persons with mental illness and persons
with substance abuse problems.
An individual may be committed involuntarily to a mental health facility if he is:
mentally ill and either dangerous to self or dangerous to others, or in need of
treatment in order to prevent further disability or deterioration that would predictably
result in dangerousness.
Procedure for IVC
Please refer to the link listed above for specific procedures as it relates to Involuntary
Commitments on an inpatient basis. IVC law changed effective October 1, 2019. If the
DSS needs to pursue an IVC the procedure is:
Petition the clerk or magistrate.
The petition shall include the facts on which the petitioner’s opinion is based.
If the petitioner has knowledge or reasonably believes that the disabled adult, in
addition to having a mental illness, also has an intellectual disability, this fact shall
be stated in the petition.
Note: Jurisdiction under this subsection is the clerk or magistrate in the county
where the respondent resides or is found.
Social Work Guidance as it relates to Voluntary/Involuntary Commitments
A commitment can happen at any point during the APS process. The decision to seek
commitment will be based on information available to the social worker.
During intake, when making a screening decision about whether a situation presents
a need for commitment, all three of the APS screening criteria shall be applied. There
may not be a need for protective services at this time if the adult in need of
commitment to a mental health or substance abuse facility has sought voluntary
admission or there is another able, willing and responsible person who has sought
admission for the disabled adult.
During evaluation, if it appears that an adult is a danger to themselves or others, the
social worker can petition for an involuntary commitment. If a disabled adult has been
admitted due to an IVC and will be in the hospital during the evaluation period, the
social worker shall continue their evaluation to determine if there is a need for
protection. This shall include speaking with collaterals, collecting medical records, and
assessing all six domains. Upon completion of a thorough evaluation, a case decision
shall be made based on the three criteria. If the case is substantiated and the
disabled adult returns to the community, case planning should be coordinated with the
LME and other responsible agencies in order to assure that the disabled adult is
receiving appropriate services and is free from further maltreatment.
148
If the adult is hospitalized after an IVC for longer than 30 days, the protective services
case should be unsubstantiated and closed. The agency shall inform the hospital or
inpatient mental health facility to make another report upon discharge, if necessary.
DSS may need to work with the hospital and mental health agencies in arranging for
services such as representative payee, guardianship, or other community services.
Forms pertaining to involuntary commitment proceedings can be found at NC Courts.
It is important to note that an APS order cannot be used to place someone in a mental
health facility [G.S. 108A-105(c)].
C. Guardianship Proceedings
Policies and Social Work Guidance Related to Guardianship can be found in the
Guardianship Manual.
Guardianship may be an integral component of protective services for adults in that it
is a mechanism for assisting incompetent adults with management of their affairs and
preventing or alleviating situations in which personal well-being and/or property are
threatened because of an inability to make decisions. This is one resource that may
be considered in substantiated APS cases.
In substantiated APS cases consideration of whether to pursue an APS order or the
appointment of a guardian should include:
the long-term needs of the disabled adult;
the urgency of the need;
the expediency of the courts; and
the type of court intervention which is the most appropriate for a particular
disabled adult
After completing a protective services evaluation in which it is determined that legal
action is needed, there are two instances when guardianship may be the more
appropriate alternative for providing protection in a substantiated APS case.
One instance is to provide authorization for essential services. When the evaluation
indicates that the disabled adult may be incompetent and will need assistance with
decision making for an extended period of time or needs assets protected,
guardianship may be pursued. Consideration should be given to the time frame for
the proceedings and whether the length of time will place the disabled adult in danger
of further mistreatment.
Interim guardianship can sometimes be used to obtain service authorization
depending on the circumstances and the information. Getting an interim guardian
appointed can be beneficial if the disabled adult is believed to be incompetent and
there is an imminent or foreseeable risk of harm to his/her physical well-being and/or
assets requiring immediate intervention. It can also be used when the social worker
believes that the disabled adult’s incapacity is temporary i.e. the disabled adult
suffered a mild stroke but is anticipated to fully recover their faculties.
149
Another instance is when services are authorized through an APS court order, but it is
determined that an adult’s incapacity or incompetency will be long term which
warrants a modification of the protective services plan. When an adult protective
services order has been obtained authorizing services for the disabled adult, it is
recommended that a review be conducted to determine if a guardianship petition
should be filed during or before one of the 60- day expiration dates of an APS order.
When a DSS decides to petition the court for guardianship to obtain service
authorization, 202 is the most appropriate SIS code for all activities including filing the
petition, the hearing, and the court case decision. Once authorization for protective
services is obtained, 202 will be closed and service code 204 should then be opened
on the 5027 to provide mobilization and planning.
D. Power of Attorney
Laws governing Powers of Attorney have been updated as of January 2018. A Power
of Attorney (POA) is a document by which a competent adult (referred to as the
principal) authorizes another designated person (referred to as the agent) to act for
him/her and manage his/her affairs.
When presented with a Power of Attorney document, the agency shall consult with
their agency attorney regarding the specifications and authorities granted to the
agent.
Changes to the Power of Attorney laws can be found here: in G.S. 32A-1, Article 1.
If there is an APS report being made regarding mistreatment by an agent, the APS
screening criteria should be applied before conducting a thorough evaluation to
determine if the disabled adult is in need of protective services.
If a POA is inappropriately utilizing their authority, the POA may need to be revoked if
the disabled adult is not incapacitated or incompetent.
If the disabled adult is thought to be incompetent or incapacitated, the social worker
might consider petitioning for guardianship, since a guardian's authority supersedes
the authority of an attorney-in-fact and the guardian can choose to have the POA
revoked (except healthcare POA.) A healthcare POA should be revoked by the Clerk
in the event that the healthcare POA is the perpetrator of the maltreatment for the
disabled adult.
An APS order cannot legally revoke a power of attorney. However, the court can order
essential services be obtained or provided by DSS. This may conflict with what the
power of attorney has or has not provided or obtained to provide protection. It would
then be up to the power of attorney to bring this to the attention of the court, if desired.
For example: if the POA has refused to appropriately place an adult and this is
causing the adult to be abused, neglected or exploited, the APS order could allow
150
DSS to place the adult in a facility against the wishes of the POA.
It is often very difficult to prove that a POA acted outside the realm of the wishes of
the adult. Courts find it difficult to prosecute or revoke a designated POA without due
cause when the POA document gives unlimited authorization.
The lack of specificity in a POA document is often problematic. The limits on the
authority of the POA over the person or the person's property are not always clear. It
is important to read the POA document thoroughly and seek legal guidance to
determine the scope of the POA’s authority and whether they can consent to the
provision of protective services.
E. Advance Directives
North Carolina has two methods for competent adults to communicate decisions
about their medical care in the event they should become incapacitated or
incompetent and no longer able to make these decisions for themselves or
communicate their wishes. A "living will" is a written declaration of the individual's
desire for a natural death. A health care power of attorney is a written document
appointing another person to accept or refuse medical treatment in the event of
incapacity. Not all states have laws providing for living wills or health care powers of
attorney. Only documents prepared under North Carolina law are valid in this state.
North Carolina G.S. 90 Article 23 recognizes, in part, as a matter of public policy that
an individual’s rights include the right to a peaceful and natural death, and that a
patient or the patients representative has the fundamental right to control the decision
making relating to the rendering of the patients own medical care, including the
decision to have life prolonging measures withheld or withdrawn in instances of a
terminal condition.
The living will or a Declaration of a Desire for a Natural Death allows the individual to
make choices about withholding or discontinuing "extraordinary means" such as
artificial nutrition or hydration in the event of terminal illness, incurable illness or a
diagnosis of being in a persistent vegetative state.
The instructions in the living will cannot be used until the attending physician
determines, and a second physician concurs in writing, that the individual's condition
is terminal and incurable or diagnosed as a persistent vegetative state. The individual
can revoke the living will at any time, but the revocation does not become effective
until the attending physician is notified.
F. Substitute Payee
Individuals may need assistance with decisions regarding their finances. This may not
constitute a need for protective services. It is important to appropriately apply the APS
screening criteria to make this determination. There are different types of substitute
payee. These include protective payee and representative payee. Requirements and
procedures for appointment of a protective payee can be found in the Division of
151
Social Services Work First Manual Section 205. G. S. 108A-37 addresses the
procedures for obtaining personal representatives for mismanaged public assistance
and G.S. 108A-38 addresses the procedures for protective and vendor payments. The
Federal Statutory Requirements for Representative Payee can be found at:
http://ssa.gov/payee/faqrep.htm .
The Written Report regarding an APS evaluation may be sent to federal, state and law
enforcement agencies when the protective services evaluation indicates violations of
statutes, rules or regulations enforced by these agencies. This would include federal
or state administrative agencies (DHB, SSA, VA etc.) if evidence of exploitation
occurs by someone acting as a representative payee for a disabled adult.
If an evaluation is conducted and the need for protective services is substantiated,
goals of the APS case may include having a payee appointed by the federal agency
administering the benefit payment (e.g. SSA or VA.) This payee may be DSS or
another responsible person or agency. For example, when the disabled adult has
been exploited because he was not able to manage his money, but can manage other
aspects of his life, obtaining a representative payee may be the appropriate plan for
this adult.
152
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICE MANUAL
XI.
PROVISION OF SERVICES WITH FEDERAL AND
STATE FUNDS
153
XI.
Provision of Services with Federal and State Funds
A. Introduction
The Requirements for the Provision of Services Manual describes the circumstances
under which funds administered by the Division of Social Services may be used to
support the provision of protective services for disabled adults. It includes the scope
of activities which may be funded, as well as the disabled adult’s eligibility criteria and
required documentation.
Requirements for the Provision of Services by County Departments of Social Services
B. Social Work Practice Related to the Provision of Protective Services
for Disabled Adults
Application
No written application for social services shall be required to initiate an evaluation to
determine the need for protective services for adults. Although no application is
required for protective services for adults, documentation which identifies the
provision of the service and documents the date the service was initiated is done by
completing the DSS-5027. For purposes of documenting the initiation of protective
services, the date the agency receives the referral or APS report is viewed as the date
of application.
A notice to the adult of action taken regarding eligibility decisions is not required for
adult protective services. However, if other services are provided in conjunction with
protective services, application must be made via the DSS-5027, including the
applicant’s or authorized representative’s signature and date of signing. The notice of
action taken is required which includes the adults rights and responsibilities regarding
the receipt of services.
Documentation
A service record must be opened and maintained for each individual for whom an
application for social services is made and for each recipient of protective services.
Recipient service records must be documented and maintained in accordance with
procedures set forth in the Requirements for the Provision of Services Manual. At the
time of case termination case documentation should be complete and current.
Applications for social services must be maintained as part of the individual's services
record for purposes of documentation in establishing the record for fiscal
accountability and for purposes of prompt provision of services. Documentation of the
continuing need for the service is made in the individual's record at least quarterly
according to procedures established for the quarterly review in the Requirements for
the Provision of Services Manual.
154
Fees for Services
No fees are imposed for the provision of protective services for adults. In addition,
services that are funded under the Social Services Block Grant that are needed in
conjunction with protective services may be provided without regard to income and
without a fee during the first 12 months that protective services are provided (12
months from the most recent protective services report) if it is documented that:
such service is available in the county in which the individual lives;
the agency has received a report pursuant to G.S. 108A-103;
the agency has initiated protective services in accordance with program policies;
and
the agency has determined that other services are needed to support the
provision of protective services.
Any service which has been provided in conjunction with protective services and
terminated during the first 12 months in which protective services are provided may
be reestablished without regard to income and without a fee; provided:
the adult is still in the first 12 months of protective services;
a request for the service is documented; and
the reestablished service is necessary to support the provision of protective
services.
After the 12-month period has ended, if protective services are still being provided,
any income criteria or fee requirements applicable to specific services being provided
must be applied.
Termination
Included in the reasons for termination, contained in the Requirements for the
Provision of Services by County Departments of Social Services is that the individual
has been determined to not be eligible for the service requested on the basis that he
does not meet, or because of changing circumstances, no longer meets, the
conditions of eligibility for the program funding source under which the service is
provided.
Protective services pursuant to G.S. 108A, Article 6 are initiated with the receipt of a
report by the county department. Any actions necessary to receive and evaluate a
report alleging an abused, neglected, or exploited disabled adult is in need of
protective services are viewed as the provision of protective services including
arranging for the provision of medical and psychological diagnostic studies as
needed. If the evaluation substantiates the need for protective services, services will
continue in accordance with policies in this manual. If the evaluation does not
substantiate the report, protective services are terminated, and an offer of any other
available and appropriate agency services is made. In addition, information and
referrals must be made to appropriate community services.
Mobilizing essential services is part of the provision of protective services once
service authorization has been obtained. Any activity surrounding this mobilization
155
including problem solving, service planning, facilitating medical and legal services,
assisting with placement planning, legal alternatives, and any other case
management activities involved in arranging or providing services is considered to be
the provision of adult protective services for funding purposes. Once the situation has
stabilized through the mobilization of services and there is no longer a need for
protective services, protective services should be terminated. Other services such as
guardianship, placement, in-home services, or individual and family adjustment may
continue to be needed, independent of adult protective services.
156
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICE MANUAL
XII.
ADMINISTRATION OF ADULT PROTECTIVE
SERVICES
157
XII.
Administration of Adult Protective Services
A. Introduction
Services must be properly administered if they are to be provided in an effective,
efficient manner. The scope and complexity of adult protective services require that
several administrative issues be addressed in designing a service delivery system
which responds appropriately to disabled adults in need of protection. The nature of
protective services requires ongoing administrative involvement and support at all
levels of the process.
This section provides guidelines regarding various aspects of administration of adult
protective services including:
staffing
caseload organization and size
agency policies and procedures for the provision of protective services
use of community resources
It may be used by administrative staff in organizing, operating and evaluating the
agency's adult protective services program.
B. Staffing
An agency's adult protective services staffing pattern should promote systematic
service delivery and provide continuity for case work. Staffing needs should be
considered in relation to the agency's conceptual framework for adult protective
services, the size and resources of the agency, the needs of the disabled adult
population, and the size and resources of the community.
An assessment of an agency's staffing patterns and needs is important in order to
determine if the current number of positions and type of organization is adequate to
provide services in a manner which is consistent with the agency's mission for adult
protective services. Elements such as staff/supervisor ratio, job qualifications, staff
development and caseload sizes will affect the agency's ability to receive reports,
thoroughly evaluate those reports and deliver effective services to disabled adults.
Staff/Supervisor Ratio
One of the primary considerations in organizing Adult Protective Services staff is the
social worker/supervisor ratio. Two key components in determining the ratio are scope
of responsibility of the supervisor and availability of the supervisor to their individual
social workers, the agency and the community.
The supervisor is the key to the effective delivery of Adult Protective Services. The
supervisor establishes the expectations, influences attitudes, provides training and
consultation and gives support. This person is also the liaison with other staff within
158
the agency such as the director and agency's attorney, and with other agencies
helping to develop resources in the community for disabled adults.
Supervisor Qualifications
The supervisor should have experience in and knowledge of adult services, have prior
supervisory experience and knowledge of supervisory methods and techniques.
Knowledge of the special needs of disabled adults, APS law and policy, and agency
and community resources, are also necessary for effective supervision in Adult
Protective Services. The supervisor should have the skills necessary to promote
coordinated service delivery both within the agency and with other community
resources.
The supervisor should have basic skills as follows, but not limited to:
Knowledge of Adult Protective Services General Statute, Administrative Code,
and Social Work Practice.
Ability to use legal knowledge necessary to intervene and to exercise good
judgment in recommending legal steps to be taken.
Knowledge of the three Adult Protective Services screening criteria.
Ability to appropriately apply the three screening criteria.
Ability to staff cases regularly with social workers.
Ability to assist, oversee, and render case decisions within mandated time frames
outlined in General Statute 108A.
Ability to oversee the mobilization of protective services.
Ability to provide guidance, problem solving, and support to social work staff
throughout the APS process.
Ability to respond to crisis situations without delay.
Ability to determine when the need for protective services no longer exists.
Social Worker Qualifications
The social worker needs to be knowledgeable of Adult Protective Services law and
policy and services and resources available in the community for disabled adults. An
understanding of how Adult Protective Services interfaces with other services and
programs is essential. The social worker responsible for providing Adult Protective
Services operates within a broad network of in-home, community, and long-term care
services and should have the ability to advocate on behalf of elderly and disabled
adults.
The social worker should have basic skills as follows:
Ability to intervene effectively and immediately, including the ability to plan and
implement the provision of an array of services under emergency and/or crisis
situations that are often substandard, inhumane and complex.
Ability to motivate disabled adults to participate in the family assessment and
change process, even if involvement is minimal.
Ability to work with other professionals and agencies on behalf of the disabled
adult.
Ability to use basic legal knowledge necessary to intervene and to exercise good
159
judgment in recommending legal steps to be taken.
Ability to recognize the differences regarding the appropriate times to refocus
social work practice in supporting, enabling and empowering the disabled adult.
Ability to "shift gears" from supportive casework to authoritative casework (and to
know when to shift.)
Ability to be a creative and assertive service provider in tapping resources which
meet the disabled adult's needs.
Staff Development/Training
The qualities and competencies necessary to be an APS Social Worker are not all
inherent in the employee. Some must be developed, and others improved. The
agency should possess a positive philosophy regarding in-service and continuing
education and training for all social workers.
The Division of Aging and Adult Services provides programmatic training for social
workers responsible for any aspect of adult protective services. This training
curriculum is an orientation to the law and policy governing APS and can be found at
NCSWlearn. Staff providing Adult Protective Services should receive APS Basic Skills
training prior to providing direct client services in APS. Preservice is an important
component of APS Basic Skills training and its successful completion is required prior
to participating in the classroom portion of training. Additional Training Resources
including webinars are found on the Division’s Sharepoint site.
Caseload Organization and Size
It is important to consider the number of reports received by a county when assessing
the organization of the APS program, especially when deciding how many cases to
assign to a particular social worker and how many social workers to assign to a
supervisor. Case complexity affects a social worker's caseload manageability and
should be considered during case assignment.
Based on the recommendations made by the 2010 work group and accepted by the
NC Association of County Directors of Social Services Adult Services Committee in
March, 2011, the current recommended APS caseload size for a full-time APS social
worker is to manage 15 total cases - 6 APS on-going evaluations and 9 on-going
planning and mobilization. The workgroup’s recommendations and methodology are
included in this section.
C. Agency Policies
Agency Written Policies and Procedures for the Provision of Protective
Services
General Statute 108A and NC Administrative Code 10A-NCAC.71 shall always be
followed. Local agency policies may be established to provide further guidance,
clarification, or monitoring to all levels of staff in carrying out APS law and policy.
These policies should be designed to assist those who are involved in making
160
decisions throughout the APS Process. Local policies could be established to address
the following:
how to make requests to law enforcement agencies for assistance;
procedures for making the decisions necessary to file a petition requesting
authorization to provide protective services on a non-emergency, emergency, or
emergency ex-parte basis;
criteria necessary to initiate consultation by agency administration or review by a
multidisciplinary team.
An APS Procedural Manual should be developed to include written procedures for:
receiving reports
after-hours coverage
setting up case records
notifying DHSR, NCDHHS Division of Health Benefits, the complainant, the
DA, the facility administration and other agencies as required
inter-county cooperation with evaluations and services
case consultation within the agency
the use of multidisciplinary teams
record-keeping standards
referrals to other agencies
working with the agency attorney on legal issues
transferring of cases to other service units
case closure
other procedures that would provide clear expectations of the social workers
and operation of the delivery system
The Ability to Respond to Reports
Another staffing issue concerns the agency's ability to respond to reports. Two such
critical times are related to intake activities and after-hours, weekend and holiday
coverage.
Intake Activities
Responsibility to receive reports should be assigned to staff who are highly skilled in
interviewing. Staff should know the screening criteria as defined in law and policy
regarding APS and be able to obtain relevant information to make a determination as
to whether the information given constitutes an APS report. The agency should
ensure that procedures are in place for reports to be transferred without delay to the
APS supervisor for response.
Staff should be aware of other community resources and services available to make
appropriate referrals if the information does not meet the three criteria for adult
protective services.
161
After-Hours, Weekend and Holiday Coverage
Arrangements shall be made for 24-hour 365-day coverage to receive reports and
take appropriate action. This includes inclement weather, disasters, and
emailed/faxed reports received after hours. Response must be initiated by the agency
within the mandated immediate, 24-hour and 72-hour time frames. Social workers
providing after-hours coverage need the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary
to conduct APS evaluations including those skills necessary to provide crisis
intervention. The agency should consider preparing an after-hours procedure which
provides access to relevant legal forms, after-hour procedures for obtaining
signatures, list of resource persons and telephone numbers. A variety of methods
may be used to provide after-hour coverage. The type of coverage depends on the
needs and resources of the county.
D. Case Record
Administrative Code Related to Case Records indicates that a separate record, or a
separate section of an existing record, shall be established to contain information on
protective services provided to an adult, including the following:
The report of a need for protective services;
The written report by the department (when the evaluation was conducted on a
patient or resident of a facility or when evidence of abuse, neglect or exploitation
was found);
Any court documents about the case (petition, orders, etc.); and
Other information relative to the evaluation of the report and the provision of
protective services.
Purpose of Separate Record
The primary purpose of a separate protective services record is to maintain the
confidentiality of the disabled adult. If court action is necessary, the protective service
record may be subpoenaed, and it is important that there be a clear separation of the
protective services information. Information of other services received by the adult
which is not relevant to the court action (i.e. FNS, SAIH, Guardianship) should be
maintained separately from the APS record.
Contents of Record
All APS records should contain:
A report form
Documentation of a thorough evaluation, including assessment of the six
functional areas
Documentation of the case decision
Documentation that a notice to the complainant has been given and
Service eligibility documentation (DSS-5027)
Other documents that may need to be included are:
A Written Report to the district attorney if evidence of abuse, caretaker neglect or
162
exploitation was found
If the report was substantiated, documentation of capacity, documentation of
authorization for services (consent from disabled adult or court order) or
documentation of disabled adult’s refusal to accept services
If the report was on a resident or patient of a facility: a written report to the
Division of Health Service Regulation; a notice to the facility administrator; a
report to the Division of Health Benefits if exploitation was involved; and a notice
to the adult's county of residence if the report was substantiated
Court documents
Bank Statements
Expert evaluations (mental health, medical, psychological etc.)
If the report was on a resident of a state mental health institution, a notice to the
chief administrator of the facility and to the disabled adult's legal guardian, if any
Photographs
E. Use of Community Resources
The agency is part of the community it serves and should be responsive to the
community's concerns. Being responsive to and interacting positively with the
community promotes a good public image and encourages understanding and
support for the agency and its programs.
Working with Other Agencies
When community service agencies have an understanding of their shared
responsibility for prevention and remediation of problems related to abuse, neglect
and exploitation of disabled adults, service provision is enhanced for the disabled
adult. DSS has a responsibility for providing leadership in the education of other
agencies regarding their role and mandates in APS.
Assistance with Evaluating the Report
Due to the complex nature of disabled adults' situations, it is imperative that APS
social workers have input from other disciplines for the purpose of evaluating each
disabled adult's needs and facilitating coordinated service delivery.
This manual addresses laws and policy regarding the cooperation of other agencies
when conducting an APS evaluation. This includes assistance from staff and
physicians of local health departments, mental health providers, and other public or
private agencies.
Assistance with Service Provision
Cooperation is needed not only with conducting the evaluation but also with service
planning and provision of services to the disabled adult. In coordinating a protective
services plan, DSS should actively involve other community resources in determining
appropriate needs and resources to meet those needs and in providing the necessary
services. Services from other agencies such as adult day services, home delivered
163
meals, home health, mental health services, and/or counseling may be needed to
meet the complex needs of disabled adults. The agency may need to access and
coordinate these types of services with more than one provider in order to develop a
protective services plan for the disabled adult. The development of formal
relationships with other community agencies is important and can be structured
through the use of written agreements such as memorandums of understanding and
the use of multidisciplinary teams.
Formal Relationships and Memorandum of Understanding
Written agreements should be initiated by management, include the procedures for
referrals, and should outline the responsibilities of both parties for the disabled adult’s
assessment and the planning and provision of services. Reference should be made to
the legal requirements of the APS law as the basis for the agreement. Regular review
of the provisions of the agreement is crucial, and a plan for such review by both
parties should be included in the agreement.
Multidisciplinary Teams
The development and support of a team approach should also be encouraged by the
agency. The agency may want to develop their own APS Multidisciplinary Team. This
team approach helps agencies coordinate services, reduce duplication of services,
provide a means for sharing the disabled adult’s information with several other
professionals in the community, and have the benefit of other's knowledge,
experience and expertise in developing service plans and resolving the disabled
adults problems. Guidance for developing an APS/Elder Abuse MDT is available at:
The North Carolina Elder Protection Network.
F. Working with the Court and Law Enforcement
To establish a cooperative working relationship with the district attorney and law
enforcement, it is helpful to arrange a meeting with both to discuss the agency's legal
responsibility under the law to notify the district attorney upon finding evidence
indicating that a person has abused, neglected, or exploited a disabled adult. The
district attorney may have a preference for how and when he wants law enforcement
to be involved in these cases.
The Initial Notice to the district attorney and/or law enforcement should be sent upon
finding evidence indicating that a person has abused, neglected and/or exploited a
disabled adult. It should precede and be followed by the Written Report of Adult
Protective Services Evaluation. If an APS social worker has found evidence and
reached a case decision simultaneously, the written report will suffice as the notice.
The social worker shall attach any evidence obtained to this point in the evaluation,
such as medical evaluations, photographs, or financial records for exploitation cases.
The relationship between APS and local law enforcement agencies is an important
one. At any time during the APS evaluation the agency may contact the district
attorney's office with concerns that the mistreatment of the disabled adult appears
164
criminal in nature. Mistreatment could be considered criminal if a caretaker had, in a
planned, knowing, and willful manner, caused the disabled adult to suffer injury as a
result of assault, failure to provide medical care, or confinement in a condition that is
cruel or unsafe. While the agency is responsible for reporting the information to local
law enforcement and the district attorney's office, determining whether the information
is criminal is the role and responsibility of the district attorney's office in conjunction
with law enforcement.
DSS may verbally share the names of the reporter and of individuals who have
knowledge of the situation when requested by law enforcement or the district
attorney's office when these agencies are involved in a criminal evaluation or
prosecution of abuse, neglect or exploitation. It will not be necessary, in most cases,
to distinguish between the identity of the reporter and the identity of other individuals
who have knowledge of the situation. This distinction should not be made unless
specifically requested by law enforcement or the district attorney's office. It will be
important for the agency to indicate which individuals the social worker has
interviewed, and which have not been contacted.
Specific findings the agency has to date must be shared when requested by a law
enforcement agency or a district attorney's office involved in a criminal investigation of
abuse, neglect, or office involved in a criminal investigation of abuse, neglect, or
exploitation. It is important to remember that the county DSS's mandated role does
not change because of the involvement of law enforcement or the district attorney's
office, and the APS social worker must continue the agency's evaluation of the
disabled adult's need for protective services. In some instances, the APS evaluation
and the criminal investigation will occur simultaneously. In those cases, cooperation,
collaboration and communication will be vital.
Legal Counsel
The availability of an attorney is essential to the delivery of APS. The attorney is
necessary for expert consultation, to secure petitions and court orders and to
represent the agency in court. The attorney should be knowledgeable about APS law
and policy and be familiar with the types of disabled adults and situations encountered
by the social worker. The attorney should be part of any multidisciplinary teams
addressing the issues of Elder Abuse or Adult Protective Services. Agency policies
and procedures should include a method for accessing the attorney and guidance on
when to inform the attorney of cases which may require legal action.
Court Officials
Social workers need to understand the procedures of the court system and the
appropriate use of those procedures. APS staff should facilitate the development of a
good working relationship between the DSS and the court system and should do so
before a crisis case. Court officials should be familiar with APS staff, their role, and
the types of problems presented in APS cases.
165
Law Enforcement
APS social workers should be knowledgeable of the range of services available
through law enforcement and how and when to access their services. Law
enforcement officials should be familiar with the DSS and which social workers are
responsible for APS. It is important that law enforcement understand the nature of
APS and why their assistance may be needed.
District Attorney
This manual addresses laws and policy regarding notification to the district attorney
when evidence of abuse, neglect or exploitation is found. For the agency to establish
a cooperative working relationship with the district attorney it is helpful to arrange a
meeting to discuss the agency's responsibility under the APS law. The district
attorney may suggest types of information necessary for preparing a case for
prosecution, such as photographs, which the agency may already have gathered as
part of the APS evaluation.
G. Inter-County Cooperation
Separate from Conflict of Interest (COI)and COL/COR there will be times when a
county needs assistance from another county in the provision or evaluation of
protective services. Keeping in mind that the goal of APS is to assess the disabled
adult's situation and determine if protective services are needed, it is vital that the
county providing the assistance does so in a prompt and thorough manner. The
following is an example of a temporary situation that would require assistance from
another county.
Information is received by a county DSS that a disabled woman, living with her
daughter, is being neglected. The allegations are that the daughter is not getting her
mother's prescriptions filled, her mother sometimes misses doctor's appointments,
and her special diet is not being followed. At some time, either before the evaluation is
actually started or during the evaluation, the mother goes to visit a daughter who lives
in another county. The county that initially accepted the report is still obligated to
evaluate the woman's need for protective services and will make a request to the
second county to assist with the evaluation. That assistance would be in the form of a
prompt visit to the disabled adult, consultation with the second daughter, who would
be a collateral contact, and others in that county who may have information pertinent
to the evaluation.
Substantiated Report: Inter-County Cooperation
When a county has assisted in the evaluation for another county and the report is
substantiated, that county may also provide or arrange for protective services as
needed. The county where the disabled adult resides should cooperate in the
provision of protective services and any other services.
Cooperation may be best achieved by both counties being involved in coordinating
166
the provision of protective services. The county which can best meet the needs of the
disabled adult by arranging for or providing the needed services should do so.
Some suggestions for coordinating services are listed below. This is not an
exhaustive list but includes ideas that may be pertinent to APS service plans.
The county that conducted the evaluation may want to contact the county of
residence, prior to developing a service plan, to discuss available resources. If
appropriate services are not available in the county of residence, alternate
resources may need to be explored together in order to develop a service plan
which will meet the goals established by the county with case management
responsibility.
The county of residence should also inform the county developing the service
plan of any services unavailable due to a waiting list and of the availability, if any,
of services for high risk disabled adults. This includes services funded by the
Home and Community Care Block Grant. The county of residence should offer to
assist with the provision of any services that are to be obtained in the county such
as setting up medical or mental health appointments and providing or arranging
for transportation.
The county of residence may also need to help facilitate the provision of
protective services by making home/site visits and monitoring the situation for the
county with case management responsibility until the goals in the service plan
have been met and the need for protective services no longer exists. The county
of residence may then need to offer services to the disabled adult after protective
services are terminated, if necessary. At that time, the county of residence would
become the case manager for the provision of those services.
H. APS Data Collection
10A NCAC 71A .0806 ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES REGISTER
(a)
Information submitted by county departments of social services to the Adult
Protective Services Register is confidential. Non-identifying statistical
information and general information about the scope, nature and extent of adult
abuse, neglect and exploitation in North Carolina is not subject to this Rule of
confidentiality.
(b)
Access to the Adult Protective Services Register is restricted to:
(1)
the county department of social services,
(A)
in order to identify whether an adult who is the subject of an Adult
Protective Services evaluation has been previously reported and
evaluated under G.S. 108A, Article 6 in any county in the state; or
(B)
in order to share client specific information with an out-of-state
protective services agency to assure that protective services will be
made available to an adult previously served in North Carolina as
quickly as possible for the purpose of preventing further abuse,
neglect or exploitation; or
167
(C)
in order to share client specific information with law enforcement
agencies to assure that protective services will be made available to
an adult as quickly as possible;
(2)
the Division of Social Services staff,
(A)
in order to perform duties pertinent to managing and maintaining the
Register and monitoring, auditing, evaluating or facilitating the
administration of other state and federal programs regarding Adult
Protective Services based on information in the Register, or
(B)
in order to share client specific information with an out-of-state
protective services agency to assure that protective services will be
made available to an adult previously served in North Carolina as
quickly as possible for the purpose of preventing further abuse,
neglect or exploitation; and
(3)
individuals who receive approval to conduct studies of cases in the Adult
Protective Services Register.
(A)
Such approval must be requested in writing to the Director, Division
of Social Services. The written request will specify and be approved
on the basis of:
(i) an explanation of how the findings of the study have potential for
expanding knowledge and improving professional practices in
the area of prevention, identification and treatment of adult
abuse, neglect and exploitation;
(ii) a description of how the study will be conducted and how the
findings will be used;
(iii) a presentation of the individual's credentials; and
(iv) a description of how the individual will safeguard the information.
(B)
Access will be denied when in the judgment of the Director the study
will have minimal impact on either knowledge or practice.
Social Work Practice Related to the APS Register
An extensive description of how to complete and use the APS Register is contained in
the Adult Protective Services Register User’s Manual APS Register Users Manual.
The eight management reports that are generated monthly can be utilized as an
administrative tool for planning and include: APS-110-1 Client Demographics, APS-
110-2 Client Demographics Substantiated Report, APS 120 Confirmed and
Substantiated Report, APS 130 Evaluation and Services Report, APS 140
168
Perpetrators Report, APS 150 Facilities Report, APS 160 Client Demographics-
Facilities Report, APS 170 Statistical Report, APS 180 Monthly Management Report,
and the APS 702 Annual Management Report.
169
ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES MANUAL
XIII.
APPENDICES
170
Appendix A
The 8 Basic Principles of Adult Protective Services
1.
Adults have a fundamental right to self-determination
Autonomy through self-determination is a key principle of Adult Protective Services.
Adults have the right to make, what others may consider, bad choices and poor
decisions.
2.
Adults should be treated with honesty, care, and respect
It is important that adults understand the role and purpose of Adult Protective
Services. Concern for each adult should be conveyed in an honest and respectful
manner without bias, ageism, racism, or sexism.
3.
Always use the least restrictive alternative
The adult’s life should be disrupted as little as possible in the provision of protective
services and should enable them to live in the environment of their choosing
whenever possible. Out-of-home placement should be a last resort and in-home
supports and/or services considered first.
4.
Give highest priority to family and other support systems
Think broadly about who constitutes support and family to the adult. Consider family
dynamics and past conflict and honor what adults have implemented in their own lives
for support.
5.
Inadequate or inappropriate intervention can be more harmful than no
intervention
Interventions which do not meet the essential need for protection can create an
inaccurate perception of adequacy and incur more harm than benefit for the adult.
6.
Protecting disabled adults is a shared community responsibility
The scope of protective services is as broad and varied as the needs of vulnerable
adults. Therefore, the capacity to adequately meet those needs must be the result of
a cooperative partnership between Adult Protective Services and the array of
community stakeholders.
7.
Focus of APS is the on the need for protection rather than investigation of
incidents
The focus of APS should be ensuring that protective services are provided to alleviate
further maltreatment and not on a particular incident or punishing the perpetrator.
8.
The adult’s confidentiality and right to privacy should always be respected
There are references within APS Statute and Administrative Code which address
adults’ right to confidentiality and privacy. However, it is equally important that the
adult’s personal boundaries for privacy be respected to the degree that information is
gathered only as it pertains to the individual’s needs for protective services.
171
Appendix B
The Six Domains: SEEMAP
Social Support
Identify individuals in the adult’s network
including caregivers
Assess strengths and deficit of current
support networks
Identify individuals, groups, or agencies
who may provide essential services
Determine if there are able, willing, and
responsible individuals
Determine social activities the adult enjoys
or previous enjoyed
Determine the nature of support, types of
relationship, and their impact on the adult
Environmental
Assess impact of the environment on
health including ventilation, unsanitary
conditions, animal/insect infestation, food
storage
Assess adult’s safety including mobility,
accessibility, fire hazards, hoarding,
safety devices such as smoke detectors,
and the neighborhood
Assess impact to function as it relates to
structural issues, food preparation,
isolation, rural/urban location
Determine if the environment contributes
or detracts from the adult’s functioning or
available supports/services
Economic
Determine sources of income i.e. Social
Security, Pensions, Retirements,
Employment, Child Support, SA-IH etc.
Determine financial accounts and assets
such as property, savings/checking
accounts, stocks, bonds, and/or CD’s
Determine expenses i.e. mortgage/rent,
utilities, internet, phone, food, medications,
insurance
Determine money management i.e. rep
payee
Determine irregularities in money
Determine adequacy of resources
available
Mental/Emotional
Determine psychiatric diagnoses and
recommended mental health treatment
Identify medications, what they are used
for, and compliance of taking
medications
Determine impact of the mental health
issues on overall functioning
Gather information on orientation,
memory, judgment, cognition, and
attention
Determine mental incapacity due to
diagnosis
Determine compliance with
recommended mental health treatment
ADL’s/IADL’s
Assess abilities and needs with ADL’s
including bathing, dressing, toileting,
eating, transferring
Assess abilities and needs with IADL’s
including money management, household
chores, telephone use, hygiene
Identify the need for assistance with any of
those tasks
Identify dependence on independence and
impact on functioning
Explore adult’s understanding of functional
limitations
Physical Health
Identify essential health and well-being
needs
Identify medications, what they are used
for, and compliance of taking
medications
Identify recommended medical
treatments and therapies and
compliance with those recommendations
Determine medical diagnoses and
disabilities
Identify indicators of physical abuse such
as bruises, skin breakdown, or skin tears
Determine impact on functioning
172
Appendix C
Adult Protective Services Conflict of Interest Protocol
The purpose of the Conflict of Interest Protocol is to implement the most efficient and effective
means of conducting an APS evaluation when there is a conflict of interest with the county’s ability to
do its own APS evaluation as defined in the Division of Aging and Adult Services Protective Services
for Adults manual and 10A NCAC 71 A.0203 Regarding County Officials. In these instances, the
County of Residence must seek the assistance of another county to conduct the APS Evaluation and
to mobilize services when the case is substantiated. For purposes of this protocol, the County of
Residence will be defined as the county that received the report and where the disabled adult lives.
The county that is requested to conduct the APS Evaluation for the County of Residence because
there is a conflict of interest will be referred to as the Responsible County.
A request from the County of Residence for a Responsible County to conduct an APS evaluation will
convey the same sense of urgency and priority as an in-county referral. Each county DSS should
identify one person in Adult Protective Services who will be the contact person for the Responsible
County. There should also be a back-up person identified. The County of Residence has a
responsibility to ensure that the APS Report is received by the Responsible County.
The County of Residence is responsible for:
1. Receiving the report alleging that a disabled adult is in need of protective services and for
the screening decision. If the Responsible County disagrees with the County of Residence
about the acceptance of the report, or the existence of a conflict of interest, the counties
should discuss their difference of opinion. If the County of Residence and Responsible
County are unable to resolve the issue, a request should be immediately sent to the Adult
Services Listserv for the Adult Programs Representative on Listserv to make the final
screening decision. At no time shall an APS evaluation be delayed because of a dispute
about the report. If there is not a timely resolution of the dispute, the County of Residence
decision shall stand.
2. Contacting the identified person (or the back-up person) in the Responsible County,
directly, with all the referral information. The County of Residence is responsible for
documenting and sharing the intake report with the Responsible County. The time frames
established in statute for initiating the evaluation remain applicable. Therefore, referrals from
the County of Residence must be made in a timely manner, allowing the Responsible County
to respond within the mandated time frames.
3. Responding to and cooperating with the Responsible County in every way possible,
providing all necessary assistance as may be requested by the Responsible County. This
may include conducting local criminal records checks and making any necessary
appointments for the disabled adult within the community.
4. Making an offer of other services to the adult once the Responsible County has conducted
the evaluation and made the case decision; when the case is unsubstantiated.
5. Maintaining a log of requests for evaluation by the assigned Responsible County. The log
should contain the case name, date and reason for report; date referred to the Responsible
County, and results for the evaluation. The log will be available for review.
173
B. The Responsible County is responsible for:
1. Responding quickly to a request for assistance by the County of Residence. Every effort
should be made to begin the prompt evaluation by seeing the disabled adult within the
statutory time frames.
2. Completing a thorough evaluation in a timely manner. A case decision should be made by
the Responsible County within the 30 or 45-day statutory time frame.
3. Making a referral back to the County of Residence if the case is not substantiated and
providing information that is adequate to support the County of Residence’s offer of other
services to the adult. Note: The Written Report should be used to share this information with
the County of Residence.
4. Retaining responsibility for the case if it is substantiated. The Responsible County will
continue with the case and will obtain appropriate service authorization, including petitioning
the court; and will act as case manager providing protective services in coordination with the
County of Residence. Note: Only enough information to facilitate the coordination of services
needed by the disabled adult should be shared with the County of Residence.
5. Documenting the case, including the evaluation, the DAAS-5026, applicable notices,
authorization for services, the protective service plans and all other pertinent documentation
are the responsibility of the Responsible County.
6. Maintaining a log of requests for assistance in an APS evaluation. The log will be available
for review.
174
Appendix D
APS Reports Received When Adult Is Not Located in County of
Residence
The following procedure is to be used whenever your agency receives an APS report
regarding an adult who is a resident of another county, but present in your county.
As part of the intake process, determine if the disabled adult is a resident of another county
but present in your county. If the disabled adult is a resident of another North Carolina
county, the Supervisor (or their designee) in the county of location (COL) must notify the
Supervisor (or their designee) of the county of residence (COR) without delay. If this is an
emergency the COL will initiate immediately without delay. This includes the requirement to
notify law enforcement and the District Attorney.
Use this process to notify the Supervisor (or designee) of COR:
1.
Telephone the COR and document the date, time and Supervisor/designee
contacted. Do not leave a voice mail message; you must speak with the
Supervisor/designee.
2.
Send the APS intake report to the COR by FAX or an encrypted e-mail as
requested.
3.
COR will call the COL to confirm receipt of the intake.
COR will determine which DSS agency will initiate the evaluation.
If COL is requested to initiate the evaluation, follow required APS procedure for
initiating and evaluating as described in Section V. “Adult Protective Services
Evaluation” of the APS manual.
COL Adult Protective Services Social Worker will verbally share findings with the COR
and will follow up with written documentation within seven workdays.
COL will share the initiation findings with the COR using the following:
o
Agency specific or DAAS APS Evaluation tool
o
Attachments such as medical and/or mental health information and narratives
Following initiation, if the disabled adult is still present in the COL, the COR may
request the COL continue to assist with the thorough evaluation. If the COL
continues with the evaluation, follow required APS procedures and timeframes
as described in Section V. “Adult Protective Services Evaluation” of the APS
manual.
The COL will share information as often and as necessary for the COR to make a
case decision using the following:
o
Agency specific or DAAS APS evaluation tool
o
Attachments, such as medical and/or mental health information and narratives
o
Verbal staffing
If legal action is needed at any point in the APS process, the COR has legal
jurisdiction and legal responsibility to petition.
175
COR is responsible for the case decision and for filing petitions. Responsibility does not
vary depending on the type of legal action needed.
If the COL has firsthand knowledge of the disabled adult’s condition, it is
recommended for representatives of that agency to be present at the
hearing.
If the COL cannot be present at the COR hearing, a sworn affidavit can be obtained and
used as part of the petitioning process and in the hearing as evidence.
The disabled adult has the right to be present at any court action.
176
Appendix E
Types of Surrogate Decision Makers
A basic principle of APS practice in North Carolina is the adult’s right to self-determination. The
ability of an adult to exercise this right is contingent upon many factors which affect their capacity for
informed consent. There are tools available to which allow them to express their wishes regarding
decisions affecting their life should they become incapacitated. Also, there are tools which allow
adults to grant authority for decision-making to individuals of their choosing. The following is a
resource to guide APS social workers regarding some of these tools. (Note: This is not a
comprehensive topical description but only a reference and should not replace the guidance provided
by legal counsel.)
Type
Description
APS Application
Notes
Advance Directive
(or “Living Will”)
Allows an adult to
authorize or direct the
withholding or
withdrawal of life-
prolonging measures
that would only serve to
delay death.
When faced with
emergencies requiring
medical treatment, this
document can inform the APS
SW of the scope of medical
services desired by the
adult/victim before mental
incapacitation.
Can also include specific
unique directives by the adult
such as the withholding of
nutrition, etc. Does not convey
authority to consent to
protective services.
Psychiatric
Advance Directive
(or “PAD”)
Allows adult to express
preferences for
treatment in a mental
health crisis.
When an adult/victim is
experiencing a mental health
crisis, this document can
inform the APS SW of the
adult’s desires for treatment
options.
Can give consent for or decline
specific psychiatric treatment,
and/or authorize a trusted
person to make treatment
decisions in a crisis. Does not
convey authority to consent to
protective services.
Power of Attorney
(or “P.O.A.”)
Allows an adult to
appoint an agent to act
for them should they
become incapacitated.
These tools vary in the
scope and nature of the
powers granted.
When an adult lacks the
capacity for informed
consent, a POA agent may
be able to consent to
protective services if the
powers granted allow that
scope of authority.
Some “types” can include
Healthcare POA, Durable
POA, and Financial POA. Can
convey authority to consent to
protective services.
Substitute Payee
When an adult is unable
to effectively manage
their funds or benefits a
substitute payee may be
appointed to manage
those benefits or funds.
It is possible that an adult
may be exploited by a
substitute payee or may
benefit from the appointment
of a payee during the course
of an APS case.
Includes two types of payee: A
Protective Payee for various
benefits or a Representative
Payee for federal (Social
Security/VA benefits). Does not
convey authority to consent to
protective services.
Guardianship
Allows a clerk of court or
judge to appoint a
guardian to make
decisions for an adult
who is deemed
“incompetent.”
A guardian may mistreat an
adult or may provide
authorization for protective
services, when applicable.
A local DSS may petition for
adjudication of incompetence
for an adult/victim in order to
secure an entity to provide
consent. Can convey authority
to consent to protective
services.
177
Appendix F
Client Movement During the APS Process
Circumstances
Legal Basis
Guidance
Temporary movement; Adult
has not changed residence but
is located in another county.
NCGS 108A-101 (c)
10A NCAC 71A .0701
The county (DSS) where the
adult resides continues with the
APS process (regardless of the
stage in the process) and
requests the cooperation of the
county (DSS) where the adult is
located.
New residence established
during an APS Evaluation.
NCGS 108A-101 (c)
NCGS 153A-257
Make a case decision based on
information gathered prior to the
change of residence. Document
maltreatment if applicable,
provide notices, and make an
APS report to the new county
(DSS) where the adult resides.
New residence established after
a substantiated case decision,
but prior to consent to protective
services.
NCGS 108A-101 (c)
NCGS 153A-257
Document confirmation of
adult’s change of residency and
make a new APS report based
upon findings from evaluation
(protecting client’s
confidentiality, as appropriate)
New residence established after
consenting to protective
services.
NCGS 108A-101 (c)
NCGS 153A-257
10A NCAC 71A .0702 (a)
Obtain consent of adult for case
information to be shared with
new county (DSS). New county
DSS will assess if protection is
still needed and provide
w/adult’s consent. If adult does
not provide consent for original
county (DSS) to share
information with new county
(DSS) the information will not be
shared but the original county
may choose to make an APS
report to the new county (DSS).
New residence established
while DSS is providing
protective services via a court
order.
10A NCAC 71A .0804
The original county (DSS) will
file a motion to be relieved of
the responsibility of the court
order and will make an APS
report to the new county (DSS).
178
Appendix H
Critical Time Frames for Adult Protective Services
Action
Time Frame
Receipt of APS Referral
Complete intake and screen promptly and
without delay
DSS-5027 SIS Code 202
Opened when report is screened in
Initiation Time Frame when referral indicates
a threat of death
Immediately/Without delay
Initiation Time Frame when referral indicates
a risk of irreparable harm
Within 24 hours
Initiation Time Frame when referral indicates
maltreatment without risk of death or
irreparable harm
Within 72 hours
Evaluation Time Frame for Abuse or Neglect
Completed within 30 days
Evaluation Time Frame for Exploitation
Completed within 45 days
Initial Notice to DA and Law Enforcement
Upon finding evidence indicating that a
person has been abused, neglected, or
exploited
Case Decision Time Frame for Abuse and
Neglect
Must be made by the 30
th
day
Case Decision Time Frame for Exploitation
Must be made by the 45
th
day
Capacity Decision
Should be made at the time of the case
decision
DAAS - 5026
Completed and keyed within 10 workdays of
the case decision
Authorization to Provide Protective Services
Type of authorization should be determined
and sought immediately after the case and
capacity decision
Ex-Parte Order
May be issued immediately upon finding
evidence that a disabled adult lacks capacity
and is in danger of death or irreparable harm
if protective services are not provided
Emergency Protective Services Order
May be issued upon finding evidence that a
disabled adult lacks capacity and is in danger
of death or irreparable harm if protective
services are not provided. There is 24-hour
notice provided to the individual and other
interested parties. If granted, an emergency
order is valid for 14 days
179
Protective Services Order
May be issued upon finding that a disabled
adult lacks capacity and needs protective
services. The petition should be heard in
district court within 14 days. If granted the
agency has authority to provide protective
services by court order for 60 days. The order
can be extended for an additional 60-day
period if requested and granted. The agency
has no authority to continue its involvement
with the adult after the expiration of the court
order unless a court review indicates that a
guardianship petition should be initiated or
unless the adult consents to the continued
provision of services.
Interim Guardianship
Upon filing of the motion for appointment of
an interim guardian, the clerk shall
immediately set a date, time, and place for a
hearing on the motion. The hearing shall be
held as soon as possible but no later than 15
days after the motion has been served on the
respondent. Once appointed the order is valid
for 45 days and can be extended for an
additional 45 days.
Guardianship
Within five days after filing of the petition, the
clerk shall issue a written notice of the date,
time, and place for a hearing on the petition,
which shall be held not less than 10 days nor
more than 30 days after service of the notice
and petition on the respondent, unless the
clerk extends the time for good cause or for
preparation of a multidisciplinary evaluation
as provided in G.S. 35A-1111.
DSS-5027: SIS code 204
Should be opened when authorization is
obtained either through consent or through a
court order.
APS Quarterly Review
90 days from the day 204 Mobilization and
Planning Services were opened.
Written Report for APS in Facilities
Due to DHSR within 30 days of completion of
the evaluation.
Termination of APS Mobilization and
Planning (SIS code 204)
Send a ten working day notice (DSS-5027)
unless adult waives right to a notice
(document copy provided to client including
rights and responsibilities).
Termination of APS Mobilization and
Planning under Court Order
Terminate upon dismissal or expiration of a
court order (document closure on DSS-5027).
180
Appendix I
APS[A2] Case Staffing Sheet
Date of Staffing
Client Name
Date of Report
Case Number
Date/Time Report was Initiated
Date/Time of face to face/Private interview
[A3]
Number/Dates of Home visits made , , ,
Collaterals Contacted (Please check) Family/Friends; Medical Personnel; Financial
Institutions; Mental Health; Home Health Provider; Law Enforcement
APS Evaluation Completed? Yes No
Is Case Documentation current? Yes No
Disabled Adult? Yes No If yes, explain
Mistreatment Confirmed? Yes No If yes, explain
Need for Protection? Yes No If yes, explain
Substantiate Unsubstantiate Date of Case
Decision
Follow Up Needed? Yes No
[A4]
If yes, explain
Date follow up is due
Does the client have capacity? Yes No Capacity decision documented? □
Type of Authorization: Client Consent Guardianship/DPOA Court Order
5027 Completed for 202/204 5026 completed/submitted
Supervisor Social Worker